Author

admin

Browsing

Pittsburgh Penguins star Evgeni Malkin was ejected from Thursday’s game for his slash to the head of Buffalo Sabres captain Rasmus Dahlin.

And now he is looking at a suspension. The NHL Player Safety department said that the center would have a hearing on March 6 for slashing.

Malkin has a history of being suspended for stick infractions. He received a four-game suspension in 2022 for cross-checking and a one-game suspension in 2019 for slashing.

He was responding on March 5 to a cross-check from Dahlin near the Sabres net in the second period. Malkin swung his stick and hit Dahlin in the side of the face and neck. He received two minutes for cross-checking and five minutes and a game misconduct for slashing.

Will Evgeni Malkin be suspended?

Yes, he’s facing a disciplinary hearing and his history will work against him.

What would be the impact of an Evgeni Malkin suspension?

The timing wouldn’t be good because Penguins captain Sidney Crosby is out with an injury suffered at the Olympics. His initial timeline was he would miss four weeks after the Olympics, but a reporter at the Penguins practice on Friday said Crosby was there.

The Penguins currently sit in second place in the Metropolitan Division.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

An Iranian ship offloaded more than 200 members of its crew to Sri Lanka on Friday after suffering an engine failure at sea, just days after a U.S. submarine sank an Iranian warship in an Indian Ocean torpedo attack. 

The IRIS Bushehr, described in previous Iranian media reports as a navy logistics ship, is being brought first to the port of Colombo, according to Sri Lanka navy spokesman Cmdr. Buddhika Sampath. Sailors are being taken to a naval base in Welisara following medical exams and immigration procedures. 

‘We have to understand that this is not an ordinary situation,’ Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake said Thursday. ‘It’s a request by a ship belonging to one party to enter into our port. We have to consider that according to the international treaties and conventions.’ 

Dissanayake added that authorities decided to take control of the IRIS Bushehr following discussions with Iranian officials and the ship’s captain, after one of its engines failed. He said some crew members would remain on board to help the Sri Lankan navy later navigate the vessel to Trincomalee on the island’s northeast coast, about 165 miles from Colombo.

The moves come after the U.S. sank the Iranian warship IRIS Dena off Sri Lanka’s coast on Wednesday.  

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said it was ‘the first sinking of an enemy ship by a torpedo since World War II.’ 

The Indian navy said Thursday that it had initiated search and rescue operations after receiving a distress signal from the Dena, deploying two aircraft along with a sailing training vessel. By the time the response was launched, the Sri Lankan navy had already started its own rescue efforts, it said.

The Sri Lankan navy rescued 32 sailors and recovered 87 bodies after the attack, according to The Associated Press. 

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Thursday that the U.S. will ‘bitterly regret’ striking and sinking that ship. 

‘The U.S. has perpetrated an atrocity at sea, 2,000 miles away from Iran’s shores,’ Araqchi wrote on X. ‘Frigate Dena, a guest of India’s Navy carrying almost 130 sailors, was struck in international waters without warning.’

‘Mark my words: The U.S. will come to bitterly regret precedent it has set,’ he added. 

Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine told reporters at the Pentagon on Wednesday that the Iranian vessel was ‘effectively neutralized’ in a Navy ‘fast attack’ using a single Mark 48 torpedo.

He added that the U.S. Navy achieved ‘immediate effect, sending the warship to the bottom of the sea.’ 

Fox News’ Stephen Sorace, Landon Mion and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Related Article

New satellite images show fires, naval base damage across Iran after US-Israeli strikes
New satellite images show fires, naval base damage across Iran after US-Israeli strikes
This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Dozens of Democrats have voted against a nonbinding resolution in the House that reaffirms Iran as the ‘largest state sponsor of terrorism.’

The resolution, put forward by Rep. Brian Mast, R-Fla., passed by a 372-53 vote on Thursday, with all those voting no being Democrats. Two Democrats also voted present. 

Among those who voted against the measure were all the members of the ‘Squad,’ such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., and Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich. 

The resolution said the Islamic Republic of Iran ‘remains the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism and provides substantial financial and military support to groups including Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis.’

It added that Iran ‘poses a direct and persistent threat to the United States and is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American citizens,’ citing the Pentagon as saying that ‘Iranian-backed proxy militias are responsible for the deaths of at least 603 U.S. service members in Iraq — roughly one in every six American combat fatalities.’ 

It also said, ‘according to the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafeal Grossi, Iran has amassed a large stockpile of enriched uranium and continues to block access to undeclared sites in Iran affiliated with their ‘big, ambitious nuclear weapons program.’’ 

The resolution concludes by saying, ‘That the House of Representatives declares it is the policy of the United States… that Iran continues to be the largest state sponsor of terrorism.’

California Democratic Rep. Lateefah Simon, who voted no, claimed the resolution ‘contains inaccuracies and is designed to justify the President’s actions in Iran.’

‘Republicans in Congress are not only surrendering their constitutional duties – they are also playing politics with a resolution reaffirming Iran as a leading state sponsor of terrorism,’ Simon wrote on Facebook. ‘That is already U.S. policy.’

‘I have been clear about my opposition to the brutal and devastating actions of the Iranian regime against those protesting for freedom,’ Simon continued. ‘This resolution does nothing to advance their freedom and instead, puts Congress on record as giving the Administration further pretext for a war that should not have been started in the first place.’

Rep. Julie Fedorchak, R-N.D., who voted in favor of the resolution, said in a statement that, ‘This week’s bipartisan classified briefing with Marco Rubio, Pete Hegseth, John Ratcliffe, and General Dan Caine underscored the significance of the threat we face from an Iran intent on developing nuclear weapons behind a curtain of impenetrable ballistic weapons.’ 

‘Standing with our allies and confronting state-sponsored terrorism is essential to protecting Americans and advancing stability around the world,’ she added. ‘This resolution sends a strong message that we will not ignore or excuse the regime’s extremist actions.’

Rep. Adam Smith, a Democrat from Washington state who also voted in favor of the resolution, said, ‘I agree with the principal assertion of this resolution that Iran is a bad actor. 

‘Iran’s malign and destabilizing actions in the region and treatment of its own citizens should be denounced. I have never contested this. What I do contest is that going to war is the reasonable response to this assertion,’ he continued. ‘I support this resolution. I do not support the president’s war of choice with Iran.’ 

Full list of 53 House Democrats who voted no:

Here are the full names of the Democratic House lawmakers listed alphabetically by last name:

  1. Donald S. Beyer Jr.
  2. Suzanne Bonamici
  3. André Carson
  4. Greg Casar
  5. Joaquin Castro
  6. Yvette D. Clarke
  7. Steve Cohen
  8. Danny K. Davis
  9. Maxine Dexter
  10. Lloyd Doggett
  11. Dwight Evans
  12. Lizzie Fletcher
  13. Valerie Foushee
  14. Maxwell Alejandro Frost
  15. Robert Garcia
  16. Jesús ‘Chuy’ García
  17. Al Green
  18. Raúl M. Grijalva
  19. Val Hoyle
  20. Jared Huffman
  21. Sara Jacobs
  22. Pramila Jayapal
  23. Henry C. ‘Hank’ Johnson, Jr.
  24. Robin Kelly
  25. Ro Khanna
  26. Raja Krishnamoorthi
  27. Summer Lee
  28. Sarah McBride
  29. Morgan McGarvey
  30. James P. McGovern
  31. LaMonica McIver
  32. Christian D. Menefee
  33. Robert Jacobsen ‘Rob’ Menendez Jr.
  34. Gwen Moore
  35. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
  36. Ilhan Omar
  37. Chellie Pingree
  38. Mark Pocan
  39. Ayanna Pressley
  40. Delia Ramirez
  41. Emily Randall
  42. Luz Rivas
  43. Linda T. Sánchez
  44. Janice D. ‘Jan’ Schakowsky
  45. Lateefah Simon
  46. Mark Takano
  47. Rashida Tlaib
  48. Lori Trahan
  49. Lauren Underwood
  50. Nydia M. Velázquez
  51. Maxine Waters
  52. Bonnie Watson Coleman
  53. Nikema Williams.

Related Article

House votes to let Trump
House votes to let Trump’s Operation Epic Fury continue in Iran
This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump took Washington by surprise Thursday with his decision to remove Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, but few lawmakers on Capitol Hill questioned his decision. 

Though Republicans rarely criticized Noem during her tenure, many GOP lawmakers argued Thursday that the secretary’s ouster was the right move. Trump quickly nominated Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., a close ally, to head the sprawling agency Thursday afternoon.

‘I think the president is doing what’s necessary to make sure the department is going to be operating effectively,’ Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., who welcomed the news of Mullin’s appointment, said Thursday. ‘It was time.’

Mullin, a 48-year-old lawmaker, is a member of Senate Republicans’ leadership team and previously served several terms in the House of Representatives.

Noem’s time helming DHS was rocked by a series of controversies involving an expensive ad campaign she claimed had Trump’s approval and her widely-panned response to the fatal shootings of two Americans in Minneapolis by federal immigration officers earlier this year.

‘Obviously, it did not go well,’ Donalds added when asked about Noem’s appearance during two hearings on Capitol Hill this week.

Several GOP lawmakers, including Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and John Kennedy, R-La., tore into Noem during her appearance before the Senate’s judiciary panel on Tuesday. 

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., a moderate lawmaker retiring at the end of his term, echoed Kennedy’s criticism questioning Noem’s prominent role in the costly ad campaign and her ties to recipients awarded contracts.

‘There’s legit concerns. When there was a $200 million advertising [campaign], we should be better stewards of our money,’ Bacon said. ‘I think the president probably saw a need for change.’

DHS has fired back that the massive ad campaign resulted in millions of self-deportations.

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., told Fox News Digital Thursday that Noem’s departure would eliminate ‘distractions’ and ‘conflicts’ that erupted at DHS under her leadership.

‘The department needs to be entirely focused on its mission, given the situation in the Middle East right now,’ Lawler said, referring to Operation Epic Fury in Iran. 

Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash., who is not running for reelection, wrote on social media Thursday that a ‘change in leadership at the Department of Homeland Security was long overdue.’

House Democrats, many of whom fiercely criticized Noem’s role in the Trump administration, appeared to agree.

‘She’s done enough damage that the president finally came to his senses,’ Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., the lead Democrat on the House homeland security panel, said Thursday. 

‘I think it’s the right decision by the president. It’s been a long time coming,’ Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla., told Fox News Digital.

Moskowitz, who tussled with Noem during her testimony to the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, argued that she would go down as the worst DHS secretary in the agency’s two-decade history. He declined, however, to sign on to articles of impeachment circulated by House Democrats.

When asked about Mullin’s appointment, Moskowitz said he wished him good luck. ‘She’s left him a disaster, but obviously I want him to succeed,’ the Florida Democrat said of Noem’s tenure. ‘We should all want that, so let’s give him that opportunity.’

Related Article

Schumer weaponizes Mullin nomination to demand DHS overhaul, says
Schumer weaponizes Mullin nomination to demand DHS overhaul, says ‘rot’ goes beyond Noem
This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Listen up, flyers: United Airlines said it will start removing passengers from flights who refuse to wear headphones while listening to content on their personal devices, and such behavior could lead to a permanent ban.

The airline revised its contract of carriage on Feb. 27 to include the new provision, which sits under the ‘refusal of transport’ section that outlines the instances in which United can boot its passengers from flights.

According to the document, United reserves the right to refuse transport — on a permanent basis — to any passenger who listens to their entertainment on speaker.

It also states that any passenger who causes United ‘any loss, damage or expense of any kind,’ may be responsible for reimbursing the airline.

‘We’ve always encouraged customers to use headphones when listening to audio content — and our Wi-Fi rules already remind customers to use headphones,’ United said in a statement. ‘With the expansion of Starlink, it seemed like a good time to make that even clearer by adding it to the contract of carriage.’

Passengers who forgot their headphones at home can request a free pair on their flight, if they’re available, according to United’s in-flight entertainment information.

The move inspired a strong reaction online.

‘One would think this is common sense and airlines would have in their rules,’ said one Reddit user. ‘Now let’s have the same rule for airline lounges.’

Others complained that this has become increasingly common on flights, especially among those with small children.

‘As a flight attendant; we have to tell people literally every flight,’ another person said on Reddit. ‘It makes our jobs harder when we’re stuck policing common courtesy instead of just focusing on service & safety.’

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Brandon Beane finally got far enough down the road to pick up the can. The question now is whether his Buffalo Bills are actually on the road to Super Bowl 61 given WR DJ Moore’s image was miraculously plastered on said can.

If nothing else, Thursday’s news that the Bills had agreed to acquire Moore from the Chicago Bears, essentially for a second-rounder, solved a major headache for Beane − TBD if he’s cured or will be reaching for more Tylenol − while creating options heading into the NFL free agency market and, ultimately, the 2026 draft.

“At the end of the day, that is on me, all that stuff is on me,” Beane told local reporters in February about the Bills’ ongoing inability to find high-end receiver production and deep-strike capability for 2024 league MVP Josh Allen opposite slot machine Khalil Shakir and TEs Dalton Kincaid and Dawson Knox.

A year ago, Beane’s frustration was especially apparent during a local radio interview, when he wondered why fans and media members were ‘bitching’ about the team’s wideout challenges.

‘Our job is to score points and win games,’ Beane added.

‘It’s not fantasy football to trot out the best receivers. You got Josh Allen. First thing you got to do is protect him. You can’t have everything. You can’t have Pro Bowl wide receivers and have a Pro Bowl offensive line and an All-Pro quarterback and three great running backs. You’ve got to pick.

‘So, that’s where I’m like, I don’t understand this narrative.’

Maybe Moore can put it to bed after Keon Coleman, Josh Palmer, Elijah Moore, Curtis Samuel, Mack Hollins, Amari Cooper and others couldn’t in the two years since Stefon Diggs’ departure. All were Band-Aid-adjacent alternatives. And no Bills fan will forget that the team was futilely (as it turned out) relying on 32-year-old journeyman Brandin Cooks, a late-season pickup in 2025, to haul in Allen’s final pass of the devastating divisional-round playoff loss at Denver that ultimately cost longtime coach Sean McDermott his job.

Regardless, this transaction should have significant ramifications for the Bills, Bears, Moore and the early part of the draft in general.

Why didn’t Buffalo just draft a receiver?

Beane’s been on the lookout. Coleman, the 33rd overall pick two years ago, has infamously not worked out − just ask Bills owner Terry Pegula.

But Moore’s a proven commodity, one who’s averaged better than 1,000 receiving yards per season over his eight-year NFL career. He’s not exactly Ja’Marr Chase − who is? − but Moore does resemble a running back once the ball is in his hands. And while he might not run routes as crisp as Shakir’s, Moore can also get open deep − look no further than his pair of game-winning TD catches against the Green Bay Packers last season.

Bottom line? He could be the perfect complement for this offense. He’s also ready to go for a squad Pegula expects Beane and rookie head coach Joe Brady to navigate to a Lombardi Trophy sooner than later.

And while the 2026 draft is viewed as rich with receivers, Beane probably wasn’t going to have the chance of taking USC’s Makai Lemon, Washington’s Denzel Boston, Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson or Ohio State’s Carnell Tate (despite Beane’s humorous wishcasting at the combine) with the 26th pick of the first round. And potentially trading up was going to cost him draft capital anyway, so why not just target Moore?

Who will the Bills target in draft now?

TBD of course, especially with free agency yet to unfold − though Buffalo is currently cap-strapped. But with DE Joey Bosa and G David Edwards and C Connor McGovern all unsigned, interior O-line and pass rush help could now be at the top of Beane’s to-do list.

What does the trade mean for DJ Moore?

A fresh start.

He had a career year in 2023 (96 catches for 1,364 yards and 8 TDs). But that’s when Justin Fields was throwing to him in Chicago, and the Bears weren’t very good. Moore seemed to struggle to find a vibe with QB Caleb Williams for much of the past two seasons and was out-produced by rookie TE Colston Loveland in 2025, Year 1 for the Bears under hotshot coach Ben Johnson. Moore, who’s just entering a four-year, $110 million extension, was also a lot more expensive than Loveland and young WRs Rome Odunze and Luther Burden III.

But now Moore will be paired with Allen, one of the league’s most accurate and strongest-armed passers − and one whose legs make it hard for defenses to double-team receivers. They could be a lethal combo.

What does the DJ Moore trade mean for the Bears?

Options.

Odunze and Loveland were first-round picks the past two years and Burden came in Round 2 in 2025. Johnson’s passing attack should be just fine in the hands of that trio − especially given Moore’s 50 receptions and 682 yards last season were career lows.

As important, having one first-round pick and two selections in Round 2 could be key for Johnson and GM Ryan Poles, who are apparently losing C Drew Dalman to retirement and could see most of last season’s starting secondary leave during free agency.

What does the DJ Moore trade mean for the draft?

Maybe not a ton overall, but with the Bills filling a glaring need, they no longer need to overreach for a wideout. I thought players like Notre Dame’s Malachi Fields, Tennessee’s Chris Brazzell II or Louisville’s Chris Bell might be considerations for Beane at No. 26 pending his desperation level. Any of them might still serve as a big-bodied target for Allen, especially in the red zone, but they’d all now be value propositions … if Beane gets one with the 91st pick. Bell in particular − he’s coming off a torn ACL but compares himself to A.J. Brown − could be a steal, if not someone likely to necessarily contribute immediately.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

In March of 1995, as the women’s NCAA Tournament was approaching, ESPN called Debbie Antonelli to offer her a job as a color analyst for the regional round of March Madness. They told her she was going to be partnering with Beth Mowins, who would handle play-by-play duties.

Antonelli’s first response was, “Who?”

“I had no idea,” she recalls now. “I had never heard of her.”

Antonelli declined that gig because she had just had a baby. But in the fall of 1996, she heard Mowins’ name again, this time from a local TV station in Pennsylvania that wanted her to call Penn State women’s basketball games. This time, she accepted.

On Tuesday, Nov. 26, 1996, Antonelli and Mowins were the voices on Penn State’s 76-62 win over Seton Hall. Angie Potthoff scored 21 points in the victory for the Nittany Lions in what would be the first of countless women’s college basketball games Antonelli and Mowins have called together.

This is the 30th season the duo has been telling the story of women’s college basketball. At a time where the sport is growing by leaps and bounds in viewership and attendance, fans know when they see Antonelli and Mowins that they are tuning into an important game.

“They’ve been trailblazers as broadcasters,” ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips told USA Today Sports. “It’s hard for me to think of a better combination than Debbie and Beth and what they’ve meant. I just think they are the gold standard and it gives me great comfort when I watch a game they’re on. I don’t know if they have any peers that I’m aware of that have quite done what they’ve done.”

Antonelli and Mowins went from not knowing each other to close friends. After traveling the country together for three decades, sketching out ideas on bar napkins after games and vacationing together with their families, they can finish each other’s sentences. They have a routine that’s second nature. Even while sitting in a green room in Colonial Life Arena in South Carolina, Antonelli sat on the left side of the couch while Mowins sat on the right — just as they would be if they were courtside at a broadcast table.

“She’s a part of our family. She’s watched my boys grow up,” Antonelli said of Mowins. “I prep a certain way when I work with Beth, because I don’t have to worry about the other things and that allows me to do what I really am good at, which is taking a deeper dive. We tell you the how and why.”

‘Wild wild west’ of women’s basketball

Antonelli’s path to television began when she was 23-years-old. After playing basketball for the Hall of Fame coach Kay Yow at NC State — she was on a Wolfpack team that won the ACC regular season and tournament championships in 1986 — Antonelli went to work at the University of Kentucky as director of marketing for the athletic department. A local TV station approached the Wildcats with the idea of producing and televising some of their games. Antonelli not only convinced them to do women’s basketball, but persuaded them to let her be on the broadcast as an analyst.

A few years later, Antonelli took a similar job at Ohio State and, again, struck up conversations with the local cable company. Antonelli soon became the voice of Buckeyes women’s basketball games across Ohio.

“I was like, ‘Wow, this is just like everything I thought coaching would be, except you don’t deal with the players,’” Antonelli told USA Today Sports. “It had everything else. Watching film, prep, practice, you know, all the things that I love about the job. It ran parallel with my interest in growing the game.”

Mowins’ path was a bit more traditional. Her dad was a coach and she played college basketball at Lafayette College where she set program records for assists in a single season and career. She then went to Syracuse’s Newhouse School and not long after graduating with her master’s degree, became the play-by-play voice for a Big East women’s basketball game of the week shown on six different cable outlets in the northeast in the early 1990s.

ESPN, which is based in Bristol, Connecticut, is nestled in the heart of the Big East footprint.

“The Big East Network saw me doing Syracuse games, and I started doing the Big East Game of the Week, and those were on in Connecticut, and ESPN saw me doing those. And then it just kind of grew from there,” Mowins told USA Today Sports. “Back in those days, it was the wild wild west.”

Mowins said when she and Antonelli first started working together, they would call several games a week in different time zones for multiple different networks. They were women’s basketball broadcasting mercenaries. They might be at Michigan State working a CBS game on a Saturday, then fly to North Carolina for a Duke game on ESPN on Sunday, then to New York for a St. John’s game for the Big East, then to Texas to do a broadcast for Fox Sports Southwest.

“Shoot, I’d be gone for three weeks at a time,” Antonelli says. “It was a hustle.”

“But we were young, we were hungry, we were working on our craft,” Mowins says. “And probably staying out too late.”

“We would meet the coaches after the game for a drink. We’d make them buy,” Antonelli says. “We did all that before the internet, before phone cameras. … When it comes to making postgame arrangements, I make those.”

“After carrying her for two hours, I’m exhausted,” Mowins says with a laugh. “I don’t want to have to make any decisions after that.”

Antonelli was a freelancer for the first 28 years of her television career. These days, she’s mainly calling games for ESPN and its partners on the ACC and SEC networks, typically working one men’s game and two women’s games a week. There are times where her schedule gets stacked up, like when she called nine games in a 14-day span earlier this season.

Mowins stays busy as the college sports seasons cross over. In the fall she calls college football, and in the spring she’s the play-by-play host of the Women’s College World Series. Since joining ESPN in 1994, Mowins has called NCAA Championships in basketball, softball, soccer and volleyball. In 2017, she became the first woman to call a nationally televised NFL game when she did a Monday Night Football broadcast between the Chargers and Broncos.

For many young women in broadcasting Mowins isn’t just a role model, she’s the standard.

“She has always been someone to aspire to and learn from, but she’s also someone who has given me hope in the incredibly wild world that is being a woman in sports,” says Mia O’Brien, an ESPN Radio host based in Jacksonville, Florida. “As I’ve strived to grow as a play-by-play announcer, it’s made me respect Beth tenfold. It’s been difficult for me to find reps today in the 2020s, so I can’t even begin to imagine what her road to national prominence entailed.”

‘I know nothing except for hoops’

Antonelli has one of the sharpest minds in basketball. Part of that could be due to the fact that basketball is all Antonelli consumes, which is why Mowins’ pop culture references fly over her head.

“I know nothing except for hoops,” Antonelli says. “I don’t watch any shows. I watch basketball.”

Mowins likens Antonelli’s ability to dissect X’s and O’s to Tony Romo and Dan Orlovsky on NFL broadcasts, in that she can predict what is about to happen on the court.

“Very few people have that ability, to not only have it stored in there, but then to bring it out when it’s appropriate. Debbie is in that group that is just extraordinary because of the way she prepares,” Mowins says. “She has relationships with all of the coaches. One of the most significant things is, if Debbie calls somebody, they’re going to pick up.”

In addition to the thousands of women’s basketball games that she’s called on television, Antonelli has also been the radio analyst for Westwood One’s broadcasts of the Final Four for 30 years. In 2022, Antonelli joined her college coach, Yow, in the Women’s Basketball Hall of Fame.

Wherever she goes, the folks most proud of what Antonelli has accomplished in growing the game of women’s basketball seem to be at her alma mater, NC State.

“She’s one of the premier announcers, and I’m telling you, she works harder than anybody I know. She’s got irons in a lot of fires,” NC State head coach Wes Moore said of Antonelli. “She does her homework. She knows going into a game what she wants to talk about and cover.”

‘Like an old married couple’

Over three decades, Antonelli and Mowins estimate they’ve called around 30 games per year together. With that many to choose from, it’s difficult for them to pinpoint the most memorable game.

The first that came to mind for Antonelli was during the COVID-impacted season of 2020-21. On Dec. 15, 2020, Antonelli and Mowins were two of the few people in the building when Stanford beat Pacific, pushing Tara VanDerveer ahead of Pat Summitt to become the all-time winningest women’s college basketball coach.

For Mowins, a trip to North Carolina’s Research Triangle sticks out, when on Feb. 1, 2003, No. 2 UConn upset No. 1 Duke in a sold-out Cameron Indoor Stadium.

“We hit the heyday of the ACC in the early 2000s. Every weekend was a top 20 matchup,” Mowins says. “For years, those Triangle schools had tried to build up fanbases, and when UConn came to Cameron Indoor it was like a men’s game. The students all turned out.”

A photo from that game of Diana Taurasi preparing to throw an inbounds pass with Alana Beard defending her appeared in Sports Illustrated the next week. If you look closely at it and spot a woman wearing a red sweater, that’s Mowins’ mother sitting near Antonelli’s parents.

Three decades into broadcasting women’s college basketball, Antonelli and Mowins still have a passion for the games, the players and the coaches.

And they show no signs of slowing down. This weekend they’ll be calling games together in Duluth, Georgia, at the ACC Tournament and will be paired again during March Madness.

The duo has lost count of exactly how many games they’ve done together.

“I would certainly say it feels like it’s been 1,000 games,” Mowins says.

“And I would say one of us deserves a medal,” Antonelli says. “The other one might need therapy.”

“I think that’s something that sort of sets our chemistry apart,” Mowins says. “When we’re working together, we’re not afraid to pick at each other, you know, like an old married couple.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Japan’s World Baseball Classic title defense got off to a rousing start at the Tokyo Dome, with four-time MVP Shohei Ohtani crushing a second-inning grand slam to open the scoring in a blowout 13-0 win over Chinese Taipei.

Ohtani, the reigning WBC MVP, took Hao-Chun Cheng deep with the bases loaded and one out, starting a 10-run Japan inning. Ohtani added an RBI single later in the frame and had already doubled in the first inning.

Japan scored more three runs in the third inning to push their lead to 13-0 en route to a mercy-rule victory (10 runs through seven innings) over Chinese Taipei which, fell to 0-2 in the tournament after losing to Australia in the opener.

‘I thought it might land as an out, so above all, I really wanted to get the first run on the board,’ Ohtani said postgame. ‘I know there will be some tough battles ahead, but if the fans and the team can unite and everyone can help build the excitement together, it will really encourage us.’

Shohei Ohtani stats today

Shohei Ohtani went 3-for-5 with a grand slam and five RBIs in Japan’s World Baseball Classic opener against Chinese Taipei.

The 31-year-old hit a double to lead off the game in the first, hit a grand slam in the second inning to give Japan a 4-0 lead and then added an RBI single as Japan batted around in the second.

Ohtani won his fourth MVP award in 2025 with a career-high 55 home runs and returned to the mound after only hitting in 2024, leading the Dodgers to a second consecutive World Series title.

  • 2025 (LAD): .282 AVG | 55 HR | 102 RBIs | 20 SB | 1.014 OPS
  • 2024 (LAD): .310 AVG | 54 HR | 130 RBIs | 59 SB | 1.036 OPS
  • 2023 (LAA): .304 AVG | 44 HR | 95 RBIs | 20 SB | 1.066 OPS
  • 2022 (LAA): .273 AVG | 34 HR | 95 RBIs | 11 SB | .875 OPS
  • 2021 (LAA): .257 AVG | 46 HR | 100 RBIs | 26 SB | .965 OPS

Japan vs Chinese Taipei WBC highlights

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Los Angeles Chargers have landed a major upgrade at center ahead of 2026 NFL free agency.

The Chargers are signing Tyler Biadasz to a three-year deal worth up to $30 million, according to NFL Media’s Ian Rapoport.

Biadasz is a six-year NFL veteran who spent the last two seasons as the starting center for the Washington Commanders. The 2022 Pro Bowler played 954 snaps across 16 games during the 2025 NFL season, grading as Pro Football Focus’ 12th-best center among 37 qualifiers while allowing three sacks, 21 pressures and committing three penalties.

Despite his performance, the Commanders released Biadasz ahead of 2026 free agency to save $2.85 million in cap space. The maneuver made the 28-year-old center immediately eligible to sign with another NFL team, which is how the Chargers were able to ink him to a contract before free agency began.

Biadasz fills a significant need for the Chargers. Bradley Bozeman – who started at center for the team in 2025 – graded dead-last among PFF’s qualified centers last year while allowing two sacks and 30 pressures on the season.

Bozeman retired following the season while backup Andre James is set to be a free agent. That left Josh Kaltenberger – a 2025 undrafted free agent out of Maryland who signed a futures contract with the team following the season – as the only center on Los Angeles’ 90-man offseason roster before the team signed Biadasz.

With center addressed, the Chargers will now turn their attention to the guard position, where Ben Cleveland and Branson Taylor are their only players under contract. Starting left guard Zion Johnson is set to be a free agent while right guard Mekhi Becton was released by the team.

Tyler Biadasz contract details

Biadasz and the Chargers agreed to a multi-year deal that will make him the sixth highest-paid center in the NFL in terms of average annual value (AAV), per OverTheCap.com. Below are the full terms of the deal:

  • Term: 3 years
  • Total contract value: $30 million
  • AAV: $10 million

Tyler Biadasz career earnings

Biadasz has logged just under $27.1 million in career earnings since being selected by the Dallas Cowboys in the fourth round of the 2020 NFL Draft, per Spotrac.com.

If the full value of Biadasz’s reported deal is realized, he will more than double his career earnings by the time his new contract expires in 2028.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump took Washington by surprise Thursday with his decision to remove Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, but few lawmakers on Capitol Hill questioned his decision. 

Though Republicans rarely criticized Noem during her tenure, many GOP lawmakers argued Thursday that the secretary’s ouster was the right move. Trump quickly nominated Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., a close ally, to head the sprawling agency Thursday afternoon.

‘I think the president is doing what’s necessary to make sure the department is going to be operating effectively,’ Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., who welcomed the news of Mullin’s appointment, said Thursday. ‘It was time.’

Mullin, a 48-year-old lawmaker, is a member of Senate Republicans’ leadership team and previously served several terms in the House of Representatives.

Noem’s time helming DHS was rocked by a series of controversies involving an expensive ad campaign she claimed had Trump’s approval and her widely-panned response to the fatal shootings of two Americans in Minneapolis by federal immigration officers earlier this year.

‘Obviously, it did not go well,’ Donalds added when asked about Noem’s appearance during two hearings on Capitol Hill this week.

Several GOP lawmakers, including Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and John Kennedy, R-La., tore into Noem during her appearance before the Senate’s judiciary panel on Tuesday. 

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., a moderate lawmaker retiring at the end of his term, echoed Kennedy’s criticism questioning Noem’s prominent role in the costly ad campaign and her ties to recipients awarded contracts.

‘There’s legit concerns. When there was a $200 million advertising [campaign], we should be better stewards of our money,’ Bacon said. ‘I think the president probably saw a need for change.’

DHS has fired back that the massive ad campaign resulted in millions of self-deportations.

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., told Fox News Digital Thursday that Noem’s departure would eliminate ‘distractions’ and ‘conflicts’ that erupted at DHS under her leadership.

‘The department needs to be entirely focused on its mission, given the situation in the Middle East right now,’ Lawler said, referring to Operation Epic Fury in Iran. 

Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash., who is not running for reelection, wrote on social media Thursday that a ‘change in leadership at the Department of Homeland Security was long overdue.’

House Democrats, many of whom fiercely criticized Noem’s role in the Trump administration, appeared to agree.

‘She’s done enough damage that the president finally came to his senses,’ Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., the lead Democrat on the House homeland security panel, said Thursday. 

‘I think it’s the right decision by the president. It’s been a long time coming,’ Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla., told Fox News Digital.

Moskowitz, who tussled with Noem during her testimony to the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, argued that she would go down as the worst DHS secretary in the agency’s two-decade history. He declined, however, to sign on to articles of impeachment circulated by House Democrats.

When asked about Mullin’s appointment, Moskowitz said he wished him good luck. ‘She’s left him a disaster, but obviously I want him to succeed,’ the Florida Democrat said of Noem’s tenure. ‘We should all want that, so let’s give him that opportunity.’

Related Article

Schumer weaponizes Mullin nomination to demand DHS overhaul, says
Schumer weaponizes Mullin nomination to demand DHS overhaul, says ‘rot’ goes beyond Noem
This post appeared first on FOX NEWS