Author

admin

Browsing

As the threat of a possible U.S. attack against Iran looms, President Donald Trump’s administration has announced additional sanctions targeting Iranian figures.

The Treasury Department announced Friday that its Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) ‘took additional action against Iranian officials responsible for the regime’s brutal crackdown on its own people.’

‘Among the officials sanctioned today is Eskandar Momeni Kalagari, Iran’s minister of the interior who oversees the murderous Law Enforcement Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran (LEF), a key entity responsible for the deaths of thousands of peaceful protesters,’ the department said.

‘OFAC also designated Babak Morteza Zanjani, a criminal Iranian investor who previously embezzled billions of dollars in Iranian oil revenue that rightfully belonged to the Iranian people and was never fully recovered. Freed from imprisonment in order to launder money for the regime, Zanjani has provided financial backing for major projects that support the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the Iranian regime more broadly.’

The Treasury Department also noted that OFAC designated two digital asset exchanges linked to Zanjani that ‘have processed large volumes of funds associated with IRGC-linked counterparties.’

The announcement comes as the Trump administration prepares for the possibility of military action against Iran.

Trump issued a saber-rattling Truth Social post Wednesday warning that the U.S. will attack if Iran does not negotiate a nuclear deal.

Trump suggested in a Truth Social post Wednesday that the U.S. could use force against Iran if a nuclear deal is not reached soon.

‘A massive Armada is heading to Iran. It is moving quickly, with great power, enthusiasm, and purpose. It is a larger fleet, headed by the great Aircraft Carrier Abraham Lincoln, than that sent to Venezuela. Like with Venezuela, it is, ready, willing, and able to rapidly fulfill its mission, with speed and violence, if necessary. Hopefully Iran will quickly ‘Come to the Table’ and negotiate a fair and equitable deal – NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS – one that is good for all parties,’ the president warned in a Truth Social post Wednesday.

Sen. Mike Rounds weighs in on Trump

The commander in chief has in recent days been supplied with an expanded list of possible military actions against Iran to inflict additional damage on the foreign nation’s nuclear and missile sites or weaken the Islamic Republic’s supreme leader, The New York Times reported on Thursday, citing U.S. officials.

The military options go further than those the president was previously mulling earlier this month to fulfill his pledge to stop the slaughter of protesters, officials reportedly said.

The current list of options includes the prospect of U.S. forces executing raids inside the nation of Iran, according to the Times, which indicated that the protests have been crushed.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Israel announced Thursday that it will reopen the Rafah border crossing for people to travel between Gaza and Egypt for the first time since May 2024. 

Israel’s Coordinator for Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), which oversees humanitarian and civil efforts in Gaza, said the crossing ‘will open this coming Sunday (February 1st) in both directions, for limited movement of people only.’ 

‘The return of residents from Egypt to the Gaza Strip will be permitted, in coordination with Egypt, for residents who left Gaza during the course of the war only, and only after prior security clearance by Israel,’ COGAT said. 

‘In addition to initial identification and screening at the Rafah Crossing by the European Union mission, an additional screening and identification process will be conducted at a designated corridor, operated by the defense establishment in an area under IDF control,’ it continued.

This will be the first opening of the Rafah crossing for people since Israel seized the area in May 2024, according to Reuters. Israeli forces captured the territory as part of an effort to prevent arms smuggling into Gaza by the terrorist group Hamas. 

In early 2025, there was an evacuation of medical patients along the route during a temporary ceasefire, The Associated Press reported.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office had said Sunday that Israel agreed to a ‘limited reopening’ of the crossing under President Donald Trump’s 20-point peace plan.

‘As part of President Trump’s 20-point plan, Israel has agreed to a limited reopening of the Rafah Crossing for pedestrian passage only, subject to a full Israeli inspection mechanism,’ the Office of the Prime Minister of Israel wrote. 

The Prime Minister’s Office said the reopening was contingent on the return of all living hostages and what it described as a ‘100 percent effort’ by Hamas to locate and return the remains of all deceased hostages.

Israel on Monday then confirmed that the remains of Staff Sgt. Ran Gvili, the last Israeli hostage held in Gaza, have been recovered and returned home after 842 days. 

Fox News Digital’s Rachel Wolf and Ashley Carnahan contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., unloaded his frustrations with the latest iteration of a government funding package backed by President Donald Trump and laid out a stark warning to the top House Republican and the White House in the process. 

Graham is one of the few remaining holdouts blocking the Senate from moving on to a government funding package brokered by Trump and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., as lawmakers race to beat the government funding deadline at midnight on Friday. 

The top Trump ally’s frustrations with the funding package have little to do with the president or the deal struck with Schumer. Much of his ire is directed at a provision tucked in by the House last week that would repeal a law that allows senators whose phone records were subpoenaed by former special counsel Jack Smith to sue for up to $500,000 per infraction. 

And Graham was not happy that House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., let the repeal slip through.

‘You could have called me about the $500,000,’ Graham said. ‘I’d be glad to work with you. You jammed me, Speaker Johnson. I won’t forget this. I got a lot of good friends in the House. If you think I’m going to give up on this, you really don’t know me.’

Graham has been a vocal proponent of that law, which was slipped into the last funding patch by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., with a green light from Schumer. 

He also turned his frustration on the White House.

‘I’ve been told the White House doesn’t like this, and I told the White House last night, ‘I don’t care if you like it or not.’ I literally texted my friends at the White House, ‘If I were you, I would not call me tonight.’’ 

‘And they didn’t call me,’ he continued. ‘I don’t work for the White House. They’re my political allies. I’m close to President Trump. I don’t work for him.’ 

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have charged that it’s a law designed to allow their colleagues to enrich themselves off the taxpayers’ dime, and tried on several occasions in the Senate to repeal it.

Graham is willing to lift his hold on the package if he gets a vote on expanding the number of people and organizations who were affected by Smith’s Arctic Frost probe that can sue, along with a vote on his legislation that would criminalize the conduct of officials who operate sanctuary cities. 

Several other lawmakers are demanding amendment votes, too, which Republican leaders are currently working to address. A positive sign, however, is that none appear to be demanding a guaranteed outcome.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Ukraine is racing to reinforce its air defenses as a brief pause in Russian strikes on Kyiv and other cities approaches its expiration, and military and diplomatic experts warn the move may do little to change conditions on the battlefield and could ultimately strengthen Moscow’s negotiating position.

Earlier Friday, President Donald Trump said at the White House, ‘I think we’re getting very close to getting a settlement,’ expressing optimism about the upcoming Russia-Ukraine talks. ‘Zelenskyy and Putin hate each other, and it makes it very difficult, but I think we have a good chance of getting it settled.’

The Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin agreed to a personal request from Trump to halt airstrikes on Kyiv until Feb. 1 to create what it described as favorable conditions for negotiations. Ukrainian officials stressed there is no formal ceasefire.

As temperatures in Kyiv are expected to plunge to minus-26 degrees Celsius beginning Sunday, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Ukraine is moving to strengthen short-range air defenses against drones to protect frontline cities in the south and northeast.

‘Protection against Russian drones must be reinforced in our cities, such as Kherson and Nikopol, as well as in the border communities of the Sumy region, where the Russians have essentially set up an ongoing ‘safari’ against civilians,’ Zelenskyy said on Telegram.

Despite the pause, Russian lawmakers and regional leaders have publicly urged escalation. Russian parliament speaker Vyacheslav Volodin said deputies are calling for the use of more powerful ‘weapons of retribution,’ while Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov said he opposed negotiations altogether.

Against that backdrop, experts told Fox News Digital the pause appears far more symbolic than transformative.

Vice Adm. Robert S. Harward, a retired Navy SEAL and deputy commander of U.S. Central Command, said the halt in strikes reflects political signaling rather than a military shift.

‘It’s symbolic in the sense of the dialogue and where we are in the negotiations,’ Harward told Fox News Digital. ‘President Trump wants to illustrate to the U.S. that his relationship with Putin delivers results. This is a validation of that relationship, which could be an indicator of where the overall negotiations are on ending the war.’

Carrie Filipetti, executive director of the Vandenberg Coalition and a former senior State Department and U.S. Mission to the United Nations official, said Russia’s agreement should not be misread as a move toward peace.

‘While I am certain that Ukrainian civilians welcome any brief pause, they also aren’t holding their breath because Putin’s war machine will not stop until his calculus is changed on the risks of continuing his war,’ Filipetti said.

She added that the short duration of the pause leaves Ukraine exposed.

‘Given how short the pause is and the duplicity of Russia saying it agreed to a week-long pause that expires in two days, this does not meaningfully change any conditions on the battlefield,’ she said.

Harward said Ukraine could face diplomatic consequences once the pause expires.

‘The risk to Ukraine is that this further weakens and isolates their role and position in the negotiations,’ he said.

Zelenskyy has also warned that Ukraine’s ability to defend civilians has been strained by delays in Western funding. He said European allies delayed payments under the PURL weapons purchase program, leaving Ukraine without Patriot air defense missiles ahead of recent Russian strikes that knocked out power across parts of Kyiv.

‘This is a critical issue for protecting civilians and Ukrainian cities and Ukraine’s energy infrastructure during the brutally cold winter months,’ Filipetti said. ‘As President Zelenskyy has said, there will be no electricity and therefore no heat for civilians if they don’t have enough Patriot missiles to defend against Russia’s ballistic missiles.’

Harward noted that the problem extends beyond Ukraine. 

‘Air Defense has been in high demand globally, considering the threats from Russia and China,’ he said. ‘Resources, expenses and the increased time to deliver and implement the capabilities add to the challenge.’

On whether the pause could open the door to broader de-escalation, both experts expressed caution.

‘This tactical pause only serves to reinforce Russia’s negotiating position,’ Harward said. ‘Putin is showing the worldthat he is willing to listen and respond. In return, he’ll want more support of his position and demands.’

‘Only time will tell,’ Filipetti said. ‘Diplomacy can always appear fruitless until there is a real deal. If this short pause, delivered by President Trump’s continued engagement and pressure on Putin, can be used to build additional progress in the trilateral talks, that would be a very positive outcome.’

Reuters contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Former CNN host Don Lemon retained a high-priced attorney familiar with defending clients against the Trump administration following his arrest related to his involvement in a protest at a St. Paul, Minnesota, church.

Lemon is being represented by Abbe Lowell, an attorney well known for taking on cases where a prominent political figure needs legal help; most notably Hunter Biden.

Biden, the surviving son of former President Joe Biden, is Lowell’s most visible recent client. The younger Biden has been one of the Trump administration’s top foils, and Lowell guided the 55-year-old author, businessman and recovering addict through a web of legal problems largely centered in his home state of Delaware.

After Lemon was arrested in Los Angeles, where he was preparing to cover an awards show for his podcast, Lowell confirmed his client was taken into custody late Thursday and said that, as a journalist, his ‘constitutionally protected work in Minneapolis was no different than what he has always done.’

Lowell slammed the Justice Department for pursuing Lemon instead of federal immigration agents involved in law enforcement shootings of alleged agitators Renee Good and Alex Pretti in recent days.

‘This unprecedented attack on the First Amendment and transparent attempt to distract attention from the many crises facing this administration will not stand. Don will fight these charges vigorously and thoroughly in court.’

During Biden’s tax and gun-charge case, Lowell often spoke out pointedly in defense of his client.

‘Based on the facts and the law, if Hunter’s last name was anything other than Biden, the charges in Delaware, and now California, would not have been brought,’ Lowell said, while also accusing Delaware federal prosecutor David Weiss of bowing to pressure from the Republican Party in pursuing the case.

Amid a countersuit against Delaware computer repairman John Paul Mac Isaac, Lowell wrote to the Justice Departments in Washington and Dover, also calling for investigations into former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Breitbart editor Steve Bannon over the laptop fiasco.

During scrutiny of Biden’s lucrative globe-trotting, Lowell depicted his client as the beloved remaining son of a doting father, saying that when ‘the President calls his son every day and it goes on the speakerphone, he says ‘hello’ to the people in the room. That is not an offense, that is nothing other than a loving father.’

Biden later, however, retained high-powered attorney and South Carolina State Sen. Dick Harpootlian, D-Charleston, in a separate defamation case against Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne. Harpootlian had just represented Low Country legal eagle–turned–convicted killer Richard ‘Alex’ Murdaugh.

Besides Biden and Lemon, Lowell has represented imprisoned former Sen. Robert Menendez Sr., D-N.J., during his 2017 corruption investigation that ended in a mistrial.

He also defended former Sen. John Edwards, the Democrats’ vice presidential nominee in 2004, as the scandal-plagued Carolinian fought allegations that he used $1 million in campaign donations to hide a mistress and child.

Then-Rep. Gary Condit, D-Calif., who was a person of interest in Chandra Levy’s disappearance; Federal Reserve Board Gov. Lisa Cook, who has been fighting attempted firing by the Trump administration; and lobbyist Jack Abramoff all counted Lowell as a legal defender.

He also represented first daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, during a 2016 election-season probe into alleged Russian interference.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump said Friday that the United States has directly communicated expectations to Iran as pressure mounts for Tehran to accept a nuclear deal, even as Iranian officials publicly signal interest in talks.

Asked whether Iran faces a deadline to make a deal, Trump suggested the timeline already had been conveyed privately. 

‘Only they know for sure,’ he said, confirming when pressed that the message had been delivered directly to Iranian leaders.

Trump also tied the growing U.S. naval presence in the region explicitly to Iran, saying American warships ‘have to float someplace’ and ‘might as well float near Iran’ as Washington weighs its next steps.

Meanwhile, Iran is ready to discuss its nuclear program with the U.S. ‘on an equal footing,’ Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Friday, as Washington dramatically ramps up military pressure in the Middle East amid growing doubts about Tehran’s willingness to accept verifiable limits on its nuclear ambitions.

The U.S. has long insisted Iran give up its ability to enrich uranium — the material used to build a nuclear weapon — while Iran maintains it has never pursued a bomb and says its nuclear program is intended for energy and civilian purposes.

Araghchi said no meeting was currently scheduled with U.S. officials, but left the door open to talks under specific conditions.

‘If the negotiations are fair and on an equal footing, the Islamic Republic of Iran is ready to participate,’ he said, adding that talks could not happen immediately. ‘Preparations are needed, both in terms of the form and subject of the discussions and the venue.’

U.S. and allied officials, however, remain deeply skeptical. 

Iran’s record under the 2015 nuclear deal — agreeing to stringent limits and international inspections only to later exceed enrichment caps and restrict monitoring — has fueled doubts about whether its latest overtures would translate into meaningful action.

That trust deficit was further strained in 2025, when diplomatic efforts unfolded alongside military action. 

In June 2025, the U.S. military joined Israel in striking three Iranian nuclear facilities — including the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan sites — in an operation aimed at degrading Tehran’s nuclear capabilities even as indirect talks were underway. Iranian officials later cited the strikes as evidence that Washington was unwilling to negotiate in good faith.

But time may be running out for diplomacy. Trump warned Thursday that Iran must end its nuclear program and halt the killing of protesters or face the possibility of U.S. military action.

‘We have a lot of very big, very powerful ships sailing to Iran right now, and it would be great if we didn’t have to use them,’ Trump said.

The USS Abraham Lincoln, which arrived in the region at the end of January, is operating with a carrier strike group that includes multiple destroyers and air squadrons flying F-35C Lightning II jets, F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, EA-18G Growlers, E-2D Hawkeyes, CMV-22B Ospreys and MH-60R/S Seahawk helicopters.

Trump reinforced his message Wednesday on Truth Social, writing: ‘Hopefully Iran will quickly ‘Come to the Table’ and negotiate a fair and equitable deal – NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS.’

Tensions broke out once again at the start of January amid mass anti-government protests in Iran and a brutal crackdown resulting in thousands of deaths.

Trump envoy Steve Witkoff has called for an end to Iran’s nuclear program, the transfer of enriched uranium out of the country, limits on its missile program and an end to financial support for proxy groups such as Hezbollah, the Houthis and Hamas.

Iran has long denied seeking nuclear weapons — an assertion U.S. and Israeli officials continue to dispute, arguing Tehran’s enrichment advances and reduced cooperation with international inspectors have brought it closer than ever to a potential nuclear breakout.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The House of Representatives is preparing a rare weekend meeting as congressional leaders race against the clock on a partial government shutdown.

The House Rules Committee, which acts as a gatekeeper before most legislation sees a chamber-wide vote, is expected to meet on Sunday at 4 p.m. to consider a federal funding deal that is poised to pass the Senate on Friday.

It means the full House could vote on the bill as early as Monday, three days after Congress’ deadline to avert a shutdown.

The plans are still tentative and expected to be finalized ahead of a 4:30 p.m. House GOP strategy call on Friday afternoon, but they are a sign that Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is looking to move with urgency once the deal passes the Senate.

Senate Democrats walked away from a bipartisan deal to fully fund the federal government for the remainder of fiscal year (FY) 2026 amid fallout over President Donald Trump’s surge of federal law enforcement in Minneapolis.

Federal officers shot and killed two U.S. citizens in the Midwest city during separate demonstrations against Trump’s immigration crackdown. In response, Democrats threatened to hold up a massive federal funding bill that also includes dollars for the departments of War, Labor, Health and Human Services, Transportation and others unless funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) were stripped out.

The deal reached would fund all but DHS through Sept. 30, while funding DHS with a two-week extension of current spending levels to give Congress time to hash out a compromise that would include stricter guardrails on immigration enforcement agencies under the department’s purview.

It rankled House Republicans all the way up to Johnson, who signaled he was not happy with the outcome but would work with his counterparts in the Senate to quickly end the expected shutdown.

‘I’ve been very consistent and insistent that they should take the House’s bills that we sent over and negotiated very carefully in bipartisan fashion, and pass them,’ Johnson told reporters on Friday. ‘We can work out decisions in the area of DHS, but we should not interrupt the funding of government in the meantime.’

A senior GOP aide close to House conservatives said the two-week stopgap for DHS was ‘crazy.’

‘That hands more leverage to Democrats to derail immigration enforcement, and we’d be right back here again in two weeks with more crazy demands from the radical Left,’ the aide told Fox News Digital.

Whether the legislation will survive the House Rules Committee remains to be seen.

Three members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus — Reps. Chip Roy, R-Texas, Ralph Norman, R-S.C., and Morgan Griffith, R-Va. — sit on the panel. Roy and Griffith have not said how they feel about the deal.

But Norman told Fox News Digital after details emerged on Thursday, ‘THERE IS NO RATIONAL REASON TO REMOVE DHS FROM THE APPROVAL PROCESS.’

Norman accused Democrats of trying to ‘demonize’ and ‘bludgeon’ DHS, adding, ‘IF THE DEMOCRATS WANT TO SHUT THE GOVERNMENT DOWN, ‘DO IT’!!’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

  • Bill Belichick was not inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in his first year of eligibility.
  • Despite the delay, Belichick is still widely expected to be inducted into the Hall of Fame, possibly as soon as 2027.

We’re on to 2027.

Taking his own advice is really all Bill Belichick can do after being passed over for induction into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in his first year of eligibility. Little reason to look back at this point.

He certainly wasn’t in a reflective mood in 2014, when his dynastic New England Patriots lost 41-14 in Week 4 to the pre-Mahomes Kansas City Chiefs under the Monday night spotlight. Belichick’s “We’re on to Cincinnati” mindset produced a resounding 43-17 defeat of the Bengals in Week 5 – and eventually carried the Pats to victory in Super Bowl 49. (It also typified Belichick’s frequently terse interactions with reporters trying to cover the team. But, after all, being a media darling doesn’t help you win Lombardi Trophies or get you into the Hall … unless it actually does?)

In actuality, Belichick actually has a reputation for being helpful to football scribes provided you’re not looking to expose his operation’s state secrets. And he readily granted behind-the-scenes access to NFL Films for profiles of his life and lengthy takeouts of his relationships with the likes of Bill Parcells and Nick Saban – even if it seemed a touch self-serving to allow the league’s mythmaking arm to begin carving his figurative bust.

Still, it’s virtually unthinkable that a significant sub-faction of the Hall’s gatekeepers were out to get him, at least in terms of grinding personal axes by denying him immediate admission. Draw whatever conclusions you want about the likes of Hall of Fame executive Bill Polian, longtime architect of the Indianapolis Colts (mortal enemies of the Patriots) and a few former players who are on the committee – none of them implicated of any wrongdoing even as the Hall issued a reminder Wednesday evening that anyone violating its “selection process bylaws” could be subject to removal from the process in the future.

But trust me, this is a group largely comprised of very trustworthy journalists – none more so than my esteemed long-term colleague Jarrett Bell. (And, ICYMI, JB spent a good chunk of his week digging into this matter and, specifically, shedding new light on the Polian rumors that were part of ESPN’s original reporting.)

But humans make mistakes. Belichick certainly has through the years.

We’re on to 2027.

And maybe the Hall’s voting process will be streamlined or simplified or otherwise improved by next year. Most outside observers have little understanding of how the recently revamped selection process works. Many voters themselves have expressed misgivings about the new procedures. One, Mike Sando, expressed on social media that “unintended consequences” have occurred as voters grapple with the new setup while trying to remain true to their voting convictions.

And, to be clear, they don’t make the ground rules. The Hall’s board of directors – which includes NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, some of the league’s team owners, a handful of Hall of Fame players, and several others – determines the process and altered it in 2024 in a bid to make selection more exclusive. (Last year’s four-member class was the smallest in two decades.)

And what irony that it’s Belichick who’s being ensnared by these recently implemented guidelines − the same coach who knew the league’s rulebook backward and forward and where its less-explored areas were as he sought advantages that his peers had never imagined.

Remember when he had Doug Flutie do a drop kick in 2006, the first time one had been successfully executed in the NFL in 65 years? Or how about the 2014 postseason game against the Baltimore Ravens, when Belichick had running back Shane Vereen report as an ineligible receiver while deploying him in the slot – as if he was going out for a pass – and exploiting a loophole in the rule book? (Meanwhile, a tight end lined up as an offensive tackle could then release on a pass route, causing mass confusion. The Ravens were not amused, and the league quickly closed the loophole.)

And, of course, this is the same Belichick who was fined a record $500,000 for the Patriots’ Spygate scandal in 2007 – whether he thought he was in a legal shade of gray or brazenly operating outside the rules – and was guilty by association amid the Deflategate brouhaha seven years later.

And maybe some voters – maybe, perhaps – felt like those were legitimate grounds to keep Belichick from going in on the first ballot. Maybe, perhaps others were a little too invested in voting for other senior candidates who might not be on the ballot in a year – maybe, perhaps redirecting a vote from Belichick under the assumption he’d coast his way to enshrinement courtesy of other yays he’d doubtless accumulate.

And maybe, perhaps Belichick’s plight, such as it is, spares his longtime quarterback, Tom Brady, from a similar one when he’s eligible for induction in 2028. After all, TB12 wears the same scarlet letters from Spygate and, more so, Deflategate as his coach – to say nothing of losing two Super Bowls to still-unbronzed Eli Manning. Maybe, hopefully none of that gets in the way when it’s time to vote for Brady.

We’re on to 2027.

And maybe, perhaps Belichick will still be coaching the University of North Carolina then – and maybe the Tar Heels will be much better than they were in his Chapel Hill debut. Maybe not – not that a disastrous ACC debut in 2025 should have been disqualifying for him, either.

Maybe, perhaps waiting for a year will serve as a reminder that no process is perfect and that any Hall of Fame has members with asterisks attached. O.J. Simpson remains in the Pro Football Hall of Fame, his life taking its dark turn nearly a decade after he was enshrined. Former players who have been suspended for gambling are in the Hall. Former players who have tested positive for banned substances are in the Hall. Former players who have been convicted of domestic violence are in the Hall. Former players who used Stickum are in the Hall.

Bill Belichick will undoubtedly go into the Hall – and with an asterisk.

Is such a caveat deserved? It’s hard to believe even most casual fans have forgotten about Spygate or the unsparingly gruff approach BB so often employed. Hall of Fame voters certainly haven’t.

But almost no one – even those who don’t qualify as casual fans – is unaware of Belichick’s record (for a head coach) six Lombardi Trophies, if not the two he earned as Parcells’ defensive coordinator for the New York Giants. And maybe not everyone could peg Belichick’s win total at 333, second only to Don Shula (347) in NFL history. But at the end of the day − if not today or this year − who hasn’t heard of Belichick? Who doesn’t consider him – or at least assume – he’s one of the greatest, if not the greatest, NFL coach in history?

And maybe, perhaps 50 years on, some nascent football fan will wonder why Belichick didn’t enter into Canton’s hallowed halls on the first ballot in 2026. Maybe, perhaps that will force him or her to dig into the history of Belichick and the NFL a bit more deeply – which Belichick might even appreciate, just a touch, given what a historian of the league he is.

And indulge a brief history lesson here: Bill Walsh wasn’t a first-ballot Hall of Famer nor, believe it or not, was Vince Lombardi. Vince Freaking Lombardi. It doesn’t detract an iota from their greatness, nor is it a distinction most football followers even make. Five years from now – or maybe one year and five minutes from now – most will assume Belichick flew in on the first ballot, which almost everyone seems to agree he should have anyway.

But in the interim, many shocked and baffled Hall of Fame voters must regroup and recalibrate in something of an embarrassing “Do your job” moment. I truly suspect most, if not at all, meant to do so this time around. I have little doubt they will unanimously − maybe, perhaps? − do so in a year.

We’re on to 2027.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

After a 9-8 campaign in 2025, the Minnesota Vikings are making changes.

The franchise confirmed on Friday, Jan. 30 in a statement that they have fired general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah after four years at the position.

Adofo-Mensah came to Minnesota after seven years with the San Francisco 49ers and two with the Cleveland Browns. He had been the vice president of football operations with Cleveland before his arrival as general manager with the Vikings in 2022.

Adofo-Mensah’s arrival coincided with the hiring of head coach Kevin O’Connell. Minnesota has made the playoffs twice in the four seasons under that tandem but has not recorded a win in either playoff berth.

The Vikings made the choice ahead of the 2025 season to not retain quarterback Sam Darnold, who is playing in Super Bowl 60 with the Seattle Seahawks. With J.J. McCarthy at quarterback, Minnesota dropped to a bottom-eight scoring offense for the first time under O’Connell.

Adofo-Mensah spoke on Thursday on the decision not to keep Darnold.

“There are nights you wake up and stare at the ceiling and ask yourself,” Adofo-Mensah said. “I always go back to the process and what we thought at the time. I still understand why we did what we did. The results maybe didn’t play out the way we wanted them to, but ultimately, at the end of the day I think we could have executed in certain places.”

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

PHILADELPHIA — The next meeting between the WNBA and players’ union will be Monday, WNBPA first vice president Kelsey Plum said during Unrivaled’s media availability Friday morning.

It has been over a month since the WNBA received the union’s latest proposal as the two sides work on a new collective bargaining agreement, and the league has not responded. A person with knowledge of the situation said the WNBA has not sent a counter because the union did not change their proposal.

‘I think we’ll learn a lot from this meeting,’ Plum said. ‘I’m not trying to put it on the meeting, but this is a meeting that I think everyone understands what’s at stake. The league has their timelines; we as players understand what’s at stake.

‘I always come into anything that I do with a great attitude, and I’m gonna see the best in this.’

A person with knowledge of the situation confirmed the meeting will take place in New York City with members of the WNBPA leadership committee and labor relations committee, led by WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert, which includes a handful of WNBA owners.

The WNBA and players’ union have been at a impasse in negotiations, extending the deadline twice before entering a ‘status quo’ period on Jan. 9.

Under ‘status quo,’ the working conditions established in the current CBA remain unchanged, allowing both sides to continue negotiations. The current agreement also prevents the WNBA or its players from engaging in a work stoppage without giving proper notice.

WNBA players are prepared to strike if they can not come to an agreement. The negotiations with the league remain at a standstill. Players voted to authorize the WNBPA executive committee to ‘call a strike when necessary,’ on Dec. 18.

‘We are standing firm in our feet and 10 toes down, there is a reason, and we will not move until y’all move,’ New York Liberty guard Tasha Cloud said. ‘So I’m gonna look directly into the camera too, but we will not (expletive) move until y’all move.

‘It would be the worst business decision of any business to not literally pay the players that make your business go. Without us, there is no W season. So if the pressure is on the WNBA, on Cathy (Engelbert), on (NBA commissioner) Adam (Silver), on everyone that is in that front office. Do your job. Negotiate and pay your people, your players, your workers.’

The 2026 WNBA season is scheduled to begin May 8. It will be the league’s 30th season, provided the WNBA and the players’ union come to an agreement.

The players have prioritized increased revenue sharing and salary structures in negotiations. The sides differ on whether revenue sharing should be net or gross income, the percentage of the share and the salary cap.

Heather Burns contributed to this report.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY