Author

admin

Browsing

Forward Kayla Thornton may have been the last player picked in the WNBA All-Star Game draft, added to captain Caitlin Clark’s roster, but she’s certainly not the least. Clark said she’s had her eye on Thornton, much like the rest of the league as the expansion Golden State Valkyries have put everyone on notice in their inaugural season.

‘I wanted Kayla Thornton on my team. I think you got to give her a lot of credit for what Golden State accomplished this year,’ Clark said during the 2025 WNBA All-Star draft on July 8. ‘Obviously being an expansion team, you never know how it’s going to go. They’ve had an absolutely tremendous season and she’s had a tremendous season. I’m happy for her and excited for her. I’m glad she can be on our team.’

Thornton, who played her college ball at UTEP, picked up the first All-Star nod in her 10-year career after being named a reserve by the league’s 13 head coaches. With the selection, Thornton became the first player to be named an All-Star as a member of a first-year team since Candice Dupree did so with the Chicago Sky in 2006, further highlighting the Valkyries’ unprecedented start.

‘It’s a long time coming. I’m just thankful for my teammates,’ said Thornton, who is averaging 15.1 points, 7.1 rebounds and 1.3 assists in 19 games this season. ‘Without them I wouldn’t be an All-Star, without my coaches I wouldn’t be an All-Star. I’m just grateful.’

WNBA expansion teams haven’t gotten off to the best starts in recent years. The Atlanta Dream went 4-30 in their inaugural season in 2008. The Chicago Sky went 5-29 in 2006. The Indiana Fever went 9-23 in their first season in 2000. The Seattle Storm went 6-26 in 2000.

You get the point.

The Valkyries, however, are rewriting that narrative and have proven themselves early. Under the tutelage of head coach Natalie Nakase, Golden State has opened its first season 10-9 as the All-Star break quickly approaches. The Valkyries notched their 10th win of the season on the road against the newly-minted Commissioner’s Cup champion Indiana Fever Golden State’s second win of the season against the Fever to become only the third expansion team in WNBA history to pick up its 10th victory in 20 games or less.

‘From the outside looking in it’s great to hear all that positivity, but for us we hold the standard,’ Nakase said. ‘We set out to win every game.’

The Valkyries have succeeded with their grit and defensive prowess. Golden State ranks second in the WNBA in defensive rating (97.3 points allowed per 100 possessions), trailing only the league-leading Minnesota Lynx. The Valkyries top the WNBA in rebounding (37.4 per game) and have allowed opponents the fewest paint points per game (28.1).

Golden State has three players — Thornton, Tiffany Hayes and Veronica Burton — averaging double figure in scoring. Thornton also leads the Valkyries in rebounding with 7.1 a game.

Nakase has also leaned on her team’s championship experience and ability to compete early on. The Valkyries’ inaugural roster includes four WNBA champions  center Temi Fagbenle and forward Cecilia Zandalasini (Minnesota Lynx, 2017); center/forward Iliana Rupert (Las Vegas Aces, 2022) and Thornton (New York Liberty, 2024). ‘We’re a team of sixth women,” Fagbenle said. “We come from different teams around the league. We know what it takes to be great teammates and we know what it takes to step up and do what we need to do for the team to succeed.

‘That’s really the strength of our team.’ 

More history could be on the horizon for the Valkyries. Golden State is looking to become the first expansion team to make the playoffs in its inaugural season since the Detroit Shock in 1998.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Semenya is appealing against World Athletics regulations that female athletes with differences in sexual development (DSDs) medically reduce their testosterone levels.
  • The verdict of the Grand Chamber, part of the European Court of Human Rights, does not set aside these rules.
  • Semenya, 34, is not seeking a return to the track, but says she is carrying on the fight for other DSD athletes.

The Grand Chamber of the European Court on Thursday upheld a 2023 ruling that double 800-meter Olympic champion Caster Semenya’s appeal to a Swiss Federal Tribunal against regulations that barred her from competing had not been properly heard.

Semenya is appealing against World Athletics regulations that female athletes with differences in sexual development (DSDs) medically reduce their testosterone levels.

The verdict of the Grand Chamber, part of the European Court of Human Rights, does not set aside these rules.

Under World Athletics rules, female DSD athletes must lower their level of testosterone to below 2.5 nmol/L for at least six months to compete. This can be done medically or surgically.

Semenya, 34, is not seeking a return to the track and has turned to coaching, but says she is carrying on the fight for other DSD athletes, who she says are discriminated against.

The verdict, which does not give an opinion on the fairness of the regulations, opens the door for Semenya to continue her challenge to the regulations, which she says are discriminatory.

‘It’s a battle for human rights now,’ the South African recently told reporters. ‘It’s not about competing. It’s about putting athletes’ rights first. It’s about the protection of athletes.’

The Grand Chamber declared inadmissible Semenya’s complaint of violations to her right to privacy and effective remedy, or that she considers herself a victim of discrimination.

Semenya challenged the rules but lost at the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Switzerland in 2019 and again at the Swiss Supreme Court in 2020.

But the ECHR ruled in July 2023, by a majority of four votes to three, that Semenya’s original appeal to a Swiss Federal Tribunal against the regulations had not been properly heard.

The Swiss courts, encouraged by World Athletics, appealed that verdict to the ECHR Grand Chamber.

The case could now return to the Swiss courts, or possibly the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

World Athletics told Reuters on Thursday they had no comment on the ECHR case, which does not relate to their regulations, but they have previously denied any attempt to discriminate against athletes.

‘World Athletics has only ever been interested in protecting the female category. If we don’t, then women and young girls will not choose sport. That is, and has always been, the Federation’s sole motivation,’ the sports body said in a previous statement to Reuters.

‘We remain of the view that the DSD regulations are a necessary, reasonable and proportionate means of protecting fair competition in the female category as the Court of Arbitration for Sport and Swiss Federal Tribunal both found, after a detailed and expert assessment of the evidence.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

You won’t find much fighting among college football fans if they are told who has the best environment in North American sports.

It’s who has the toughest one where the punches are thrown.

In one of the most argumentative-driven sports, perhaps nothing gets the blood boiling − other than playoff rankings − more than trying to determine which stadium is the class of college football, and hardest to play in.

Home field advantage is what makes college football great. Crazed student sections, packed stadiums in football cathedrals with more than 100,000 people partaking in traditions while ensuring their team has the best possible chance to win, no matter the opposition.

EA Sports tasks itself with trying to determine the top 25 toughest stadiums to play in for its annual video game. For College Football 26, EA Sports gave the top honors to LSU’s Tiger Stadium, with Beaver Stadium (Penn State), Ohio Stadium (Ohio State), Sanford Stadium (Georgia) and Bryant-Denny Stadium (Alabama) rounding out the top five.

Is there a consensus agreement on it? Not even close.

The social media replies to EA Sports’ account are filled with people questioning the rankings, wondering how could it come to such a conclusion. Even Florida’s Swamp, ranked seventh, and Tennessee’s Neyland Stadium, ranked 12th.

They certainly have a point. There isn’t a correct or wrong way to determine the rankings, but there are statistics that back it up or disprove it. So, which stadium really is the toughest to be in?

How does EA Sports determine toughest stadiums?

What’s certain in the top 25 rankings is the stadium size and attendance. The nine biggest stadiums in the country are on the list, and 20 of the 26 largest college football stadiums by capacity made it. National success is also consistent with 27 of the past 29 national champions on it, which plays a role in the EA Sports rankings.

Ahead of College Football 25, EA Sports said there are several factors that are considered in the rankings, but more notable ones are home winning percentage, home game attendance, active home winning streaks and team prestige, among other factors. USA TODAY Sports reached out to EA Sports did n for more information into this year’s rankings.

Home stadium success

After stadium size, a great starting point would be a team’s history at home. Sixteen of the 25 teams with the best home winning percentage since 2004 made the rankings. Ohio State has the highest figure at a 91.6% win percentage (141-13) in that timeframe. In the top eight, only Boise State (89.2%) didn’t make it.

In it are:

  • Ohio State: 1st (91.6%, 141-13)
  • Oklahoma: 2nd (89.7%, 122-14)
  • Alabama: 4rd (87.7%, 135-19)
  • Georgia: 5th (86.9%, 119-18)
  • Clemson: 6th (86.6%, 129-20)
  • LSU: 7th (86%, 129-21)
  • Oregon: 8th (85.9%, 122-20)
  • Wisconsin: 13th (80.8%, 118-28)
  • Michigan: 14th (79.1%, 121-32)
  • Florida: 16th (78.2%, 111-31)
  • Penn State: 17th (77.8%, 119-34)
  • Utah: 18th (76.9%, 103-31)
  • Iowa: 20th (75%, 111-37)
  • Oklahoma State: 22nd (74.8%, 107-36)
  • Auburn: 24th (73.9%, 119-42)
  • Texas: 25th (73.9%, 102-36)

Meanwhile, the worst top 25 team on the list is Mississippi State. Their 58.2% win percentage (82-59) is 90th.

Comparing 2024 rankings to 2025

Another way it could be looked is what last year’s rankings and how it affected the 2025 edition. In College Football 25, Texas A&M had the top spot, followed by Alabama, LSU, Ohio State and Georgia.

Texas A&M went 5-2 at home, with two top 10 victories and two close losses to Notre Dame and Texas. Yet the Aggies dropped to No. 11 this year, the biggest fall in the rankings. Meanwhile, LSU rose from third to first after a 6-1 home record. However, that included the laugher against Alabama, when the Crimson Tide beat the Tigers so bad the stadium was emptying out early in the fourth quarter. At the top, plenty of cases could be made for who should be where.

There were moves that made sense. After the abysmal season, Florida State went ninth to 14th with a 2-5 home record, and Wisconsin’s 3-4 mark dropped it from seventh to 15th. Washington joined the party at No. 18 following a 6-0 mark at Husky Stadium.

Yet there were head-scratching decisions. Five teams on the list had perfect home records, but arguably the most questionable move is Alabama. It went from 7-0 at home in 2024, including wins over Georgia and Missouri, but went from second to fifth. Plus, Oklahoma State jumped into the rankings at No. 23, even though it went 2-4 at home with the wins against South Dakota State and Arkansas. Meanwhile, Boise State continued its blue turf dominance with a 7-0 record, yet completely fell out.

In total, there are six teams − Auburn, Utah, Wisconsin, Oklahoma State, Mississippi State and Florida State − that were .500 or worse at home in 2024 and still in the rankings. All dropped spots except for the Cowboys.

Margin of victory

Winning at home is necessary, but what really determines the strength of the home field advantage is how a team does it. When it comes to crushing teams, no one on the list did it better than Tennessee. Not only did the Volunteers go 7-0 at home, but they won by an average of 33.6 points at Neyland Stadium, second-best in the country behind Indiana. How was Tennessee rewarded? Moving up just one spot to No. 12. Sure, the Volunteers have won just 67.6% (100-48) of their home games since 2004, but it’s coming off a dominant season in Rocky Top.

Eight teams − Tennessee, Ohio State, Texas, Alabama, Penn State, Notre Dame, Georgia and Iowa − won by an average of at least 20 points at home, showing how they mostly dominated opponents. Four are in the top five, yet Iowa (19th) only moved up one spot, and Notre Dame (21st) didn’t move at all.

No. 1 LSU’s average margin was 10.4, 18th-best on the list. The Tigers were winning, but ‘Death Valley’ wasn’t a terror. At No. 14, Florida State had a -6.3 average margin, the worst on the list, yet it’s ahead of eight teams that were positive, including the Hawkeyes and Fighting Irish. Oklahoma State (-4), Mississippi State (-4.1) and Michigan State (-4.3) were the others with a negative margin.

Did EA Sports get stadium rankings right?

It’s anyone’s guess how EA Sports made its rankings, but it’s safe to say they aren’t the end-all-be-all list.

Based on these determinations, Alabama, Tennessee, Oregon, Texas should have been ranked higher, while LSU likely shouldn’t have the top spot. Teams like Florida State, Auburn and Utah should’ve seen more dramatic drops than Texas A&M.

The cowbells can be tough to play in, but it’s evident Mississippi State shouldn’t be on a list where the only wins with against Eastern Kentucky and Massachusetts. North Carolina State’s admission is questionable but Oklahoma State had zero business moving into the top 25, resulting in Boise State being wrongfully punished.

Of course, these opinions won’t be correct to everyone. Determining the toughest − not the best − stadium isn’t an easy task, but there’s data that certainly backs it up.

Think your team deserves to be higher? Then show up, be raucous and hope your team wins, and wins by a lot.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama chatted about golf during a viral moment of bipartisanship during former President Jimmy Carter’s funeral in January, just days before Trump’s return to the Oval Office, a new book detailing the unprecedented 2024 election cycle reported. 

Trump and Obama were seen smiling and quietly chatting with one another in the pews of the Washington National Cathedral on Jan. 9, 2025, in a moment that spread like wildfire on social media as Americans sounded off with speculation over what the pair of presidents who had long traded political barbs were talking about. 

‘2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America,’ which was released Tuesday, said that Trump arrived in Washington for Carter’s funeral as a ‘conqueror’ following the November 2024 election and sat next to Obama for the funeral service. 

‘He’d attended Jimmy Carter’s funeral, walking into Washington not as a scourge but as a conqueror,’ the book reported of Trump. ‘He could ignore the speech on character by the outgoing president, and the cold shoulder from the vice president he’d defeated.’

‘Instead he sat next to Barack Obama and invited him to play golf, enticing him with descriptions of Trump’s courses around the world,’ the book continued of the pair’s conversation. ‘He was no longer an anomaly. He was being treated like an American president. He wanted to be remembered as a great one.’

Trump and Obama were seated near other high-profile former U.S. leaders, including former President George W. Bush, former Vice President Mike Pence, former President Bill Clinton, former first lady and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as well as then-President Joe Biden and then-Vice President Kamala Harris.

Social media commenters at the time remarked that footage and video clips of the pair were unexpected, and others joked that Obama may have voted for Trump despite years of the pair trading political barbs. 

‘Trump and Obama sitting next to each other was not on the 2025 bingo card,’ one social media user posted to X in January. 

‘Did Obama vote for Trump too?!’ Clay Travis, founder of sports and politics commentary platform OutKick, joked at the time. 

‘We need lip readers to see what Trump said to make Obama laugh,’ another person posted to X in January. 

Trump was asked about the viral moment ahead of his inauguration, remarking that he ‘didn’t realize how friendly it looked.’

‘I said, ‘Boy, they look like two people that like each other.’ And we probably do,’ Trump added at the time. ‘We have a little different philosophies, right? But we probably do. I don’t know. We just got along. But I got along with just about everybody.’

Fox News Digital’s Kristine Parks contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Department of Justice leaders are facing sharp criticism and resignation calls from a faction of their supporters after they ended their inquiry into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking case without releasing new files.

The outrage, emanating largely from the right, can be tied to several past instances when those same leaders and other Republicans with large platforms once promoted the existence of incriminating, nonpublic Epstein case files, including a supposed list of sexual predators who were his clients.

Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino now say they have nothing further to share with the public about Epstein’s case.

In a joint, unsigned memo, the DOJ and FBI said Monday that after an exhaustive inquiry uncovering 300 gigabytes’ worth of material related to Epstein’s case, they found no signs of illegal activity by any new third parties. 

‘We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties,’ the memo read.

The memo stated that ‘much of the material’ related to the Epstein case was subject to court-ordered seals, prohibiting the DOJ from releasing it. The client list, a point of significant discourse, does not exist, the memo said.

Some of President Donald Trump’s supporters and Patel’s and Bongino’s massive fan bases are now making it clear that they expected more. Below are 10 possible reasons for that.

1. Kash Patel said House Republicans should release ‘Epstein’s list’ of ‘pedophiles.’ 

Right-wing commentator Benny Johnson asked Patel why the government had not released information about Epstein’s purported clients, according to a clip Johnson shared in December 2023, before Patel became FBI director.

‘Simple, because of who’s on that list,’ Patel replied. ‘You don’t think that Bill Gates is lobbying Congress night and day to prevent the disclosure of that list?’

Patel criticized the Republican-led House for failing to obtain ‘Epstein’s list.’

 ‘What the hell are the House Republicans doing? They have the majority. You can’t get the list?’ Patel asked, later adding, ‘We can’t even get basic documents out. This is why America hates Congress.’

‘Put on your big boy pants, and let us know who the pedophiles are,’ Patel said.

2. Kash Patel told Glenn Beck that the FBI director has ‘direct control’ of Epstein’s address book.

In an interview in December 2023, Patel addressed questions from BlazeTV host Glenn Beck about Epstein’s ‘black book.’ Patel said the FBI had the book.

‘That’s under direct control of the director of the FBI,’ the now-FBI director said.

Patel added, ‘That’s a thing I think President Trump should run on. On day one, roll out the black book.’

Epstein’s address books have long been a point of scrutiny. His house manager tried to sell one, according to a 2009 FBI affidavit. Gawker published one of the address books in 2015 with phone numbers redacted. That version contains hundreds of both well-known and obscure names. A judge allowed one of the address books to be entered under seal into the court record during his associate Ghislain Maxwell’s sex trafficking trial in 2021.

3. Trump told Fox News during his campaign that he plans to release the Epstein files.

When asked on ‘Fox & Friends Weekend’ last year if Trump would ‘declassify the Epstein files’ if he were elected president, Trump replied that he would.

‘Yeah, yeah I would. I guess I would,’ Trump said. ‘I think less so because you don’t know, you don’t want to affect people’s lives if it’s phony stuff in there, because there’s a lot of phony stuff with that whole world, but I think I would.’

On Tuesday during a Cabinet meeting, Trump brushed off the topic of Epstein when asked by a reporter about him.

‘Are people still talking about this guy, this creep?’ Trump said. ‘That is unbelievable.’

4. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., insisted there is a ‘list,’ even after the Bondi-led DOJ said otherwise.

‘What about her little black book? The 97-page book, contains the names and contact details of almost 2,000 people including world leaders, celebrities and businessmen,’ Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene wrote this week on X. ‘No one believes there is not a client list.’

The Miami Herald’s Julie Brown, who followed and reported on Epstein’s case for years, has said claims about the list are dubious.

‘There is no client list that I am aware of. My theory is it was something conspiracy theorists cooked up to monetize their podcasts online,’ Brown wrote in response to social media users in 2024.

5. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., claimed ‘Epstein’s client list’ was ‘key to helping us crack this trafficking ring wide open.’

Sen. Marsha Blackburn has made the release of the Epstein files one of her top priorities over the past couple of years.

From promoting anticipated disclosures on the Senate floor to posting dozens of times about the matter on social media, Blackburn has vowed that ‘accountability for these predators is coming.’

‘Epstein’s client list and the information I requested to reveal his associates & business dealings are key to helping us crack this trafficking ring wide open,’ Blackburn wrote on social media in February.

Ahead of the DOJ releasing a small tranche of files in February, Blackburn said ‘this will be a ‘phase 1’ release. There will be more to come.’

The Trump administration first released that batch of information, which contained no new revelations, in February to right-wing social media influencers. They appeared in photos at the White House with binders the Trump administration gave them that were labeled ‘classified’ and ‘Epstein files: Phase 1.’

Blackburn also secured a promise from Patel during his confirmation hearing this year that he would publish Epstein files.

6. Bondi suggested an Epstein list was on her desk.

Bondi was asked by host John Roberts during a Fox News interview in February if she planned to release a ‘list of Epstein’s clients.’

‘It’s sitting on my desk right now to review,’ Bondi said. ‘That’s been a directive by President Trump. I’m reviewing that.’

Bondi clarified her remarks during the Cabinet meeting with Trump on Tuesday, saying she was referencing Epstein’s entire case file.

‘In February, I did an interview on Fox, and it’s been getting a lot of attention because I said, I was asked a question about the client list, and my response was, ‘It’s sitting on my desk to be reviewed,’ meaning the [Epstein] file along with the JFK and MLK files, as well,’ Bondi said. ‘That’s what I meant by that.’

Bondi says Epstein client list is ‘sitting on my desk right now’, and is reviewing JFK, MLK files

7. Bondi told Sean Hannity that the DOJ has a ‘truckload’ of Epstein evidence.

After the initial document release flopped, Bondi falsely said the FBI’s New York office was intentionally withholding documents from her.

During an interview with Fox News’s Sean Hannity in March, Bondi claimed a ‘source’ told her the case files were in New York, where Epstein was indicted in 2019.

‘I gave them a deadline of Friday at 8 a.m. to get us everything, and a source had told me where the documents were being kept, Southern District of New York, shock,’ Bondi said. ‘So we got them all by, hopefully all of them, Friday at 8 a.m., thousands of pages of documents.’

‘Director Patel is going to get us a detailed report as to why the FBI withheld all of those documents,’ Bondi said, adding that a ‘truckload of evidence arrived’ at the DOJ after she requested the documents from New York.

The attorney general then went on a tirade about transparency and again questioned why the case files were in New York.

8. Bongino told his podcast listeners the ‘Epstein client list is a huge deal.’ There is ‘a reason they’re hiding it,’ he said.

Bongino predicted on his podcast in September 2024 that the ‘Epstein client list,’ which he now says does not exist, ‘is going to rock the Democrat Party.’

‘Folks, the Epstein client list is a huge deal,’ Bongino said.

‘The reason the Epstein client list being revealed is so important is because I want you to understand that there is a class of bekightened folks … who are not subjected to the same rules you are,’ Bongino said.

The former podcast star warned, ‘Folks, you’re going to see a lot of names on that. … It’s going to rock the political world. There’s a reason they’re hiding it.’

Bongino pushed the theory that Epstein’s death in 2019 in his jail cell was not a suicide, despite the DOJ inspector general and a medical examiner saying it was.

Epstein ‘is deceased under, at a minimum, suspicious circumstances,’ Bongino said.

In the FBI and DOJ’s new memo, they concluded that Epstein’s death was caused by suicide.

9. Bondi said she was briefed on the Epstein files and could not talk about them.

Bondi told Benny Johnson in February that she was briefed about the matter and unable to comment on it.

Johnson asked, ‘Where are we at with the Jeffrey Epstein list? The documents? And Kash has made a lot of public statements about this.’

‘I was briefed on that yesterday,’ Bondi said. ‘I can’t talk about that publicly. But, President Trump has given a very strong directive, and that’s going to be followed.’

10. Patel said in November that ‘restoring trust’ in federal agencies could include giving the public the ‘Epstein list.’ 

Patel told told Johnson last November that what is ‘most important’ is ‘restoring trust in our agencies and departments.’

‘The way to do that is to literally give the American people the truth,’ Patel said. ‘And that’s what they feared about Donald Trump. He’s going to come in there and maybe give them the Epstein list and maybe give them the P. Diddy list … and they are terrified.’

Epstein was indicted in 2019 for allegedly recruiting dozens of women and minors as young as 14 and engaging in sexual relations with them at his lavish homes in Florida, New York and elsewhere. He allegedly sexually abused some of them.

He died after being found unresponsive in his prison cell in New York City in 2019. Maxwell, his associate, was convicted of conspiring to sexually abuse minors and sentenced to 20 years in prison. She has an appeal in her case pending.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Following a crash at a stock car track, former UFC fighter Randy Couture, 62, was airlifted to a burn center in the Kansas City area on Tuesday, according to multiple reports.

He is expected to make a full recovery, his spokesperson told MMA Junkie.

Couture had recently been preparing to make his National Hot Rod Association (NHRA) debut this year. Couture has long been a motorcycling enthusiast and had begun earning his competitive license in the hopes of racing stock cars in official races before the end of 2025.

What were Randy Couture’s injuries?

Couture suffered first- and second-degree burns, other trauma-related injuries, and smoke inhalation.

It is unclear what actually caused the crash.

Randy Couture’s interest in racing

Couture seemed excited at the prospect of pro racing. In a video on his Instagram from June, Couture was seen in a kitted-out vehicle gaining experience behind the wheel.

Couture even said: ‘This is a new way to tickle that competitive spirit that I’ve had most of my life; a new place for me to get competitive and make a mark in racing.’

Randy Couture’s UFC career

Couture is a legend in the world of mixed martial arts, winning UFC championships in two different weight classes during his career. He was inducted into the UFC Hall of Fame in 2006.

(This story was updated to include video.)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Senate Republicans are gearing up to claw back billions of dollars in foreign aid and public broadcasting funding, but dissent is brewing among some who could eat into President Donald Trump’s cut request.

A cohort of Senate Republicans are publicly and privately growing squeamish over the White House’s $9.4 billion rescissions package, which would slash $8.3 billion from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and over $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), the government-backed funding arm for NPR and PBS.

The cuts stem from Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which was lauded by most Republicans for its mission to root out waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government.

Still, concerns and calls for changes are being made, in particular to proposed slashes to the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the public broadcasting fund.

Publicly, Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Mike Rounds, R-S.D., and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, have all aired their concerns about the House-passed bill and are eyeing changes that could see the cuts reduced.

‘I don’t like it as it is currently drafted,’ Murkowski said. ‘I’m a strong supporter of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and our health programs are important.’

Collins has raised issues with slashes to PEPFAR, an issue brought forth during a hearing with White House officials last month, while Rounds is worried about funding being slashed to rural radio stations, particularly for Native American populations in his state and others ‘and their ability to get good information during times of stress.’

Senate Republican leadership already has plans for an amendment process on the bill, which will likely culminate in another marathon vote-a-rama amendment session — roughly two weeks after the grueling amendment process for Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill.’

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said that he intended to put the package on the Senate floor next week, likely ahead of the Friday deadline for lawmakers to advance the clawbacks.

If the bill is amended, it would have to be sent back to the House before heading to Trump’s desk.

Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., told Fox News Digital that he expected the vote-a-rama to begin Wednesday, and said the hope was that leadership would be able to address as many concerns among Republicans as possible before bringing the bill to the floor.

‘Whatever it takes, we’re having those conversations,’ he said. ‘The point is, once we get to the vote-a-rama, we want to have as much issues resolved so we know where we’re at on the floor without any surprises. And I think we can do that, maybe not, but I think we can. I think we got a good picture of where we’re at right now.’

Other lawmakers see the package in its current form as a no-brainer to pass.

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said that if amendments were offered to keep spending that he agreed with, he could find himself supporting tweaks to the package. But he challenged his colleagues to reject a spending cut package that ultimately amounted to less than half a percent of the nation’s entire budget.

‘This is gut check time for our Republican colleagues,’ he said. ‘They either believe in reducing spending or they don’t. They either believe in spending porn or they don’t, and I’ve listened to my colleagues, especially in the last 100 plus days, talk about how great DOGE was. Well, now is the chance to show it.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama chatted about golf during a viral moment of bipartisanship during former President Jimmy Carter’s funeral in January, just days before Trump’s return to the Oval Office, a new book detailing the unprecedented 2024 election cycle reported. 

Trump and Obama were seen smiling and quietly chatting with one another in the pews of the Washington National Cathedral on Jan. 9, 2025, in a moment that spread like wildfire on social media as Americans sounded off with speculation over what the pair of presidents who had long traded political barbs were talking about. 

‘2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America,’ which was released Tuesday, said that Trump arrived in Washington for Carter’s funeral as a ‘conqueror’ following the November 2024 election and sat next to Obama for the funeral service. 

‘He’d attended Jimmy Carter’s funeral, walking into Washington not as a scourge but as a conqueror,’ the book reported of Trump. ‘He could ignore the speech on character by the outgoing president, and the cold shoulder from the vice president he’d defeated.’

‘Instead he sat next to Barack Obama and invited him to play golf, enticing him with descriptions of Trump’s courses around the world,’ the book continued of the pair’s conversation. ‘He was no longer an anomaly. He was being treated like an American president. He wanted to be remembered as a great one.’

Trump and Obama were seated near other high-profile former U.S. leaders, including former President George W. Bush, former Vice President Mike Pence, former President Bill Clinton, former first lady and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as well as then-President Joe Biden and then-Vice President Kamala Harris.

Social media commenters at the time remarked that footage and video clips of the pair were unexpected, and others joked that Obama may have voted for Trump despite years of the pair trading political barbs. 

‘Trump and Obama sitting next to each other was not on the 2025 bingo card,’ one social media user posted to X in January. 

‘Did Obama vote for Trump too?!’ Clay Travis, founder of sports and politics commentary platform OutKick, joked at the time. 

‘We need lip readers to see what Trump said to make Obama laugh,’ another person posted to X in January. 

Trump was asked about the viral moment ahead of his inauguration, remarking that he ‘didn’t realize how friendly it looked.’

‘I said, ‘Boy, they look like two people that like each other.’ And we probably do,’ Trump added at the time. ‘We have a little different philosophies, right? But we probably do. I don’t know. We just got along. But I got along with just about everybody.’

Fox News Digital’s Kristine Parks contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

In EA Sports College Football 26, it’s been all about improving the product.

The next chapter in the EA Sports’ college football video game series will be fully released Thursday, July 10 after the early access window started three days prior. After the successful return of the franchise in 2024, EA Sports wanted to build on last year’s game, focusing on filling the holes some of the popular features had like dynasty mode while expanding the authenticity of a Saturday in the fall.

USA TODAY Sports was able to play the game ahead of the full release and try out all of the different gameplay options. The game has been out three days, but the early impression is College Football 26 has taken a major step forward from the previous game. 

Is the game perfect? No, but EA Sports really heard the community feedback, and it resulted in an excellent sequel that gives optimism the franchise will just keep getting better and better.

EA College Football 26 gameplay

It almost feels like an entirely new game when it comes to actually playing football. College Football 25 was a nice introduction back to football video games from an 11-year hiatus. In College Football 26, it’s now a completely different ballgame. 

At first, it’s extremely overwhelming to see the overhaul of changes. But over time, it becomes easier to understand. Casual football enjoyers will have to learn deeper game knowledge on things like adjustments and schemes. It’s very noticeable how playbooks have expanded, with each team having a plethora of plays to choose from to where you can easily go an entire game without running the same play twice. 

Being able to sub players in and out at certain points is a big plus since you’re not required to continuously pause the game to do so. However, the feature isn’t exactly as advertised. It can only be done in the pre-snap when the team is already in formation, so it won’t affect the upcoming play and instead will take place in the following snap. It’s helpful in managing injuries and the hot hand, but you’d want it for the next play, not the one after. It would’ve made sense to allow it when selecting a play. Instead, it still requires pausing the game for immediate substitutions.

The player movement is much smoother and the animations feel more realistic. Those interceptions from defenders not looking at the ball don’t happen, and the offensive line actually blocks with better play recognition at the line of scrimmage. The mixture of user skill and player ratings feel like it matters, as it becomes tougher to make plays with a 70 overall quarterback while it’s easy pickings doing it with a signal-caller at 85.

The wear-and-tear also has improvements where players aren’t getting fatigued so easily.

One bug that persisted was getting an injury update after every play, which became annoying and would still appear on the screen in no-huddle, so you couldn’t see everything. Also, some injuries that happened wouldn’t be in effect. Like a player with a broken collarbone was still playing.

Despite some minor issues, the gameplay still is a big step-up. It’s hard at first to grasp, but soon enough, people will get a better understanding of football.

EA Sports College Football 26 dynasty mode

There were only two things dynasty mode needed fixed: trophy and accolades history, and transfer portal revamp. The two issues were addressed and the mode really feels like one of its best iterations. Dynasty mode is the franchise’s money maker, and it cashes in big.

Gamers can adjust how wild the transfer portal gets, which can get pretty ludicrous depending on the program being run. When deciding to coach a small program, it only took a few years before it became dominant. Now even on the regular sliders, it becomes much more difficult to retain players who want a bigger opportunity at higher-level teams. 

While it could decimate teams, players now can fully adopt a strategy to focus on high school recruiting or the transfer portal to make up the roster, much like real life. One element that would make the transfer portal better is seeing the stats of players rather than just ratings, so users can get a sense of who they are really seeking. Imagine knowing a guy that tore up the Sun Belt could join your ACC team?

The mode that benefited most from actual coaches in the game is dynasty. Going against the sport’s coaches adds another layer of realism that last year’s game heavily lacked. Now, teams really adopt the persona of their coach, whether it’s aggressive decision making or run the ball approach. The coaching carousel can also be just insane as the transfer portal, with big name coaches unexpectedly taking other jobs.

EA Sports College Football 26 Road to Glory

If there was one mode that needed to be upgraded, it was road to glory after it missed out on the high school experience last year. It got added in this year’s game, but it isn’t close to being as good as the NCAA Football series had it.

The moments make for a good challenge into boosting your recruiting stock, but it really takes away from having an authentic recruitment. Players shouldn’t get punished if they throw an 80-yard touchdown, but the challenge required a quarterback run for the score. 

It makes sense EA Sports was trying to speed along the high school process so gamers weren’t stuck playing for hours before making it to college, but maybe chose the wrong process to do it. Having players complete certain drives and get graded for how it went would have been a better process to boost your stock, just like how high school athletes actually do. 

And then there’s the ever so controversial equipment topic. The fanbase feels almost split in whether the amount of player customization falls short or doesn’t matter. Both sides of the crowd got points with this. There are more things to change the look of a player with new arm sleeves, but there are also elements missing like leg sleeves. Is it a big deal? It shouldn’t be, but EA Sports should eventually tackle the issue.

But for all the things falling short in the mode, the recruiting process itself is a nice touch. Hearing from coaches about their thoughts on you, seeing schools offer and pull scholarships and gauging who is the right fit is an authentic process. Getting to see what other recruits the school is targeting increases the intrigue in the process, culminating with the iconic hat ceremony every football player dreams of doing.

Other notes

College football is a tradition-rich sport, and after every school had their own quirks in the previous game, it feels much more enhanced this year. The audio is greatly enhanced to where fight songs sound clearer and the crowd is louder, feeling like you’re at the stadium.

The game presentation and graphics got massively upgraded, giving the big game feel to those high-stake matchups. The commentary feels more sequenced and the conversations discussed about the teams, the last game and season performance help it not feel so robotic. 

EA Sports deserves credit for listening to feedback from College Football 25, something production director Christian McLeod previously told USA TODAY Sports the team spends plenty of time doing. It’s noticeable, as last year’s issues were not just addressed, but greatly improved to where it wouldn’t be a consistent issue.

People often argue sequels aren’t better than the original. That isn’t the case with EA Sports College Football 26, giving its loyal fanbase another stellar game to play.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump told donors in 2024 he had cautioned Russian President Vladimir Putin that bombs would drop on Moscow if the Russian leader invaded Ukraine, a new book claims. 

The book, ‘2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America,’ was published on Tuesday and chronicles how Trump secured his victory in the November 2024 election, and how former President Joe Biden’s team dismissed concerns about his age in the campaign cycle. 

According to the book, Trump told donors that he’d issued a harsh warning to Putin about any potential invasion. Additionally, he said he’d issued a similar warning to Chinese President Xi Jinping, should the Chinese leader invade Taiwan, the book said. 

‘I was with Putin and I told him, ‘Vladimir, if you do it, we’re going to bomb the s— out of Moscow,’’ Trump revealed, according to an audio recording, also shared with CNN. ‘‘If you go into Taiwan, I’m going to bomb the s— out of Beijing.’ He thought I was crazy… He didn’t believe me either, except 10 percent. And 10 percent is all you need.’ 

In response, the White House said that Russia only invaded Ukraine in February 2022 — after Trump’s first term in office. 

‘As President Trump has said time and again, Russia never dared invade Ukraine when he was in office. It happened only when Biden was in office,’ White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a Wednesday statement. ‘Thanks to this President’s leadership, America is once again the leader of the free world, and peace through strength is restored. President Trump won on an America First agenda, and he is working hard to implement the mandate the American people gave him.’

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital confirming the authenticity of the audio. 

The book ‘2024’ is one of several that have been released in 2025 detailing how Trump secured victory in the 2024 election and how Biden’s mental acuity declined. It is authored by Josh Dawsey of the Wall Street Journal, Tyler Pager of the New York Times and Isaac Arnsdorf of the Washington Post. 

The authors did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. 

Trump has recently voiced frustration with Putin as he’s sought to bring an end to the war between Russia and Ukraine. Tuesday, Trump said during a Cabinet meeting he was fed up with Putin and said he was eyeing potentially imposing new sanctions on Russia. 

‘We get a lot of bulls— thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless,’ Trump said Tuesday. 

Fox News’ Sarah Tobianski contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS