Author

admin

Browsing

BEREA, OH – Earlier in June, Cleveland Browns defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz dropped a famous “Spider-Man” line while discussing defensive end and $40 million man Myles Garrett. 

With great power, comes great responsibility.

“So that would make him my Uncle Ben?” Garrett said with a smile Tuesday following the Browns’ first minicamp practice. 

Schwartz charged his star player to have the best season of his career now that he’s the highest-paid defensive player in football (and the second-highest non-quarterback behind Cincinnati Bengals receiver Ja’Marr Chase). Production has never been lacking for Garrett, as he’s racked up 102.5 career sacks since the Browns drafted him first overall in 2017 (60 of those have come in the last four seasons). 

Growing as a leader is the next step for the 29-year-old and is something the Browns have discussed from owner Jimmy Haslam to head coach Kevin Stefanski. 

“That’s what’s been laid out for me,” Garrett said.

Garrett’s appearance at minicamp came four months removed from his trade request and the assertion that, given his desire to win, moving on from the Browns and a 3-14 season was necessary. 

“I’m back and it’s time to go,” said Garrett, who will play on a four-year, $160 million deal with $123 million guaranteed. 

Garrett’s teammates understand football is a business. He loves his job and the Browns. But Garrett had to do what he felt was best for him. 

“What’s best for me and what’s best for this team, eventually that aligned,” Garrett said. “Looking forward to the future of this team and how we can achieve the goals we want to.” 

The urgency will have to increase another level to reach that point, said Garrett. Everything feels like it’s “really clicking” on the defensive side of the ball. He wants to set standards and show the heralded rookie class what it takes to win in the NFL. Asked to assess the roster, Garrett replied: “That’s what minicamp and training camp are for.” 

But it wasn’t his best comeback of the day – by far. With Aaron Rodgers making his Pittsburgh Steelers practice debut Tuesday, Garrett had this to say about playing No. 8 (formerly No. 12) twice a year. 

And to think he ever thought about leaving the AFC North. 

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Female players who choose to undergo a fertility protection procedure will be allowed to take time away from the sport and return to competitive action with a protected ranking, the governing body of women’s tennis (WTA) said.

The new rule aims to support women athletes to balance their family goals and career ambitions and comes three months after the WTA offered players up to 12 months of paid maternity leave for the first time.

‘The new rule means that players can now take time away from professional tennis for a fertility protection procedure such as egg or embryo freezing and safely return to competition with a protected ranking,’ the WTA said in a statement.

‘Eligible players will receive a Special Entry Ranking (SER), which can be used to enter up to three tournaments, based on the 12-week average of their WTA Ranking from eight weeks prior to the start of their out-of-competition period.’

Sloane Stephens, the 2017 U.S. Open champion, has previously called for egg freezing to be recognized as a protected ranking activity and called Wednesday’s announcement a ‘ground-breaking’ move.

‘I’m incredibly proud of our sport in recognizing the importance of fertility treatments for female athletes. For any woman, the conversation of family life versus a career is nuanced and complex,’ the former world number three said.

‘The WTA has now created a safe space for players to explore options and to make the best decisions for themselves.’

The WTA also said players will benefit from paid maternity leave and grants for fertility protection through the WTA Maternity Fund sponsored by the Saudi Public Investment Fund.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 125th U.S. Open has arrived and tees off in less than 24 hours. The world’s best golfers will gather at the historic Oakmont Country Club, each vying for the prestigious title of the next champion.

The field for the third major of the year is set, promising an intense battle. World No. 1 Scottie Scheffler, fresh from his third victory at the 2025 Memorial Tournament, will face off against a formidable field that includes World No. 2 Rory McIlroy, who completed the career Grand Slam at the Masters earlier this year and has also secured three wins this season.

One of the most beloved figures in golf, Phil Mickelson, is set to make a potentially final appearance at this year’s U.S. Open. Here’s how to watch all the U.S. Open action.

How to watch the 2025 U.S. Open

The entire 2025 U.S. Open, spanning all four rounds, will be aired across NBC and USA Network. Below is a guide on how to watch each round.

All times Eastern.

First round: Thursday, June 12

  • 7 a.m.-5 p.m. on USA Network, Fubo
  • 5 p.m.-8 p.m. on Peacock

Second round: Friday, June 13

  • 6:30 a.m.-1 p.m. on Peacock
  • 1-7 p.m. on NBC, Fubo
  • 7-8 p.m. on Peacock

Third round: Saturday, June 14

  • 10 a.m.-12 p.m. on USA Network, Fubo
  • 12-8 p.m. on NBC, Fubo

Final Round: Sunday, June 15

  • 9 a.m.-12 p.m. on USA Network, Fubo
  • 12-7 p.m. on NBC, Peacock, Fubo
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 125th U.S. Open is about to begin and tournament officials have set up plenty of potential drama thanks to the groups and tee times for the opening rounds at Oakmont Country Club.

The first golfers for Thursday’s first round will get underway at 6:45 a.m. ET and it won’t be long before the top contenders hit the course. The marquee morning group features defending U.S. Open champion Bryson DeChambeau as well as Xander Schauffele, a two-time major winner last year. They’re followed by Masters champion Rory McIlroy, who will play alongside his good friend and Ryder Cup teammate Shane Lowry.

Thursday’s afternoon groups will bring fans two star-studded groups teeing off at the same time from different holes. One features former major winners Jon Rahm, Jordan Spieth and Dustin Johnson, who won the U.S. Open in 2016 when it was last played at Oakmont. The other has world No. 1 Scottie Scheffler, Collin Morikawa and Viktor Hovland.

The 156-golfer field will tee off from both the No. 1 and No. 10 holes at Oakmont during first-round action Here’s a look a complete schedule for Thursday at the 2025 U.S. Open, including tee times and how to watch:

Notable 2025 US Open first round tee times

  • Ludvig Åberg: 7:18 a.m. ET
  • Hideki Matsuyama: 7:18 a.m. ET
  • Bryson DeChambeau: 7:29 a.m. ET
  • Xander Schauffele: 7:29 a.m. ET
  • Rory McIlroy: 7:40 a.m. ET
  • Mason Howell (a): 8:46 a.m. ET
  • Justin Thomas: 1:03 p.m. ET
  • Russell Henley: 1:03 p.m. ET
  • Jon Rahm: 1:14 p.m. ET
  • Scottie Scheffler: 1:25 p.m. ET
  • Collin Morikawa: 1:25 p.m. ET
  • Sepp Straka: 1:25 p.m. ET

2025 US Open round 1 tee times

All times Eastern; (a) amateur(1 or 10) starting hole

  • 6:45 a.m. (1): Matt Vogt (a), Kevin Velo, Trent Phillips
  • 6:45 a.m. (10): Zac Blair, Scott Vincent, Alistair Docherty
  • 6:56 a.m. (1): Chandler Blanchet, Alvaro Ortiz, Doug Ghim
  • 6:56 a.m. (10): Jacques Kruyswijk, Jordan Smith, Eric Cole
  • 7:07 a.m. (1): Evan Beck (a), Maxwell Moldovan, Justin Hicks
  • 7:07 a.m. (10): Tom Kim, J.J. Spaun, Taylor Pendrith
  • 7:18 a.m. (1): Harris English, Keegan Bradley, Tommy Fleetwood
  • 7:18 a.m. (10): Ludvig Åberg, Adam Scott, Hideki Matsuyama
  • 7:29 a.m. (1): Xander Schauffele, Bryson DeChambeau, Jose Luis Ballester
  • 7:29 a.m. (10): Ben Griffin, Andrew Novak, Maverick McNealy
  • 7:40 a.m. (1): Matt Fitzpatrick, Wyndham Clark, Gary Woodland
  • 7:40 a.m. (10): Shane Lowry, Justin Rose, Rory McIlroy
  • 7:51 a.m. (1): Akshay Bhatia, Matt McCarty, Robert MacIntyre
  • 7:51 a.m. (10): Patrick Cantlay, Si Woo Kim, Lucas Glover
  • 8:02 a.m. (1): Cam Davis, Davis Thompson, Thomas Detry
  • 8:02 a.m. (10): Cameron Smith, Brian Harman, Phil Mickelson
  • 8:13 a.m. (1): Richard Bland, Trevor Gutschewski (a), Lanto Griffin
  • 8:13 a.m. (10): Niklas Norgaard, Brian Campbell, Justin Lower
  • 8:24 a.m. (1): Edoardo Molinari, Sam Stevens, Ryan Gerard
  • 8:24 a.m. (10): Davis Riley, Jackson Koivun (a), Johnny Keefer
  • 8:35 a.m. (1): Thriston Lawrence, Noah Kent (a), Thorbjørn Olesen
  • 8:35 a.m. (10): James Hahn, Mark Hubbard, Michael La Sasso (a)
  • 8:46 a.m. (1): Jinichiro Kozuma, Cameron Tankersley (a), Chase Johnson
  • 8:46 a.m. (10): Joakim Langergren, Mason Howell (a), Chris Gotterup
  • 8:57 a.m. (1): Philip Barbaree, Riley Lewis, Brady Calkins
  • 8:57 a.m. (10): Zach Bauchou, Jackson Buchanan, Lance Simpson (a)
  • 12:30 p.m. (1): Frederic LeCroix, Emiliano Grillo, Sam Bairstow
  • 12:30 p.m. (10): Will Chandler, Andrea Pavan, Takumi Kanaya
  • 12:41 p.m. (1): Byeung Hun An, Joe Highsmith, Ryan Fox
  • 12:41 p.m. (10): Bryan Lee (a), Guido Migliozzi, Preston Summerhays
  • 12:52 p.m. (1): Victor Perez, Jacob Bridgeman, Adam Schenk
  • 12:52 p.m. (10): Erik van Rooyen, Max Greyserman, Matt Wallace
  • 1:03 p.m. (1): Min Woo Lee, Justin Thomas, Brooks Koepka
  • 1:03 p.m. (10): Russell Henley, Christiaan Bezuidenhout, Nick Taylor
  • 1:14 p.m. (1): Sam Burns, Nico Echavarria, Denny McCarthy
  • 1:14 p.m. (10): Jordan Spieth, Jon Rahm, Dustin Johnson
  • 1:25 p.m. (1): Viktor Hovland, Collin Morikawa, Scottie Scheffler
  • 1:25 p.m. (10): Tyrrell Hatton, Sungjae Im, Sepp Straka
  • 1:36 p.m. (1): Corey Conners, Jason Day, Patrick Reed
  • 1:36 p.m. (10): Cameron Young, Tom Hoge, J.T. Poston
  • 1:47 p.m. (1): Joaquin Niemann, Bud Cauley, Daniel Berger
  • 1:47 p.m. (10): Jhonattan Vegas, Michael Kim, Matthieu Pavon
  • 1:58 p.m. (1): MacKenzie Hughes, Tony Finau, Chris Kirk
  • 1:58 p.m. (10): Marc Leishman, Aaron Rai, Nick Dunlap
  • 2:09 p.m. (1): Ben James (a), Rasmus Højgaard, Stephan Jaeger
  • 2:09 p.m. (10): Matthew Jordan, Yuta Sugiura, Carlos Ortiz
  • 2:20 p.m. (1): Rasmus Neergaard-Peterson, Justin Hastings (a), Laurie Canter
  • 2:20 p.m. (10): Ryan McCormick, Trevor Cone, Zachary Pollo (a)
  • 2:31 p.m. (1): Frankie Harris (a), Emilio Gonzalez, Roberto Díaz
  • 2:31 p.m. (10): James Nicholas, Tyler Weaver (a), Riki Kawamoto
  • 2:42 p.m. (1): Grant Haefner, Joey Herrera, George Kneiser
  • 2:42 p.m. (10): Austin Truslow, Harrison Ott, George Duangmanee

Watch the U.S. Open with Fubo

How to watch 2025 US Open first round

Full coverage of the first round is available to watch on USA Network. It can also be streamed on Fubo.

  • Dates: Thursday, May 11
  • Location: Oakmont Country Club (Oakmont, Pennsylvania)
  • Time: First tee on Thursday is scheduled for 6:45 a.m. ET
  • TV channels: USA Network
  • Streaming: Peacock | Fubo (free trial) 
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

There’s not much quite like the view from the top of a ballpark. However, some of those views are greater than others.

Now, you could go online and look for somebody’s opinion on all 30 parks. But that person could be biased about a specific team, and who’s to say that what they value in a ballpark will match up with what you appreciate?

The point is that getting one person’s perspective might not be enough. Instead, we should look at the greater collective, and what better place to go than Yelp. Fans are unafraid to air out a ballpark’s dirty laundry on that website. So in a sense, the fans writing reviews there might offer the most honest reviews online, and that makes for a tremendous ranking.

Here’s every MLB ballpark ranked based on their Yelp rating.

Explaining the rankings

These rankings are pretty self explanatory, but given that there are only 50 possible ratings a ballpark can have, there are a few that will have the same rating. In order to make a decision on which one is superior, we went with the one that had more total reviews. Figure the more reviews a ballpark has, the more that ballpark moved spectators to write reviews, thereby giving it the edge.

Furthermore, the A’s and Tampa Bay Rays are not currently playing at their permanent home fields. We will be using Sutter Health Park for the A’s, as their stadium in Vegas has not opened yet and Sutter Health is the field that the team will play in for the next few years. As for the Rays, we will be using Tropicana Field for these rankings, since the team plans on returning to Tropicana in 2026.

MLB ballpark rankings based on Yelp reviews

30. Texas Rangers, Globe Life Field (3.5)

Bee D. writes, ‘This place is a mess. Untrained staff, zero consistency, and absolutely no regard for customer experience. Whether you’re VIP or general admission, expect chaos and confusion.’ − 1 star

Mike B. writes, ‘Absolutely hands down the worst MLB stadium I have ever been to, and I have been to over 15. The food choices are pathetic. The layout to get around the stadium is pathetic. No one knows how to get from level to level, and you have to walk a country mile or walk up 3 flights of stairs to get anywhere. I would never give this place a time of my money again!!!’ − 1 star

29. Tampa Bay Rays, Tropicana Field (3.6)

Kang S. writes, ‘One would think that a team with the widely acknowledged worst stadium in MLB and attendance near the bottom of the league would try to make things fun and easy for the fans. Not so much. First off, you can only buy tickets online and/or through the annoying MLB Ballpark app. So if you show up at the stadium without having done this, it’s a real pain because their so-called staff don’t really know how the app works and they apparently lack the bandwidth to handle a large volume as evidenced by the fact that I had to go in and out of the app four times to purchase my ticket. At least it was cheap; in fact, some tickets are cheaper than beers inside the park!’ − 2 stars

Rebecca F. writes, ‘Five stars for the stadium itself, two stars for the food service. While the food we had was delicious, I missed 1.5 innings of the game because of their requirement to use the kiosks for ordering. It seemed very disorganized.’ − 3 stars

28. Miami Marlins, LoanDepot Park (3.6)

Evelyn M. writes, ‘I personally like the stadium but the parking situation is awful. They need to be more organized. I arrived to the stadium on time did the game but it took me almost an hour to park.’ − 3 stars

Anysia S. writes, ‘As the wife of an avid MLB fan, I have been to more than my share of stadiums. There is nothing good, special, or different about this one.’ − 2 stars

27. Toronto Blue Jays, Rogers Centre (3.6)

Elizabeth S. writes, ‘Loved this ballpark. Seats in 100 level definitely need that renovation they are doing in the off season but the park was clean, welcoming and easy to navigate. Staff was friendly. Can’t wait to go back.’ − 4 stars

Sunil R. writes, ‘Came here for the final game of the Red Sox and Blue Jays series. It was super fun and the atmosphere and ambiance were great. I wish the Blue Jays had pulled off a win but they lost steam towards the end and the lost. We still had a great time. It was easy to get in and out of the stadium and everything was well designed and planned for. Great location right by the CN tower and Union Station.’ − 4 stars

26. Athletics, Sutter Health Park (3.8)

Michael J. writes, ‘Attended our second A’s game last night this season. Being a native of Sacramento, I was excited when the Athletics announced they would play a couple seasons there. I hoped they would bring a bit of the big leagues to the experience. But they have not been able to elevate the game day experience to attending games at this flawed minor league facility. There are a plethora of issues. The scoreboards are subpar. Entry is limited to two gates, which is particularly problematic departing at the games conclusion. As well, exiting the unpaved parking lots is poorly organized and takes significantly too long, and that is for a ‘crowd’ of only 9,000, many of which departed early or parked elsewhere other than the main lot.’ − 2 stars

Joey Y. writes, ‘The security upfront is problematic. Maybe sutter health needs to hire better security? I forgot my clear bag and stuffed everything into my crossbody bag/fanny pack. It was maybe a cm off the bag limit if you don’t take into consideration the corners that stretches out to the strap. But the person there did count that and said my bag was too big. Fine. I dropped almost everything off at the car besides my essentials. I return and I see multiple people allowed to walk in with tote size bags that aren’t clear. Doesn’t make much sense.’ − 3 stars

25. Atlanta Braves, Truist Park (3.8)

Brian H. writes, ‘This is a solid baseball stadium. Very clean and beers and food are a plenty here. A little pricey but what do you expect? Sitting by first base is a great view and if you bring a small bag please note they will probably tell you to take it back to your car or put it in a locker which costs $11. Overall a fun place to come with friends and family.’ − 4 stars

Liz G. writes, ‘Food options are subpar within the stadium, with few options for vegetarians. No diverse craft beer options unlike Mercedes Benz and prices are sky high. Alcohol compliance enforcers roam the stadium harassing visitors nonstop, aggressively checking my ID on average 3 times a game when I am 23 years old. Limited affordable parking options when there is no other option than to arrive by car. The chop house service is terrible for the seats you’d pay extra for. Very disappointed in this ‘new and improved’ stadium.’ − 2 stars

24. Arizona Diamondbacks, Chase Field (3.8)

Liv M. writes, ‘A beautiful stadium! We went to see my Dodgers play against the D-Backs during Mother’s Day weekend. The stadium is quite beautiful, loved the open ceiling and large panels that open to allow air to flow through the stadium. The variety of food options, drinks, and bar choices was awesome. The service was friendly.’ − 4 stars

Skyler P. writes, ‘Overall, had a great experience here. Got to watch the opening day game and enjoy some great food. Found some good barbeque like a pulled pork sandwich and a loaded potato. Both were delicious. The barbeque nachos in the helmet were not great. Chips were soggy, not much meat, and it was not filled up that much. I definitely saw other people with helmets stacked high, while ours was not even filled halfway. I was hoping to find some soft serve, but couldn’t figure out where it was so opted for some Coldstone which was nice too.’ − 4 stars

23. Washington Nationals, Nationals Park (3.8)

Axel R. writes, ‘It’s a beautiful ballpark, worthy of our nation’s capital. But be ready to receive a pounding on concession stands. Everything is very expensive. Also, make sure you don’t bring a big purse or backpack. They’ll make you pay $15 to rent a locker to leave your belongings.’ − 3 stars

Dean P. writes, ‘Overall, pretty good. There was nothing too special about this stadium that stands out from the others. It was pretty dirty, but what do you expect? The food wasn’t too expensive, and our seats were nice. I would definitely go again to watch some baseball.’ − 4 stars

22. Los Angeles Dodgers, Dodger Stadium (3.8)

Tony Y. writes, ‘I love LA, but what i don’t love is traffic and Dodger Stadium is no exception. While it nice that they have a lot of parking locations/lots, people seem to get bottled neck coming in or out. Best thing about this stadium? The Dodgers and community. You’d be impressed with the views and history. It’s always a good time at the games and though the price has steadily increase over the years, I would definitely try to make it out to one game and soak in the lights.’ − 4 stars

Pedro G. writes, ‘Man, Dodger Stadium is always a fun place to get out to and catch a game. I just wish the food and beer weren’t so pricey though it would be great if they made it more affordable for everyone. The restrooms are spacious, but they could definitely use an update. One thing I really don’t like is the bathroom setup. The faucets are too low, and it feels like you end up touching everyone else’s dirty water just trying to wash your hands, they need to raise them. Other than that, the experience is awesome. There are so many friendly workers around who help guide you and make the visit enjoyable.’ − 3 stars

21. Houston Astros, Daikin Park (3.9)

Jennifer G. writes, ‘Giveaways at the ball park this year are like not knowing what the secret code is for a hideout. You are there more than two hours before the game starts and still not receiving the promotion. Even with boxes of giveaways left, they are either set aside for others, or if you go in the entrance that doesn’t have the item you can’t get one at another entrance as re-entry is not allowed.’ − 2 stars

Levi A. writes, ‘Great ball park. But the security has the biggest power trips imaginable. Also, there’s a nasty lady, who is one of the security guards, who cussed me out because I forgot my jacket and I had to go back down to get it.’ − 3 stars

20. Los Angeles Angels, Angel Stadium (3.9)

Mary R. writes, ‘I mean gross! When your preteen boy that eats everything put in front of him won’t eat the food…you know it’s bad!’ − 2 stars

Casey R. writes, ‘The parking situation here is a nightmare. Especially when leaving. The fans here are pretty lackluster compared to Dodger games. I came here when they played the Yankees a week ago and there were as many Yankee fans as Angels fans. You would never see that at Dodger Stadium no matter who they were playing.’ − 3 stars

19. Chicago White Sox, Rate Field (4.0)

Janet M. writes, ‘As a die-hard Cubs fan, I wasn’t sure what to expect at Guaranteed Rate Field, but I was pleasantly surprised! We came for the home opener to celebrate a family member’s birthday, and it ended up being a fantastic time. Not as much as Wrigley but a good time.’ − 5 stars

Gerald H. writes, ‘Arguably the most boring, bland park I have been to. Visited on a Friday night for a game in mid-May. Really wasn’t much to the park – very boring – straightforward and nothing to it.’ − 2 stars

18. New York Yankees, Yankee Stadium (4.0)

Dale C. writes, ‘Huge concrete ball park. I would have loved to see the old park. This was good just not what I was expecting from the Yankees. If you were coming for the game we tried to see all of the museums and statues but it was closed. Bummer. Probably wouldn’t return. Nothing was remarkable. Except baseball.’ − 3 stars

Danielle V. writes, ‘Yankees stadium is an okay stadium. They pride themselves on history, which shows. It’s not a very flashy stadium.’ − 4 stars

17. Colorado Rockies, Coors Field (4.1)

Angelique F. writes, ‘Arena is clean, safe and employees are great for the most part. Wish they had more then one food stop that offered gluten-free as the one they have is disorganized, and honestly not good. The bread tastes old and the chicken and such do not look appealing so passed on that.’ − 3 stars

Savanna R. writes, ‘Coors field is fun from every angle. Our favorite part is getting there early for the $3 beers at the rooftop bar. The concessions are always great and reasonably priced. The tickets are also incredibly cheap…can’t beat it!’ − 4 stars

16. New York Mets, Citi Field (4.1)

Peter M. writes, ‘I want to thank the Mets for making various improvements throughout the ball park and for giving me a few opportunities to attend some games. The crowds are good this year with the Soto signing and Pete mashing. Great large Jumbotron and video production/entertainment. The concessions folks and ticket takers and greeters seem more cheerful these days and the ball park is fan friendly. Let’s keep this going!’ − 4 stars

Andrew B. writes, ‘Citi Field is very nice, the venue has enough outside room and plenty of access to a variety in choices for transportation within walking distance. The appearance of the stadium is classic and it’s certainly functional. I liked the staff but many were not well informed about the event happening and even gave incorrect information several times.’ − 4 stars

15. Kansas City Royals, Kauffman Stadium (4.2)

Daryl T. writes, ‘Great experience at Kaufman. Great park lots to do. Easy parking. Hoping for a royals win. Food is the only thing that stopped me from eating it a 5 star. Popcorn had a greasy film much different than movie popcorn. Still a great family fun experience.’ − 4 stars

Leslie W. writes, ‘Still one of the most fan friendly and amenity-filled ballparks in MLB. Huge ballpark parking lots. And at about $15 a car, it’s one of the cheapest. They have lot attendants that will get carts for folks who need a little help getting to the stadium.’ − 4 stars

14. Detroit Tigers, Comerica Park (4.2)

Amy B. writes, ‘As someone who grew up going to Tiger Stadium and now, Comerica Park, this is a great baseball field. It’s in the heart of downtown Detroit close to many attractions. The park has many good features and most every single seat is a great view.’ − 4 stars

Alan N. writes, ‘This is one of my favorite ballparks – if not my absolute favorite. Very family friendly. Great food selection. Carousel and a ferris wheel. I came for 4 games here. The most amazing time. I had a gyro, elephant ear, several local beers, and ice cream.’ − 5 stars

13. Seattle Mariners, T-Mobile Park (4.2)

Abel M. writes, ‘I love the industrial look to the entire park. They really double down on the theme and pulled it off perfectly. Everything looked pretty new and clean. We had the pizza, the ice cream nachos and the what up dog. No complaints whatsoever on the food. The pizza here was better than what I’ve had at most chains. All of the people working for the park were very kind and helpful and the museum is a nice unique touch. I would definitely return.’ − 5 stars

Chuck M. writes, ‘We had a wonderful time at the ballgame. The stadium is beautiful. Our seats were on the club level, great unobstructed view. Parking was easy, going into the stadium parking structure…although we got lost trying to find our car when it was time to leave. All in all we had a great time. If I was to make a recommendation it would be to bring your own foods and not rely upon the stadium vendors. The cost of food was insanely expensive.’ − 4 stars

12. San Diego Padres, Petco Park (4.2)

Kalvin P. writes, ‘Petco park is so cool, and a really great San Diego venue. I’ve only been here a couple times, and most times, visiting someplace for the first time is always the best (when it’s some place you grow to like, or are impressed with), but with Petco Park, it has been like that every time.’ − 5 stars

Timothy N. writes, ‘Big Padres fan here. We are pretty lucky to have such a beautiful park. And I’m super lucky because sometimes my boss gives me tickets to see the game! It’s a good time rooting for the Padres and lots of action when watching the game.’ − 4 stars

11. Cleveland Guardians, Progressive Field (4.3)

Adam H. writes, ‘Though I’ve not likely rated most of them in these annals, I’ve visited many baseball parks in my 50-some-odd trips around the sun. Progressive Field ranks as one of my favorites … right up there with PNC Park (Pirates), The Ballpark at Arlington (previous home of the Texas Rangers), Camden Yards (Baltimore), Wrigley Field, and too many Minor League and independent parks to mention.’ − 4 stars

Tyson N. writes, ‘Highly recommend the high seats! We were in Section 561 and the view was stunning. The facility was very clean, and it was easy to get around between sections. The weather was perfect, the game was entertaining, and it wasn’t overcrowded, which made for an all-around great experience.’ − 5 stars

10. Cincinnati Reds, Great American Ball Park (4.3)

Garrett B. writes, ‘Fun and exciting ball park with great food and drink options. Tons of restaurants and bars right outside the stadium in a very walkable city.’ − 4 stars

Yvette K. writes, ‘Great stadium fantastic fans! Lots of food options! Great family atmosphere. Surrounded by bars and restaurants in case you want to avoid stadium prices. It’s definitely a win-win here!’ − 5 stars

9. Philadelphia Phillies, Citizens Bank Park (4.3)

Kathleen F. writes, ‘This is only my second MLB park that I’ve been to so my experience is limited. That being said I thought there were several nice amenities in the park. There were a good number of food stands with various choices, reflecting Philly heritage. The various tables were nice to spread out and eat prior to the game starting. I thought the bathrooms could have used some additional lighting or possibly more airflow.’ − 4 stars

Reed B. writes, ‘Citizens Bank Park is a nice modern city ballpark with friendly staff, bad lines and not so great parking. The arrival experience wasn’t the best. As first timers to the ballpark we didn’t know the parking situation and with bad traffic, very few directional signs which often contradicted each other we ended up being late for the first pitch even though we arrived with ample time.’ − 4 stars

8. Milwaukee Brewers, American Family Field (4.3)

Stephanie H. writes, ‘Got to love American Family Field! The food selection has grown so much, adding The Food Truck Alley and the 3rd Street Market Hall Annex! It also still has your classic baseball food….you can’t go wrong! Cheering for the Brewers is the best! Go Brew Crew!’ − 5 stars

Elliott L. writes, ‘Nice stadium. Grew up going here and it is everything a stadium should be. The food is hit or miss and the racing sausages are great.’ − 4 stars

7. Minnesota Twins, Target Field (4.4)

Matthew J. writes, ‘One of the best stadiums I’ve ever been in. Lots of food options and easy to navigate. The facilities are well kept and you can’t beat the craft beer options.’ − 5 stars

Sara C. writes, ‘Target Field is one of the best outdoor venues I’ve been to. I know it’s the field of the Minnesota Twins, but my experience there was for a concert. The seats were actually pretty wide and comfortable in terms of the stadium seating I’ve experienced. There isn’t really a bad seat in the whole place because they all slope down to where the field/stage is at, with no real ‘obstructed view’ seats that I saw (for our show at least).’ − 5 stars

6. St. Louis Cardinals, Busch Stadium (4.4)

Alex T. writes, ‘The party suites were some of the most well serviced, clean, and amazing seats that I could have asked for. Amazing value. Came here for my brothers bachelor weekend and this was a really amazing start to the entire thing. Premium liquors and hot dogs and nachos and desserts that would typically run you 60 dollars anyways, so might as well get unlimited with an amazing view!’ − 5 stars

Kyle B. writes, ‘Very nice stadium. Spacious, semi-modern, with a lot of history. Zero references to Mark McGwire. But it has an AMAZING back shot of the skyline.’ − 4 stars

5. Chicago Cubs, Wrigley Field (4.4)

Kealy C. writes, ‘I love Wrigley Field! It truly is a place that has unmatched energy. The comradery of the fans and view of city is absolutely amazing. If you are doing anything in Chicago, it must be going to a Cubs game. It honestly doesn’t matter who they are playing, you are going to have a high quality Chicago experience.’ − 5 stars

Ed S. writes, ‘I have been attending baseball games at Wrigley Field since the early 1980’s. It is such an iconic ballpark. Even if you are not a Cubs fan, you need to see a game here. There’s so much history to take in.’ − 5 stars

4. Baltimore Orioles, Oriole Park at Camden Yards (4.5)

Kenneth K. writes, ‘Amazing ballpark! It feels so classic. I have been to so many great stadiums that this ranks in the middle but it is still amazing. Definitely beats Nationals Park but took me a few times to agree. I have gotten seats all over the park including Splash Zone. I look forward to hopefully going back next week.’ − 5 stars

Dale C. writes, ‘It is a beautiful ball park. My wife and I love baseball and are trying to see all 30 parks. This is one of the most beautiful parks in MLB. There’s several of them but his one is close to the top. I would watch games here regularly if I lived in Baltimore.’ − 5 stars

3. Boston Red Sox, Fenway Park (4.5)

Fred L. writes, ‘Simply put Fenway is a Mecca of Baseball. This is one of the last remaining historic ball parks in the U.S. and is packed with history and culture. If you visit during the season (April till September and sometimes October), game days are literally an experience and a must do on any Boston check lists. The atmosphere is incredible no matter when you see a game there, but really kicks up a notch during the playoffs.’ − 5 stars

Linda E. writes, ‘This place needs no review. This historical baseball field is something everyone should visit while in Boston. On this occasion, I went for the tour which starts every hour. It lasts about one hour, and costs $20. It is well worth it as it gives you access to places you wouldn’t normally have. I definitely recommend the tour and can’t wait until I catch an actual game.’ − 5 stars

2. San Francisco Giants, Oracle Park (4.5)

Alvin Jarod A. writes, ‘Food 4.5/5 . Drinks 5/5. Service 5/5. Ambiance 5/5. This place is amazing! I see why a lot of baseball fans say you got to come to Oracle Park. Really fun environment and stadium bathrooms were clean.’ − 5 stars

Tiffany C. writes, ‘Just an overall fun time coming here. Great views, good food for a baseball stadium and chill vibes. I love a weekday night game or early afternoon weekend game with high up seats. Mainly there for the good views and catching up with friends. A spring/summer staple! Crab sandwich and garlic fries and my go-to’s! And the Ghirardelli Sunday is a classic too.’ − 5 stars

1. Pittsburgh Pirates, PNC Park (4.6)

Kelly T. writes, ‘I was in town for the weekend and one of my good friends was able to get us some great seats for the Friday night game against Philly. The stadium is beautiful with great views of the city. We were on the second level with access to all of the indoor amenities. There are so many food options with so much variety. Great place to see a game.’ − 5 stars

Maria M. writes, ‘We got cheap seats on the first baseline, and even though they were cheap, the view of the city was fantastic, and the game was fun. The facility had good access to food and restrooms, and my family had a great time!’ − 5 stars

The biggest stories, every morning. Stay up-to-date on all the key sports developments by subscribing to USA TODAY Sports’ newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A national security-focused nonprofit organization has released a comprehensive report detailing the workings of a well-funded nominally U.S.-based organization that it says is undermining American energy, pushing left-wing green initiatives, and ultimately advancing Chinese interests. 

The report, published by State Armor, outlines the money trail of Energy Foundation China, registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that is technically headquartered in San Francisco but with employees mostly based in Beijing.

‘Energy Foundation China used to be known as the Energy Foundation before it spun off most of its U.S.-based operations in 2019 into a separate organization called the U.S. Energy Foundation,’ the report explains. ‘While still formally organized as the Energy Foundation, since 2019, the organization has used the alias ‘Energy Foundation China’ or ‘EF China’ to differentiate from the now-separate U.S. Energy Foundation. The group was founded by Hal Harvey, a climate activist and entrepreneur with deep ties to numerous left-wing organizations and to China.’

State Armor found that EFC has ‘spent millions each year to bankroll climate advocates who promote phasing out fossil fuels and implementing green energy alternatives like the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the latter of which was the target of a 2018 Congressional inquiry into whether it should register as a foreign agent based on its Chinese funding.’

The Rocky Mountain Institute produced one of the most prominent studies used by many Democrats to justify cutting down on gas stoves and was cited by President Biden’s Department of Energy. 

Earlier this year, multiple committees joined to begin an investigation into EFC, and requested files from EFC President Zi Chou about financial resources given to American organizations after Fox News Digital reporting on the group funneling millions of dollars to fund climate initiatives and environmental groups in the U.S.

The report details how EFC ‘led a U.S. state-level legislative drive’ against Bayer, the leading Western fertilizer company, that pushed for lawsuits against the company over a potentially carcinogenic pesticide with the aim of driving the company out of the U.S. and in turn forcing reliance on Chinese suppliers. 

The report goes on to outline how the organization has ‘provided millions’ to the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) to support ‘a clean energy future’ and how ICCT was an ‘active supporter’ of climate initiatives in the Inflation Reduction Act targeting increased battery electric trucking infrastructure. 

Fox News Digital reported in 2023 that The Energy Foundation sent $480,000 to the Washington, D.C.-based International Council on Clean Transportation, which advocates for widespread EV adoption and policies decarbonizing the transportation sector broadly. It also wired grants — one to the University of Maryland and another to the Jackson Hole Center for Global Affairs — worth a total of $450,000 and earmarked for projects to phase out coal power reliance.

Josh Hodges, Commissioner on the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission and former National Security Advisor to Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and NSC Senior Director in the first Trump Administration, told Fox News Digital that EFC is a ‘textbook example of the CCP’s asymmetric warfare strategy and drive to deepen its dominance over American companies.’

‘Communist China is manipulating a supposed philanthropic network to steer the U.S. away from reliable domestic energy sources and into dependence on Chinese supply chains,’ Hodges said. ‘Whether it’s solar panels, mobile phones, electric vehicle batteries, or agricultural chemicals, Beijing’s fingerprints are all over the ‘green transition’ being pushed on America.’

The report quotes Chinese climate envoy Liu Zhenmin who suggested that Biden’s green energy policies will remain even under a more skeptical Trump administration and said, ‘even if the new Trump administration reverses climate change policies, it is unlikely to completely change the green transition actions that have already begun in various parts of the U.S.’

‘In other words, the CCP’s penetration of the U.S.’ political and industrial systems runs so deep that CCP officials believe that not even a skeptical White House could halt America’s growing dependence upon Chinese technologies,’ the report states. 

Will Hild, Executive Director of Consumers’ Research told Fox News Digital that the report ‘exposes a disturbing truth’ that EFC is part of a broader push to undermine American energy independence and ‘stifle’ the Trump energy agenda to benefit the CCP. 

EFC is weaponizing woke ideology to pull off this scheme and force American consumers to rely on the Chinese Communist Party for energy sources,’ Hild said. ‘Americans deserve to know the truth about our foreign adversary’s campaign that is poisoning our economy and reshaping our energy future. We applaud organizations like State Armor that are working to expose these grifts against consumers.’

In addition to the EFC’s climate activism, the report focuses on how, by ‘co-opting climate activism and dominating new so-called green supply chains, Beijing converts a domestic weakness into a global strength’ while also detailing the ties between EFC and the CCP. 

For example, EFC’s CEO Zou Ji has served in previous roles at top leadership positions in China’s official National Center for Climate Change Strategy within the National Development and Reform Commission of the State Council. 

‘He was so deeply tied into CCP leadership that he was included as a part of China’s delegation to the 2015 Paris Climate Talks,’ the report says. ‘Zou’s other affiliations include a position at Tsinghua University at a center where his colleagues include a retired senior PLA officer and a former deputy director of an MSS think tank.’

Zou is not the only EFC figure with ties to the CCP, the report says, pointing to EFC Board Member and Washington, D.C. based attorney Hongjun Zhang, who serves as a member of China’s Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development and was previously a legislative director for the China National People’s Congress. 

Zhang, according to his law firm’s bio page, spent ‘many years in the Chinese government’ that included work at the ‘Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), State Food and Drug Administration (CFDA), Ministry of Agriculture (MOA), and National Development and Reform Commission.’ 

The report states that EFC’s operations in China are overseen by the CCP’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and that the organization’s Beijing headquarters are located in a building owned by a state-owned investment corporation tied to Chinese state media propaganda. 

Rep. John Moolenar, R-Mich., who is the chairman of the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party, sounded the alarm over the report, telling Fox News Digital ‘This report confirms what we’ve long warned: the Chinese Communist Party is using seemingly innocuous nonprofits to influence American policy and undermine U.S. interests — in this case, our energy independence.’

‘Energy Foundation China operates at the direction of the CCP and is exploiting our charitable system to push policies that benefit Beijing, not the American people,’ Moolenar continued. ‘The Select Committee continues to investigate how CCP-linked organizations infiltrate U.S. institutions, shift critical supply chains toward China, and shape environmental agendas that aim to make America weaker while China gets stronger. We will continue to expose these influence operations and work with Congress and the Administration to safeguard U.S. energy security and national sovereignty.’

The report also points to examples of EFC collaborating with U.S. entities and officials including in 2023 when it ‘provided support’ for an event that featured California Gov. Gavin Newsom during a visit to China and then hosted a forum a month later for a discussion promoting ‘low-carbon cooperation between the two nations.’

Vance Wagner, the vice president for strategic partnerships at Energy Foundation China, pushed back on the report, telling Fox News Digital that ‘Energy Foundation China (EFC) is an independent grantmaking charitable organization that provides funding for research and capacity building related to climate change and China.’

‘Climate change is one of the greatest threats facing our world. Our work is currently focused on China given the scale of its energy sector and its role in global emissions. Despite geopolitical tensions, meaningful engagement with China on climate change and emissions reductions is in everyone’s interests,’ Vance continued. ‘All grants we make support projects related to climate change and China, and are in no way related to influencing U.S. energy policy. EFC does not accept funding from any government or political party.’

‘Neither the Chinese government nor the CCP fund, direct, or control EFC or our grant-making decisions,’ he added. ‘We are compliant with all U.S. and Chinese laws and regulations and do not lobby or support electoral activities in any country.’

The report states that between 2020 and 2021, EFC gave over $1 million to the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for funding ‘green energy research’ and laboratory training increasing the efficiency of China’s industrial sectors. 

The Biden administration, according to the report, gave $60 million in grants to the Institute for Sustainable Communities, which is a group ‘frequently in collaboration with Energy Foundation China.’

‘America’s energy security is national security,’ Jason Isaac, CEO of American Energy Institute, told Fox News Digital. 

‘The State Armor report lays bare how the Chinese Communist Party has co-opted climate activism to shift the U.S. onto so-called ‘green’ technologies that are manufactured, mined, and controlled by China. From solar panels to EV batteries and rare earth minerals, our supply chains are increasingly entangled with a foreign adversary that uses forced labor, ignores environmental safeguards, and openly aims to dominate the global energy future. This isn’t progress—it’s dependence. Real energy dominance means leveraging America’s vast domestic energy resources, not outsourcing our future to Beijing.’

Along with the report, State Armor has sent letters to Republican committee chairs in Congress, including Chairmen Grassley, Lee, Moolenaar, Comer, and Guthrie, that call for prompt oversight on the matter. 

‘Congress must act,’ the letter, authored by Lucci, implores. ‘Oversight is urgently needed to expose the full extent of this operation, beginning with Energy Foundation China. The EFC is not a passive observer; it is an active player in a geopolitical contest where America’s energy security and global leadership hang in the balance.’

Fox News Digital’s Thomas Catenacci and Joe Schoffstall contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

An Iowa congressman is taking a major step toward running for governor on Wednesday.

Rep. Randy Feenstra, R-Iowa, is launching a finance committee comprised of 47 top donors and business leaders in the Hawkeye State, Fox News Digital is learning first.

‘I am grateful for the overwhelming support that our campaign has received from Iowans who believe in our mission to take our state to new heights,’ Feenstra said in a statement.

‘Our finance committee will ensure we have the resources necessary for victory. I cannot thank our supporters enough for their support and confidence in our campaign.’

Feenstra has not formally announced a campaign for governor, but he’s now taken several steps in the process ahead of the 2026 elections.

He revealed last month that he is exploring a run for the role after the current governor, Republican Kim Reynolds, said she was stepping aside after serving two terms in Des Moines. 

Feenstra also filed a ‘Feenstra for Governor’ organizing committee.

It’s not clear when the official kickoff will be, but Feenstra is all but certain to join an increasingly crowded field of candidates for the open seat.

Members of the campaign committee include Kurt Croell, the owner of a concrete company who’s donated to both Reynolds and President Donald Trump, and members of the Doll family, who own beer company Doll Distributing.

West Des Moines Mayor Russ Trimble is also on the list, as are Nutratech executives Andy and Russ Kosky, among others.

Feenstra has represented Iowa’s 4th Congressional District since 2021, and serves key roles in the House as a member of both the Agriculture and Ways & Means Committees.

Other Republicans running to lead the state include state lawmaker Eddie Andrews and Brad Sherman, a former state representative.

The GOP primary could turn into a high-profile political clash if Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird enters the race. 

Iowa House Speaker Pat Grassley, grandson of U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is also publicly toying with a bid.

On the Democratic side, Iowa auditor Rob Sand is among the declared candidates, as is Julie Stauch, who served as Pete Buttigieg’s 2020 presidential campaign Iowa political director.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Justice Department says President Donald Trump has the right to abolish national monuments established by former President Joe Biden at the request of Native American tribes.

In the final days of his presidency, Biden established the Chuckwalla National Monument and the Sáttítla Highlands National Monument to protect hundreds of thousands of acres of land in California. According to Reuters, the Chuckwalla National Monument protects over 624,000 acres, while the Sáttítla Highlands National Monument protects 224,000 acres.

The monuments could lose their status after a Trump DOJ legal opinion reversed a 1938 determination that presidents did not have the power to abolish monuments designated by previous presidents under the Antiquities Act of 1906. 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General Lanora Pettit argued in the opinion that ‘for the Antiquities Act, the power to declare carries with it the power to revoke.’

In his first term, Trump reduced the size of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase Escalante National Monuments in Utah, according to the Associated Press. The outlet noted that Trump claimed the monuments were a ‘massive land grab.’ However, Biden later restored them during his term in office.

The DOJ’s opinion, which was released on Tuesday, has already drawn backlash as Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., slammed the Trump administration.

‘At Donald Trump’s order, his Justice Department is attempting to clear a path to erase national monuments,’ said Heinrich, who serves as the ranking member of the Senate Natural Resources Committee. ‘Here’s what they don’t understand: Our national monuments are about who we are. They tell the story of our ancestors, support jobs and our rural economies, and connect Americans to our history and the land itself. No president can erase that.’

Heinrich also vowed to oppose Republican efforts ‘to rip away our national monuments.’

In the legal opinion, Pettit wrote that Biden’s designation of the new monuments was part of a larger effort to create an environmental legacy for himself. She also appeared to discredit Biden’s reasons for designating the sites as national monuments, including the creation of more places for outdoor recreational activities, like biking, hiking, hunting and camping.

‘Such activities are entirely expected in a park, but they are wholly unrelated to (if not outright incompatible with) the protection of scientific or historical monuments,’ Pettit wrote.

There is no clear indication if or when Trump would revoke the status of the two sites established by Biden—or the status of any other monuments. However, according to Reuters, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields spoke about the need to ‘liberate our federal lands and waters to oil, gas, coal, geothermal, and mineral leasing’ when asked about the opinion.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Aaron Rodgers is set to play his first season with the Pittsburgh Steelers in 2025. It will also be his first as a married man.

Rodgers revealed at Steelers minicamp Tuesday he got married during the 2025 NFL offseason.

‘Been a couple of months,’ Rodgers said after telling reporters he was, in fact, wearing a wedding ring.

Rodgers did not provide any additional information about whom he had married. He previously indicated during an April appearance on ‘The Pat McAfee Show’ he was ‘in a serious relationship.’

Rodgers revealed in that same interview he was delaying a decision about his future due to personal matters. It is unclear whether the quarterback’s wedding was among those personal matters, but the 41-year-old explained to McAfee that he had ‘people in my inner circle battling difficult stuff.’

Here’s what to know about Rodgers’ wedding and to whom he was married.

Who is Aaron Rodgers’ wife?

Rodgers has not yet revealed the identity of his wife.

Rodgers last publicly mentioned having a girlfriend in a December 2024 episode of ‘The Pat McAfee Show.’ He said her name was ‘Brittani,’ clarifying she spelled her name with an ‘I.’

It isn’t clear whether she is the woman Rodgers married during the 2025 offseason.

All the players and plays: Sign up for USA TODAY’s Sports newsletter.

Aaron Rodgers previous relationships

Rodgers previously dated a handful of celebrities, including actress Olivia Munn, NASCAR driver Danica Patrick and actress Shailene Woodley, to whom he was briefly engaged.

Rodgers lamented in the Netflix series ‘Aaron Rodgers: Enigma’ how public those relationships were.

‘I didn’t do myself any favors with some of the girls I dated after that that were in the public eye,’ Rodgers said.

As such, he appears happy to keep his marriage on the down-low.

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

BEREA, OH — The road for Shedeur Sanders to become the starting quarterback of the Cleveland Browns is long – a lot longer than the 40 yards his right arm covered with his first rep of modified team drills during Cleveland’s first minicamp practice on June 10. 

Sanders dropped that pass in a bucket to wide receiver Gage Larvadain, a fellow rookie, on a go route down the right sideline that received a cheer from the gathered Browns employees and fans watching from the roof of the team’s practice facility. It was the highlight of the day for Sanders and the entire Browns quarterback group – all four of them. 

Veteran Joe Flacco did not take many reps, and Kenny Pickett – acquired over the offseason from the Philadelphia Eagles – took the bulk of reps with the first-team offense. Dillon Gabriel, the Browns’ third-round draft pick, was next in line and had all of the reps with the starters against the first-team defense during the 11-on-11 portion of practice. 

“I view things as, ‘I got time.’ I got time to grow and mature and be able to understand the ins and outs of the defenses and get the insight from the vets in the room,” Sanders said after practice. “I look at it as a plus…Whenever it’s time for me to play, it’s time for me to play. But I’m not really looking too far into the future.” 

In April, Sanders’ selection in the fifth round baffled the NFL draft ecosystem while serving as an indictment of Sanders’ play and how he and his father Deion Sanders, his college coach at Jackson State and Colorado and a Pro Football Hall of Famer, handled the pre-draft process. Since then, the confident bravado that lasted his entire college career has waned into a more traditional avatar of an NFL rookie not trying to draw much attention – positive or negative. 

To that end, Sanders said he could view the lack of reps negatively, or he can be proactive to stay warm so there’s no excuses when his number is called. Because nobody cares about practice when it’s game time, he said.  

“When you get out there,” Sanders said, “you got to be able to produce. 

“Everything off the field, it is what it is, but everybody knows when it’s time to get on that grass, you know who I am.” 

For Browns head coach Kevin Stefanski, being intentional with the practice reps helps him evaluate the other three quarterbacks outside of Flacco, who’s entering his 18th season in the league and played the 2023 season with the Browns following Deshaun Watson’s season-ending shoulder surgery that year. 

“All of them look pretty calm, efficient, going through their calls, making the plays they need to make,” defensive end Myles Garrett said. 

Sanders watched Pickett and Gabriel run their plays while holding his helmet in his right hand. Sometimes, he’d debrief with Flacco or quarterbacks coach Bill Musgrave. Six reps at a time, though, Sanders tried to make the most of his turn at the front of the line. The waiting until that point is being treated as a life experience. 

“Anything in life, you got to go through different things so you can understand the message God is trying to give you,” the Big 12 Offensive Player of the Year said. 

That message was received loud and clear the night before minicamp began. Much like the night before his heavily-publicized pro day at Colorado two months ago, Sanders said he felt a higher power trying to reach him in his hotel room. Earlier in the day, Sanders said he’d spoken with pastors about his purpose. 

“It’s a lot going on, I’d say in my mind, and I understand what peace is,” said Sanders, who will go back to Texas and reset between the three days of practice this week and training camp. 

Tuesday’s practice ended with red-zone, 7-on-7 work. Sanders displayed his quick-processing abilities by finding an open receiver over the middle at the goal line.

“I already have a different type of confidence about myself,” Sanders said. “But when you go out there and you know the ins and outs of everything, then it’s a whole different type of confidence. I’m definitely getting to that point.

By the time training camp arrives in July, Sanders said, he plans on being there. Whether Stefanski and the Browns coaching staff agree or not will determine the direction of Sanders’ rookie season.

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY