Author

admin

Browsing

Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash., one of the few Republicans who voted to impeach President Donald Trump in 2021, announced on Wednesday that he will not seek re-election in 2026.

‘This decision comes with no reservations or remorse, only gratitude for the tremendous opportunity to have represented my home state in Congress,’ Newhouse wrote in a statement.

‘After over 25 years of public service, including more than a decade in the House, I am grateful to the Washingtonians who put their faith in me, as well as the colleagues I have served with on both sides of the aisle,’ he added.

Newhouse’s upcoming departure means that Rep. David Valadao, R-Calif., could be the only remaining House Republican who voted in favor of Trump’s impeachment in 2021, if Valadao wins re-election.

Newhouse was one of 10 House Republicans who supported the impeachment effort. In addition to Valadao, the others were Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming; Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio; Jaime Herrera-Beutler of Washington; John Katko of New York; Adam Kinzinger of Illinois; Peter Meijer of Michigan; Tom Rice of South Carolina, and Fred Upton of Michigan.

The latter eight have since left Congress.

Newhouse won re-election in 2024 despite Trump making an effort to oust him.

‘Newhouse has to go! He wished he didn’t do what he did, but it’s too late,’ Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform just a week before Election Day.

Trump also emphasized his support for Newhouse’s rival. ‘Jerrod Sessler is a fantastic Candidate and will be a GREAT Congressman for Washington State’s 4th Congressional District.’

‘He is running against a Weak and Pathetic RINO named Newhouse, who voted to, for no reason, Impeach me,’ Trump wrote at the time.

Sessler, a Navy veteran, unsuccessfully challenged Newhouse for Washington’s 4th Congressional District. In addition to Trump, he was also backed by the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus.

At the time, Newhouse argued his vote to impeach Trump wouldn’t be a problem.

‘I worked very closely and successfully with President Trump and his first administration and I feel very confident that I can do that again,’ he told the Yakima Herald-Republic.

Fox News’ Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

It has been more than two decades since an expansion franchise was awarded in the NBA, and commissioner Adam Silver says that a decision will be made next season on whether the league will end up at 32 teams.

Silver laid out the league’s possible expansion plans at a press conference before the NBA Cup final on Tuesday, Dec. 16, and the league could be looking to add its first new teams, since the Charlotte Bobcats became the 30th franchise in 2004.

‘I’d say in terms of domestic expansion, that is something we’re continuing to look at,’ Silver said. ‘It’s not a secret we’re looking at this market in Las Vegas. We are looking at Seattle. We’ve looked at other markets, as well. I’d say I want to be sensitive there about this notion that we’re somehow teasing these markets, because I know we’ve been talking about it for a while.

‘As I’ve said before, domestic expansion, as opposed to doing a new league in Europe, is selling equity in this current league. If you own 1/30 of this league, now you own 1/32 if you add two teams. So it’s a much more difficult economic analysis. In many ways, it requires predicting the future.’

Seattle and Las Vegas have long been considered the favorites to get teams should the league expand. Seattle has been without a team since the SuperSonics moved to Oklahoma City before the 2008-09 season, and Vegas has hosted a portion of the Summer League since 2004 and all three years of the NBA Cup finals. Silver says he is confident that Las Vegas could support an NBA team.

‘I think Seattle and Las Vegas are two incredible cities,’ Silver said. ‘Obviously we had a team in Seattle that had great success. We have a WNBA team here in Las Vegas in the Aces. We’ve been playing the summer league here for 20 years. We’re playing our Cup games here, so we’re very familiar with this market.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Would you look at that. Everybody’s so happy, and committed, no less. 

Except there’s one teeny-weeny problem with Alabama coach Kalen DeBoer and Crimson Tide athletic director Greg Byrne this week expressing their undying love for each other and the Alabama program.

The loud and proud on the periphery with more power than you’d think — the influential and wildly supportive Alabama fan base — still isn’t feeling it.

In fact, we’ve reached a critical crossroads moment for a fan base that has been spoiled by Nick Saban’s greatness, and doesn’t mind admitting it. They see the commitment from DeBoer and Byrne, despite DeBoer’s name surfacing with the Michigan coaching search.

The problem is the results.

And wouldn’t you know it, here comes the main culprit: Oklahoma. 

Two years ago, Alabama needed a win over the worst Oklahoma team in more than three decades to clinch a College Football Playoff spot — and lost by 21.

A year later in the rematch in Tuscaloosa — in a game that can only be described as the second-ugliest in DeBoer’s two seasons (the first being the first loss to OU) — Alabama allowed a team with barely 200 yards off offense take a critical November win.

Two season-defining games, two collapses from Alabama, and by proxy, DeBoer.

So when Alabama arrives in Norman on Friday evening for another shot at Oklahoma in the first round of the CFP, there’s much more at stake than moving onto the quarterfinals against No.1 Indiana. 

The buy-in with DeBoer from the Alabama faithful is beginning to wane. Lose to the Sooners again, and it will quickly become legitimate anxiety.

Then who cares if DeBoer decides to leave for Ann Arbor?

“Just feel completely supported,” DeBoer said earlier this week. “Just all the things that we continue to build on. Love the progress.”

I ask you, who among us really believes the 100,000-plus who pack Bryant-Denny Stadium are satiated by “progress”?

They bathed annually in the luxury of Saban for 17 years. Six national championships since 2009, nine national title game appearances, and eight CFP appearances in the 10 years of its existence.

You think they care about progress?

This, everyone, is the blessing and curse of the Saban experience. Unprecedented success, unrealistic expectations. 

They can put up with a defense that’s not like the early years, when Saban and then-defensive coordinator Kirby Smart were overwhelming the sport with a roster full of high-round NFL draft picks. The defense had fallen off in the final years under Saban, anyway, since Smart left for Georgia and impact recruits along the defensive line followed.

What the Alabama fans can’t put up with is an offense that doesn’t produce. You can’t go from Jalen Hurts, to Tua Tagovailoa, to Mac Jones, to Bryce Young, to who knows what on a weekly basis from the most important position on the field.

Ty Simpson can’t look like the Heisman Trophy leader one week, and struggle to complete 50% of his throws the next. You can’t have a quarterback with arguably the best receiving corps in the nation struggle for much of November. 

Especially if the head coach is an offensive savant, who has developed elite players at quarterback everywhere he has coached.

You better believe Alabama fans see a team that misfired much of November, and frankly, was given a pass to the CFP because there’s no way the SEC team with the best regular season record can’t make the CFP (who knows why, but that’s another story for another time).

We’ve reached critical mass here, and nothing DeBoer and Byrne say can do anything about it. This is about wins and losses now, and heaven help DeBoer if Friday night ends with another poor performance (and loss) to the Sooners. 

Three games against Oklahoma, three games as the betting favorite. Three games with the better roster.

It’s not that hard to see where this goes from here if Alabama can’t find a way to beat Oklahoma. No amount of public declarations of support will make it any easier for a fan base that includes deep-pocket boosters — who can and have wielded influence.

How do you think Saban got to Alabama in the first place, after publicly declaring he was staying in the NFL and wouldn’t be the Alabama coach? 

DeBoer was asked earlier this week about Oklahoma players celebrating last month on the Alabama logo, taking pictures after the 23-21 victory and later singing ‘Sweet Home Alabama’ and ‘Dixieland Delight’ in the postgame locker room. An insulting move that further underscored the distance between You Know Who. 

DeBoer said he wasn’t aware of it, then later admitted he had seen “something” about the incident.

“They’ve obviously got the better side of things the last two times we played,” DeBoer said. “And that’s really where our focus is at.”

Saban often spoke of deeds, not words. Anyone can say anything, but it’s always about results. 

Now more than ever for DeBoer.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The UConn Huskies look to keep their undefeated season alive against Big East rival Marquette.

The No. 1 seed Huskies (10-0) are set to host the Golden Eagles (7-3) on Wednesday at PeoplesBank Arena in Hartford, Connecticut. It will be the 24th matchup between the teams, with UConn holding a 22-1 advantage.

UConn is coming off a 79-51 win over USC behind a 17-point performance from Azzi Fudd. Three Huskies are averaging double-digits this season: Fudd (18.1 points per game), Sarah Strong (17.5) and Blanca Quiñonez (10.1).

Marquette defeated Le Moyne 89-42 win on Sunday. Halle Vice recorded a double-double with 23 points and 10 rebounds. Skylar Forbes leads the Golden Eagles in scoring this season with 15.8 points per game.

Here’s what you need to know about Wednesday’s matchup:

What time is UConn vs. Marquette women’s basketball?

Top-ranked UConn (10-0) faces Marquette (7-3) at 7 p.m. ET on Wednesday, Dec. 17 at PeoplesBank Arena in Hartford, Connecticut.

UConn vs. Marquette: Streaming

  • Date: Wednesday, Dec. 17
  • Time: 7 p.m. ET (6 p.m. CT)
  • Location: PeoplesBank Arena (Hartford, Connecticut)
  • Stream: Peacock, Fubo

UConn women’s basketball roster

Marquette women’s basketball roster

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The big business of youth sports has reached the U.S. Congress. A House subcommittee says it has created a “crisis” for kids and their parents.

“The youth sports industry generates more than $40 billion in annual revenue,” Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA), the chair of the subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education, said to open a hearing on Tuesday, Dec. 16, entitled “Benched: The Crisis in American Youth Sports and Its cost to Our Future.”

“But this revenue comes at a steep cost to families,” Kiley said. “Parents are told that only year-round travel teams, private coaching and early specialization will keep their child competitive and maybe even earn them a scholarship. That false promise has created a spending surge that prices out the average family while pushing kids as young as eight into high-cost, high-pressure programs that simply aren’t necessary for long term development.”

Kiley said more than 60 million kids participate in youth sports in the U.S., and he doubled down on the 63% participation target set through the Healthy People 2030 program administered by the government.

We are somewhere around 55 percent of kids ages 6 to 17, a participation rate that lags behind the pre-pandemic level of 2019 (61%).

“Public funding absolutely is crucial to making sure that we have community-based, nonprofit-based and school-based programs,” said Katherine Van Dyck, a senior legal fellow for the American Economics Liberties Project and a witness at Tuesday’s hearing. “Because when we don’t have those, what we have left is these really high-cost monopolistic entities that aren’t interested in growing their programs to make them affordable and accessible to everybody.

“They’re interested in protecting their monopoly and driving cost up. That’s why we see a $40 billion industry that is growing according to investment firms, but it’s growing as participation is going down. What does that tell us? It tells us that they are jacking up prices and that they are solely focused on profit. …

“Our children deserve better than a childhood for sale to the highest bidder.”

While experts and Congress members pushed to the national forefront many of the issues that consume sports parents, they also offered potential changes to the system. Here are some highlights of the hearing:

Why is a Congressional subcommittee saying we have a youth sports ‘crisis’?

Several statistics used by Kiley, other members of the House subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education, and witnesses at the hearing have been mentioned in this space.

  • Seventy percent of kids quit organized sports by age 13.
  • The average U.S. sports family spent more than $1,000 on its child’s primary sport in 2024. [Travel sports can cost families upwards of $3,000 per year or more.]
  • Private equity firms are helping to fuel spending, along with a feeling of pressure among parents that playing for select teams and specializing early leads to playing in college.
  • An increasingly fewer number of kids have access to affordable opportunities to learn important life skills and to try new things, leading to obesity and excessive screen time.

“What we are witnessing is more than a drop in sports participation,” Kiley said. “It is the loss of one of the most effective tools we have to combat rising isolation and mental health challenges in our children. When children lose regular in-person team activities, they lose daily opportunities to build confidence, belonging, and real world social connection.”

How can kids and their parents better navigate youth sports?

My personal experience with travel and club teams at the high school level is that they don’t promise you the chance to play in college as much as give the opportunity to play in front of college coaches.

While we can look at sports as an outlet for getting a scholarship and helping us to get into a college or university, we need to understand the odds and can be more realistic about our kids’ chances.

“I think parents need to begin at the end,” says John O’Sullivan, chief executive officer of the Changing the Game Project, which helps use sports as a recreational but life developmental tool.  “What do you want out of sport? They want a healthy, functioning, high-character human being. Sign up for sporting programs, and find coaches and find leagues that support that mission. The purpose is to develop a great human being, and then maybe if you have the luck and the genetics, you do well. And you get a scholarship. Maybe you play it the next level, but it’s really about human development first.”

According to 2024 NCAA data, supplemented by data from the National Federation of State High School Associations, about 6% of high school athletes play collegiately (a lower percentage play Division 1), while less than 1% of NCAA athletes are drafted into a professional sport.

Perhaps filling the disconnect of perception requires us to reprioritize why we play sports. 

“A kid standing over a putt, a kid about to take a penalty kick, a kid about to take a free throw that matters, those are life skills you can teach in real time,” Steve Boyle, the co-founder and executive director of 2-4-1 Sports, an organization that helps kids try out multiple sports, testified Tuesday. “I was a school counselor, and so I would always be told, ‘Hey, you gotta go in and do a lesson on anxiety, or anger management, or conflict resolution.’

“It was a heck of a lesson. You know how much impact it had? None. The next day, it was gone. We wouldn’t teach piano once and say, ‘Good luck, have at it. Now you’re good at it.’ You have to continue to teach these skills and use the opportunity of sports when those emotions are happening in real time, to say, ‘All right, this is how you can deal with this right here in a safe and fun place, so that when you’re about to road rage or lose it on somebody, you’ve developed those skills in such ways.’ Sports is the best opportunity to do that, and we miss out on so many kids if we don’t give them access to sports.”

Boyle and his wife, Kerry, started 2-4-1 Sports in 2006 after their 9-year-old daughter was told trying other sports wasn’t an option if she wanted to play for a local travel team. Still, many parents fear of missing out on such opportunities.

Kiley, the subcommittee’s chair, says he played basketball and soccer growing up. He didn’t make his high school freshman basketball team or varsity soccer team (though he played tennis) and spoke of an “inherent winnowing process in a lot of sports.”

He asked O’Sullivan, who has spent five decades as an athlete or coach to youth and collegiate athletes, how we maintain opportunities for young people of different skill levels?

“I think it’s, again, this education around what is the purpose of sport,” O’Sullivan replied. “Parents ask me all the time, ‘How does my kid make the elite team? And I think that’s the worst word in sports is ‘elite’ for little kids. We have to keep as many kids as possible, as long as possible, in the best environment possible. The countries that do it best in sport development, they keep those kids. They’re not making cuts at six or seven years old. They’re not forming competitive teams.”

STATE OF PLAY REPORT: Do immigration raids threaten the rise of youth sports?

What are some solutions to the youth sports ‘crisis?’

Van Dyck, an anti-monopoly and consumer advocate, said the 2008 financial crisis and the recession that followed proved devastating to parks and recreation budgets while COVID-19 delivered another crushing blow.

“Parks and Rec budgets were slashed, and that really did leave a void, where private equity firms came in and filled it with high cost, flashy, elite club teams,” she says. “And by filling that void, they were then able to continue to build their flywheel, where they gained control of the venues, and the governing bodies, and the apparel companies, and that flywheel also builds a moat that the community groups that my colleagues here are talking about can’t compete with. They can’t penetrate it because these private equity companies aren’t just capturing the teams and the leagues, they’re capturing the players.”

Robert “Bobby” Scott (D-VA), the ranking member of the House’s Committee on Education & Workforce – under which Kiley’s Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education is a subcommittee – then responded to her: “Well, it seems to me that we gotta get Parks and Rec and the public schools back involved so those opportunities are gonna be there.”

Fewer P.E. classes are being offered in U.S. schools due to budget cuts, according to Aspen Sports & Society Program’s State of Play 2025. 

“My P.E. colleagues would say there’s more to physical education than just sport,” says Boyle, who played Division 1 basketball at Manhattan College. “I don’t think it has to be either/or. I think that schools can work in a way that teach fundamental sports skills so that kids have some confidence to perhaps do some sports outside of school time. I think there’s an opportunity here to create some consistency around how it’s being delivered and to recognize the value of sport.”

Tom Farrey, executive director of Aspen Sports & Society, testified Tuesday that we need to take a more deliberate look at the structure of school-based sports.

“One of the problems we have here is there’ll be 80 kids who try out for the boys’ basketball team,” he said. “And 15 will make it, and nine will get playing time, and we structurally push aside kids because of our traditional structure of school-based sports.

“But there are models out there where they’re creating multiple teams. You might have two freshman teams, or three J.V. teams. We need to move to an environment where the supply of experiences meets the demand for them. And that’s partly a function of schools rethinking their model.”

Farrey also suggested we can require all youth sports organizations to register with the U.S. Center for SafeSport and get their coaches trained in abuse prevention and pass background checks.

He also suggested redirecting federal sports betting taxes to close youth sports gaps, especially for low income youth, and educating states on ways to prioritize access to community sports.

What does the hearing mean for American sports families?

It appealed to several members of the House subcommittee, both about their own childhoods and the needs of constituents.

“In the district I represent, I have a lot of urban areas – Portland and Beaverton areas – but I also have a lot of very rural areas as well,” said Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), the subcommittee’s ranking member. “So even with something like school bus drivers, if there’s a bus, it’s gonna take students somewhere. School bus driver employment is down 10%. What’s gonna happen for students who are hoping to engage in these extracurricular activities if they don’t have that vital transportation, especially in rural areas? Many kids are going to be left out.”

Kiley, the subcommittee chair from California, said he hoped the hearing would amplify the work within youth sports the witnesses are doing, and even institute change.

He identified a few areas “where we could see improvement.”

“One is just programmatic in terms of having more offerings for students to continue to be involved, regardless of skill level, having maybe more robust P.E. programs in schools,” he said. “The second is financial, removing the barriers to entry that have gotten just exorbitant in many communities across the country.

“The third, I think, is cultural, just trying to re-establish a culture that is supportive of play and competition, and giving kids these opportunities from an early age. I do have to say, a few witnesses mentioned the experience of COVID, where we took this opportunity away from many kids. In my state, we were the last to allow youth sports to continue again. I took part in what we called ‘let them play rallies’ with kids across our state. And that was a period where the interests of young people were not the highest priority when it came to policy, and this was one manifestation of it, and we really must never make that mistake again.

“That’s a broader issue, but on this specific issue of youth sports, I think we’ve had a lot of bipartisan agreement.”

Borelli, aka Coach Steve, has been an editor and writer with USA TODAY since 1999. He spent 10 years coaching his two sons’ baseball and basketball teams. He and his wife, Colleen, are now sports parents for two high schoolers. His Coach Steve column is posted weekly. For his past columns, click here.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Gutting the filibuster was once a taboo notion among Senate Republicans, but the idea is gaining traction thanks to President Donald Trump’s repeated calls to throw out the longstanding procedure.

The Senate filibuster is the 60-vote threshold that applies to most bills in the upper chamber, and given the nature of the thin majorities that either party has commanded in recent years, that means legislation typically has to be bipartisan to advance.

It proved a key barrier to reopening the government and advancing several other Republican priorities in recent weeks, like the GOP’s Obamacare fix that was torpedoed by Senate Democrats.

For years, it’s been viewed as a tool of the minority party in the Senate meant to prevent majorities from ramming through partisan legislation that both Republicans and Democrats have taken advantage of.

But near-monthly prodding from Trump and recent frustration with the 43-day government shutdown has some Republicans rethinking their position on the filibuster.

‘It’s something I’m giving serious consideration to now,’ Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., told Fox News Digital.

Marshall previously told Fox News Digital, ‘Never, never, ever, never, none,’ when asked if he would consider changing the rules after Trump called on Republicans to nuke the filibuster in October.

Just a few months later, Marshall is reconsidering his position.

‘I think between the last government shutdown and the threat of this one, it makes me pause,’ he said. ‘It seems like the appropriations process is being slowed down. It feels like, with healthcare, that the Democrats, really the Democratic Party, doesn’t want to get anything done. So eliminating the filibuster ends all that.’

He echoed Trump, who on Monday told reporters that he wanted Senate Republicans to ‘knock out’ the filibuster.

‘You wouldn’t have January 30th looming, because you have the 30th of January looming, you know that, right? And if we knocked out the filibuster it would be just a simple approval,’ he said. ‘But you have some Republicans — they’re unable to explain why, you know if you ask them why they’re unable to explain, they cannot win the debate, but they should knock out the filibuster.’

The likelihood that such a change crosses the floor in the Senate is low, given that Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has routinely remained rooted in his position that the filibuster shouldn’t be touched.

Still, Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., a member of Thune’s leadership team, said that his position had also changed on the filibuster.

Mullin told Fox News’ Will Cain that during a recent meeting with Senate GOP leadership, he asked the room if they truly believed that Senate Democrats wouldn’t try to get rid of the procedural safeguard when they regained a majority again.

‘If we believe that they’re going to do it, then why don’t we just go ahead and get it done,’ he said.

Other Republicans are more skeptical about the odds of the filibuster getting axed. Some, like Mullin, think it could be narrowly tailored to only apply to spending bills, while others see the move as fantasy. 

‘That’s not gonna happen,’ Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, told Fox News Digital.

And Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said that lawmakers weren’t even ‘using the tools we have right now’ to pass Republicans’ agenda.

Kennedy has pushed for another round of budget reconciliation, given that Republicans have two more attempts at the grueling process, to tackle the growing affordability issues in the country.

He argued that’s how Republicans passed Trump’s signature legislation, the ‘one, big beautiful bill,’ earlier this year.

‘Yes, you can’t do everything, but you can do a lot, and that’s what I would be concentrating my energies on,’ Kennedy said. ‘And I’ve said respectfully to the president that I don’t think the United States Senate is going to give up the filibuster or the blue slip. He obviously disagrees, and I respect that reasonable people disagree sometimes, but I’m a pragmatist. I deal with the world as it is, not as I want it to be.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A new report released Wednesday from Polaris National Security details what the group says are 100 foreign policy achievements from President Donald Trump’s second term. The document is organized chronologically, starting with his return to office in January and tracking each major foreign policy move through the present day.

The report, titled ‘100 Trump Foreign Policy Wins From 2025 the Media Wants You to Miss,’ is an advocacy and policy analysis document that reflects the authors’ evaluation of U.S. foreign policy developments over the past year. 

‘Since January, the Trump administration has moved with historic pace to restore America’s strength and security,’ the report states, arguing that the administration has emphasized deterrence, alliance burden-sharing and direct engagement with adversaries.

Venezuela and Western Hemisphere strategy

The report groups several Venezuela-related actions into what it describes as a broader U.S. policy shift in the Western Hemisphere. It highlights expanded counter-narcotics operations off Venezuela’s coast, including airstrikes on maritime vessels linked to organizations such as Tren de Aragua and the National Liberation Army. The campaign, called Operation Southern Spear, is described as underscoring a commitment to ‘defending the homeland from the influx of fentanyl and other illicit drugs ravaging American communities.’

The administration also raised the U.S. reward for information leading to the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to $50 million, citing a public announcement from Attorney General Pam Bondi accusing Maduro of central involvement in narcotics trafficking. Venezuela has rejected the allegations. Polaris links these actions to the 2025 National Security Strategy, calling it ‘the most significant hemispheric reorientation of U.S. foreign policy in decades.’ 

Cale Brown, chair of Polaris National Security and former State Department principal deputy spokesperson, said the administration’s posture marks a reset on the global stage. ‘President Trump has taken the world stage by storm, reasserting American strength after four years of weakness,’ he said.

Gaza ceasefire and hostage releases

A substantial section of the Polaris report focuses on the October Gaza ceasefire, which it calls a central diplomatic breakthrough involving the United States, Israel and Hamas. According to the document, the agreement ‘secured an immediate ceasefire and the return of all surviving hostages,’ including Americans, with one hostage still unaccounted for. It also outlines plans for prisoner exchanges, Gaza’s demilitarization, an international stabilization force, transitional governance and large-scale reconstruction.

The report also highlights a November U.N. Security Council vote in which a U.S.-led Gaza resolution passed 13–0, with Russia and China abstaining. The resolution is described as providing ‘an international legal framework for the next phase of the Israel-Hamas ceasefire.’

Additionally, the administration’s prohibition on U.S. taxpayer funding for UNRWA is noted, citing U.S. concerns over alleged ties between some personnel and Hamas. UNRWA denies institutional involvement in terrorism, while U.S. officials say the move was based on national security considerations.

Iran nuclear strikes 

The report cites U.S. military strikes carried out in June against Iranian nuclear facilities using B-2 bombers and bunker-buster munitions, framing the mission as proof that the United States ‘will not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran.’ Iran denies pursuing a military nuclear program.

Nathan Sales, a distinguished fellow at the Atlantic Council and former State Department counterterrorism coordinator, said the administration views regional diplomacy primarily through the lens of countering Tehran. ‘The Trump administration gets that the Iranian regime is the fundamental source of violence and instability across the Middle East,’ Sales said.

However, some analysts say the administration’s record presents sharp contrasts. Foreign policy analyst and editor-in-chief of the Foreign Desk Lisa Daftari said that while Trump has delivered on several strategic priorities — including strong support for Israel, terrorist redesignations, aggressive action against drug cartels and renewed momentum behind the Abraham Accords — other moves warrant closer scrutiny.

‘This record is tempered by concerning diplomatic overtures that urge caution. The characterization of Syria’s president as ‘young, attractive tough guy’ appears premature given unverified claims about severing ties with terrorist organizations—particularly troubling in light of recent attacks on U.S. servicemen. Similarly, the administration’s approach to Turkey and Saudi Arabia suggests a willingness to extend trust and strategic concessions that may exceed what these relationships warrant, potentially squandering leverage on critical issues like the Abraham Accords. Whether these calculated diplomatic gambles yield strategic gains or prove costly remains an open question. The true measure of this foreign policy doctrine will ultimately depend on how these relationships and decisions unfold in 2026.’

NATO defense spending commitments

The report also points to commitments made at the NATO summit in The Hague, where alliance members pledged to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, far above the longstanding 2% benchmark. The document says the pledge followed sustained U.S. pressure for ‘fairer burden-sharing among allied nations.’

Armenia–Azerbaijan peace pledge

The report highlights an August agreement signed at the White House by the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan aimed at ending the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The declaration includes commitments on border security, regional transit routes and economic cooperation involving the United States.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

First lady Melania Trump is giving Fox News an exclusive first look at her upcoming film, ‘MELANIA,’ set to hit theaters worldwide next month.

The 104-minute film is set to hit theaters globally on Jan. 30, 2026, appearing in theaters across North America, South America, Asia, Europe, Israel, the United Arab Emirates and more. Amazon will also launch a documentary series in the coming months. 

‘History is set in motion during the 20 days of my life prior to the U.S. Presidential Inauguration,’ the first lady told Fox News. ‘For the first time, global audiences are invited into theaters to witness this pivotal chapter unfold—a private, unfiltered look as I navigate family, business, and philanthropy on my remarkable journey to becoming First Lady of the United States of America.’

Fox News exclusively obtained the trailer, which opens with the first lady walking into the U.S. Capitol rotunda ahead of her husband’s second inauguration. She looks to the camera in her now-iconic inauguration outfit, and says: ‘Here we go again.’

The trailer jumps from the first lady and president at the inauguration; to standing together outside of Mar-a-Lago; behind-the-scenes of the inauguration showing Baron Trump and Mrs. Trump’s father; to a series of images of the first lady; Air Force One; the presidential seal and more.

The infamous Metro Goldwyn Mayer (MGM) lion roars and takes over the screen. 

The trailer then shows Mrs. Trump entering a room where President Trump stands at a podium during a meeting and is rehearsing a speech.

‘My proudest legacy will be that of peacemaker,’ Trump said. 

The first lady breaks in and says: ‘Peacemaker and unifier.’ 

The trailer shows the first lady getting out of a vehicle, sporting a pair of black stiletto boots, and jumping to the East Wing residence, where she stands in her stunning white and black inaugural ball gown, and smiles at the camera. 

The trailer invites the audience to ‘witness history in the making.’ 

The trailer also shows the first lady reviewing materials with staff and more. 

It cuts to a scene of Mrs. Trump asking a security detail ‘is it safe?’ and the agent confirming ‘it is safe,’ before the film cuts to sirens and the motorcade driving through a city. 

’20 days to become first lady of the United States,’ the trailer says. 

‘Everyone wants to know,’ Melania Trump says. ‘So here it is.’ 

The trailer ends with Mrs. Trump calling ‘Mr. President’ to say ‘congratulations.’ 

‘Did you watch it?’ President Trump says through the phone. 

‘I did not.  Yeah, I will see it on the news,’ Mrs. Trump says. 

The film is set to hit theaters around the globe on January 30. 

The first lady said that the story ‘has never been told, and because the subject matter is historically consequential, it was imperative for me to produce a film of the highest cinematic standard, suitable exclusively in theaters worldwide.’

‘The 20 days of my life, preceding the U.S. Presidential inauguration, constitutes a rare and defining moment—one that warrants meticulous care, integrity, and uncompromising craftsmanship,’ she said. ‘I am proud to share this very specific moment of my life—20 days of intense transition and planning—with moviegoers and fans across the globe.’

Fox News Digital has learned that the first lady was involved ‘in every aspect’ of the film — from her ‘creative vision,’ to working as a producer on the film and to ensuring the post-production marketing is executed properly. Fox News Digital has learned that the first lady has been very ‘hands on’ from start to finish. 

‘She is giving the audience unprecedented access to her life — and to any first lady’s life — during this 20-day period,’ a source familiar with the planning of the film told Fox News Digital. 

The film takes the audience through the first lady’s life leading up to the inauguration — from her home in Trump Tower in New York City, to Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, and behind-the-scenes access in Washington D.C. 

Mrs. Trump first had the idea for the film in November 2024, after President Trump won the election. 

Marc Beckman, Mrs. Trump’s agent and exclusive senior advisor, led negotiations on her behalf with Amazon, specifically with Amazon CEO Andy Jassy, beginning on Nov. 18, 2024. 

Fox News Digital has learned that Disney sought to obtain the exclusive rights to the film, as well as Netflix and Paramount. Amazon and MGM had the highest bid, purchasing the license for the film for $40 million — the largest documentary deal in history.

‘I’m honored to be working with Amazon — they’ve been great partners from the minute we started to negotiate the deal, through production and now as we gear up for the film’s release,’ Beckman told Fox News Digital.

‘Speaking of the deal, there has been so much speculation in the press on the bidding and how we ended up with Amazon, that we’re at a point where it’s worth clarifying a few things,’ Beckman said.

First, Beckman told Fox News Digital that some bidders were ‘interested only in a film, and others only in a series.’

‘Amazon ended up bidding on both, and checked all the boxes we were looking for, as they could also deliver a theatrical film release,’ Beckman explained.

Beckman stressed that he negotiated the deal on behalf of the first lady while dealing with ‘all the studios directly.’

‘I’ve seen reporting that Amazon paid nearly three times the nearest other bid, and that’s just false,’ Beckman said. ‘It was an incredibly competitive bidding process with multiple rounds of bids.’

Beckman added: ‘Yes, Amazon had the highest bid, but they also bid on the most product — series and film.’

Filming began in December 2024. The film is executive produced by Trump and Fernando Sulichin of New Element Media, with Brett Ratner of RatPac Entertainment serving as director. 

The film itself is produced in a ‘highly cinematic’ way. Sources familiar with the production told Fox News Digital that the first lady did not want the film to look like a documentary, but rather an ‘elevated film.’ 

The launch of the film comes a year after the release of her first-ever book, ‘Melania.’ The memoir presents an intimate portrait of Melania Trump and includes personal stories and family photos she had not previously shared with the public. 

‘Melania’ has been at the top of the New York Times’ best-selling list since its release to the public. 

Upon the release of the memoir last year, the first lady told Fox News Digital that writing her story was ‘an amazing journey filled with emotional highs and lows.’

‘Each story shaped me into who I am today,’ she said. ‘Although daunting at times, the process has been incredibly rewarding, reminding me of my strength, and the beauty of sharing my truth.’ 

‘Melania’ is the first lady’s first book. She released the original book along with a special collector’s edition that includes photos hand-selected by the first lady, many of which she photographed herself of her home and of various trips she has taken around the world. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Oba Femi thinks he sucks.

Sounds harsh, but that’s just how he approaches his work. He doesn’t buy into any of his stock.

“I never want to think I’m bigger than I am. I always want to believe I suck,” Femi told USA TODAY Sports. “I think you have to be your greatest critic. You have to tell yourself you suck all the time.”

For as negative as it sounds, Femi admits you should give yourself some flowers once in a while. Even if he barely does, there are plenty around the WWE world that are throwing full-on bouquets at him.

There probably is no young talent in WWE with more superstar potential than Femi. The former college athlete debuted in November 2022 and has skyrocketed to the top of NXT, becoming a dominant force in a way rarely seen. He is in his second reign as NXT Champion and just had his first main roster match, against Undisputed WWE Champion Cody Rhodes no less.

In the biggest match of his young career, Femi shined, even though the match ended in a no contest. Even better, the crowd was fully invested into Femi, proving that it won’t be long before “The Ruler” of NXT becomes “The Ruler” of WWE.

How Oba Femi rose in WWE

Real name Isaac Odugbesan, Femi is from Lagos, Nigeria, where he said the groundwork was framed for the success he has today. He recalled the long days of school and having to work for everything instilled lifelong values and habits.

“Coming up in a third-world country is definitely difficult,” he said. “The work ethic is just different.”

While going through the “utmost grind” back home, Femi became a star in the shot put at the University of Lagos. Through a coach connection, he got a spot to move to the United States to compete at Middle Tennessee State in 2017. After a season there, he transferred to Alabama, where he won back-to-back SEC indoor shot put titles in 2021 and 2022.

Before graduating, Femi was part of WWE’s inaugural “Next In Line” class that gave a path for college stars to transition to wrestling. It’s become a popular avenue for the company to find its next crop of talent with now several people coming from non-traditional wrestling backgrounds.

It can be tough to adjust to wrestling – both physically and psychology – and not everyone pans out. Yet Femi said his roots and college athlete background helped him find a way to thrive.

“You have to be coachable and teachable, because that’s one of the biggest determining factors to success in the athletic world. You can be as talented as you want all day, but talent is only going to get you so far,” Femi said. “We need to let go of all those old habits that have worked for you in the past, for us to reach greater heights.”

So far, Femi keeps reaching those heights. He became the longest-reigning NXT North American Championship in 2024 and has had a bigger 2025, becoming the NXT Champion in January. After losing the title to Ricky Saints in September, he reclaimed it on Dec. 6.

His rise to the top of WWE’s developmental brand is a result of Femi having every tool needed to succeed. Billed at 6-foot-6-inch and 310 pounds, he possesses great power, the ability to throw anyone around like they’re a shot put ball. He’s not just strong, able to move swiftly in matches. 

Then there’s the charisma. His promos are impactful, wording them with incredible precision to make you feel the intensity, passion and confidence in his voice. 

You also can’t forget the entrance. At a time where most WWE fans aren’t thrilled with talent music, Femi is already in the upper echelon of entrances. The drums, the crowd chanting “ooh” and his dominant silhouette staring down the ring ooze aura. It’s all capped off with his signature strut down the ramp.

“I feel like Oba Femi is an experience at this point,” he said. “You get to feel everything the character feels.”

Femi is destined for stardom, and with that comes a passionate fan group. The name? The Oba Feminists, which he is very aware of. He believes it’s cool to be a meme because it adds a bit of light-heartedness to a character that is so serious. 

“Just know for the feminist out there, Oba Femi loves it,” he added.

‘He is a star’

The entire WWE universe got to see the Oba Feminist movement in full force at Saturday Night’s Main Event on Dec. 13. After delivering a great promo the night before, he and Rhodes opened the show and Femi displayed all the power and finesse that makes him a guy with unlimited potential. 

Even though there wasn’t a result due to interference by Drew McIntyre, it’s not crazy to say Femi won and officially put everyone on notice.

“He is a star,” WWE chief content officer Paul “Triple H” Levesque said in the event postshow. “He is a bona fide, charismatic X-factor-having star that will be on top of this business when he gets there, and will stay there for a long time.

“I don’t know how anybody stops this kid. I really don’t.”

The opportunity came thanks to John Cena, who wanted to showcase the up-and-coming talent on the show dedicated to the final match of his career. Femi called it a huge favor for Cena to give him and other NXT talent a chance to shine on the biggest stage of their young careers.

Now with a bigger audience witnessing the rise of Femi, he wants the rest of the world to know there’s a new crop of NXT talent ready to challenge the older veterans holding it down on the main roster.

And he’s accepting the responsibility to lead the charge.

Femi talks a lot about destiny, and that may have been what happened at Saturday Night’s Main Event. As WWE’s greatest star of all-time closed his career, another made a statement to put themselves on the same trajectory.

“It’s symbolic that John’s final is my beginning,” Femi said.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The big business of youth sports has reached the U.S. Congress. A House subcommittee says it has created a “crisis” for kids and their parents.

“The youth sports industry generates more than $40 billion in annual revenue,” Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA), the chair of the subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education, said to open a hearing on Tuesday, Dec. 16, entitled “Benched: The Crisis in American Youth Sports and Its cost to Our Future.”

“But this revenue comes at a steep cost to families,” Kiley said. “Parents are told that only year-round travel teams, private coaching and early specialization will keep their child competitive and maybe even earn them a scholarship. That false promise has created a spending surge that prices out the average family while pushing kids as young as eight into high-cost, high-pressure programs that simply aren’t necessary for long term development.”

Kiley said more than 60 million kids participate in youth sports in the U.S., and he doubled down on the 63% participation target set through the Healthy People 2030 program administered by the government.

We are somewhere around 55 percent of kids ages 6 to 17, a participation rate that lags behind the pre-pandemic level of 2019 (61%).

“Public funding absolutely is crucial to making sure that we have community-based, nonprofit-based and school-based programs,” said Katherine Van Dyck, a senior legal fellow for the American Economics Liberties Project and a witness at Tuesday’s hearing. “Because when we don’t have those, what we have left is these really high-cost monopolistic entities that aren’t interested in growing their programs to make them affordable and accessible to everybody.

“They’re interested in protecting their monopoly and driving cost up. That’s why we see a $40 billion industry that is growing according to investment firms, but it’s growing as participation is going down. What does that tell us? It tells us that they are jacking up prices and that they are solely focused on profit. …

“Our children deserve better than a childhood for sale to the highest bidder.”

While experts and Congressmembers pushed to the national forefront many of the issues that consume sports parents, they also offered potential changes to the system. Here are some highlights of the hearing:

Why is a Congressional subcommittee saying we have a youth sports ‘crisis’?

Several statistics used by Kiley, other members of the House subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education, and witnesses at the hearing have been mentioned in this space.

  • Seventy percent of kids quit organized sports by age 13.
  • The average U.S. sports family spent more than $1,000 on its child’s primary sport in 2024. [Travel sports can cost families upwards of $3,000 per year or more.]
  • Private equity firms are helping to fuel spending, along with a feeling of pressure among parents that playing for select teams and specializing early leads to playing in college.
  • An increasingly fewer number of kids have access to affordable opportunities to learn important life skills and to try new things, leading to obesity and excessive screen time.

“What we are witnessing is more than a drop in sports participation,” Kiley said. “It is the loss of one of the most effective tools we have to combat rising isolation and mental health challenges in our children. When children lose regular in-person team activities, they lose daily opportunities to build confidence, belonging, and real world social connection.”

How can kids and their parents better navigate youth sports?

My personal experience with travel and club teams at the high school level is that they don’t promise you the chance to play in college as much as give the opportunity to play in front of college coaches.

While we can look at sports as an outlet for getting a scholarship and helping us to get into a college or university, we need to understand the odds and can be more realistic about our kids’ chances.

“I think parents need to begin at the end,” says John O’Sullivan, chief executive officer of the Changing the Game Project, which helps use sports as a recreational but life developmental tool.  “What do you want out of sport? They want a healthy, functioning, high-character human being. Sign up for sporting programs, and find coaches and find leagues that support that mission. The purpose is to develop a great human being, and then maybe if you have the luck and the genetics, you do well. And you get a scholarship. Maybe you play it the next level, but it’s really about human development first.”

According to 2024 NCAA data, supplemented by data from the National Federation of State High School Associations, about 6% of high school athletes play collegiately (a lower percentage play Division 1), while less than 1% of NCAA athletes are drafted into a professional sport.

Perhaps filling the disconnect of perception requires us to reprioritize why we play sports. 

“A kid standing over a putt, a kid about to take a penalty kick, a kid about to take a free throw that matters, those are life skills you can teach in real time,” Steve Boyle, the co-founder and executive director of 2-4-1 Sports, an organization that helps kids try out multiple sports, testified Tuesday. “I was a school counselor, and so I would always be told, ‘Hey, you gotta go in and do a lesson on anxiety, or anger management, or conflict resolution.’

“It was a heck of a lesson. You know how much impact it had? None. The next day, it was gone. We wouldn’t teach piano once and say, ‘Good luck, have at it. Now you’re good at it.’ You have to continue to teach these skills and use the opportunity of sports when those emotions are happening in real time, to say, ‘All right, this is how you can deal with this right here in a safe and fun place, so that when you’re about to road rage or lose it on somebody, you’ve developed those skills in such ways.’ Sports is the best opportunity to do that, and we miss out on so many kids if we don’t give them access to sports.”

Boyle and his wife, Kerry, started 2-4-1 Sports in 2006 after their 9-year-old daughter was told trying other sports wasn’t an option if she wanted to play for a local travel team. Still, many parents fear of missing out on such opportunities.

Kiley, the subcommittee’s chair, says he played basketball and soccer growing up. He didn’t make his high school freshman basketball team or varsity soccer team (though he played tennis) and spoke of an “inherent winnowing process in a lot of sports.”

He asked O’Sullivan, who has spent five decades as an athlete or coach to youth and collegiate athletes, how we maintain opportunities for young people of different skill levels?

“I think it’s, again, this education around what is the purpose of sport,” O’Sullivan replied. “Parents ask me all the time, ‘How does my kid make the elite team? And I think that’s the worst word in sports is ‘elite’ for little kids. We have to keep as many kids as possible, as long as possible, in the best environment possible. The countries that do it best in sport development, they keep those kids. They’re not making cuts at six or seven years old. They’re not forming competitive teams.”

STATE OF PLAY REPORT: Do immigration raids threaten the rise of youth sports?

What are some solutions to the youth sports ‘crisis?’

Van Dyck, an anti-monopoly and consumer advocate, said the 2008 financial crisis and the recession that followed proved devastating to parks and recreation budgets while COVID-19 delivered another crushing blow.

“Parks and Rec budgets were slashed, and that really did leave a void, where private equity firms came in and filled it with high cost, flashy, elite club teams,” she says. “And by filling that void, they were then able to continue to build their flywheel, where they gained control of the venues, and the governing bodies, and the apparel companies, and that flywheel also builds a moat that the community groups that my colleagues here are talking about can’t compete with. They can’t penetrate it because these private equity companies aren’t just capturing the teams and the leagues, they’re capturing the players.”

Robert “Bobby” Scott (D-VA), the ranking member of the House’s Committee on Education & Workforce – under which Kiley’s Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education is a subcommittee – then responded to her: “Well, it seems to me that we gotta get Parks and Rec and the public schools back involved so those opportunities are gonna be there.”

Fewer P.E. classes are being offered in U.S. schools due to budget cuts, according to Aspen Sports & Society Program’s State of Play 2025. 

“My P.E. colleagues would say there’s more to physical education than just sport,” says Boyle, who played Division 1 basketball at Manhattan College. “I don’t think it has to be either/or. I think that schools can work in a way that teach fundamental sports skills so that kids have some confidence to perhaps do some sports outside of school time. I think there’s an opportunity here to create some consistency around how it’s being delivered and to recognize the value of sport.”

Tom Farrey, executive director of Aspen Sports & Society, testified Tuesday that we need to take a more deliberate look at the structure of school-based sports.

“One of the problems we have here is there’ll be 80 kids who try out for the boys’ basketball team,” he said. “And 15 will make it, and nine will get playing time, and we structurally push aside kids because of our traditional structure of school-based sports.

“But there are models out there where they’re creating multiple teams. You might have two freshman teams, or three J.V. teams. We need to move to an environment where the supply of experiences meets the demand for them. And that’s partly a function of schools rethinking their model.”

Farrey also suggested we can require all youth sports organizations to register with the U.S. Center for SafeSport and get their coaches trained in abuse prevention and pass background checks.

He also suggested redirecting federal sports betting taxes to close youth sports gaps, especially for low income youth, and educating states on ways to prioritize access to community sports.

What does the hearing mean for American sports families?

It appealed to several members of the House subcommittee, both about their own childhoods and the needs of constituents.

“In the district I represent, I have a lot of urban areas – Portland and Beaverton areas – but I also have a lot of very rural areas as well,” said Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), the subcommittee’s ranking member. “So even with something like school bus drivers, if there’s a bus, it’s gonna take students somewhere. School bus driver employment is down 10%. What’s gonna happen for students who are hoping to engage in these extracurricular activities if they don’t have that vital transportation, especially in rural areas? Many kids are going to be left out.”

Kiley, the subcommittee chair from California, said he hoped the hearing would amplify the work within youth sports the witnesses are doing, and even institute change.

He identified a few areas “where we could see improvement.”

“One is just programmatic in terms of having more offerings for students to continue to be involved, regardless of skill level, having maybe more robust P.E. programs in schools,” he said. “The second is financial, removing the barriers to entry that have gotten just exorbitant in many communities across the country.

“The third, I think, is cultural, just trying to re-establish a culture that is supportive of play and competition, and giving kids these opportunities from an early age. I do have to say, a few witnesses mentioned the experience of COVID, where we took this opportunity away from many kids. In my state, we were the last to allow youth sports to continue again. I took part in what we called ‘let them play rallies’ with kids across our state. And that was a period where the interests of young people were not the highest priority when it came to policy, and this was one manifestation of it, and we really must never make that mistake again.

“That’s a broader issue, but on this specific issue of youth sports, I think we’ve had a lot of bipartisan agreement.”

Borelli, aka Coach Steve, has been an editor and writer with USA TODAY since 1999. He spent 10 years coaching his two sons’ baseball and basketball teams. He and his wife, Colleen, are now sports parents for two high schoolers. His Coach Steve column is posted weekly. For his past columns, click here.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY