Author

admin

Browsing

President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the U.S. will soon begin construction of a ‘Golden Dome’ missile defense system they say will be a next-generation ‘game changer’ protecting the American homeland from outside adversaries.

A similar system, the Iron Dome, has already been developed in Israel with U.S. assistance and has proven effective in repelling missile attacks. Now. Trump says a bigger, more technologically advanced, multi-layered dome system will soon be installed in America.  

The president announced the ‘one big beautiful’ budget bill being discussed in Congress will include $25 billion in initial funding for the project, which he expects will cost $175 billion overall. He said he expects a major phase of the dome will be complete in under three years and that it will be ‘fully operational before the end of my term.’

He noted there is significant support for the project in Congress, quipping, ‘It’s amazing how easy this one is to fund.’

‘In the campaign, I promised the American people that I would build a cutting-edge missile defense shield to protect our homeland from the threat of foreign missile attack. And that’s what we’re doing today,’ he said, adding that the Golden Dome ‘will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from the other side of the world and even if they are launched from space.’

Trump also announced he is placing Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein in charge of the project, saying, ‘No one is more qualified for this job.’

Hegseth called the Golden Dome a ‘bold initiative’ and another addition to Trump’s ‘long and growing list of promises made and promises kept.’

He said investing in the new system is essential to respond to growing threats from countries like Russia and China.

‘Ultimately, this right here, the Golden Dome for America, is a game changer,’ said Hegseth. ‘It’s a generational investment in the security of America and Americans.’

Addressing Trump, Hegseth said, ‘Mr. President, you said we’re going to secure our southern border and get 100% operational control after the previous administration allowed an invasion of people into our country. President Reagan 40 years ago cast the vision for it. The technology wasn’t there. Now it is, and you’re following through to say we will protect the homeland from cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, hypersonic missiles, drones, whether they’re conventional or nuclear.’

Guetlein indicated the Golden Dome is necessary to preserve the safety, security and the quality of life Americans are used to.

‘We owe it to our children and our children’s children to protect them and afford them a quality of life that we have all grown up enjoying. Golden dome will afford that,’ said Guetlein.

The general said ‘our adversaries have become very capable and very intent on holding the homeland at risk.’

‘While we have been focused on keeping the peace overseas, our adversaries have been quickly modernizing their nuclear forces, building up ballistic missiles capable of hosting multiple warheads, building out hypersonic missiles capable of attacking the United States within an hour and traveling at 6,000 miles an hour, building cruise missiles that can navigate around our radar and our defenses, building submarines that can sneak up on our shores and, worse yet, building space weapons,’ Guetlein said. 

‘It is time that we change that equation and start doubling down on the protection of the homeland.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The top-seeded Oklahoma City Thunder are prohibitive favorites as they open the NBA’s Western Conference Finals Tuesday night against the No. 6-seeded Minnesota Timberwolves.

The Thunder needed to work a little harder to get here, going the distance against the Denver Nuggets before finally pulling away with a 125-93 victory in Game 7 behind 35 points from MVP candidate Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. This marks the franchise’s sixth appearance in the conference finals since moving from Seattle in 2008, though Oklahoma City is still looking for its first title.

Minnesota earned a second consecutive trip to the conference finals by eliminating the Steph Curry-less Golden State Warriors in five games. By the time this game tips off, the Timberwolves will have enjoyed five full days of rest, compared to just one off day for the Thunder.

What time is Timberwolves vs. Thunder?

Game 1 of the NBA’s Western Conference Final series between the Minnesota Timberwolves and Oklahoma City Thunder gets underway at 8:30 p.m. ET/7:30 p.m. CT.

Timberwolves vs. Thunder predictions: Expert Picks

USA TODAY Sports experts make predictions ahead of the series Games 1:

Timberwolves vs. Thunder series winner

  • Jeff Zillgitt: Thunder in seven
  • Lorenzo Reyes: Thunder in six
  • Heather Tucker: Thunder in six
  • James Williams: Thunder in six
  • Jordan Mendoza: Timberwolves in six
  • Scooby Axson: Thunder in six
  • Cydney Henderson: Thunder in seven

Timberwolves vs. Thunder Game 1 winner

  • Jeff Zillgitt: Oklahoma City Thunder
  • Lorenzo Reyes: Oklahoma City Thunder
  • Heather Tucker: Oklahoma City Thunder
  • James Williams: Oklahoma City Thunder
  • Scooby Axson: Oklahoma City Thunder
  • Cydney Henderson: Oklahoma City Thunder

Timberwolves vs. Thunder odds

Odds via BetMGM as of Monday, May 19

Game 1 odds

  • Line: Thunder – 7.5
  • Moneyline: Thunder -325, Timberwolves +260
  • Over/under: 215.5

Odds to win Western Conference Final

  • Oklahoma City Thunder -350
  • Minnesota Timberwolves +280

How to watch Timberwolves vs. Thunder: TV, stream

  • Time: 8:30 p.m. ET/7:30 p.m. CT
  • Location: Paycom Center; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
  • TV: ESPN
  • Stream: ESPN+, Fubo
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The last time the Carolina Hurricanes and Florida Panthers met in the playoffs, Game 1 of the 2023 Eastern Conference finals was memorable.

The game went to overtime and Ryan Lomberg’s goal for Florida in the first overtime was disallowed. The Panthers’ Matthew Tkachuk scored with 12.7 seconds left in the fourth overtime for a 3-2 victory in the sixth-longest game in NHL history. Florida goalie Sergei Bobrovsky finished with 63 saves and Carolina’s Frederik Andersen had 57.

All except Lomberg are back as the defending champion Panthers and Hurricanes meet again in the conference finals. The Panthers are trying for a third consecutive trip to the Stanley Cup Final. The Hurricanes, swept in 2023 in four one-goal losses, will try to end a 12-game losing streak in the conference finals.

Here’s what to know about Game 1 of the 2025 Eastern Conference finals between the Carolina Hurricanes and Florida Panthers:

What time is Hurricanes vs. Panthers NHL playoff game?

Game 1 of the Carolina Hurricanes-Florida Panthers series is scheduled to start at 8 p.m. ET in Raleigh, North Carolina.

How to watch Hurricanes vs. Panthers NHL playoff game: TV, stream

  • Time: 8 p.m. ET
  • Location: Lenovo Center (Raleigh, North Carolina)
  • TV: TNT
  • Stream: Sling TV, Max
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

If the NHL playoffs’ conference finals look familiar, it’s because both series are a repeat of recent matchups.

The Dallas Stars and Edmonton Oilers met in last season’s Western Conference finals. Edmonton won that series in six games and went on to lose in the 2024 Stanley Cup Final.

The Carolina Hurricanes and the Florida Panthers met in the 2023 Eastern Conference finals. Florida swept that series and lost in that year’s Stanley Cup Final before picking up the team’s first championship in 2024.

Here’s what the same and what’s different between now and the last time these teams met in the playoffs:

Dallas Stars vs. Edmonton Oilers

What’s the same for the Stars: Coach Peter DeBoer is in his third consecutive conference finals. Goalie Jake Oettinger, defenseman Miro Heiskanen and the rest of the core are mostly back.

What’s different for the Stars: They have a new-look first line with trade acquisitions Mikko Rantanen and Mikael Granlund joining Roope Hintz. Rantanen leads the league in playoff scoring. Defenseman Thomas Harley is a bigger factor, stepping up during Heiskanen’s injury. Jason Robertson is trying to find his game again in the playoffs after coming back from an injury in the final game of the season.

What’s the same for the Oilers: Teams have to figure out how to shut down Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl. Goalie Stuart Skinner again has bounced back after sitting out following a slow playoff start.

What’s different for the Oilers: Evander Kane is healthy and a force. He was hurting in last year’s series and eventually missed all of this regular season. He has four goals since his return. The Oilers have better scoring depth than last season. Newcomer Jake Walman leads the league with a plus-13 rating. Gritty Trent Frederic was added near the trade deadline. Edmonton is starting to get recognized for its defensive play.

Carolina Hurricanes vs. Florida Panthers

What’s the same for the Hurricanes: Coach Rod Brind’Amour is the conference finals for the third time. The core is basically the same.

What’s different for the Hurricanes: Forward Andrei Svechnikov was hurt in the 2023 playoffs. He has eight goals this postseason. Goalie Frederik Andersen’s numbers are even better than his stellar stats from back then.

What’s the same for the Panthers: Paul Maurice continues his successful coaching. He has made the conference finals during each of his three seasons with the team. Goalie Sergei Bobrovsky, defenseman Aaron Ekblad and five of their top 2023 playoff scorers are still part of the core.

What’s different for the Panthers: They added forward Brad Marchand and defenseman Seth Jones before the trade deadline and they’re playing big roles. Marchand leads the team in playoff scoring while playing on the third line. Jones is averaging more than 25 minutes a game.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

When it comes to the Philadelphia Eagles’ infamous ‘tush push,’ some have more to say than others.

The Eagles have made a living on that signature play that comes with many nicknames. In 2024, they rode that controversy all the way to a Super Bowl victory. That was enough to ramp up the conversation.

That became especially true when Shawn Hochuli channeled his inner annoyed principal and told the Washington Commanders he could award the Eagles a score in the NFC championship game.

So like kids on the playground at recess, some NFL teams have learned that life isn’t fair and they’re ready to do something about it.

Some have tried and almost all have failed to replicate the success that was pioneered by Jalen Hurts, Jason Kelce and Nick Sirianni. The Green Bay Packers chose to present the case to ban the controversial play, and NFL owners are set to vote on its fate this week.

The question is: Should it be banned? Does the ‘tush push’ rise to the level of annoyance like Silly Bandz or fidget spinners? Is it as dangerous as old-fashioned dodgeball or a book that found itself caught up in a heated political debate?

USA TODAY Sports’ NFL experts present their cases on the ‘Brotherly Shove’ and whether or not the play should be outlawed:

Nate Davis

I could be swayed to vote against the push play – but in the future, when it reaches the point of essentially being an automatic conversion league-wide, similar to what extra points became when they were 20-yard kicks. But now? Putting a stop to it in the moment feels something like a vendetta against the Super Bowl champion Eagles, who use it far more frequently – and effectively – than any other team.

After all, the NFL is only a copycat league when you can copy the cat – but the Eagles have tush-pushed like no other. And I’ve been around them more than enough to know how they feel.

Pro Bowl guard Landon Dickerson told me it’s basically a modified quarterback sneak, so legislating it out of the game is problematic – though I might concede having QB Jalen Hurts rammed from behind by TE Dallas Goedert and others could be the component of the play most logically disallowed.

Left tackle Jordan Mailata told me after last season’s NFC championship game rout of the Washington Commanders, who crumbled against the tush push – I see you, Frankie Luvu – that the strategy encapsulated Philly winning in the “mental warfare” department.

As for the notion it’s dangerous – despite the utter lack of data to support that theorem – come on. You really going to contend the tush push is more fraught with bodily risk than RB Saquon Barkley barreling toward a goal line packed with bodies at full speed – for him or defenders?

You want my vote to kill the tush push? Fine. Just bring me a better case than I’ve seen to date. Until then? Stop the Eagles. Or successfully mimic them.

Vote: Keep it!

Tyler Dragon

It seems that most of the NFL’s rules cater toward the offense and handicap the defense, so it’s kind of refreshing to see the NFL consider a rule that helps the defense. But the tush push isn’t a play the NFL should outlaw.

According to ESPN, the Eagles have a success rate of 86% since they started doing the tush push in 2022. The NFL average is 76%. While the success rate is high in short-yardage situations, the play isn’t unstoppable.

I’m all for the NFL becoming a bit more physical on both sides of football (and still remaining as safe as possible). There isn’t evidence to suggest that the tush push is a dangerous play. But it’s a physical play in an NFL game that’s becoming less physical. 

Vote: Keep it!

Tom Viera

The Eagles are one of 32 teams with a competitive advantage on this play. In 2024, they successfully executed 28 out of 34 ‘tush push’ attempts, according to Next Gen Stats. Other teams prepare for the play, but they still can’t stop it.

That’s bad for entertainment value, therefore it’s bad for business. Imagine in a few years’ time if all 32 teams learned to run the ‘tush push’ successfully; How’s that entertaining?

Dust off the traditional QB sneak perfected by Tom Brady, which never garnered the same level of ire and detest as the ‘tush push.’ Should the play be banned, Jalen Hurts and the Eagles are likely to navigate this situation better than many expect.

Vote: Ban it!

Jack McKessy

The Green Bay Packers’ proposal to ban the play reads like a tattletale child on the playground that didn’t get included in the latest game of tag.

“Well if I can’t have fun, then no one should.”

All 32 teams could run the same exact play if they so choose. There’s no “secret” or “hidden method,” but the other 31 teams still don’t try it.

With that being the case, Occam’s razor would say the Eagles simply run a quarterback sneak play better than every other team, and every other team can’t run their own “tush push” effectively. It’s a copycat league, so why hasn’t this play been effectively copied yet in the three years since it’s been introduced?

That’s not to mention the poor wording of the current proposal, which leaves plenty of room for loopholes and liberal interpretations. And if the rule change does pass, the Eagles and other teams will simply find those loopholes or come up with other ways to run effective plays in short yardage situations.

Banning a play that only one out of 32 teams has used effectively and consistently for three years is like the teacher listening to that aforementioned tattletale child and banning the game of tag at recess. The rest of the kids are just going to find other ways to have fun.

Vote: Keep it!

Ayrton Ostly

Winning consistently in the NFL is tough. There are only so many ways to find small margins that make the difference on a weekly basis and teams shouldn’t be punished for finding advantages with their personnel.

The Eagles have one of the best offensive lines in the league and a powerful runner at quarterback. Getting the upper hand in leverage in the trenches is no new concept. Philadelphia’s just better at it than other teams due to their unique talent on the roster.

Don’t get mad and complain to the teacher (in this case, the NFL) to get the one kid banned from playing a game a certain way just because you can’t exactly replicate it or beat them. Figure out how to win. Other NFL teams need to catch up in doing it themselves and/or invest in better ways to combat it defensively.

Vote: Keep it!

Nick Brinkerhoff

Death, taxes and ‘tush push’ first downs can’t be the only things guaranteed in life.

Yes, other teams have failed, but what if they don’t going forward? Do we want to live in a world where players get their tushes pushed all game long? Think of the children – and the game that’ll be left behind.

As it’s said, one person has a tendency of ruining it for the rest. In this case, that’s the Eagles. Inadvertent or not, they pushed the envelope too far, making their play too big of a talking point. It’s a lot like that local restaurant that gets noticed by a big celebrity; You’re happy for their bottom line and the success that follows, but annoyed that the 20 minute wait is now 40 and items on the menu are sold out.

Sometimes there is too much of a good thing and the Eagles may learn that the hard way. The ‘tush push’ must go.

Vote: Ban it!

Joe Rivera

Much like D.J. Khaled, the Eagles are suffering from success.

Is it fair to penalize Philadelphia for being too good at one play? Probably not. However, unlike the NFL’s oftentimes reactionary and late-to-the-party nature on rule changes, it’s better for the league to get out in front of this than wait until the copycats crack the code on what makes the ‘tush push’ darn near automatic.

Sure, not all 31 other squads have a world-class offensive line and a quarterback who can squat Volkswagens, and at least a small fraction won’t for a long time, if ever.

But, as a fan, do you want to wait until that point in which those other teams are spending the majority of their Sundays pushing their own quarterbacks around more than the opposing team’s? Do you want to see the drama and suspense sucked out of critical short-yardage situations? That doesn’t sound like an entertaining product to watch.

No one has been able to replicate the Eagles’ success on the ‘tush push.’ That doesn’t mean the league never will. I’d rather not wait to find out what that looks like on NFL Sundays.

Vote: Ban it!

Final tally

Keep it: Four votesBan it: Three votes

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is instructing the Pentagon to launch a comprehensive review into the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. 

In 2021, then-President Joe Biden removed U.S. troops from Afghanistan, following up on existing plans from the first Trump administration in 2020 with Taliban leaders to end the war in the region. Biden faced scrutiny after the withdrawal as the Taliban quickly took over Afghanistan again and more than a dozen U.S. service members died supporting evacuation efforts. 

Thirteen U.S. service members were killed during the withdrawal process due to a suicide bombing at Abbey Gate, outside the then-Hamid Karzai International Airport, as the Taliban quickly seized control of Kabul.

‘The Department of Defense has an obligation, both to the American people and to the warfighters who sacrificed their youth in Afghanistan, to get to the facts,’ Hegseth said in a Tuesday memo. ‘This remains an important step toward regaining faith and trust with the American people and all those who wear the uniform and is prudent based on the number of casualties and equipment lost during the execution of this withdrawal operation.’ 

Hegseth said the Pentagon has already completed a review into the ‘catastrophic’ withdrawal and concluded that a full investigation is necessary to provide a complete picture of the event and to hold those responsible accountable. 

As a result, Hegseth is directing Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell to spearhead a special review panel to evaluate previous investigations and to ‘analyze the decision-making that led to one of America’s darkest and deadliest international moments.’ 

‘This team will ensure ACCOUNTABILITY to the American people and the warfighters of our great Nation,’ Hegseth wrote in the memo. 

On Aug. 26, 2021, an ISIS-K suicide bomber who the Taliban released earlier that month detonated his body-worn improvised explosive device at Abbey Gate outside Kabul’s airport, according to a U.S. Army Central Command investigation released in 2024. In addition to the 13 U.S. service members who were killed, approximately 170 Afghan civilians also died.

The Biden administration’s White House released a report in 2023 evaluating the Afghanistan withdrawal, which stated that top intelligence officials did not accurately assess how quickly the Taliban would retake control of Kabul. 

Republicans on the House Foreign Affairs Committee conducted their own investigation into the withdrawal, and the U.S. military produced at least two reports on the matter. 

The Biden administration ‘prioritized the optics of the withdrawal over the security of U.S. personnel on the ground,’ according to the House Foreign Affairs Committee report. 

‘For that reason, they failed to plan for all contingencies, including a noncombatant evacuation operation (NEO) and refused to order a NEO until after the Taliban had already entered Kabul,’ the report said.

Additionally, the report said the ‘failure’ to adequately establish evacuation plans led to an unsafe environment at the airport and put the lives of service members and State Department officials at risk. 

In February, Trump told reporters that he wouldn’t instruct Hegseth on what actions the Pentagon should take when asked if he was considering firing military leaders who oversaw the withdrawal. But Trump said he would ‘fire every single one of them.’ 

The commander of U.S. Central Command in 2021, retired Marine Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., in 2024 took full ownership of the loss of U.S. troops that day. 

‘I was the overall commander, and I and I alone bear full military responsibility for what happened at Abbey Gate,’ McKenzie told the House Foreign Affairs Committee in March 2024.

Now-retired Army Gen. Mark Milley, the former chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told lawmakers at the same hearing that he believed the evacuation should have occurred sooner and that multiple factors contributed to failures in the withdrawal. Both McKenzie and Milley told lawmakers they advised Biden to keep some U.S. troops in Afghanistan after pulling out most U.S. forces.

‘The outcome in Afghanistan was the result of many decisions from many years of war,’ Milley told lawmakers. ‘Like any complex phenomena, there was no single causal factor that determined the outcome.’

Fox News’ Liz Friden contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump’s rallying speech to House Republicans Tuesday morning wasn’t enough to convince some holdouts to unite behind his ‘big, beautiful bill’ ahead of a planned vote this week.

Trump urged Republicans to cease infighting on Medicaid reform and state and local tax (SALT) deduction caps at the House GOP’s weekly conference meeting. Several Republicans who emerged said they were still concerned enough to oppose the bill, however.

House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris, Rep. Eric Burlison of Missouri, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and representatives Nick LaLota, Mike Lawler and Andrew Garbino of New York told Fox News Digital Tuesday they would vote against the bill if changes were not made.

On the other hand, Trump did persuade some people. Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina, one of several Republicans to sink a committee vote on the bill Friday, told reporters he would review it and make a ‘judgment call’ ahead of a 1 a.m. meeting to advance the bill through the House Rules Committee.

Norman said Trump did a ‘fantastic job’ and delivered ‘one of the best speeches I’ve heard’ at the House GOP meeting, and he urged his blue state colleagues to ‘take the words the president said to heart about SALT.’

Norman and Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, are both members of the powerful rules panel who have not been shy about their concerns with the current bill. The committee acts as the final gatekeeper before most legislation sees a full House vote.

Roy did not appear to attend Trump’s speech but told reporters Monday evening the 1 a.m. Wednesday vote should be postponed.

But the New York Republicans weren’t budging after Trump’s ‘big, beautiful’ speech, maintaining the bill doesn’t go far enough to deliver for middle-class New Yorkers on the SALT deduction cap.

‘This is the single biggest issue that I’ve talked about, and, with all due respect to the president, I’m not budging,’ Lawler said. 

‘Between property taxes and income taxes, it blows well past the $30,000 cap with the $400,000 income cap. So, as I’ve said repeatedly, that is insufficient. We will continue the dialogue with leadership, but as it stands right now, I do not support the bill,’ Lawler said. 

Lawler said SALT is one of the biggest issues affecting his district in New York and campaigned on never supporting a tax bill that doesn’t ‘adequately lift the cap.’

‘The president can say whatever he wants, and I respect him, but the fact is, I certainly understand my district. I’m one of only three Republican members that won in a district Kamala Harris won, and I did so for reasons,’ Lawler said. 

‘We need a little more SALT on the table to get to this,’ fellow New York Republican LaLota added. ‘I hope the president’s presence motivates my leadership to give us a number that we can go sell back home.’

LaLota said while he is still a ‘no,’ he hopes ‘the president’s presence here today motivates some folks in the Ways and Means Committee and my leadership to give us a number to which we can actually say ‘yes.’’

When asked if Trump did enough to ease concerns in Tuesday’s meeting, Garbarino, another New York Republican, said, ‘No. There were no specifics. … It was more of a rally. We need to get this done.’

‘We share President Trump’s call for unity within the House Republican Conference,’ Rep. Young Kim, R-Calif., said in a joint statement after Trump’s visit to Capitol Hill. 

‘We hope his remarks today motivate the Speaker to advance a SALT proposal that delivers meaningful relief for our middle-class constituents, as we have worked in good faith with House Leadership for more than a year,’ the statement from Kim, Garbarino, Lawler, LaLota and Rep. Tom Kean, R-N.J., said.

Meanwhile, Trump urged Republicans not to ‘f— with’ Medicaid in his speech, though different factions came to different conclusions about what he meant.

Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee, who was not in the room for Trump’s speech, called for more cuts to the entitlement program in an X post Tuesday afternoon but told Fox News Digital he was opposed to the legislation as written.

‘I agree with President Trump — we must crush the waste, fraud, and abuse. Liberal states like California and New York are abusing Medicaid — and making you pay for it. Illegal aliens and freeloaders have no right to taxpayer-funded benefits,’ Ogles said on X.

Other fiscal conservatives, like Ogles, who were in the room, said the bill does not go far enough to reform Medicaid and would also vote ‘no’ in the bill’s current form. 

‘I think it’s inappropriate for us to say we’re not going to touch it and then leave all of this fraud that’s happening in the system,’ Burlison said. 

Harris, the House Freedom Caucus chair, said, ‘I can’t support the bill. It does not eliminate waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid. The president called for waste, fraud and abuse to be eliminated. I don’t think that’s where the bill sits.’

Massie, known for being a libertarian, was unconvinced by Trump’s appearance, telling reporters that his constituents didn’t ‘vote for increased deficits and Biden-level spending.’

He acknowledged that younger members or those who harbor ambitions for higher office would likely fall in line, however.

‘I think he probably closed the deal in there,’ Massie said. 

SALT deduction caps and Medicaid remain two of the biggest sticking points in Republican negotiations. SALT deduction caps primarily benefit people living in high-cost-of-living areas like New York City, Los Angeles and their surrounding suburbs. Republicans representing those areas have argued that raising the SALT deduction cap is a critical issue and that a failure to address it could cost the GOP the House majority in the 2026 midterms.

Republicans in redder, lower-tax areas have said in response that SALT deductions favor wealthy people living in Democrat-controlled states and that such deductions reward progressive high-tax policies.

It was Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 that first instituted caps on SALT deductions, setting the maximum at $10,000 for both married couples and single filers.

SALT Caucus members have rejected House Republican leaders’ offer to increase that to $30,000.

Members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, meanwhile, are pushing for the bill to be more aggressive in cutting waste, fraud and abuse in the Medicaid system, including a faster timeline for implementing work requirements for able-bodied recipients. Currently, the legislation has work requirements kicking in 2029.

They also want to restructure Medicaid cost-sharing to put a bigger burden on the states. Moderates, meanwhile, have been wary of making significant cuts to the program.

House GOP leaders are hoping to hold a full House vote on the bill this week.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The defending champion Florida Panthers are in the Eastern Conference finals for the third season in a row and are looking to make a third consecutive trip to the Stanley Cup Final.

The Dallas Stars are making their third consecutive appearance in the Western Conference finals, but they have come up short the last two seasons.

The Panthers will play the Carolina Hurricanes in a rematch from 2023, which Florida won in a sweep. The Stars will play the Edmonton Oilers, who beat them in six games last season.

Which two teams will reach the Stanley Cup Final? USA TODAY Sports weighs in with predictions for the Hurricanes-Panthers and Stars-Oilers series:

Carolina Hurricanes vs. Florida Panthers

Season series: 2-1 Panthers. Total goals: 13-6 Panthers.

Jason Anderson: Hurricanes in 7. Carolina made light work of the Washington Capitals, and that may be the difference in a series that feels sure to be a marathon. Andrei Svechnikov’s eight postseason goals are second only to Dallas’ Mikko Rantanen (nine), but goalie Frederik Andersen’s .937 save percentage might be the more important stat. The defending champs won’t go down easily, but the Canes have delivered on all fronts through two rounds.

Mike Brehm: Panthers in 6. The Hurricanes have lost 12 consecutive games in the conference final. They will end that streak, but it will be hard for them for them to knock off the defending champions. Carolina’s Frederik Andersen is playing great, but Florida’s Sergei Bobrovsky has given up only four goals in his last four games after a rough start to the second round. The Panthers have plenty of scoring depth, led by trade deadline acquisition Brad Marchand, who’s playing on the third line.

Jace Evans: Hurricanes in 7. The Hurricanes have generated very little discourse these playoffs, outside of discussions about whether the team is or isn’t ‘boring.’ What they are is great, ripping through the Devils and Capitals in five games apiece with a relentless offense that throws an obscene number of shots toward the cage. If shots get through on the other end, they’ve often hit Frederik Andersen — the best goalie in these playoffs by far (1.36 GAA, .937 save percentage).

Dallas Stars vs. Edmonton Oilers

Season series: 2-1 Stars. Total goals: 12-9 Stars

Jason Anderson: Stars in 6. Both teams have players lighting it up on the offensive end in the postseason. Mikko Rantanen has 19 points for Dallas, while Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl have combined for 25 assists. It’s at the other end where each team has had issues, with Edmonton’s goalies combining for a .886 save percentage. The Stars have given up a whopping 408 shots in the playoffs, but Jake Oettinger has been up to the challenge, leading the league in some key underlying metrics for goaltenders. Expect plenty of goals in this series, but ultimately Dallas moves on.

Mike Brehm: Stars in 7. The Oilers are deeper than they were last season, but so are the Stars, with the additions of forwards Mikko Rantanen and Mikael Granlund. Defenseman Thomas Harley took a big jump when Miro Heiskanen was hurt, and now Heiskanen is back. This series will go the distance because Oilers defenseman Mattias Ekholm will return at some point. The Stars get the edge in the series finale because they’re at home, and coach Peter DeBoer is 9-0 in Game 7.

Jace Evans: Oilers in 6. Seeking to erase last season’s heartbreak, Edmonton has some team of destiny vibes. They looked completely on the ropes against the Kings in the first round only to rally in wild fashion and win six consecutive games after switching to Calvin Pickard in net. After Pickard was injured, Stuart Skinner got his job back and responded with two consecutive shutouts to oust the Golden Knights. You need some magic to win the Stanley Cup. It certainly feels like the Oilers have it. (And having Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl also helps.)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Hilary Knight laughed when her brother first raised the idea of sticking around through the Milan-Cortina Olympics.

“Yeah, right,” Knight she said, recalling her reaction. “There’s no way.”

She was already north of 30 then — she turned 33 five months after the Beijing Games in 2022 — and had her hands full trying to get the PWHL off the ground. The idea of signing up for another four years of the grind seemed like a lot.

And yet, here she is preparing for Milan. It will be her fifth, and she’s announcing now, final Olympics.

“It’s time,” Knight told USA TODAY Sports. “I have grown up in this program and it’s just given me so much. I’m at peace. I just have this feeling that it’s time. And I’m grateful that — hopefully I can stay healthy and everything — I can go out when I’d like to be done. That is such a privilege that only a handful of competitors get.”

Knight, who turns 36 in July, is still one of the very best players in the world. At last month’s world championships, where the U.S. women beat archrival Canada for the title (Knight’s 10th, for those counting), she led the Americans with nine points. Already the career leader in points and goals at the world championships, she added the career assists record during the tournament, too.

Knight also was the PWHL’s points leader this season with 29, and her 15 goals for the Boston Fleet were second most in the league.

Impressive as Knight’s resume as a player is — in addition to the 10 world titles, she’s an Olympic champion (2018) and three-time silver medalist (2010, 2014 and 2022) — it is what she’s done off the ice that will be her greatest legacy.

The sport looks nothing like it did when Knight began playing. Heck, it barely resembles what it looked like five years ago.

The U.S. women’s team now receives similar benefits and treatment from USA Hockey as the men’s team because Knight and her teammates threatened to boycott the world championships in 2017. USA Hockey also agreed to improve its developmental program, which means little girls now have their own teams to play on.

The PWHL exists because Knight and the game’s other top players refused to accept the substandard professional leagues that existed previously in Canada and the United States. They staged their own “Dream Gap” tour in 2021 to spotlight the lack of professional opportunities for women and raise interest for a new league.

“You realized how much responsibility we just chewed off,” Knight said. “You’re just like, `Wow, I’m responsible for making sure this thing exists,’ and then to see it through and make sure that we can actually put the pieces together to find somebody who’s going to invest long-term in us.

“Sometimes you felt really defeated because you’re like, `I believe in this thing. I know what we’re capable of,’ but it’s convincing other people to see it, too, and have the same vision,” she said. “And fortunately, we were able to find that.”

In 2022, the Professional Women’s Hockey Players Association, of which Knight was a founding board member, announced a deal with Los Angeles Dodgers owner Mark Walter and Billie Jean King for a new league.

The PWHL began play last year in six cities, and has already surpassed the 2 million mark in total attendance. It’s been so successful that two expansion teams will be added next season.

“I understood what the sport gave me and I wanted to give that to other people. I wanted other people to have the same opportunities that I had,” Knight said. “Obviously there’s tons of work that always needs to be done, but I think we now have a career path. Investments are now starting to happen more at the grassroots level. Girls are being invested in.

“Not only me, but all of us have changed that, and so I feel very fulfilled from that standpoint and hoping that those barriers are lesser and lesser as we move forward.”

Reflecting on her legacy is not high on Knight’s list of favorite things to do. Quite honestly, it’s nowhere on that list. That’s partly why she’s announcing now that these will be her last Games, in hopes it will no longer be a story in Milan. Or at least not a focal point.

Because Knight has never played hockey to shine up her legacy. Even all those titles, they have meaning because they’re a reflection of the work it took to get them and the people who played alongside her.

It’s those things that Knight will miss.

“There’s something to be said about the grind and the appreciation for putting the most vulnerable part of yourself on the line and working together as a group and navigating the highs and lows before a tournament and in a tournament,” she said. “Those are the memories that will, I think, pop up for me.”

That and the pranks.

Anyone who has ever been part of a team knows the shenanigans that go on when you spend that much time together. The prank calls to family members back in the States. The rubber bands that can turn bidet handles into super soakers. The cups of water left inside helmets when they’re sitting on a shelf.

“Just adding little moments of lightness because, at the end of the day, representing your country on a world stage is kind of stressful!” Knight said.

Knight still plans to play in the PWHL after Milan, but she knows that part of her career will soon end, too. She’s enjoyed the broadcasting work she’s done for ESPN and could see herself doing more of that.

She’d also like to put together a group of investors and buy an NHL team someday. (A PWHL team, too, but it’s still a single-owner league.)

“There’s just so much to be done and so many opportunities in the women’s space that are really exciting,” Knight said.

In part because of her and what she’s achieved, on and off the ice.

For now, though, there’s one more Olympics. One more time to represent Team USA. One more chance to win a title for her country.

“It took me a while, but I think I’m very much so at peace with it,” Knight said. “I’ve had an incredible career at the Olympic stage. And (in Milan) I will have the same mission and the same purpose, and that’s to win an Olympic gold.”

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt fielded questions from the children of journalists and White House officials to celebrate Take Our Sons and Daughters to Work Day on Tuesday.

The children’s questions focused mainly on President Donald Trump, with Leavitt being forced to reveal the president’s favorite flavor of ice cream, what super power he most wants to have, and whether he likes to give hugs.

‘Oh, does he like to give hugs? You know, I think he does. I have seen him give many hugs to children and his family and our beautiful first lady. So, yes, I do think he likes to gives hugs,’ Leavitt told her first questioner.

‘What is the funnest part about your job, and the hardest part?’ the next child asked.

‘I think the most fun part about my job is doing things like this with all of you in the briefing room and answering so many great questions. I think that the hardest part of my job is also doing things like this in the briefing room and answering all of these questions,’ she responded, to laughter.

‘And reading the news is a big part of my job every day. I wake up and read the newspaper and watch the news and listen to all of the things that your parents are reporting on in the news, and that’s a big part of my job every day,’ she added.

The next child asked about Trump’s favorite food, and Leavitt said he prefers steak to anything else.

Leavitt informed the next child that Trump’s favorite ice cream flavor is a classic ice cream sundae.

‘If the president could have a superpower, what would it be? That is a very good question,’ Leavitt responded to the next child. ‘I think if he had a superpower it would be to just snap his fingers and solve all of our country’s problems just like that, because he likes to get things done very quickly but sometimes it takes a little bit longer.

‘Like today, he had to go to Capitol Hill to convince people to vote for his one big beautiful bill. I bet if he had a superpower he would snap his fingers and get it passed immediately, but Life doesn’t work that way, unfortunately,’ she added.

First lady Melania Trump also spent time with kids outside the White House. Many of them could be seen wearing dark blue hats that said ‘Gulf of America’ in bright red letters.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS