Tag

Slider

Browsing

Newly revealed emails show senior military officials raised concerns with the White House within days of Israel commencing its operation in Gaza. 

Reuters obtained and examined emails between senior State Department and Pentagon officials between Oct. 11-14 that showed concern and alarm as Israel started hitting the Gaza Strip with missile strikes. 

The emails specifically focused on the mass evacuation of Palestinians as a potential legal issue. Dana Stroul, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East at the time, wrote to senior Biden aides Oct. 13 and warned that Israel could face war crime charges for its actions. 

The emails also include pressure to include messages of sympathy for the Palestinian people and to allow more aid into Gaza while seeking to remain in solidarity with Israel. 

Israel’s invasion of Gaza has proven polarizing and painful for the Democrats. The progressive wing and younger voters are trying to hold the Biden administration to account for its support of Israel as tens of thousands of Palestinians die. 

The invasion also made it difficult — if not impossible — for aid groups to help the displaced residents of Gaza who fled their homes to avoid getting caught up in Israel’s operations. 

Stroul outright alleged that Israel could be ‘close to committing war crimes’ after the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) dropped leaflets over northern Gaza urging residents to flee their homes ahead of the military rolling into the territory as part of the early ‘targeted incursions.’ 

‘Their main line is that it is impossible for one million civilians to move this fast,’ Stroul wrote. One official said that such an operation was not possible without creating a ‘humanitarian catastrophe.’ 

Three senior U.S. officials argued the White House was slow to address these problems, with Biden’s team at one point arguing that the U.S. was ‘leading international efforts to get humanitarian aid into Gaza,’ which would remain a ‘top priority.’ 

Bill Russo, at the time an assistant secretary of state in the Bureau of Global Public Affairs, attempted to drive home the long-term impact of the U.S.’s ‘lack of response on the humanitarian conditions’ in Gaza, calling it ‘ineffective and counterproductive’ while also harming relations with Arab nations. 

‘If this course is not quickly reversed by not only messaging, but action, it risks damaging our stance in the region for years to come,’ Russo wrote in one email, according to Reuters. A colleague forwarded his emails to White House officials and warned that ‘otherwise would-be stalwart’ Arab partners might think twice about relations with the U.S. 

Russo eventually resigned from his post in March 2024, citing personal reasons for his decision.

Far-left voters have placed the fate of Gaza front and center of their concerns approaching November’s election. The voters of Michigan started an ‘uncommitted’ protest vote during the Democratic primary as a means of venting frustration at the Biden administration’s handling of the crisis. 

Those same voters shredded Harris for her DNC speech in August, calling it ‘horrible’ and accusing Harris of ‘downplaying’ U.S. complicity in the Gaza invasion by providing Israel funding and weapons. 

Neither the White House, the State Department nor the Pentagon responded to Fox News Digital’s requests for comment. 

Reuters contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Thousands of dockworkers on the East Coast and Gulf Coast will return to work after reaching a tentative agreement on wages, ending one of the biggest work stoppages in decades.

In a joint statement, the United States Maritime Alliance, or USMX, and the International Longshoreman’s Association said the two sides have an agreement to extend their current labor contract through Jan. 15 and continue to negotiate.

‘The International Longshoremen’s Association and the United States Maritime Alliance, Ltd. have reached a tentative agreement on wages,’ the union and the alliance said.

‘Effective immediately, all current job actions will cease and all work covered by the Master Contract will resume,’ the statement said.

The terms of the tentative wage agreement were not disclosed in the joint statement.

The International Longshoremen’s Association, known as the ILA, argued that big global cargo carriers have raked in huge profits since pandemic-era supply-chain snags drove up freight rates, and that workers haven’t sufficiently shared in those gains.

The United States Maritime Alliance, or USMX, represents major ocean freight and port operators. 

The union also sought limits on automation at ports. The joint statement only mentions wages.

The strike began at midnight Monday, going into Tuesday. The ILA strike that shut down ports is its first since 1977. That one lasted 44 days.

The work stoppage involved ports from Maine to Texas. The governors of New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Maryland were among those calling for a swift resolution to the labor dispute.

President Joe Biden on Thursday praised both sides for finding a way to get a tentative deal done so that ports can reopen and talks can continue.

‘Today’s tentative agreement on a record wage and an extension of the collective bargaining process represents critical progress towards a strong contract,’ Biden said.

The tentative wage agreement and resumption of the contract appears to end fears of higher prices for consumers and supply-chain issues had the stoppage dragged on. It also temporarily quiets a contentious labor issue with around a month left to go in the U.S. presidential campaign.

Biden had publicly urged USMX to make what he called a fair offer, and he said the alliance represents a group of foreign-owned carriers.

“Now is not the time for ocean carriers to refuse to negotiate a fair wage for these essential workers while raking in record profits,” Biden said in a statement Tuesday.

On Wednesday, with no deal in place, Biden increased the pressure by having White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients convene a meeting with CEOs of foreign carriers for Thursday, said sources familiar with the thinking of Biden and the White House.

National Economic Council Director Lael Brainard was able to get global shippers to increase their offer, although still not quite enough, the sources said.

Zients, Brainard, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su had a 5:30 a.m. call on Thursday with the shippers on Thursday, who by midday had agreed to move forward with the wage increases to reopen ports, the sources said.

The union and USMX will still need to come to terms on the question of automation, which has emerged as a more existential issue. Ports around the world have embraced technology that can make shipping faster, cheaper and safer, with U.S. ports now regularly lagging behind international ports in efficiency.

A Government Accountability Office report from this year found that U.S. ports had embraced some automation, but that labor opposition as well as cost were hindering the adoption of automation technology.

As for any lingering effects from the brief work stoppage, the number of ships waiting to dock has already started to decline, and no major disruptions are expected to be felt by consumers. Everstream Analytics, a supply chain risk management company, told NBC News that it will take about three weeks to clear the backlog.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

After two decades of friendship, and as someone who had the honor to serve on Mrs. Trump’s White House team for a time, I am excited that the former first lady is finally telling her story in her forthcoming book, ‘Melania.’ For this reason, I can no longer remain silent as many self-proclaimed ‘experts’ continue to opine on her thoughts, her statements and her actions — especially when many of them have obvious malice in their hearts and money on their minds.

The hate-Trump media industrial complex is largely a money-making endeavor attracting many longing to remain relevant, become famous, advance personal agendas, or cash in while they can.  

Mrs. Trump’s response to all of this — she ignores all but the most egregious attacks — is not surprising to those who truly know her as a woman of tremendous strength, grace and resilience, a loving and devoted mother, wife, daughter and friend.

Their vitriol is only likely to reach a more fevered pitch in coming days, ahead of the Oct. 8 release of Mrs. Trump’s memoir, ‘Melania.’ Yet I remain hopeful that, with the book’s publication, the public will finally have a chance to learn her story, firsthand, and come to understand the remarkable woman I am so fortunate to call my friend. 

In my role as one of Mrs. Trump’s advisers in the White House, I was in many of the rooms and witnessed many of the moments that have since been drastically recast in books, tweets and interviews by former staffers— and I am aghast at the disparity between the truth I witnessed and the skewed narrative that is widely promoted.

Consider the ongoing rants of one of her former staffers, and self-proclaimed close friend, who has since worked indefatigably to promote herself while bashing Melania. After her contract with the White House was terminated, (full disclosure: my contract with the White House was also terminated at the same time) she wrote a one-sided book about her former boss. She admitted to secretly taping personal phone calls with Mrs. Trump, who was first lady at the time. An unprecedented breach of trust and civility if not ethics. 

Further, after leaving the White House, she began her campaign to criticize Mrs. Trump at every turn, apparently not only to sell her book but also to settle imagined personal scores. Like other former Trumpians, she apparently was positioning herself to be the go-to expert about a woman to whom she has not spoken now in more than seven years.

Examine her ongoing hateful tweets, such as opining about why Melania was not on the campaign trail with her husband last fall. When Mrs. Trump told reporters to ‘Stay tuned’ about her plans to campaign, this former staffer predictably chimed in with a supposedly all-knowing tweet: ‘Let me interpret this for you: DON’T HOLD YOUR BREATHE! [sic]’

How, exactly, would she know that — or anything else about the former first lady? She was clearly so far out of the loop that she was unaware that Mrs. Trump was caring for her dying mother at the time. So much for expertise. 

 

Then there is Mrs. Trump’s onetime White House press secretary, who also appears to be competing to become the Left’s Melania expert. This, after writing a self-aggrandizing book that attacked her former boss while auditioning for the never-Trump ‘conservative’ seat on ABC’s ‘The View.’  

This former ‘insider’ is the same person who, embarrassingly, could not correctly explain to reporters in 2018 why the first lady wore a now-famous Zara designer jacket with its bold logo — ‘I Really Don’t Care, Do U?’ — on a flight to visit migrant children detained at the Texas border.  This press secretary told reporters: ‘It’s just a jacket. There was no hidden message.’

How did she not know that the first lady was intentionally signaling to her critics with that jacket and not referring to the children? And if she had no understanding of Mrs. Trump then, while working for her, how can she possibly be considered an expert on her now when she has had no access to Mrs. Trump in years?

It took the former first lady herself to clear up the confusion and repair the damage. Melania told an ABC News interviewer that the jacket was ‘kind of a message, yes,’ but one directed at her critics: ‘I want to show them that I don’t care. You could criticize whatever you want to say, but it will not stop me to do what I feel is right.’

Sadly, we have rarely seen any positive reporting on Melania’s achievements because Mrs. Trump has seldom been recognized or credited for the important initiatives she undertook and supported during her four years as First Lady and in the years since. 

As first lady, she worked to focus attention on the opioid crisis and its toll on families when visiting Lily’s Place, a treatment center in Huntington, W.Va. She championed ‘Be Best,’ her campaign which aimed at building children’s wellness and emotional intelligence in education which included her work against cyber-bullying in schools. 

Since leaving the White House, she has created ‘Fostering the Future,’ to raise college scholarship funding for former foster children. Since its inception, ‘Fostering the Future’ has given out scholarships to many students. You have probably heard little about it. 

When consuming news, as with any other commodity, the old adage of ‘let the buyer beware’ has perhaps never been more relevant. It is essential for media consumers to approach information about politics with a critical eye, to seek out reliable sources, and to question the credibility of self-proclaimed experts. Otherwise, we may learn that it was our freedoms and our very way of life that were actually for sale all along.

As a wise man once said, ‘Consider the source.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Taiwan’s top official in the U.S. is warning that China has ramped up its aggression toward the island, and that its people are ready to fight.

‘Yes, of course,’ Alexander Yui, the Taiwanese representative to the U.S., told Fox News’ Aishah Hasnie when asked whether the island’s residents were willing to meet the moment, if China were to invade. ‘We’ve seen Ukraine.’

Taiwan has been intensely watching the conflict in Eastern Europe as Kyiv’s forces have battled a Russian invasion for more than two years. 

Yui said he hoped to not need help from U.S. troops, which Ukraine also does not have, but suggested they would be eagerly accepted if offered.

‘If your house is under fire, and they respond to help you with a bucket of water, would you say no?’ Yui posed.

The diplomat said Chinese President Xi Jinping has escalated regional tensions since former President Donald Trump left office, but he stopped short of blaming the Biden administration for emboldening China.

‘XI Jinping has been emboldened because he wants to realize what he calls his China dream,’ Yui said. ‘It’s not about which administration is in the United States . . . but rather, what are the thoughts of Xi Jinping?’

Taiwan’s ministry of defense tracked eight Chinese military aircraft and two naval ships near the island earlier this week. The defense ministry said four of the eight planes crossed the median line dividing China and Taiwan’s territory in the Taiwan Strait – though Beijing, which claims ownership of Taiwan, does not recognize the geographic delineation. 

A week prior, on Sept. 25, Taiwan’s defense ministry said it had detected 43 Chinese military aircraft in a 24-hour period, with 34 having crossed the median line. The next day saw 41 Chinese military planes detected near Taiwan.

Xi is believed to be preparing his country for an invasion of Taiwan by 2027 – meaning the U.S. response would fall to whoever wins the presidency in November.

Asked if he had a message for Americans about Taiwan ahead of Election Day, Yui said it was a ‘peace-loving nation.’

‘We believe in democracy and freedom. We have to share the same values. And we want to be incorporated in the world, because we’ve been isolated for many decades due to the conflict that we have . . . with mainland China,’ he said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Melania Trump is not the only first lady to express pro-choice views. She joins several former Republican first ladies who have shared similar perspectives, often in their memoirs, despite this stance historically contrasting with the GOP platform.

Other spouses of Republican presidents, such as Pat Nixon, Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush and Laura Bush, have been recorded either during or after their husbands’ tenure in office expressing pro-choice views.

‘I feel very strongly that it was the best thing in the world when the Supreme Court voted to legalize abortion and, in my words, bring it out of the backwoods and put it in the hospital where it belongs,’ Betty Ford said in a CBS News’ ’60 Minutes’ interview in 1975, two years after Roe v. Wade was handed down.

Following Ford’s comments on premarital sex, marijuana and abortion during the CBS interview, then-President Gerald Ford reportedly joked that she had cost him votes.

As a more conservative first lady, Nancy Reagan avoided taking a public stance against abortion that would put her at odds with former President Ronald Reagan. However, she later revealed her personal position on the issue.

‘I’m against abortion, I don’t believe in abortion,’ Reagan said at George Washington University in 1994, five years after her husband left the Oval Office. ‘On the other hand, I believe in a woman’s choice. So, it puts me somewhere in the middle, but I don’t know what you’d call that.’

Barbara Bush, former President George H. W. Bush’s wife, was more reserved in her public statements about abortion and was at odds with her husband’s anti-abortion stance. While she was not as outspoken as Betty Ford, she wrote in her 1994 memoir, ‘I hate abortions, but I just could not make that choice for someone else.’

Former first lady Laura Bush, wife of former President George W. Bush and daughter-in-law to Barbara Bush, also differed with the former Presidents Bush on abortion. 

‘I think it’s important that it remain legal, because I think it’s important for people for medical reasons and other reasons,’ she said in an interview with Larry King Live in 2010. 

Pat Nixon, then-President Richard Nixon’s wife, told reporters during a 1972 press conference – as Roe v. Wade arguments were being considered by the Supreme Court – that she supported the right to choose an abortion, but opposed ‘wholesale abortion on demand.’

Trump, wife of Republican presidential candidate and former President Donald Trump, wrote the memoir entitled ‘Melania’ that is scheduled to come out on Oct. 8, per the Amazon release date. In the book, according to a preview by The Guardian, she expresses a viewpoint closely aligned with that of former first ladies before her.

‘It is imperative to guarantee that women have autonomy in deciding their preference of having children, based on their own convictions, free from any intervention or pressure from the government,’ Trump reportedly wrote.

‘Why should anyone other than the woman herself have the power to determine what she does with her own body? A woman’s fundamental right of individual liberty, to her own life, grants her the authority to terminate her pregnancy if she wishes.

‘Restricting a woman’s right to choose whether to terminate an unwanted pregnancy is the same as denying her control over her own body. I have carried this belief with me throughout my entire adult life.’

The former first lady drew criticism from pro-life advocates on social media after the excerpts were published just a month away from Election Day. This year, the Republican Party’s official platform also softened its language on abortion, as former President Trump also said he would not support a federal abortion ban.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Taiwan’s de facto U.S. ambassador is warning that China, Iran and Russia are forming an ‘alliance’ that the rest of the world should be ready for.

It comes days after Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the three autocratic countries were working together but not an ‘axis,’ as they have so often recently been called.

‘They’re working together, that’s for sure, whether that’s an axis or an alliance’ Alexander Yui, Taiwan’s representative to the U.S., told Fox News this week.

‘And as you know, it’s up to anyone to define it. But there were certainly there are symptoms, signs that they’re working together.’

During the interview, Yui also suggested that Taiwan’s government was in touch with both Vice President Harris and former President Trump’s circles to be prepared for whatever comes next in U.S. relations.

‘The whole world is watching, and I’m sure the diplomatic community here in Washington, D.C., is also watching closely and [trying] to reach out to both candidates or to the people around the candidates,’ Yui said.

Blinken penned an op-ed in Foreign Affairs Magazine on Oct. 1 that said world powers were in competition to set the stage for a ‘new age’ of international relations.

‘A small number of countries — principally Russia, with the partnership of Iran and North Korea, as well as China — are determined to alter the foundational principles of the international system. While their forms of governance, ideologies, interests, and capabilities differ, these revisionist powers all want to entrench autocratic rule at home and assert spheres of influence abroad,’ the Biden administration official wrote.

‘While these countries are not an axis, and the administration has been clear that it does not seek bloc confrontation, choices these revisionist powers are making mean we need to act decisively to prevent that outcome.’

Meanwhile, national security hawks on the right and left have warned that those four regimes were forging an unholy alliance not seen since WWII.

Both House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called them a new ‘axis of evil.’

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., House Democrats’ former majority leader, said after President Biden’s address on Israel and Ukraine in October 2023, ‘We face a new axis of evil today. The dictators, despots, and dealers of destruction leading Russia, North Korea, Iran, and Iranian proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah stand together in their assault on democracy.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The FBI is refusing to give the House Judiciary Committee a briefing on Iran’s hack of the Trump campaign and other key issues, Chairman Jim Jordan told Fox News Digital, saying that the American people deserve to have the information before Election Day. 

Jordan, R-Ohio, spoke exclusively with Fox News Digital and said that he and his committee have been seeking a briefing in an unclassified setting to obtain information relating to Iran’s hack of the Trump campaign, and whether the former president and his team had been given a defensive briefing on the matter.

The FBI has told Fox News Digital that it is committed to working with the committee but did not say if or when officials would brief Jordan. 

‘This hacking of the Trump campaign by Iran — it looks like there was a dossier on JD Vance — that dossier winds up at the Harris campaign, and somehow, it happens to wind up in the press,’ Jordan said. ‘There are lots of questions, like when did you find out about this? How did you find out about this? Did you give Trump a defensive briefing? Who was the person in the Harris campaign who got the information? How did they get the information? When did they tell you they had the information? How did it then get to the press?’ 

Jordan said, ‘Those are just questions off the top of my head.’ 

‘It makes no sense, because we know if everything were reversed and the Iranians hacked the Harris campaign and there was a dossier on Tim Walz that ended up in the Trump campaign and then in the press, we know that they would all be going crazy,’ Jordan said. ‘There would probably already be a special counsel.’ 

Jordan also pointed to the fact that the hack was taken by an adversarial nation — Iran. 

‘This is the same country that says they are trying to assassinate President Trump. This is the same country who is the chief sponsor of terrorism. This is the same country that wants to assassinate [Israeli] Prime Minister Netanyahu. And this is the same country who just sent rockets to our best ally — ballistic missiles to our best ally — the State of Israel,’ Jordan said. ‘And we want to be briefed on this hacking, and they won’t do it.’ 

The Trump campaign said that the documents had been obtained ‘illegally from sources hostile to the United States,’ who ‘intended to interfere in the 2024 election and sow chaos throughout our Democratic process.’ 

The hack by Iran came ‘after recent reports of an Iranian plot to assassinate President Trump around the same time as the Butler, PA tragedy.’ 

The documents were sent to Politico and included a 271-page ‘dossier’ that the Trump campaign had put together on his eventual running mate Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, that dated back to February, the outlet said. 

It included Vance’s past stances on issues, statements and previous criticisms of Trump in a section called ‘POTENTIAL VULNERABILITIES.’

Meanwhile, Jordan also said his committee has other questions relating to Trump, the GOP presidential nominee, including why the Justice Department released the ‘bounty letter’ from the second attempted assassin, Ryan Routh, who offered $150,000 to someone who could ‘complete the job’ against Trump if he were to fail.

The DOJ, in a court filing last month, released Routh’s letter as evidence in a detention memo by the Justice Department in an effort to ensure Routh’s detention. 

Jordan also told Fox News Digital he wants information from Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who testified last week that he would include in his highly anticipated report on Jan. 6, 2021 details about confidential human sources from the FBI and whether they had been embedded in the mob during the Capitol riot. 

During the hearing last week, Horowitz was asked whether he would ‘expose that there were confidential human sources at the Capitol’ on Jan. 6, and ‘how many went into the Capitol?’ 

Horowitz replied, ‘I’ll have that information in the report.’

Horowitz, though, indicated his report would not be made public until after Election Day. 

‘Well, for goodness’ sake, it’s been four years,’ Jordan said. ‘Why not give us that information now, right?’ 

But Jordan said that ‘the FBI will not sit down with the committee.’ 

Jordan stressed that the House Judiciary Committee is ‘the authorizing committee for the Justice Department.’ 

‘They will not sit down and talk with our committee, and it’s ridiculous,’ Jordan said. ‘This is important information for the American people to know before a consequential election.’ 

Fox News Digital has learned that representatives for the House Judiciary Committee began requesting the briefing during a phone call on Sept. 24 with the FBI. The committee then had two phone calls on Sept. 25 with the FBI requesting a briefing, a call with the Justice Department on Oct. 1 requesting a briefing, and two calls with the FBI on Oct. 1 requesting a briefing. 

A source said representatives of the committee also left a voicemail for the FBI on Oct. 1 requesting a briefing and had a call with the FBI again on Oct. 2. 

An FBI spokesperson told Fox News Digital that the bureau ‘has continually demonstrated its commitment to working with the Committee to accommodate its requests, and we have provided numerous documents and briefings.’ 

‘The FBI recognizes the importance of congressional oversight and remains committed to cooperating with the Committee in good faith,’ the FBI spokesperson said. 

But that cooperation has not met Jordan’s requests, the chairman said, and warned that all options are on the table. 

‘We have done more than 100 subpoenas this Congress, so every option is on the table for us to try to get the information that we believe the American people are entitled to have before making a decision, as I said, in an election that is so consequential,’ Jordan told Fox News Digital. 

‘We’ve got important questions about important issues that impact our country and one of the major candidates for political office,’ he said. ‘Give us the briefing, for goodness’ sake. Answer our questions.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Virtually all of the world’s supply of a mineral that is critical to semiconductor production comes from one tiny town in the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains that has been devastated by Hurricane Helene.

Spruce Pine, North Carolina has no running water or electricity, more than a week after Helene ripped through the town of 2,200. Roads and railways in and out of the area are severely damaged, according to local officials.

Mines in Spruce Pine produce the world’s purest form of quartz, which plays a central role in chip manufacturing.

Now, the town’s exceedingly valuable supply of high-purity quartz is at risk, threatening to cripple the $600 billion global semiconductor industry.

The natural disaster unfolding in Spruce Pine also highlights the continued instability of global supply chains, more than four years after Covid-19 drove home to Americans how dependent they had become on imported goods.

Two companies, Sibelco and The Quartz Corp., extract the high-purity quartz in Spruce Pine, refine it and export it to manufacturing facilities based primarily in China and other parts of Asia.

Much of the refined, high-purity quartz is then used to create a vessel called a crucible, which holds silicon as it is melted and transformed into the wafers on which semiconductors are made.

But mining, refining and shipping are all on hold, for now.

Both Sibelco and the Quartz Corp. were forced to halt operations on Sept. 26 due to the storm, which dumped more than two feet of rain on Spruce Pine, according to the National Weather Service.

The companies say there is no timeline right now as to when they expect to resume normal operations.

“The Spruce Pine community has been hit particularly hard,” Sibelco said in a statement on Sept. 30. “We have temporarily halted operations at the Spruce Pine facilities in response to these challenges.”

The Quartz Corp. said in an Oct. 1 statement that the company has “no visibility” as to when their operations will be able to resume.

For the semiconductor industry, the challenges that any long-term disruption to the Spruce Pine mines would present cannot be overstated, experts say.

“This is the only plant in the world right now that serves the semiconductor industry in its entirety,” said TECHCET CEO Lita Shon-Roy, who has studied the quartz supply chain for more than two decades. “If something were to happen to these mines, it can put the entire industry on its ear, period. There’s no other capability.”

What happens next, experts say, is a two-part question. First, operators need to determine whether there has been any damage to the quartz mines themselves, or to the equipment the companies use to extract or refine the mineral.

If mining operations can start up again, the secondary question is how either company will transport refined quartz to export markets, given the state of some of the infrastructure in western North Carolina.

TECHCET estimates it could be four to six weeks before the companies’ operations are running at full throttle again. But that forecast, Shon-Roy says, is dependent on roads opening back up, given that both companies rely primarily on trucking to move their minerals.

Early indications, however, are that transit infrastructure will require extensive rebuilding. 

“Roads are gone,” said Spencer Bost, the executive director of Downtown Spruce Pine, a nonprofit that partners with the city. In some areas, he said, “The roads just don’t exist anymore.”

When it comes to electricity, said Bost, “it’s not like power lines are down — telephone poles are gone.”

Yet there are still two glimmers of hope for the semiconductor industry.

The first is that there is likely some inventory of high-purity quartz stockpiled for the components it helps create. This could give the industry a cushion of two or three months, while Spruce Pine recovers from Helene, Shon-Roy said.

As the semiconductor industry emerges from its own downturn, demand has been fairly soft, said Shon-Roy. Additionally, ever since the pandemic most companies have been keeping larger inventories in stock.

“That will help cushion the delay in getting these plants restarted,” Shon-Roy said.

The other upside: The crucibles that quartz is used to create have a shelf life of about 300 to 400 hours — or roughly two weeks — before they need to be replaced, said Dustin Mulvaney, an environmental studies professor at San Jose State University who studies solar energy commodity chains.

As a result, there could be some lag before chip manufacturers are hurting for more. 

“But once they start having to replace the crucibles, that’s where you will run into the potential for disruption,” Mulvaney said.

The longer it takes for Spruce Pine’s mining industry to get back to work, the bigger the impact will be.

“A month’s delay is not bad,” said Shon-Roy. “Two months is getting difficult. Three months becomes a real problem.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

More than 400 national security and foreign policy officials, ex-Cabinet members, retired military officers and Gold Star families endorsed former President Trump on Thursday.

In an open letter organized by former National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien and former NSC Chief of Staff Alex Gray, the signatories condemn the ‘repeated failures’ of the Biden-Harris administration’s foreign policy and urged Americans to re-elect Trump.

‘From a world at peace under President Trump, we are closer to a third world war than ever before under the Biden-Harris Administration,’ the letter states. ‘With multiple escalating wars around the world, an open border that allows terrorists to flood into the American homeland, and malign actors like China operating unabated, U.S. national security has been profoundly damaged by the failed policies of Kamala Harris and Joe Biden.’

The endorsement was signed by several prominent officials from the Trump administration, including former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, former Attorney General Bill Barr, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and former 2024 Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley, and many more.

Eleven family members of the 13 American troops killed at Abbey Gate at Kabul’s airport during the 2021 U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan also signed the letter, which praised Trump’s foreign policy record in contrast to Biden’s controversial actions. 

‘When President Trump took office, the war in Afghanistan had dragged on for almost 16 years. By February 2020, a peace agreement was reached, ensuring no American soldier was killed in combat until the end of the Trump Administration. This agreement held strong because the Taliban understood President Trump’s resolve and U.S. forces were prepared to ensure their compliance,’ the letter reads.

‘The botched withdrawal from Afghanistan under the Biden-Harris Administration in 2021, led to the unnecessary deaths of thirteen brave American troops at Abbey Gate and left untold billions of dollars of high grade military equipment to the Taliban, making it the most well-armed terror organization in the world.’

Additionally, 40 retired U.S. ambassadors, 75 retired senior military officers and several hundred officials from previous Republican administrations signed the letter, praising Trump’s diplomatic efforts on cease-fire agreements between Turkey and Kurdish fighters in Syria and the Abraham Accords. The letter refers to Trump as a ‘peacemaker.’ 

‘Securing peace is in the greatest tradition of American foreign policy and the Judeo-Christian principles upon which our nation was founded,’ the letter continues before quoting from Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew. ‘Jesus said, ‘blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be sons of God.’ (Matthew 5:9) Such is the legacy of the Trump Administration.’

Writing on X, O’Brien said he was ‘honored’ to join his colleagues from the Trump administration in ‘supporting a return to a ‘peace through strength’ foreign policy under President Trump.’

Another signatory, Dr. Jerry Hendrix, former director of the Secretary of the Navy’s Advisory Panel, said it ‘wasn’t a hard decision’ to attach his name to the letter.

‘Trump had 1 of the more successful foreign policy presidencies since the Cold War,’ Hendrix wrote on X. ‘He ended sequestration. He invested in the Navy. The Biden-Harris admin has been one foreign policy debacle after another.’ 

The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Starlink, the satellite internet service from SpaceX, is poised to become a crucial lifeline in parts of southern Appalachia that were devastated by Hurricane Helene.

The Biden administration has announced it is planning to deploy dozens of ground-based Starlink devices that connect with satellites to provide internet services to remote areas. And the company has said approximately 500 Starlink kits are being deployed by private individuals and organizations to help with the recovery efforts. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has said the company is waiving costs in affected areas. 

The connectivity comes as many communities remain cut off from phone and internet systems.

But with that connectivity has come a less-welcome element: politics. 

Former President Donald Trump said Monday that he’d spoken directly with Musk, one of his most ardent and high-profile supporters, about deploying Starlink to affected areas. That quickly drew a response from a Biden administration spokesperson who noted that the Federal Emergency Management Agency already had Starlink deliveries in place.

The brief exchange comes as the federal government’s response has drawn some scrutiny, with questions emerging about its readiness and placement of FEMA resources in advance of the storm. President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris visited the area Wednesday.

Though Musk has not directly tied Starlink to any criticisms of recovery efforts, he has appeared comfortable tying the internet satellite service to Trump, reposting on X the former president’s assertions that he had requested that Starlinks be sent and saying on Tuesday that Trump had alerted him to the need for additional Starlink terminals in North Carolina.

“Since the Hurricane Helene disaster, SpaceX has sent as many Starlink terminals as possible to help areas in need,” Musk wrote on X Tuesday. “Earlier today, @realDonaldTrump alerted me to additional people who need Starlink Internet in North Carolina. We are sending them terminals right away.”

It’s not the first time Musk has seemingly politicized access to Starlink in ways that critics say undermine the objectives of the Biden administration.  

Last year, the Ukrainian government, which has relied heavily on Starlink to help defend itself against Russia’s invasion, criticized Musk after learning he had reportedly sought to limit Starlink access for its forces. Musk gave his version of events in a series of posts on X. 

“The Starlink regions in question were not activated. SpaceX did not deactivate anything,” Musk said in a response to a thread on X about Ukraine’s claims, which were made in a book about the conflict. 

“There was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink all the way to Sevastopol,” he added, referring to Crimea’s largest city, which is home to Russia’s Black Sea fleet. 

“The obvious intent being to sink most of the Russian fleet at anchor,” Musk said. “If I had agreed to their request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation.”

Before that, Musk asked the U.S. government to take over funding Ukraine’s use of the network, suggesting SpaceX was going to take a huge financial loss on that deployment. In the end, the Pentagon agreed to purchase terminals from Musk for use in Ukraine.    

Musk has also been accused of undermining the ability of Taiwan, and U.S. forces stationed there, to access versions of the service. 

In February, Musk received a letter from the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party asking him why U.S. troops stationed on Taiwan weren’t able to access StarShield, which experts describe as a militarized version of Starlink. Musk replied that he was in full compliance with his Pentagon contract, and SpaceX denied the House’s claim. 

According to a CNN report, SpaceX subsequently insisted on majority ownership of a Starlink-based venture requested by Taiwan, a proposal the island nation rejected, calling it incompatible with its laws. Taiwanese officials also questioned the impact from Musk’s commercial ties to China, where his Tesla electric car company operates an assembly plant and where he is also building a new Gigafactory.

“What if we relied on Starlink and Musk decided to cut down because of pressure from China, because he has China’s market at stake?” Yisuo Tzeng, a researcher at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a think tank funded by Taiwan’s defense ministry, told the Times. “We have to take that into consideration.”        

Yearslong momentum in Washington toward privatizing America’s space industry has deeply linked Musk’s entities with the U.S. government. NASA recently tapped SpaceX to ferry two astronauts stranded aboard the International Space Station at a rendezvous currently scheduled for February.  

In addition to Starlink and SpaceX, Musk also owns Tesla and X, formerly Twitter — and he has bragged about the power he now exerts. 

“Between Tesla, Starlink & Twitter, I may have more real-time global economic data in one head than anyone ever,” Musk posted on X last year.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS