Author

admin

Browsing

Levi Strauss has agreed to sell Dockers to brand management firm Authentic Brands Group for $311 million, the companies announced Tuesday. 

Under the terms of the deal, Authentic will own Dockers’ intellectual property while Centric Brands will take on operations, handling manufacturing, sourcing and distribution. Under the brand management business model, Levi’s stands to make up to $391 million in future years based on how well Dockers performs under the Authentic umbrella, which also includes Forever 21′s intellectual property and brands like Reebok and Nautica.

“The Dockers transaction further aligns our portfolio with our strategic priorities, focusing on our direct-to-consumer first approach, growing our international presence and investing in opportunities across women’s and denim lifestyle,” Levi’s CEO Michelle Gass said in a statement. “After a robust process, we are confident that we maximized the value of the business and that Authentic is the right organization to usher in the next chapter of growth for the Dockers brand.” 

In October, Levi’s announced it was considering selling Dockers as it looked to focus on growing its namesake line and its athleisure brand, Beyond Yoga. Levi’s created Dockers in 1986 as a hedge against denim and to offer consumers an alternative: khakis. The brand was hugely popular throughout the 1990s and 2000s, but khakis have since fallen out of fashion in the U.S., especially recently as denim makes another comeback. 

To grow Dockers, Levi’s needed to offer more tops and bottoms, but the company is doing the same thing at its namesake banner and there was too much overlap between the two brands. Dockers’ performance was also dragging down Levi’s results and Gass, who took the helm of the company a little over a year ago, has been working to cut off extraneous businesses to fuel growth and focus on direct selling. 

In the three months ended March 2, Levi’s reported $67 million in revenue related to Dockers. The figure isn’t comparable to the year-ago period because Levi’s only recently started breaking out the performance of each individual brand. 

While khakis have fallen out of favor in the U.S., Dockers is still popular abroad, which is what makes a brand management company a strategic fit, according to people who have seen Dockers’ financials and spoke on the condition of anonymity because the details were private. Firms like Authentic are skilled at rapidly licensing and deploying brands internationally.

In a press release, Authentic said it plans to “unlock new opportunities” for Dockers through its global network of 1,700 licensing partners. It said it is in active discussions with regional operators in Latin America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia to expand Dockers’ existing businesses across those markets. 

“Few brands own a category the way Dockers does, yet still have so much room to grow,” said Matt Maddox, president at Authentic. “Its legacy in casualwear gives it a strong foundation, but the real opportunity lies in reimagining the brand for a new generation. Through our global platform and deep licensing network, we’re committed to stewarding the brand into its next era of growth and relevance.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

  • Tennessee is home to a rare quarterback competition inside the SEC. Most starting jobs are settled.
  • Door cracked in Alabama, but Ty Simpson leads pack.
  • Is Gunnar Stockton the answer in Georgia? Spring game points to him leading the battle.

Steve Sarkisian cleared up the quarterback drama at Texas in February when he announced Arch Manning as the Longhorns’ starting quarterback. Just kidding — there was no drama at Texas. Sarkisian’s anointment of Arch equated to saying it’s hot in Texas in July.

Thanks, we know.

Not everyone’s a Manning, but Texas’ quarterback situation is more the rule than the exception this offseason. Most SEC teams feature an obvious starter.

Here’s an assessment of the quarterback situation at each SEC school:

We know the starting quarterback

Some coaches won’t announce their quarterback until much closer to the season opener, but I’m confident in pegging each of these as their team’s starter:

Auburn (Jackson Arnold)

Coach Hugh Freeze declared Arnold, the Oklahoma transfer, as “the No. 1.’ If Arnold struggles like he did with the Sooners, Stanford transfer Ashton Daniels provides another option with starting experience.

Kentucky (Zach Calzada)

Way back in 2021, Calzada started for Texas A&M in an upset of Alabama. Now, he’s entering his seventh season with his fourth team. He’s fresh off an appearance in the FCS playoffs with Incarnate Word.

Arkansas (Taylen Green)

Green returns as the starter following an up-and-down first season in Fayetteville after he transferred from Boise State. A lack of proven playmakers around Green projects as a bigger issue.

Florida (DJ Lagway)

The Gators won four straight games to finish last season while Lagway started as a true freshman. He’s a top-tier SEC quarterback.

Texas (Arch Manning)

If Manning lives up to the hype, the Longhorns should have the juice to contend for a national championship.

BEST OF BEST: Our ranking of college football’s top 25 coaches

Oklahoma (John Mateer)

The Sooners needed solutions on offense. Insert Mateer, the Washington State transfer who rushed for 826 yards last season.

LSU (Garrett Nussmeier)

Nussmeier is the SEC’s only returning quarterback who passed for more than 4,000 yards last season.

Vanderbilt (Diego Pavia)

Pavia owns two wins against Auburn and one against Alabama. He has made Vanderbilt relevant. That’s no easy feat.

Missouri (Beau Pribula)

Pribula teased some dual-threat talents in two seasons as Penn State’s backup. He’s a nice portal pickup for Missouri.

Texas A&M (Marcel Reed)

Reed supplanted Conner Weigman as the Aggies’ starter last season, and Weigman’s offseason transfer to Houston means there’s no lingering competition.

South Carolina (LaNorris Sellers)

Sellers became one of the SEC’s top breakout players last season. Now, he’s a proven commodity.

Mississippi State (Blake Shapen)

A shoulder injury sidelined Shapen after four games last season. The good news for Mississippi State is that he’s back, and its offense looked better last year with him on the field.

Mississippi (Austin Simmons)

Coach Lane Kiffin described Simmons as having “a very high ceiling.” Simmons showed a glimpse of that ceiling in a relief appearance against Georgia last season.

Door remains cracked in quarterback competition

Alabama (Ty Simpson)

Offensive coordinator Ryan Grubb said after the spring game that Simpson would start if Alabama’s season started then. Five-star freshman Keelon Russell might be the quarterback of the future. As for the present, Simpson enjoys the edge after three years as an Alabama backup.

Georgia (Gunner Stockton)

Stockton retains the inside track for the job after starting Georgia’s playoff game against Notre Dame. He showed his lead in the competition over Ryan Puglisi in Georgia’s spring game.

Door fully open in quarterback competition

Tennessee (Joey Aguilar or …)

The Vols will have a new starting quarterback after Nico Iamaleava transferred to UCLA in April. Former Appalachian State starter Joey Aguilar will headline a competition that includes Jake Merklinger and George MacIntyre.

Merklinger was Tennessee’s third-stringer last season. MacIntyre is a true freshman, making him the long shot. Aguilar’s starting experience might give him a slight edge. He must quickly learn Josh Heupel’s offense after transferring this spring. Aguilar struggled with his completion rate and interceptions at App State, but he has mobility and moxie.

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

After Chicago Sky star Angel Reese claimed that a fan made racially insensitive comments to her during the team’s season-opening game against the Indiana Fever at Gainbridge Fieldhouse, the WNBA launched a formal investigation.

It appears the Fever are backing the league’s actions.

In a statement from the WNBA, the league said, ‘The WNBA strongly condemns racism, hate and discrimination in all forms — they have no place in our league or in society.  We are aware of the allegations and are looking into the matter.’

Fever star Caitlin Clark expressed similar dismay for the alleged racist acts aimed at Reese. Following team practice on Monday, Clark said ‘There’s no place for that in our game. There’s no place for that in society.’

She continued, ‘We want every person that comes into our arena, whether player, whether fan, to have a great experience. I appreciate the league doing that. I appreciate the Fever organization has been at the forefront of that since Day 1, and what they’re doing. With the investigation, we’ll leave that up to them to find anything, and take the proper action if so.’

Clark’s sentiment has been mirrored by Fever teammate Brianna Turner. On Monday, Turner, who also serves as the WNBA players’ union treasurer, said she supports the league opening an investigation into Reese’s claims.

‘One person is too many,’ Turner said. ‘If one person said something, I think it’s worth an investigation. If they find nothing, they find nothing. But if someone thinks they heard something or said something, I think it’s warranted to investigate.’

Does this investigation have to do with the scrum between Reese and Clark?

During the third quarter of Indiana’s 93-58 win over Chicago, Reese and Clark got into a brief fight after Clark committed a flagrant 1 foul on Reese, who was attempting to make a rebound. According to IndyStar, the investigation has nothing to do with that foul.

Did Clark hear any racist comments?

Clark claims she did not hear anything, but also noted that she couldn’t really hear anything with how crowded the arena was.

‘It’s super loud in here, and though I didn’t hear anything, I think that’s why they’re doing the investigation,’ said Clark. ‘That doesn’t mean nothing happened, so I’ll just trust the league’s investigation, and I’m sure they’ll do the right thing.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump will make an announcement on the Golden Dome missile defense system at 3 p.m. ET this afternoon alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Space Force Vice Chief of Operations, General Michael Guetlein, a U.S. official confirmed to Fox News. 

The Pentagon’s recommendations for the multibillion-dollar project will be announced, including the drafted architecture and implementation plan for the complex satellite system, the official added. 

A total of $25 billion has been carved out of next year’s defense budget for this system, but the Congressional Budget office estimates it could cost as much as $500 billion over the next 20 years.   

Officials told Reuters that Guetlein will likely be named as the lead program manager for the Golden Dome project. 

Last month, Reuters reported that Elon Musk’s SpaceX and two of its partners have emerged as frontrunners to build part of the missile defense system. 

SpaceX is teaming up with software maker Palantir and defense technology company Anduril for a joint bid, with all three of the companies having met with top officials in the Trump administration and the Pentagon to pitch their proposal, sources told Reuters at the time. 

Their plan is to build and launch 400 to up to more than 1,000 satellites to track the movement of missiles around the globe, the sources said. A fleet of 200 attack satellites armed with missiles or lasers would then eliminate enemy projectiles, but the SpaceX group is not anticipated to play a role in the weaponization of those satellites, the sources added.   

Trump has ordered the construction of an advanced, next-generation missile defense shield to protect the U.S. from an aerial attack.  

In January, he signed an executive order that tasks Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth with drawing up plans to build an ‘Iron Dome for America’ that will protect Americans from the threat of missiles launched by a foreign enemy. 

The Pentagon has received interest from more than 180 companies to help build the project, a U.S. official told Reuters.   

Fox News’ Sarah Rumpf-Whitten contributed to this report.   

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Republican senators are renewing calls for the Pentagon’s watchdog to investigate alleged misconduct and efforts to ‘undermine the chain of command’ by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley, Fox News Digital has learned. 

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Jim Banks, R-Ind., penned a letter obtained by Fox News Digital to the acting inspector general of the Department of Defense, Steven Stebbins, renewing their 2022 request for a review of Milley’s conduct.

‘We are writing to ensure that our concerns about alleged misconduct by the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, are finally addressed,’ Grassley and Banks wrote. 

The two senators made a request for an independent review of the conduct on Aug. 17, 2022, when Banks was serving as the chair of the House Republican Study Committee, but the review was closed by the former inspector general ‘without ever providing acceptable answers to our questions.’ 

Grassley and Banks said that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has since ‘revived this review,’ directing the acting inspector general to ‘conduct a review of General Milley’s alleged misconduct, including his actions to ‘undermine the chain of command.’’ 

Hegseth is also seeking answers on whether ‘enough evidence exists for General Milley to be stripped of a star in retirement.’ 

‘The Secretary’s request rungs parallel to ours,’ Grassley and Banks wrote, noting that Hegseth’s request ‘takes priority,’ but requested that once his request is complete, they will expect ‘some long overdue answers.’

The senators’ inquiry was triggered by ‘explosive statements’ made by Milley in several books, including ‘Peril’ by Bob Woodward and Robert Costa. The book chronicled Milley making ‘disparaging remarks about his Commander-in-Chief’ and attempting ‘to insert himself in the nuclear chain of command despite having no nuclear command authority,’ Grassley and Banks said. 

They also referenced a promise Milley made to his Chinese counterparts ahead of any potential U.S. attacks on Beijing. 

Fox News Digital reported in 2021 that Milley confirmed that he did, in fact, tell his Chinese counterpart that he would likely call ahead of any potential U.S. attacks on China, but he maintained that he had that conversation at the direction of then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper after assessing intelligence suggesting heightened Chinese concerns about escalation.

Milley added, though, that he was ‘not going to tip off any enemy to what the United States is going to do in an actual plan.’ 

The book also chronicled comments in which Milley said he believed then-President Donald Trump ‘had gone into serious mental decline … and could go rogue and order military action or use nuclear weapons, without going through required procedures.’

The lawmakers also pointed to the book’s report that Milley had to ‘take any and all necessary precautions’ to prevent the former president from engaging in a ‘rogue’ military action and he ‘wanted to find a way to inject, if not require, that second opinion.’

Grassley and Banks said that the Department of Defense’s former inspector general’s ‘refusal to investigate allowed Milley to dodge responsibility.’  

‘The nation’s highest-ranking military officer has a solemn responsibility to set an example of excellence and to model good conduct for all American service members,’ they wrote. ‘The record suggests that General Milley failed to meet those standards.’ 

Grassley and Banks said Milley’s ‘conduct and willful undermining of his Commander-in-Chief posed a grave threat to civilian control of the military.’ 

‘The issues raised by Milley’s alleged misconduct are too important to be swept under the rug,’ they wrote. ‘They must be examined, and if substantiated, General Milley should be held accountable.’ 

Grassley and Banks added that the acting inspector general’s ‘full cooperation would be appreciated.’ 

Milley did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Tuesday called U.S. demands that Tehran stop enriching uranium entirely ‘utter nonsense’ and questioned whether future nuclear talks could succeed. 

‘For the Americans to say, ‘We won’t allow Iran to enrich uranium,’ is utter nonsense,’ he said in a post on X. ‘We aren’t waiting for anyone’s permission. 

‘The Islamic Republic has certain policies, and it will pursue them,’ he added, without expanding on what these policies are. 

Iran in recent years has been under international pressure to halt its nuclear program, as many fear Tehran is actually in pursuit of nuclear weapons development. 

Iran has not stated it intends to build a nuclear weapon, but it has enriched uranium to near-weapons grade and bolstered its missile program in what experts argue is an important step to ensure Tehran could fire a nuclear warhead.

While uranium can be enriched for civil nuclear power and nations across the globe rely on nuclear energy, including the U.S., which utilizes nuclear energy to supply nearly 20% of its energy needs and is its largest source of clean energy, Iran’s reliance on nuclear energy amounted to less than 1% in 2022, according to the International Energy Agency. 

The White House did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s questions over whether it has in fact demanded that Tehran halt all uranium enrichment. 

However, Khamenei suggested the Trump administration’s push to negotiate on Iran’s nuclear program could be short-lived. 

‘Indirect negotiations took place during Martyr Raisi’s term similar to what’s happening now. Needless to say, there was no result,’ he added in reference to negotiation attempts under the Biden administration. ‘We don’t think these negotiations will yield results now either. We don’t know what will happen.’

Reports suggested that the fifth round of nuclear talks could take place this weekend in Rome, but Khamenei, as well as his Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, said Iran had not yet agreed to the talks following the U.S.’ latest demands.  

‘A date has been suggested, but we have not yet accepted it,’ Araqchi told reporters Tuesday, according to a Reuters report. ‘We are witnessing positions on the U.S. side that do not go along with any logic and are creating problems for the negotiations. 

‘That’s why we have not determined the next round of talks, we are reviewing the matter and hope logic will prevail,’ Araqchi added.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

BEIJING — One Chinese baby products company announced Tuesday it is officially entering the United States, the world’s largest consumer market — regardless of the trade war.

Shanghai-based Bc Babycare expects its supply chain diversification and the U.S. market potential to more than offset the impact of ongoing U.S.-China trade tensions, according to Chi Yang, the company’s vice president of Europe and the Americas.

“Even [if] the political things are not steady … I’m very confident about our product for the moment,” he told CNBC, adding he anticipates “very fast” growth in the U.S. in coming years. That includes his bold predictions that Bc Babycare’s flagship baby carrier can become the best-seller on Amazon.com in half a year, and that U.S. sales can grow by 10-fold in a year.

The $159.99 carrier, eligible for a $40 discount, already has 4.7 stars on Amazon.com across more than 30 reviews. The device claims to reduce pressure on the parent’s body by up to 33%. A far cheaper version of the baby carrier is a top seller among travel products for pregnancy and childbirth on JD.com in China.

Bc Babycare already has the carrier stocked in its U.S. warehouses, and has a network of factories and raw materials suppliers in the Americas, Europe and Asia, Yang said. “The global supply chain is one of the things we keep on building in the past couple years.”

The Trump administration has sought to reduce U.S. reliance on China-made goods and to encourage the return of manufacturing jobs to the U.S. In a rapid escalation of tensions last month, the U.S. and China had added tariffs of more than 100% on each other’s goods. Last week, the two sides agreed to a 90-day pause for most of the new duties in order to discuss a trade deal.

Baby gear is particularly sensitive to tariffs since the majority of those sold in the U.S. are made in China, said U.S.-based Newell Brands, which owns stroller company Graco, on an April 30 earnings call. That’s according to a FactSet transcript.

The company said it raised baby gear prices by about 20% in the last few weeks, but had not incorporated the additional 125% tariffs announced in mid-April. Newell said on the call it had about three to four months of inventory in the U.S., and had paused additional orders from China.

The company did not respond to a request for comment about whether it had resumed orders from China and whether it planned more price increases.

Bc Babycare declined to share how much it planned to invest in the U.S. But Yang said the company plans to open an office in the country and hire about five to 10 locals.

The company initially plans to sell online, spend on marketing and eventually work with major retailers for offline store sales. Its partners for raw materials and research include three U.S. companies: Lyra, Dow and Eastman.

The Chinese company, which entered the baby products segment in 2014, in 2021 claimed a 700 million yuan ($97.09 million) funding round from investors including Sequoia Capital China.

Yang said the company scrutinizes the comments section on Chinese and U.S. e-commerce websites to improve its products. As a result, the U.S. version of the baby carrier is softer and larger than the Chinese version, he said.

Bc Babycare’s U.S. market ambitions reflect how large U.S. and European multinationals not only face growing competition in China, but also in their home markets.

“After experiencing substantial growth due to the premiumization of consumption in the Chinese market, multinational brands are now entering a challenging second phase where they compete fiercely for market share,” Dave Xie, retail and consumer goods partner in Shanghai at consultancy Oliver Wyman, said in a statement last week.

Oliver Wyman said in a report last month that the Chinese market has become the incubator for premium product innovations that are being exported. The authors noted, for example, that Tineco floor scrubbers have become Amazon best-sellers.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

BOSTON — As the baseball sailed deep to left field, Juan Soto took two steps backward out of the batter’s box to appreciate the flight.

The only problem? The ball bounced about halfway up the Green Monster at Fenway Park. Soto, who initially delayed, did not have time to recover and settled for a single in the sixth inning, with the Mets trailing the Red Sox, 3-1.

‘I hit it pretty hard, a really short Green Monster, but tried to get to second but it wasn’t enough,’ Soto said.

Mets manager Carlos Mendoza said he will address Soto’s baserunning after Monday night’s misjudgment on the ball, which traveled an estimated 347 feet, according to Statcast.

‘We’ll talk to him about it. Tonight, obviously someone gets a hold of one and if he knows when he gets it, it’s Juan,’ Mendoza said. ‘He thought he had it. But with the wind and all that, and in this ballpark and anywhere, but in particular in this one with that wall right there, you gotta get out of the box. We’ll discuss that.’

It was the second consecutive night in which Soto’s hustle was called into question. The Mets outfielder was slow out of the batter’s box after hitting a sharp ground ball to the right side of the infield in the eighth inning of Sunday’s 8-2 loss to the Yankees. DJ LeMahieu made a sliding play on the ball, which he knocked down but did not glove cleanly. As Soto broke into a full sprint, it was too late and he was thrown out at first base.

Soto, who stole second after Monday’s long single, did not see any issue with his baserunning.

‘I think I’ve been hustling pretty hard,’ Soto said. ‘If you saw it today, you could tell.’

The 26-year-old, who signed a record 15-year, $765 million deal in the offseason, finished Monday night 1-for-4. His batting average is lingering at .246. He grounded into his ninth double play of the season in the top of the third inning.

The Mets superstar, who is coming off a rough return to the Bronx, is enduring another rocky stretch. In his last eight games, Soto has four hits in 29 at-bats, scoring three times, walking seven and striking out eight times. On the season, Soto has a .376 on-base percentage and .815 OPS.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

As the Trump administration and Republicans across the country push to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies across the board, the executive director of a top consumer advocacy group spoke to Fox News Digital about what companies and institutions are doing to skirt those efforts.

‘Over the last few months, we’ve sort of seen a phase shift in the ways that they’re trying to keep this DEI grift going,’ Consumers’ Research Executive Director Will Hild told Fox News Digital about companies, organizations, hospitals and other entities that are attempting to rebrand DEI and environmental, social and governance in the Trump era. 

‘At first, they just pushed back on, tried to defend DEI itself, but when that became so obvious that what DEI really was was anti-White, anti-Asian, sometimes anti-Jewish discrimination in hiring and promotion, they abandoned that,’ Hild said. ‘Now what they’re trying to do is simply change the terminology that has become so toxic to their brand. So we’re seeing a lot of companies move from having departments of DEI, for example, to ‘departments of belonging’ or ‘departments of inclusivity.’’

Several major companies have publicly distanced themselves from DEI in recent months as the new administration signs executive orders eliminating the practice while making the argument that meritocracy should be the focus. 

However, FOX Business exclusively reported in April on Consumers’ Research warning that some businesses appear to be rebranding the same efforts rather than eliminating them. 

‘It is the exact same toxic nonsense under a new wrapper, and they’re just hoping to extend the grift because a lot of these people, I would say most of the people working in DEI are useless,’ Hild told Fox News Digital. 

‘They are mediocrities who have managed to get very high-level positions that they’re not qualified for by running this DEI grift, and they’re desperate,’ he continued. ‘They can’t just move into running logistics for Amazon because that takes actual competence and intelligence and if you’re in a DEI department, you probably don’t have either of those things. So they are desperate to keep this grift going so they can justify their own existence. So they’re changing it into a new wrapper.’

Hild, who spoke to Fox News Digital at the State Financial Officers Foundation conference in Orlando, Florida, also explained some of the other issues Consumers’ Research is focused on going forward, including fighting ‘woke’ hospitals in three different areas.

‘One is net zero pledges and activities that raise costs for consumers, patients having to pay more because these hospitals are investing millions, sometimes tens of millions of dollars, into green boondoggle projects that have nothing to do with the treatment of patients and the improvement of their health, but they do raise prices,’ Hild said.

Secondly, Hild said that his group is concerned about DEI quotas at hospitals.

Hild explained that the third and ‘worst’ issue is transgender surgeries and procedures being forced onto children.

‘Pushing of radical left transgender ideology onto kids, and not just pushing it ideologically and rhetorically, but pushing it physically, and what I mean by that is the injection of damaging, lifelong damaging hormones into children to, quote, unquote, change their sex, which is impossible, and even worse, the actual surgical application, removal and mutilation of their genitals, which is a grotesque violation of the Hippocratic Oath,’ Hild said.

Consumers’ Research has been actively involved in launching advertising campaigns against hospitals across the United States, including a recent campaign against Henry Ford Health in Michigan, calling out what it says are situations where hospitals are putting ‘politics over patients.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration’s dismantling of the U.S. Institute of Peace, writing in a ruling that the removal of its board members and the takeover of its headquarters by members of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are actions that are ‘null and void.’ 

The response this week from U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell comes after the Institute filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration in March calling for ‘the immediate intervention of this Court to stop Defendants from completing the unlawful dismantling of the Institute and irreparably impairing Plaintiffs’ ability to perform their vital peace promotion and conflict resolution work as tasked by Congress.’ 

‘The Administration removed the Institute’s leadership, including plaintiff Board members and its president in contravention of statutory limitations, and had personnel from a newly created federal office, called the Department of Government Efficiency, forcibly take over the Institute’s headquarters on March 17,’ Howell wrote in her ruling. ‘With a newly installed USIP president, the Administration then handed off USIP’s property for no consideration and abruptly terminated nearly all of its staff and activities around the world.’

‘Congress’s restrictions on the President’s removal power of USIP Board members are squarely constitutional, and the President and his Administration’s acts to the contrary are unlawful and ultra vires. The actions that have occurred since then – at the direction of the President to reduce USIP to its ‘statutory minimums’ – including the removal of USIP’s president, his replacement by officials affiliated with DOGE, the termination of nearly all of USIP’s staff, and the transfer of USIP property to the General Services Administration, were thus effectuated by illegitimately-installed leaders who lacked legal authority to take these actions, which must therefore be declared null and void,’ she added. 

The Institute of Peace is an independent, national institution funded by Congress that was established in 1984 under the Reagan administration to promote peace and diplomacy on the international stage.  

‘Congress has endorsed USIP’s important work by continuing to fund the Institute through appropriations bills signed by seven different Presidents from both major political parties, including the current President during his first term in office,’ Howell said in the ruling.  

‘In a drastic and abrupt change of course, within the first month of his second term, President Trump unilaterally decided that USIP is ‘unnecessary,’ issuing Executive Order 14217 to this effect, and then his Administration rushed through actions, including removal of Board members, to reach the professed goal of reducing all of USIP’s operations and personnel to the bare minimum to perform only mandated statutory tasks, while ignoring the broader statutory goals set out for this organization to fulfill,’ she also said. 

Ultimately, Howell concluded, the Trump administration’s actions ‘represented a gross usurpation of power and a way of conducting government affairs that unnecessarily traumatized the committed leadership and employees of USIP, who deserved better.’

The White House did not immediately respond Tuesday to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. 

In March, it said the Trump administration gutted the Institute of Peace of ‘rogue bureaucrats’ who held a tense standoff with a DOGE team that required police intervention. 

‘Rogue bureaucrats will not be allowed to hold agencies hostage,’ White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said at the time. ‘The Trump administration will enforce the president’s executive authority and ensure his agencies remain accountable to the American people.’ 

The administration now has 30 days to file an appeal to the ruling.

‘The United States Institute of Peace has existed for 40 years on a $50 million annual budget, but failed to deliver peace,’ Kelly told the Associated Press. ‘President Trump is right to reduce failed, useless entities like USIP to their statutory minimum, and this rogue judge’s attempt to impede on the separation of powers will not be the last say on the matter.’ 

Fox News Digital’s Emma Colton contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS