Author

admin

Browsing

Rep. Eugene Vindman, D-Va., is demanding that President Donald Trump release a 2019 call with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, saying the American people ‘deserve to know what was said’ in the aftermath of Jamal Khashoggi’s murder.

Vindman, a retired Army colonel who once served on Trump’s National Security Council, said the call was one of two that deeply concerned him — the other being the 2019 conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that triggered Trump’s first impeachment. 

Standing beside Hanan Elatr Khashoggi, the slain journalist’s widow, Vindman said Trump ‘sidelined his own intelligence community to shield a foreign leader’ and that transparency is owed to both the Khashoggi family and the country.

‘The Khashoggi family and the American people deserve to know what was said on that call,’ Vindman said Friday. ‘Our intelligence agencies concluded that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered the murder of Mr. Khashoggi’s husband. When the president sidelined his own intelligence community to shield a foreign leader, America’s credibility was at stake.’

Vindman’s name already is polarizing in Trump-era politics. 

He and his twin brother, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, became central figures in the first impeachment attempt against Trump, when their internal reporting of Trump’s Ukraine call led to accusations from conservatives that they had undermined an elected president. To Trump’s allies, Eugene Vindman’s demand to release the 2019 Saudi call feels like a replay of that fight — another attempt by a former National Security Council insider to damage the president under the banner of transparency.

Still, his comments land at a revealing moment. Washington’s embrace of bin Salman underscores a familiar trade-off in U.S. foreign policy: strategic security and economic interests over accountability and human rights.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said: ‘The U.S.-Saudi friendship is now a partnership for the future. President Trump’s historic agreements with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from defense to investment, will create quality jobs for Americans and will grow our economy. No virtue-signaling. No lecturing. Only results for the American people.’

White House relations

Trump’s latest visit with bin Salman brought sweeping defense and investment deals, even as questions over 9/11 and Khashoggi’s murder continue to test that balance. The United States granted Saudi Arabia major non-NATO ally status, formally elevating the kingdom’s defense and intelligence partnership with Washington and clearing the way for expedited arms sales and joint military programs.

Bin Salman also pledged nearly $1 trillion in new Saudi investments across U.S. industries, including infrastructure, artificial intelligence and clean energy. The commitments were announced alongside a Strategic Defense Agreement that includes purchases of F-35 fighter jets, roughly 300 Abrams tanks and new missile defense systems, as well as joint ventures to expand manufacturing inside Saudi Arabia.

Administration officials said the initiatives would create tens of thousands of American jobs and strengthen the U.S. industrial base.

During his appearance with Trump at the White House, reporters shouted questions about Saudi Arabia’s alleged role in the Sept. 11 attacks and the 2018 killing of Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul — marking a rare moment of public pressure on the crown prince, who typically avoids unscripted exchanges with the press.

Trump accused the press of trying to ’embarrass’ his guest, but the crown prince offered what sounded like regret for the killing of Khashoggi, even as he denied involvement.

‘A lot of people didn’t like that gentleman that you’re talking about,’ Trump said. ‘Whether you like him or don’t like him, things happen, but he knew nothing about it … We can leave it at that. You don’t have to embarrass our guest by asking a question like that.’

ABC reporter Mary Bruce had told bin Salman that U.S. intelligence determined he’d signed off on the killing and that 9/11 families were ‘furious’ about his presence in the White House. ‘Why should Americans trust you?’

‘It’s been painful for us in Saudi Arabia,’ bin Salman said of the killing, calling it ‘a huge mistake.’ ‘We’ve improved our system to be sure that nothing happens like that again,’ he added.

A 2021 report by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence stated: ‘We assess that Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman approved an operation in Istanbul, Turkey, to capture or kill Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.’ 

Bin Salman has repeatedly denied approving the killing, though he said in 2019, ‘It happened under my watch, I take full responsibility as a leader.’

Sept. 11, 2001

The question of Saudi Arabia’s involvement in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks remains one of the most sensitive and unresolved issues in the U.S.-Saudi relationship. While 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals, the U.S. government has never concluded that the Saudi state or senior Saudi officials had prior knowledge of or directed the attacks.

Families of 9/11 victims condemned bin Salman after he invoked Osama bin Laden during his White House remarks, saying the al-Qaeda leader used Saudi nationals to drive a wedge between Washington and Riyadh.

‘We have to focus on reality,’ the crown prince said. ‘Reality is that Osama bin Laden used Saudi people in that event for one main purpose: to destroy the American–Saudi relationship. That’s the purpose of 9/11.’

‘The Saudi crown prince invoking Osama bin Laden this afternoon in the White House does not change the fact that a federal judge in New York ruled a few short months ago that Saudi Arabia must stand trial for its role in the 9/11 terrorist attacks that murdered 3,000 of our loved ones,’ said Brett Eagleson, president of 9/11 Justice, a group representing victims’ families.

In August 2025, U.S. District Judge George B. Daniels issued a landmark ruling bringing Saudi Arabia under U.S. federal jurisdiction for a 9/11 trial. The court found evidence of a network of Saudi officials inside the U.S. who allegedly provided logistical support to the hijackers, citing ‘prior planning’ and ‘constant coordination.’ 

Among the materials described in the ruling was a drawing seized from a Saudi government operative showing an airplane with flight-path equations — evidence prosecutors said suggested advance knowledge of the attacks.

Saudi Arabia has denied any role, calling the allegations ‘categorically false.’ 

But for bin Salman, who came to Washington seeking to highlight new security and economic ties, the families’ sharp rebuke was a reminder that the 9/11 case still looms large in the public eye, even as the Trump administration deepens its partnership with Riyadh.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

SOUTH BEND, IN – Notre Dame football star Jeremiyah Love, fresh off a 70-7 Senior Day shellacking of Syracuse, allowed himself the slightest of knowing smiles as he considered a tasty hypothetical Saturday evening.

Should the ninth-ranked Irish make it back to the College Football Playoff, just how dangerous might they be?

“I mean, we’re a very dangerous team,” Love said. “I feel like we have all the things that we need in order to have success.”

Running game? Check.

Passing game? Check.

Airtight blocking? Check.

Ball-hawking secondary? Two more pick-sixes in the first 5:17 on Saturday gave the Irish three of those in a span of five quarters.

Run-stuffing defense? Yep, that’s there too.

And so, after his 171 rushing yards and three touchdowns on just eight carries — EIGHT! — Love spoke on behalf of America’s growing college football storm.

“I feel like we match up well with pretty much anybody,” said Love, who tied Jerome Bettis’ 34-year-old program record for most scrimmage touchdowns (20) in a season. “We can play with anybody. We’ll go and compete against anybody. We’re not scared or anything like that.”

Why should they be? Since the bucket of ice-cold water that was the Northern Illinois loss way back in Week 2 of 2024, Notre Dame has lost just three games by a combined 15 points.

That includes a 34-23 loss to Ohio State in last year’s CFP title game.

You know all about this year’s 0-2 start at Miami and at home against Texas A&M and how just four points kept the Irish from taking those teams into overtime.

But what about this stat: In its past 23 de facto elimination games, coach Marcus Freeman’s Irish are 22-1.

Last year’s 13-game winning streak that got them back to Atlanta for the final could yet be surpassed over the next two months. It would take 14 straight wins for the Irish to run the table and end a national championship drought that dates back to 1988.

Jeremiyah Love says Notre Dame can ‘compete with anybody’

Love, making a serious bid at ending the school’s Heisman Trophy drought that goes back one additional year (1987), sounds confident that’s exactly what might happen.

“We’re going to put our best foot forward, no matter who we’re playing,” he said. “As for who we’re playing, we don’t know. We still have one more game to play (at Stanford) to finish out the season strong.

“There’s no guarantee that we’ll be in the playoffs as of right now. We still have business to handle. But if we are to make it that far, we believe in our ability to compete with anybody.”

Top-ranked Ohio State? The Irish have lost to them three straight years, but do you really think Buckeyes coach Ryan Day wants to see Freeman’s club across the way in a potential Rose Bowl quarterfinal?  

Second-ranked Indiana? Curt Cignetti’s second edition feels more legitimate than the Cinderella story that ended last December in a first-round game at Notre Dame Stadium, but the Irish were up 27-3 at one point before taking their foot off the gas.

The third-ranked Aggies? Only a botched hold kept that instant classic from going to extras back on Sept. 13.

Dynastic Georgia, putting it all together again for a possible third national title in five seasons under coach Kirby Smart? Notre Dame has the fortifying memory of a 23-13 win over the Bulldogs in last season’s Sugar Bowl quarterfinal of the CFP.

Not bad, ‘Team B’, not bad at all

Sure, Syracuse is playing out the string after an injury-filled season, but the 3-8 Orange are still an ACC member.

And Notre Dame, aka “Team B” in ACC social-media account parlance, came within seven exasperating seconds of finishing off its first shutout in 42 games, dating back to a 44-0 win over Boston College in the Senior Day snow of 2022.

That says plenty, no matter how many lacrosse players Syracuse had taking snaps on this unseasonably warm afternoon. This was the worst loss for the Orange since a 66-0 final against Union College in 1893.

Two years before that, the Schenectady, N.Y., power beat Syracuse 75-0, so this was the second-most points allowed in program history.

So the modern Irish have taken their place alongside a school that now plays at the Division III level. The Garnet Chargers (née Dutchmen) have an NCAA playoff game Sunday against Muhlenberg.

Before Saturday’s play, 10 FBS teams had pounded an opponent this season by 63 points or more. Just one of those victims was a Power Four foe: Oklahoma State, a 69-3 loser at Oregon on Sept. 6.

The other nine losing teams on that 2025 list: Northwestern State (twice), East Texas A&M, Louisiana-Monroe, Indiana State, Grambling State, Portland State, Akron and Alcorn State. Of those, only two play at the FBS level (ULM and Akron).

For Notre Dame to roar out to a 35-0 lead after just 11 minutes was one thing. That tied the 1921 team’s fast start against Kalamazoo College for most first-quarter points in program history.

For the Irish to keep the hammer down and nearly eclipse the 1932 win over Haskell Institute (73-0) for largest scoring output in Notre Dame Stadium history, well, that’s another level of warning to a wide-open CFP landscape.  

“We’ll go with both feet on the gas pedal, actually,” Love said. “Whenever that time is that time, we’ll be ready.”

Mike Berardino covers Notre Dame football for the South Bend Tribune and NDInsider.com. Follow him on social media @MikeBerardino.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Kansas State football coach Chris Klieman choked up multiple times and had to be comforted by athletic director Gene Taylor during his postgame news conference following the Wildcats’ heartbreaking 51-47 loss to No. 12 Utah on Saturday in Salt Lake City.

A three-minute opening statement started with Klieman calling the Wildcats’ effort the greatest he’s ever been a part of, and made reference to the calls for his job amid what’s been a disappointing season.

After three minutes, Klieman sat back in his chair and tried to gather himself. Taylor walked up to Klieman and put his arm around him.

‘You ain’t going anywhere, bud,’ Taylor said, overheard on the microphone. ‘Understand that. We’ve got your back. We’ve got your back.’

Kansas State dropped to 5-6 overall and 4-4 in Big 12 play with the defeat, when many expected the Wildcats to compete for a conference title in 2025. The Wildcats have been ravaged by injuries, but they showed in Saturday’s defeat they’re still fighting plenty. They can earn bowl eligibility when they host Colorado on Nov. 29 at Bill Snyder Family Stadium.

The Wildcats gained 574 yards of offense against the Utes, with a program-record 472 coming on the ground. Joe Jackson set the program single-game record with 293 yards and three touchdowns.

Utah erased a 12-point deficit in the final seven minutes, with Devon Dampier running in a 1-yard touchdown with 56 seconds left for the game-winner.

‘I’d go to friggin’ battle with these kids any day,’ Klieman said. ‘That was a top-10 team in the country, one of the best offenses and defenses in the country that we just rushed for 472 yards on because we told the guys we were going to commit to running the football, we told the guys to buy into and believe in it.

‘Our kids bought into it, and we stuffed it down their throat the entire game, and we lost. I’m crushed because of that, but I’m gonna stand up here with my friggin’ pride and say that we’ve battled our ass off against a really good team and I’m crushed.’

What is Chris Klieman’s buyout?

Klieman has one regular-season game remaining in his seventh season as the Wildcats’ coach. A bowl appearance would be the program’s fifth-straight. Klieman is signed through the 2032 season, and if he were to be bought out after the season, he’d be owed nearly $30 million.

Wyatt D. Wheeler covers Kansas State athletics for the USA TODAY Network and Topeka Capital-Journal. You can follow him on X at @WyattWheeler_, contact him at 417-371-6987 or email him at wwheeler@usatodayco.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama are polar opposites in many ways, but, as with anyone who has sat behind the Resolute Desk, they do share some similarities.

One thing both have in common is overseeing government shutdowns — one under Obama and two under Trump. And even in that sparse similarity, both men operated differently, particularly in the most recent, 43-day closure.

While both congressional battles were centered on Obamacare, Obama put his shutdown at the center of attention, while Trump kept it at more of an arm’s length.

Romina Boccia, director of budget and entitlement policy at the Cato Institute, told Fox News Digital that a major difference in the Obama and Trump administrations’ approaches to their respective shutdowns was that in 2013, Obama wanted the pain of shutdown to be felt by Americans, while Trump kept the focus centered on Washington, D.C.

‘During the Obama shutdown, it was more to make it extremely visible, shut down beloved functions — even if you didn’t have to — that affect average Americans,’ she said.

Boccia at the time worked for the conservative think-tank the Heritage Foundation and recalled the barricades that were swiftly erected around Washington, D.C.’s many national parks.

Those barricades, both concrete and human, spilled out beyond the nation’s capital and were placed around the hundreds of national parks across America as a stark reminder that the government was closed.

Boccia noted that a direct comparison of the two shutdowns would be difficult given the differing lengths, but that the Trump administration, at least early on, sought to inflict direct pain on congressional Democrats and the federal government.

That was carried out largely by the Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought, who ordered mass firings of furloughed workers and withheld or canceled billions in federal funding to blue cities and states.

‘It’s not that this wasn’t a shutdown, it’s just that the choices the administration made were an attempt to focus the impacts of the shutdown this round on the government itself,’ Brittany Madni, executive vice president of the Economic Policy Innovation Center, told Fox News Digital.

‘This was showmanship from President Obama,’ Madni continued. ‘And if you look at what happened over the last 40 something days, it was the exact same playbook by congressional Democrats.’

Madni argued that discussions and debate during the 2013 shutdown were centered largely in Washington, D.C. The latest closure saw some of that, but it also saw Trump continuing to work on trade deals, particularly during his high-profile visit to Asia, which was a point of contention for Democrats on the Hill.

‘He was doing his job,’ Madni said. ‘He was doing his job. Meanwhile, congressional Democrats, quite simply, were not.’

Still, there was a shared thread in both shutdowns: Obamacare.

In 2013, congressional Republicans wanted to dismantle Obama’s signature piece of legislation. Fast-forward, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., led his caucus to push extensions to enhanced Obamacare subsidies.

Boccia said that played a large part in why Obama was at the vanguard during his shutdown.

‘He was front and center in the media talking about the shutdown, and because it was over his legacy achievement,’ she said.

It was because his key legislative achievement was under fire that Obama took such a central role in the shutdown, Boccia argued, but for Trump, who tried during his first administration to gut and replace Obamacare, it wasn’t a priority.

‘The fact that it was over the Obamacare COVID credits, I think, made the president less necessary and perhaps interested in being the face of the shutdown,’ she said. ‘It was really a congressional battle.’

Madni disagreed that the latest shutdown wasn’t a direct bid by congressional Democrats to go after one of his legislative achievements.

Before the climactic failed vote in the Senate in late September that ushered in the longest shutdown in history, Democrats offered a counter-proposal that would have stripped several provisions from Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill,’ which has so far been the crowning legislative achievement of his second term.

‘It’s really important that everyone remembers the subsidy request was one request in a laundry list of radical, incredibly expensive ideas that added up to $1.5 trillion,’ Madni said. ‘Another item in that list was dismantling key portions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.’

‘If this was really about the subsidies, then the Democrats would have been willing at any point during the last 43 days to adjust their asks and just make it about subsidies,’ she continued. ‘Not once did they.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump’s administration is rejecting claims that its most recent plan for a peace deal in Ukraine was really a Russian ‘wish list.’

Confusion arose regarding the deal after lawmakers on Capitol Hill claimed they were told by White House officials that the deal was a proposal from the Russian side. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has since pushed back on that claim, however.

‘[Rubio] made it very clear to us that we are the recipients of a proposal that was delivered to one of our representatives,’ Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said at a press conference. ‘It is not our recommendation. It is not our peace plan. It is a proposal that was received, and as an intermediary, we have made arrangements to share it — and we did not release it. It was leaked.’

According to The Associated Press, Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, said that Rubio told him and his colleagues that it ‘was not the administration’s plan’ but a ‘wish list of the Russians.’

Rubio responded to this narrative with a post on social media, writing that the peace proposal ‘was authored by the U.S.’

‘It is offered as a strong framework for ongoing negotiations. It is based on input from the Russian side. But it is also based on previous and ongoing input from Ukraine,’ he added.

Rounds released another statement through his press office after Rubio’s response.

‘I appreciate Secretary Rubio briefing us earlier today on their efforts to bring about peace by relying on input from both Russia and Ukraine to arrive at a final deal,’ Rounds wrote.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.

Rubio traveled to Geneva on Sunday to meet with Ukrainian officials alongside Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, where they are expected to hash out Kyiv’s misgivings regarding the deal.

Trump himself lashed out at Ukraine over the peace talks in a Sunday statement.

‘UKRAINE ‘LEADERSHIP’ HAS EXPRESSED ZERO GRATITUDE FOR OUR EFFORTS, AND EUROPE CONTINUES TO BUY OIL FROM RUSSIA,’ Trump wrote on Truth Social.

While the current agreement has not been made public, a leaked draft has been reported to include terms that would halt the fighting in Ukraine while giving Russia concessions like control over Ukrainian territory that the Russian military does not yet control, as well as barring Ukraine from membership in NATO.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy did not reject the plan outright in an address last week, but he insisted on fair treatment while pledging to ‘work calmly’ with Washington and other partners in what he called ‘truly one of the most difficult moments in our history.’

Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

In a stunning overnight development, the top two drivers in the 2025 Formula 1 points standings were disqualified from Saturday’s Las Vegas Grand Prix.

McLaren teammates Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri were stripped of their places in the standings and the accompanying points when stewards determined five hours after the finish of the Saturday, Nov. 22 race that they both had excessive skid plank wear.

Norris, who finished second to winner Max Verstappen, had his lead in the overall standings cut to 24 points, while Piastri, who came in fourth, is now tied with Verstappen with only two races remaining in the 2025 season.

‘It’s frustrating to lose so many points,’ Norris said in a team statement.

‘As a team, we’re always pushing to find as much performance as we can, and we clearly didn’t get that balance right today. Nothing I can do will change that now, instead full focus switches to Qatar, where we’ll aim to go out and deliver the best possible performance in every session.’

Verstappen has now won four of the seven races since the circuit returned from its summer break, turning what looked like Norris’ cruise to a season-long title into a potentially nail-biting finish.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Style points don’t matter for No. 8 Oklahoma.

Last week’s win against No. 10 Alabama bumped the Sooners into at-large position and made things very simple heading into games against No. 22 Missouri and LSU to end the regular season. Just win — by a point, by a touchdown, by five touchdowns — and make the College Football Playoff.

One game down, one more to go. While not pretty, the Sooners beat Missouri 17-6 thanks to an inspired performance from a defense that forced two turnovers and allowed just 4.2 yards per play.

That offset more weak production from the offense and quarterback John Mateer, who completed 14 of 30 attempts for 173 yards and has topped 200 passing yards just once in his past four games. Mateer did add a team-high 60 rushing yards and had two touchdowns passes without an interception for the first time this season.

Down the line, this offensive mediocrity will limit the Sooners’ ability to win one playoff game, let alone stack wins and advance to the national semifinals. Oklahoma hasn’t gained more than 359 yards in an SEC game and has topped 400 yards against just one Power Four opponent – No. 17 Michigan.

But that’s a down-the-road concern for a program more focused on nailing down double-digit wins for the first time as members of the SEC. And while struggling down the stretch, Missouri represents a much stiffer test than LSU, which has taken another step back since firing Brian Kelly.

Taking care of business put the Sooners atop Saturday’s biggest winners and losers:

Winners

Oregon

Hanging around the top of the playoff rankings despite having just one notable win — that would be two weeks ago against Iowa — No. 5 Oregon delivered a long-awaited statement by beating No. 16 Southern California 42-27 in a matchup with intense Big Ten and playoff implications. With the win, the Ducks are likely locked into an at-large berth and would even sneak into a rematch against No. 2 Indiana should No. 1 Ohio State lose a fifth game in a row against No. 18 Michigan. The defense forced a pair of turnovers, allowed just 1.8 yards per carry and slowed down prolific wide receiver Makai Lemon, who had seven receptions and two scores but only 34 yards. With 257 yards and two touchdowns, Dante Moore paced a balanced offense that averaged 8.6 yards per pass attempt with 179 rushing yards.

Brigham Young

No. 11 Brigham Young pushed around Cincinnati to the tune of 265 rushing yards on 49 carries in a 26-14 win that achieves two ends: one, the Cougars are still on track to have one loss when they rematch with No. 7 Texas Tech in the Big 12 championship game; and two, the playoff committee will have to be impressed by a controlling win against an opponent recently in their rankings, which might help BYU stick around in the at-large conversation even with a second loss to the Red Raiders. The Cougars had possession for over 38 minutes, slowing a Cincinnati offense that averaged 6.3 yards per play but turned the ball over twice.

SMU

Like last year, SMU is surging through the finish line of the regular season. Facing off against slumping Louisville, the Mustangs allowed just 228 yards and Kevin Jennings had four combined scores in an easy 38-6 win. Even better news came later on Saturday with No. 12 Georgia Tech’s loss to Pittsburgh, giving the Yellow Jackets two ACC losses. That means SMU will face off against No. 19 Virginia in the conference championship game with a win against California.

Notre Dame

Leaving nothing to chance, No. 9 Notre Dame returned two interceptions and a blocked punt for touchdowns as part of a 35-point first quarter and smashed Syracuse 70-7 to inch closer to an at-large playoff berth. Amid minor concerns that Miami could leapfrog ahead in the playoff rankings because of September’s head-to-head win, the Fighting Irish looked the part of a genuine championship contender against one of the biggest disappointments in a deeply disappointing ACC. Running back Jeremiyah Love continued to make a steady run toward the Heisman Trophy ceremony with 171 yards and three scores on 21.4 yards per carry.

Diego Pavia

While Love might get squeezed out of the mix as a Heisman finalist, Pavia seems locked into a trip to Manhattan after leading No. 13 Vanderbilt to a 45-17 win against Kentucky by completing 32 of 38 attempts for 484 yards and four touchdowns with a team-high 48 yards and a score on the ground. The senior is virtually assured of becoming the Commodores’ highest Heisman finisher since Carl Hinkle placed seventh in 1937 and could end up taking home the award with another brilliant performance next weekend against No. 20 Tennessee.

Tulane

No. 25 Tulane comes in third among Group of Five teams in the US LBM Coaches Poll but leads the way at No. 24 in the playoff rankings, giving the Green Wave the inside track for the Group of Five’s automatic spot. While getting there will eventually require a win in the conference championship game, Tulane escaped a sneaky test at Temple with a 37-13 victory and are only a matchup against hapless Charlotte away from playing for the American crown for the fourth year in a row.

Losers

Southern California

Losing in Autzen Stadium ends the Trojans’ Big Ten and playoff hopes. There was a slim path to a matchup against Indiana: USC had to win on Saturday, win again next week against UCLA and then have Michigan beat Ohio State. Now with three losses, the Trojans are not a serious contender for an at-large spot and must begin looking ahead to a vitally important transfer-portal season to continue building a deeper roster. In the end, losses to Notre Dame and the Ducks won’t be what ruined USC this season — the big miss was a 34-32 loss on a last-second field goal to Illinois earlier in Big Ten play.

Georgia Tech

In one of the biggest regular-season games for this program in years, Georgia Tech fell behind 28-0 early in the second quarter but rallied to within a touchdown late in the fourth quarter before taking a 42-28 loss. A second conference loss down the stretch knocks the Yellow Jackets out of the ACC championship game and virtually out of the playoff picture entirely heading into the rivalry against No. 4 Georgia. It wasn’t too long ago that Tech seemed like one of the surest bets for the bracket.

James Madison

Three explosive scoring plays — a 37-yard interception return, a 68-yard touchdown pass and a 58-yard touchdown run — helped No. 21 James Madison beat Washington State 24-20 to avoid what would’ve been a crippling loss for the Dukes’ playoff hopes. Though better than the alternative, the nature of the win might be too much to overcome: WSU was very competitive in games against No. 6 Mississippi and Virginia but did lose 59-10 earlier this season to North Texas, one of four teams in contention for the American championship. In the case where JMU and UNT are the two teams under consideration for the Group of Five’s playoff bid, this result would be another factor in favor of the Mean Green and the American.

North Carolina

Leading rival Duke 25-24 after making a fourth-down stop with about nine minutes to play, North Carolina went three-and-out to hand the ball right back to the Blue Devils and then gave up an 11-play, 67-yard touchdown drive to lose 32-25 and guarantee that Bill Belichick’s trainwreck debut will fall short of bowl play. (Join in a round of applause for Duke coach Manny Diaz and the design of a fake field goal that set up the Blue Devils’ winning score.) This will be the first year out of the postseason since 2019 for the Tar Heels, who won at least six games in all six seasons under former coach Mack Brown.

Baylor

Days after Baylor gave coach Dave Aranda a public vote of confidence in announcing he’d return for the 2026 season, the Bears were bulldozed during Arizona’s furious fourth quarter and suffered a demoralizing 41-17 loss to remain on the precipice of bowl eligibility heading into the finale against No. 24 Houston. Blame for four losses in five games falls squarely on the defense: Baylor allowed at least 41 points in all four setbacks, at least 34 points in five of six games and at least 27 points in seven of eight conference games.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Heading into Thanksgiving, Major League Baseball’s free agent market is still taking shape ahead of the annual winter meetings.

Outfielder Kyle Tucker is widely considered the best player available and could end up signing a deal north of $400 million. Other impact bats include Alex Bregman, Bo Bichette and Pete Alonso, while Framber Valdez, Dylan Cease, Zac Gallen and Ranger Suarez are among the top pitchers in the class.

USA TODAY Sports’ MLB team made our official winter predictions earlier in November and will stand by those picks, but here’s why one of us thought – and still thinks – the way we did about a couple of those things:

Orioles will sign a higher-end starter

Coming off back-to-back postseason trips a year ago, the Orioles drew widespread condemnation in the Old Line State for their winter inactivity. They proceeded to finish in last place, firing manager Brandon Hyde along the way and the Orioles Project now comes to a crossroads in 2026.

It was admittedly David Rubenstein’s first offseason as an owner so perhaps the boss could be forgiven if he splashes some cash to make an impact signing this winter.

The Orioles are expected to pursue some of the top starting pitchers on the market, namely lefty Framber Valdez and right-hander Dylan Cease, and a signing or two may signal that Baltimore is now open for business.

Edwin Diaz will leave the Mets

Six years after joining the team in a trade that this columnist foolishly said would go down as one of the worst in franchise history, Diaz is fourth on the Mets’ all-time saves list and has become something of a cultural icon across sports for his bullpen entry.

A free agent for the second time in four winters, Diaz opted out of the final two years of the record-breaking deal he signed to stay in Flushing late in 2022. He missed the entire 2023 season after a fluke injury in the World Baseball Classic, overcame rust in his 2024 return to get the Mets to the NLCS and then won his second NL Reliever of the Year award for the Mets in 2025.

But maybe it’s best for everybody to say goodbye?

There was consensus on Diaz’s last nine-figure contract but he’s three years older now and chasing another deal in the $85-105 million range. David Stearns would surely love to reinvest in multiple relievers as the Mets pick up the pieces following a disaster finish.

Diaz won’t be without high-level suitors as the Los Angeles Dodgers and Toronto Blue Jays should both be in the market for a top reliever. Would the 31-year-old sign on if he wasn’t guaranteed the ninth inning?

MLB free agent predictions

Here’s what USA TODAY Sports’ MLB writers and editors predicted for the winter’s top free agents back on Nov. 9:

Kyle Tucker, OF, Cubs

  • Bob Nightengale: Blue Jays
  • Gabe Lacques: Yankees
  • Jesse Yomtov: Dodgers

Bo Bichette, SS, Blue Jays

  • Nightengale: Atlanta
  • Lacques: Blue Jays
  • Yomtov: Blue Jays

Alex Bregman, 3B, Red Sox

  • Nightengale: Red Sox
  • Lacques: Cubs
  • Yomtov: Red Sox

Framber Valdez, LHP, Astros

  • Nightengale: Blue Jays
  • Lacques: Giants
  • Yomtov: Orioles

Pete Alonso, 1B, Mets

  • Nightengale: Red Sox
  • Lacques: Mets
  • Yomtov: Mets

Cody Bellinger, OF/1B, Yankees

  • Nightengale: Yankees
  • Lacques: Diamondbacks
  • Yomtov: Giants

Kyle Schwarber, DH, Phillies

  • Nightengale: Phillies
  • Lacques: Phillies
  • Yomtov: Phillies

Dylan Cease, RHP, Padres

  • Nightengale: Atlanta
  • Lacques: Orioles
  • Yomtov: Giants

Zac Gallen, RHP, Diamondbacks

  • Nightengale: Mets
  • Lacques: Phillies
  • Yomtov: Mets

Edwin Diaz, RHP, Mets

  • Nightengale: Mets
  • Lacques: Dodgers
  • Yomtov: Blue Jays

Ranger Suarez, LHP, Phillies

  • Nightengale: Cubs
  • Lacques: Tigers
  • Yomtov: Cubs
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Saints LB Demario Davis is participating in the NFL’s ‘My Cause My Cleats’ campaign to promote the philanthropic organization Stand Together.
  • The ‘My Cause My Cleats’ campaign involves over 1,800 NFL participants highlighting various social causes.

As much as Demario Davis is all-in for the monumental rebuilding task confronting the New Orleans Saints, the veteran linebacker carries on with another mission, too.

Davis sees football as a means to a larger purpose.

“I think it’s a responsibility of humanity to look out for your fellow man,” Davis, 36, told USA TODAY Sports. “I also believe that to sit in the seat that I’m in, to whom much is given, much is required.”

Davis explained the motivation behind his extensive track record for community service against the backdrop of the NFL’s annual My Cause My Cleats campaign. He’s one of more than 1,800 participants – players, coaches, staff, even on-air TV personalities – who will wear cleats or sneakers during Week 12 and Week 13 that highlight social issues and nonprofit organizations. The shoes will be auctioned, with proceeds donated to each individual’s selected cause.

When Davis lines up against the Atlanta Falcons on Sunday at the Mercedes-Benz Superdome, his cleats will promote Stand Together, a philanthropic organization that assists a multitude of social causes and organizations committed to community service.

From Devoted Dreamers to Stand Together, Davis dreams big for impact

A 14th-year NFL veteran, Davis established a foundation with his wife, Tamela, shortly after his pro career began in 2012, that supports the development of youth through a wide array of programs. In 2020, Davis’ foundation aligned with Stand Together, which he said has been key to taking his vision for broader impact to a higher level.

“They’ve helped us realize that we can help the country,” Davis said, adding that Stand Together, based in Arlington, Virginia, works with more than 350 organizations in 600-plus communities nationwide.

Davis opened the Devoted Dreamers Academy in 2023, which supports youth with after-school enrichment programs, camps, conferences and the like, with a template that can be applied by other organizations. The academy’s name fits. Davis dreams big for impact.

“Someone took the time and invested in me,” said Davis, a devout Christian, alluding to the team chaplain at Arkansas State who helped him get back on track during a pivotal juncture in his life. “When you invest in other people, I realize how it can change the trajectory of their lives. To be somebody living out their dream, I want other people to live out their dreams as well.”

Over the years, Davis estimates that his foundation’s work – with a mission to provide spiritual, mental, academic, social and physical support – has touched more than 10,000 kids.

“Whatever the dreams are, they’re going to need the resources to do it,” said Davis, whose initial outreach included efforts in his home state of Mississippi. “We saw change that needed to happen in our communities and inside the school system and went to work at it in 2013, and now it’s been over a decade that we’ve been at that work.”

‘It’s the shoes, Homey!’ My Cause My Cleats’ purpose extends beyond football

It’s a noble purpose. Of course, Davis shares the spotlight with hundreds of others in the NFL universe who will highlight issues and organizations that they passionately care about. Given the level of participation, it is inspiring that My Cause My Cleats has routinely been one of the NFL’s most widely-supported community-service campaigns – complete with the elaborate creative art displayed on the cleats and sneakers.

To borrow an Air Jordan-influenced phrase from Spike Lee’s iconic character, Mars Blackmon: ‘It’s the shoes, Homey!’

Causes and organizations highlighted by other players include cancer prevention, mental health, social justice, military appreciation and disease awareness, among others.

“Although the cleats are on my feet, it’s not about me,” said Davis, who has reflected a cause with his cleats in each year since 2017.  “The work is so much bigger than me. I’m using the cleats to highlight something going on around the nation, because that’s what it’s about. It’s about purpose.”

A larger purpose that goes far beyond football.

Contact Jarrett Bell at jbell@usatoday.com or follow on  X: @JarrettBell

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • The College Football Playoff selection committee’s lack of clear criteria is causing confusion.
  • Teams are running up scores in an attempt to impress the committee with the ‘eye test.’
  • Metrics like head-to-head results and strength of schedule appear to be inconsistently applied.

When there is no leadership, there are no rules. 

When there are no rules, there are no boundaries.

When there are no boundaries, well, Notre Dame scores 70 points on a team so devastated by injury, it’s using a former lacrosse player at quarterback. 

Or Vanderbilt plays star quarterback Diego Pavia during a 40-point rout of Kentucky, and keeps chucking it. 

Or Miami, having salted away a 10-point win over Virginia Tech, throws in the end zone in the final 90 seconds to make it 17.

All because no one knows what in the world the College Football Playoff selection committee wants. Or how it works. Or what it takes to earn one of the coveted seven at-large spots in the 12-team field. 

The committee chairman (whoever it is this week) says things like strength of schedule, game control, efficiency, net rate success and any of the many other nonsensical metric garbage it feeds the breathless looking for answers. 

When they know damn well this thing is about the eye test. And as confounding, its hand-in-hand buddy, the prisoner of the moment. 

It’s here where we introduce Oregon, the one team — more than any other — who’s resume has been built through the eye test and prisoner of the moment. Prior to Saturday, the Ducks had played one game of significance ― six weeks ago! ― and were embarrassed at home by Indiana. 

Not that getting embarrassed by Indiana is such a bad thing, but it most certainly still is a thing that can’t be ignored. Unless you’re one of 12 on the selection committee, which has ranked Oregon among the Top 10 since the first CFP poll earlier this month.

Why? We don’t know, but apparently it has something to do with a big road win at four-loss Iowa — which beat Michigan State on Saturday in Iowa City on a last-second field goal. 

The same Spartans that haven’t won a Big Ten game.

This brings us all the way to Oregon playing host to USC on Saturday, a game of two top-15 teams billed as “win or go home.” Or something like that. 

Why is USC in this spot, you ask? Well, USC beat Iowa, too, by three points in Los Angeles, and a week after Oregon won in Iowa City. 

Maybe the good folks at the CFP should start ranking Iowa in the top 15, by proxy. 

Anyway, I’m not done with USC just yet. The Trojans’ big win (outside of that juggernaut Iowa, of course) is Michigan. The same Michigan team whose entire existence this season is the inevitable Ohio State car wreck that may or may not be coming.

So the Wolverines have to be ranked, right? Forget about the loss to Oklahoma in September (in case those two are staring at each other in the final CFP poll), that was eons ago. Just like Notre Dame’s loss to Miami.

It’s not about head-to-head, dummy. It’s about whose losses are better, right Mr. Yurachek?

So Oregon rolls a decent USC team at home, and I’d be willing to bet a few matchsticks the one-loss Ducks will be ranked ahead of one-loss Ole Miss — despite Ole Miss’ win at top-10 Oklahoma, which beat Michigan, which lost to USC, which is now, apparently, the be-all, end-all for Oregon.

The problem for Ole Miss: It didn’t play this week, and other than Lane Kiffin’s self-made circus, is out-of-sight, out-of-mind for the committee. Unless it decides to start using the Kiffin kerfuffle against the Rebels, because a team with uncertainty at the top can’t be trusted.

Isn’t that right, selection committee?

The whole point of this selection committee exercise was to eliminate decades-old crutches used to pick the national champion, or the teams who play for the national championship.

Yet here we are, stuck in the past, with the same tired process shrouded in something called game control. And net YPP (yards per play). 

And any other nonsense they can shovel at us to avoid admitting there’s no leadership. No rules, no boundaries. 

And apparently, no need for the head-to-head metric. Or the one metric that should be used, but isn’t: Who have you beaten?

Oregon has beaten USC, which beat Michigan, which beat no one.

But buddy, that Ohio State game could change everything. 

Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY