Author

admin

Browsing

The Heisman Trophy winner aims to give an NFL team two players for the price of one in the 2025 NFL Draft.

Hunter played over 86% of Colorado’s offensive snaps and 82% of the team’s defensive snaps in 2024. The 21-year-old has showcased his ability to be a natural playmaker with instincts that would translate at the NFL level on offense and defense.

Hunter has met with multiple teams through the pre-draft process, and his message to each one remains consistent. If an NFL team asked him to choose one side of the ball or the other, he would choose the highway.

‘It’s never playing football again,’ Hunter said in an interview, per Garrett Podell of CBS Sports. ‘Because I’ve been doing it my whole life, and I love being on the football field. I feel like I could dominate on each side of the ball, so I really enjoy doing it.’

Hunter remains adamant about playing wide receiver and cornerback for whatever team selects him in next week’s draft.

His message has been clear since the early days of the pre-draft process.

Hunter spoke to reporters at the NFL combine in February and said he’d like to play 100% of snaps on both sides of the ball in the NFL.

The Colorado product is undoubtedly one of the most unique prospects we have seen in the modern NFL era. His skills have earned him recognition as a cornerback, drawing comparisons to Hall of Famers like Charles Woodson and Champ Bailey. Additionally, as a wide receiver, he has been compared to Odell Beckham Jr. and DeVonta Smith.

In 13 games last season, Hunter amassed 1,268 yards from scrimmage and 16 touchdowns. On the defensive side of the ball, he finished with 36 tackles, four interceptions, a forced fumble and 11 passes defended.

Hunter is widely expected to be drafted inside the top three selections of the 2025 NFL Draft next Thursday.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

It’s too bad there are no cameras allowed in federal courtrooms, because I really would like to see Mark Zuckerberg testify.

He was the leadoff witness in the Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust lawsuit against Meta, and that in itself was news.

The clash is the most sweeping attempt to dismember the world’s biggest social network, and goes to the heart of how competition is defined.

Not since the government broke up AT&T more than four decades ago has a mega-corporation faced the prospect of being torn apart.

The suit was filed in the first Trump term (the president couldn’t stand Facebook at the time), aggressively pursued by Joe Biden, and now has finally come to trial in a Washington courtroom.

Trump once told me Facebook was such a threat to society that he used it as justification for flip-flopping on his effort to ban TikTok. 

But since he won a second term, Zuck, like many tech bros, has been cozying up to the new sheriff in town, including a $1-million donation to the president’s inaugural.

There are reports that when the man who runs Facebook recently met with Trump, he asked about the possibility of dropping the lawsuit. Obviously, it didn’t work.

The focus of the trial is Zuckerberg’s decision to buy Instagram and WhatsApp when they were small start-ups.

The FTC’s lead lawyer questioned Zuckerberg about a platform meant to foster ties between family and friends to a concentration on showing users interesting third-party content through its news feed.

‘It’s the case that over time, the ‘interest’ part of that has gotten built out more than the ‘friend’ part,’ Zuckerberg said. He added that ‘the ‘friend’ part has gone down quite a bit, but it’s still something we care about.’

Translation: Screw the friends. Very 2010s. We’ve moved on.

Zuckerberg spoke slowly – at least according to reporters who were there – and he was back on the hot seat yesterday. FTC lawyers pressed him on a stack of emails he had sent:  

‘We really need to get our act together quickly on this since Instagram’s growing so fast.

‘Instagram has become a large and viable competitor to us on mobile photos, which will increasingly be the future of photos.’

‘If Instagram continues to kick ass on photos, or if Google buys them, then over the next few years they could easily add pieces of their service that copy what we’re doing now.’ Which was a flop called Facebook Camera.

In yet another message, Zuck called Instagram’s growth ‘really scary,’ saying ‘we might want to consider paying a lot of money for this.’ Facebook bought Instagram for $1 billion in 2012, and two years later spent $19 billion on WhatsApp.

In an email to Tom Alison, head of Facebook, Z offered alternatives:

‘Option 1. Double down on Friending. One potentially crazy idea is to consider wiping everyone’s graphs and having them start again.’

Alison responded: ‘I’m not sure Option #1 in your proposal (Double-down on Friending) would be viable given my understanding of how vital the friend use case is to IG.’

Now we come to the fascinating part.

It’s not breaking news that Mark’s judgment can be flawed. Remember when he insisted that virtual reality would be the next big thing? 

But he argues that Meta has all kinds of rivals in the ‘entertainment’ area, such as X, TikTok and YouTube – and he easily could have added Snap, Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and HBO’s Max. It’s all about the battle for eyeballs now. There are only so many hours in the day. Mindshare is everything.

And with group chats all the rage, Meta doesn’t do well on that kind of interaction, with Instagram as a possible exception.

Now of course it’s in Zuckerberg’s self-interest to testify that he competes with anything that has a screen. But it’s not that far off the mark. Keep in mind that Meta has 4 billion active monthly users.

I sure wish we could see the embattled CEO making the case that he’s awash in a vast sea of rivals. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

PHOENIX — It’s Jackie Robinson Day on Tuesday, with every player wearing No. 42, teams holding ceremonies, ballparks showing video tributes, and Major League Baseball reminding America that he helped spearhead the Civil Rights movement in 1947 with the integration of its sport.

Yet, here we are 78 years later, and the African-American player population on opening-day rosters and injured lists this season is 6%. There are three Black managers. There is one Black general manager.

And, after all of the programs and initiatives designed to increase Black and minority representation in front offices, coaching staffs and on the playing field, Major League Baseball recently scrubbed references to diversity on its careers web page, while also erasing details on its Diversity Pipeline Program, adhering to President Donald Trump’s executive orders on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies.

It comes on the heels of the Department of Defense removing an article on Robinson’s military career on its website, only for it to be restored, claiming it was a mistake as part of broader anti-DEI efforts.

The fear now is that if Black representation in MLB is painfully low after their initiatives, what in the world will happen if there are cutbacks in its Diversity Pipeline Program leading to less minority representation among clubs?

“These owners have always had the right to do what they want to,’ says former 20-game winner Dave Stewart, one of only seven Black GMs in MLB history. “They just aren’t in the mood to hire Black males in high decision-making positions.

“I’m not sure how this could make things any worse.

“The numbers are pretty low already, bro.’

Stewart, who was dismissed by the Arizona Diamondbacks after the 2016 season, says he never got another call to interview for a GM vacancy. It’s no different for Ken Williams, who led the Chicago White Sox to the 2005 World Series championship, was dismissed in 2023, and has never been contacted for another front office position.

If you’re White, you can always get recycled, with Dave Dombrowski of the Philadelphia Phillies in charge of his fourth team. Jerry Dipoto of the Seattle Mariners is running the baseball department for a third different team. Ben Cherington of the Pittsburgh Pirates and Chaim Bloom of the St. Louis Cardinals are on their second jobs after being fired from their first GM job with the Boston Red Sox.

“I knew that when I got that job,’ Williams said. “You get one shot. You know it’s your one shot. You better make the most of it.’

MLB, with its opening-day rosters consisting of 27.8% foreign-born players, and Black representation increasing for the first time since 2018 after being just 5.7% last season – the lowest since 1955 – has no plans to scrap its development programs and initiatives. They may have changed some of the titles, but the goal remains the same.

MLB officials say they can’t talk about it publicly, instead referring to commissioner Rob Manfred’s comments during spring training.

“Our values, particularly our values on diversity, remain unchanged, but another value that is pretty important to us is we always try to comply with what the law is,” Manfred said. “There seems to be an evolution going on here. We’re following that very carefully. Obviously, when things get a little more settled, we’ll examine each of our programs and make sure that while the values remain the same that we’re also consistent with what the law requires.”

Even with the fear of potential repercussions, there are those who wish MLB executives would speak out, just as Williams did in MLB meetings when he often was the only Black executive in the room as the White Sox’s executive vice president. Houston Astros GM Dana Brown is the game’s lone Black GM, and the only one hired since Stewart in 2014.

“I have never seen so many people afraid to talk about something that has gone so successfully,’ Williams tells USA TODAY Sports. “People listen to the Ivy League schools, the Stanfords, and what have you, for almost everything else in terms of the acumen and guidance and certainly their research. Those same schools will tell you that the organizations and companies that adapt these strategies have 30% gains economically, and their internal dealings with one another are better. Yet, it has somehow been turned upside down and weaponized that those same institutions have not been listened to.

“It’s a hell of a case study.’

The success why MLB has no plans to shutter any of their programs and diminish their pursuit of making the game as diverse as possible.

“I don’t think in my conversations with people (in the Commissioner’s office) that there’s an interest in anything going away,’ Williams says, “with some of the things that have proven to further things along. In real time, there’s no evidence that is not happening.’

MLB still will retain its RBI (Reviving Baseball in Inner Cities) programs, the Hank Aaron Classic, the Andre Dawson Classic, the Dream Series, the Breakthrough Series, the Swingman Classic, and the Selig rule, requiring all teams to interview at least one minority candidate when hiring a front office executive or field manager.

“I can say this, if you look at the Commissioner’s Office itself, you can honestly say it has more color than it used to have 10 years ago,’ Stewart said. “Rob Manfred is practicing what he’s preaching. You walk in 10 years ago, and there were very few minorities. Now, it’s a different look, with minorities having meaningful positions.

“The problem is the industry as a whole has not taken the leadership and example of the commissioner and taken that into their own organization. That’s a shame.’

The Players Alliance, which began in 2020 and has donated $41.7 million to underserved communities, says it will continue its role with a mission statement to “address baseball’s systemic barriers to equity & inclusion by creating pathways to opportunities on and off the field for an undeniable pipeline of Black talent.’

“Regardless of what’s happening, the focus has remained the same,’ said Curtis Granderson, the Players Alliance board chairman. “We’re starting to see results. Players are getting signed. Schools are getting more equipment. Boys and girls are playing at a younger age. We need to help the areas in the biggest need, and who have the biggest challenges. Not just Black kids, but Asian, and Hispanic and White kids.

“This space, whether it has an organized title or an initiative, is still going to shine a light on the sport because it is such a big piece of us. There still are problems, this isn’t going to be fixed overnight, but our commitment remains the same.’

MLB officials privately share the same sentiments. There are 17 Black players on opening-day rosters who are alumni of their MLB Development Programs. The 2025 Spring Breakout rosters had 35 players who played for the development programs, the Hank Aaron Invitational, and other MLB-affiliated events.

While there are 13 teams who had no more than one Black player on their opening-day roster – including two teams with no Black players – nine teams have at least three Black players. The Minnesota Twins, New York Yankees and Washington Nationals lead baseball with four African-Americans on their team. There was also a modest increase of Black pitchers to 16 and Atlanta catcher Drake Baldwin is attempting to become the first everyday African-American catcher since Charles Johnson.

MLB is also encouraged that more Black players are on their way, with 18 additional players on 40-man rosters, 17 players ranked among MLB’s top 100 prospects, with 16 players projected to be selected among the top 100 picks in this year’s draft. A year ago, nine of the first 21 picks were Black.

“We try to do our part,’ Washington Nationals shortstop C.J. Abrams said. “I don’t really pay attention to the outside noise, but whatever I can do to help, I do it.

“We’ve got to keep it alive.’

Certainly, it’s vital for MLB to assure that their programs and initiatives don’t go backwards. Even a small step back could lead to a virtual avalanche, wiping out everything baseball has strived to accomplish the last decade.

Williams, executive chairman and co-founder of the DEI Network and CLARA, believes that MLB will stand up for what’s right, no matter the landscape of the current administration. His company already has received a verbal commitment from MLB to utilize their tools to mitigate bias and level the playing field.

“I know some of the sentiment [in today’s political climate] starts to get deeper and more ingrained in people,’ Williams said, “and they believe there’s more justification to it.

“But, as we’ve found out, it takes years and years for progress to move forward.

“It only takes a short period of time for it go to backwards.’

Follow Nightengale on X: @Bnightengale

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Maybe it’s time to start evaluating the clear and present more substantially. 

Instead of overreacting to every possible unintended consequence.

I know this is going to shock you, but there will be more college football players in the very near future holding out and demanding restructuring of NIL contracts. 

Prior to the start of fall camp in 14 weeks. 

Prior to the start of the season in 18 weeks. 

Prior to the start of the College Football Playoff in December. 

If you think Nico Iamaleava’s now failed leverage game with Tennessee is a one-off, you obviously haven’t been connecting the dots. The great college money rush is on.

“Just the landscape of college football,” Tennessee coach Josh Heupel said after last weekend’s spring game. “That this happens at this point.”

And it’s going to happen again. 

Look, this isn’t about complaining or pining for yesteryear, or blaming greedy players for the ills of the game. It’s about solving the problem, one that’s slowly eating away at the soul of the sport.

This is about adding hefty buyouts to NIL deals. This is about corralling the unbridled mess that is NIL money.

What did college football’s braintrust think was going to happen when the figurehead NCAA followed orders from the power conference presidents in 2021 to set up a system that allowed unregulated name, image and likeness deals — and free player movement? 

It should come as no surprise that Ohio State, which spent nearly $42 million last season on its football program – head coach, assistant coach and player salaries – won the national championship. 

It should also come as no surprise that without critical transfers Will Howard (Kansas State), Caleb Downs (Alabama) and Quinshon Judkins (Mississippi), the Buckeyes don’t even reach the playoff.

Keep up with the off season: Sign up for USA TODAY’s Sports newsletter.

And now we’re shocked that Iamaleava, a heralded recruit that was solid in his first-year starter in 2024 at Tennessee, was holding up the program for more cash — or else?

The solution, everyone, is in the regulation. But the easy solve is one college sports continues to avoid at all cost: employee status, contracts and collective bargaining.

Absent that, we’re forced down the nonsensical road of maybe Congress will help with federal legislation (it won’t). Or maybe the NCAA can come up with “guardrails” that won’t be challenged in court (they will).

I’ve seen this dance before, and it doesn’t end well for all things NCAA. 

For decades upon decades, the NCAA fought to the bitter end for its pollyanna ideal of the amateur model, losing case after case in legal proceedings while holding on like grim death to outdated philosophy. 

I’ve got a better idea: treat players like coaches and solve the problem. 

Hello, buyouts. 

Buyouts don’t restrict coaching movement, they’re simply an addendum to a contract outlining a fee paid to the employer if the employee decides to leave for another job prior to the end of the contract. 

That fee is agreed upon by both parties during initial contract negotiations, and is legally secure. If a coach wants to later leave one job for another, it’s on him to pay his buyout.

He can pay it, or the school hiring him can pay it. But you better believe it’s getting paid. 

While buyouts rarely stop a school that wants to hire a coach or a coach who wants out of a deal, they do create pause in the procedure. That hesitation, meanwhile, can eventually leads to a restructured deal.

Or maybe it simply leads to a more organized departure. 

Nearly a decade ago, Jim McElwain wanted to leave Colorado State to take the Florida job. His buyout was $7 million, and Colorado State wasn’t giving in. 

So Florida paid Colorado State $3 million, gave the Rams another $2 million for a future guaranteed game, and McElwain paid the remainder of the buyout. 

Now trace that process to players and power and all things NIL. Before we go further, understand that a majority of power conference schools must buy into the process. 

In other words, schools must start inserting significant buyouts into contracts. It can’t be hit and miss, or high school and transfer portal players will simply shop and sign with schools that don’t have buyouts. 

If all power conference schools have NIL deals with buyouts, the possibility of player holdouts at least comes with a caution signal. The machinations within the deal are then inherent obstacles.  

How much is the buyout? Who pays the buyout? How much will the buyout affect the new deal? 

“Not 100 percent of it is exactly what you want,” Heupel said when asked about the current state of college football. 

Then the former player in Heupel showed up, the junior college transfer quarterback who led Oklahoma from mediocrity to the 2000 national title. And didn’t get an NIL nickel for it.   

“I can understand a player’s perspective, too,” Heupel said. “There’s some benefits to it.”

This isn’t about vilifying players. It’s about evaluation and finding answers.

Solve the problem. 

Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Defense Department’s (DOD) deputy chief of staff was placed on administrative leave on Tuesday, following the steps of another Pentagon official earlier in the day.

Darin Selnick, the deputy chief of staff for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, has been removed, a senior U.S. official confirmed to Fox News.

Selnick is under investigation for the same leak probe that saw Hegseth aide Dan Caldwell escorted out of the Pentagon by security. Both Selnick and Caldwell are on administrative leave.

According to the Pentagon’s website, Selnick is a retired Air Force officer who has worked extensively in veterans’ affairs organizations.

‘Mr. Selnick leverages his extensive government and non-government experience advocating for veterans to position Service members for productive post-separation lives from the first day they put on a uniform,’ the biography states.

Both Selnick and Caldwell worked for Concerned Veterans for America in the past, a group formerly led by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Reuters reported that Caldwell was placed on leave for an ‘unauthorized disclosure,’ as part of an investigation into leaked Pentagon documents.

The probe was announced last month, and concerned itself over ‘recent unauthorized disclosures of national security information.’ 

‘The use of polygraphs in the execution of this investigation will be in accordance with applicable law and policy,’ DOD Chief of Staff Joe Kasper wrote in a memo at the time. ‘This investigation will commence immediately and culminate in a report to the Secretary of Defense.’

An official told Politico that the leak concerned Panama Canal plans and Elon Musk’s visit to the Pentagon, among other matters.

More information about the leak is unknown, and there is currently no evidence to connect Caldwell or Selnick to that leak.

Fox News Digital’s Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

If I told you there was a player in Major League Baseball who had one of the highest chase rates in the league, had some of the worst hard contact metrics, and never walked, what would you expect his batting average to be?

Somewhere around the Mendoza line? Maybe if he was lucky and had a super high BABIP he could sneak into .250 territory? Now, what if I told you he was batting nearly .350. Among qualified hitters, that player, with zero bat control ranks 11th in MLB in batting average.

The Athletics’ shortstop Jacob Wilson has always been a high-average hitter. He hit over .400 across two seasons in the minors after all. However, his method of approach is baffling.

Plate discipline? What’s that

The best contact hitters in baseball more or less share a lot of the same traits. Steven Kwan, Luis Arraez, Jung Hoo Lee, all of them strike out very little, hit the ball to all fields, and are very patient at the plate. Wilson follows the first two rules, but treats the third like a five-year-old treats a ‘No running’ sign at the local pool, like it doesn’t exist.

Steven Kwan’s on-base percentage in 2024 was 76 points higher than his batting average that same year. Luis Arraez’s was 32 points higher. And while we haven’t seen much from Jung Hoo Lee given that he was injured for most of 2024, his OBP in 2025 is currently 72 points higher than his average.

Wilson’s batting average and OBP are much closer together. In fact, they’re the same number. That’s right. Across 61 plate appearances this year, Wilson has not walked a single time. Where Kwan and Lee each boast a walk rate of at least 6%, Wilson sits at 0.0%. Where Kwan, Arraez, and Lee each swing at fewer than 50% of the pitches thrown their way, Wilson is taking his bat off his shoulder 59.1% of the time.

It’s especially bad out of the zone. Wilson is chasing an enormous 38.4% of pitches thrown out of the strike zone to him. That ranks in the 8th percentile among MLB players. For even more perspective, Javier Baez, known for his lack of plate discipline, is chasing 32.2% pitches outside the zone. Yet while Baez is striking out 22% of the time, Wilson has struck out just three times all year, good for a 4.9% rate.

Contact metrics

So clearly, if Wilson is chasing a lot of bad pitches and still getting hits, he must be making great contact, right? In a normal world, that would make perfect sense. In Jacob Wilson’s world, that’s a ridiculous assumption, and we should be ashamed of ourselves.

In today’s MLB, a player’s potential as a hitter is often boiled down to their bat speed and hard-hit rate. Wilson does not excel in either category. He ranks in the 16th percentile of MLB hitters with a 29.3% hard-hit rate. He ranks in the ninth percentile with an average exit velocity of 85.1 mph. But those aren’t even the most shocking metrics.

Jacob Wilson has the absolute slowest average bat speed in MLB. This man is the antithesis of everything MLB scouts look for in a hitter, yet he’s hitting .344 with an .852 OPS.

Is he beating out little dribblers with his blazing speed? No. He ranks in MLB’s 48th percentile in sprint speed. Is he getting extremely lucky? Not really. His expected batting average is .338. He’s just unlike anything else in MLB currently.

What to make of Wilson

The cynics of the world would probably argue that Wilson is bound to come back to Earth, but he’s been doing this his entire career, and he’s never fallen off. Through two full years in the minor leagues, Wilson only ever drew 20 walks, and he had a .401 batting average with eight home runs to boot.

Some people break all the rules and still find success. Wilson is a weirdo, a freak, an anomaly that shouldn’t work but does anyway. His Baseball Savant page is chaotically magnificent. The man isn’t average at anything. He’s either one of the best in the league or one of the worst, nothing in between.

But that’s what makes baseball incredible. As much as statisticians and analysts like to boil the game down to numbers, sometimes all that math accounts for diddly-squat. Sometimes people are just ballers.

By the way, I don’t know where to bet on the AL batting title or what Wilson’s odds are but that’s definitely something I’d keep an eye on as the season progresses.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NEW YORK ― Georgia Amoore’s first-round WNBA draft selection seemingly eases much of the doubt surrounding her smaller stature.

On Monday, fans, family members, coaches and draft prospects entered The Shed in Manhattan full of chatter and anticipation ahead of the 2025 WNBA draft. As they filled the building, drifting off to their seats, trying the on-site activations or strolling to the WNBA orange carpet, a line formed at a nearby escalator. Upon approach, the patrons waiting seemed like ordinary people excited to watch history being made at of the biggest events in women’s sports. But, they needed the line to move along to do it.

‘Are we allowed to use this escalator?’ one person said. ‘What’s going on?’ said another. Then, a woman, unsuspecting, but warm, flashed a darling smile as bright as the leather jacket she was wearing ― with ‘Honor Tailoring: custom alteration’ stitched onto the back ― and briefly turned around to say she was waiting like everyone else to get upstairs.

That woman was Kentucky guard Georgia Amoore, wearing a custom outfit designed by Denver Nuggets guard Russell Westbrook.

‘Honor the gift,’ she told media members about the look moments later on the league’s orange runway. As Amoore explained how her outfit came to life, her eyes lit up with a childlike twinkle. She explained with enthusiasm and appreciation how the collaboration with Westbrook encapsulated everything she wanted, and she was thankful that the Denver guard was detailed in his approach. Then, Amoore revealed that Westbrook wouldn’t let her leave parts of the design to him.

‘He actually checked me at one point because I told him to just go ahead and do whatever, and he was like, ‘Nah, Nah. It’s your night,’ she said.

It was Amoore’s night. The Washington Mystics selected the Australian native with the No. 6 overall pick, pairing her with other first-round selections, Notre Dame guard Sonia Citron and USC forward Kiki Iriafen. The Mystics’ new floor general was selected higher than various predictions leading up to the WNBA draft had her landing, but it’s hard to pass up elite talent ― even with a smaller 5-foot-6 frame than most WNBA guards. So, what potentially drew Washington’s front office to Amoore?

‘Just my brain,’ Amoore proudly shared after being drafted. ‘ I think, you know, it’s no secret. I’m on the shorter side. So, having to use my brain and my abilities in different ways ― I’ve had to study the game like I studied for a test in college.’

The Mystics needed shooting and additional guards on Monday evening, and with the Kentucky product, they have both. Amoore’s cerebral approach to basketball makes her an immediate asset for a franchise that is rebuilding and likely wants to compete sooner rather than later. What’s more, her no-fear mentality and confidence practically leap off the court every time she slashes through opposing defenses or unleashes her signature step-back jumper, something she improved with the help of Kentucky coach Kenny Brooks.

‘Yeah, these quads and Coach Brooks,’ Amoore joked. However, when speaking about what else helped her to get to the WNBA draft, she credited Brooks’ impact again. ‘He’s always told me (to) stop and smell the roses … just be super present with everything that’s happening. That helped me tonight, and it’ll help me going forward.’

As she begins her professional career, Amoore has a steep rookie learning curve ahead of her. The WNBA is one of the premier leagues in the world and the guard play and basketball knowledge is top-tier. The ebbs and flows of the season are often unforgiving for first-year players, and when carrying the load of being one of the faces of the franchise, the curve becomes even steeper. Still, true to form, Amoore is undeterred by any perceived obstacle she faces. ‘Iron (sharpens) iron. When you get thrown into that situation you either adapt or drown,’ she said. ‘I’m excited to go and be challenged mentally and grow my game.’

‘As long as people have called me too short, I’ve been looking to counteract that … But I think with my competitive background, I have a little bit of dog in me that’s gonna keep fighting.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Atlanta Braves broadcast team is facing backlash and criticism over unprofessional behavior after a segment during Monday’s game against the Toronto Blue Jays in which a sideline reporter got the phone number of a female fan he had just interviewed when encouraged to do so on-air by his fellow announcers.

FanDuel Sports Network Braves reporter Wiley Ballard hosted ‘The Field Report’ during the top of the fifth inning in Toronto and spoke to two female fans about their Braves fandom. One noted she was ‘not quite’ a Braves fan yet. Ballard then attempted to transition back to Braves play-by-play announcer Brandon Gaudin and color analyst C.J. Nitkowski.

‘I’m gonna go to work up here, guys,’ Ballard said. ‘Good luck the rest of the way.’

Gaudin replied with more suggestive and flirty language.

‘Ok, Wiley,’ he said, ‘You got four innings to get the numbers.’

‘I’m on it. I’m on it. I’m on it,’ Ballard responded, and immediately pulled out his cell phone.

‘Alright, so they want me to get your number,’ Ballard said to a woman who had identified herself as ‘Lauren’ during the interview.

She wondered aloud, ‘They want you to get my number?’

‘I’m dead serious. They’re saying it in my ear right now,’ Ballard said back before speaking to Gaudin and Nitkowski through the camera.

‘She doesn’t believe me because she thinks you guys, she thinks we’re making this up. Even if you guys weren’t, I may use that in the future. It’s actually a pretty good move.’

‘This is unbelievable,’ Gaudin said.

Then, Nitkowski chimed in. ‘So the best part about this is Wiley could totally be faking it,’ he said. ‘This might be the new move. Just walk around with a fake FanDuel microphone and an ear piece in and convince fans that they’re actually on TV.’

As this was happening, Lauren did appear to type her phone number into Ballard’s phone.

‘I got the number. We’re good,’ Ballard said at the end of the clip that subsequently went viral once it was shared on social media.

But the segment appears to have drawn a polarizing reaction from those watching live and and generated an immediate rebuke online as the footage was disseminated nationally, particularly in the broadcasting and journalism communities.

Many called the behavior unprofessional and misogynistic, and pointed toward a double standard that exists as it relates to the way male and female reporters are expected to conduct themselves. Others found the unorthodox on-air exchange to be funny and came to Ballard’s defense.

Here’s a sampling of what the sports world is saying on social media about an Atlanta Braves broadcast that was anything but normal:

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Philadelphia Phillies’ first baseman Bryce Harper is known for his wild gear. Whether it’s his iconic American flag headband as he wore during the 2018 Home Run Derby or his massive collection of cleats he wears for specific games, Harper is always elevating the gear game, and Monday was no different.

During the first at-bat of Philadelphia’s 10-4 loss to the San Francisco Giants, Harper carried a blue bat into the batter’s box, revealing to himself and the entire baseball world that the two-time MVP’s fourth child is going to be a boy.

Not even Harper knew what color his bat was going to be as the game started. Prior to the contest, he asked teammate Trea Turner to hand him a blue or pink bat depending on his child’s gender.

Turner revealed that he got a text message with the gender, and even messed with Harper in the dugout beforehand, giving the pink bat a few swings to throw Harper off the trail. ‘I ended up handing him the blue one, and he was pretty happy,’ said Turner.

Bryce Harper’s family

Harper and his wife Kayla married in December 2016. The couple have a son, Krew, and two daughters, Brooklyn and Kamryn.

Krew is the oldest, born August 22, 2019. Brooklyn was born a year later in November 2020. Kamryn was born in April 2024.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

White House aides are quietly floating a proposal within the House GOP that would raise the tax rate for people making more than $1 million to 40%, two sources familiar with discussions told Fox News Digital, to offset the cost of eliminating tips on overtime pay, tipped wages, and retirees’ Social Security.

The sources stressed the discussions were only preliminary, and the plan is one of many being talked about as congressional Republicans work on advancing President Donald Trump’s agenda via the budget reconciliation process.

Trump and his White House have not yet taken a position on the matter, but the idea is being looked at by his aides and staff on Capitol Hill.

Meanwhile House GOP leaders including Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., have publicly opposed the idea of any tax hikes.

‘I’m not a big fan of doing that. I mean, we’re the Republican Party and we’re for tax reduction for everyone,’ Johnson said on ‘Sunday Morning Futures.’

One GOP lawmaker asked about the proposal and granted anonymity to speak candidly said they would be open to supporting it but preferred a higher starting point than $1 million.

They said the reaction was ‘mixed’ among other House Republicans. But not all House GOP lawmakers are privy to the discussions, and it’s not immediately clear how wide the proposal has been circulated.

Nevertheless, it signals that Republicans are deeply divided on how to go about enacting Trump’s tax agenda.

Extending Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and enacting his newer tax proposals is a cornerstone of Republicans’ plans for the budget reconciliation process.

By lowering the Senate’s threshold for passage from 60 votes to 51, it allows the party in power to skirt opposition to pass a sweeping piece of legislation advancing its own priorities – provided the measures deal with tax, spending, or the national debt.

Extending Trump’s tax cuts is expected to cost trillions of dollars alone. But even if Republicans use a budgetary calculation to hide its cost, known as current policy baseline, they will still have to find a path forward for new policies eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay, and retirees’ Social Security checks.

Hiking taxes on the ultra-wealthy could also serve to put Democrats in a tricky political situation in forcing them to choose between supporting Trump’s policies and opposing an idea they’ve pushed for years.

The top income tax rate is currently about 37% on $609,351 in earnings for a single person or $731,201 for married couples. 

But raising the rate for millionaires could be one way to pay for Trump’s new tax policies.

House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris, R-Md., one of the deficit hawks leading the charge to ensure new spending is paired with deep cuts elsewhere, said ‘That’s one possibility.’

‘What I’d like to do is I’d actually like to find spending reductions elsewhere in the budget, but if we can’t get enough spending reductions, we’re going to have to pay for our tax cuts,’ Harris told ‘Mornings with Maria’ last week.

‘Before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the highest tax bracket was 39.6%, it was less than $1 million. Ideally, what we could do, again, if we can’t find spending reductions, we say ‘Okay, let’s restore that higher bracket, let’s set it at maybe $2 million income and above,’ to help pay for the rest of the president’s agenda.’

But Johnson’s No. 2, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., again poured cold water on the idea Tuesday.

‘I don’t support that initiative,’ Scalise told ‘Mornings with Maria,’ though he added, ‘everything’s on the table.’

‘That’s why you hear all kind of ideas being bounced around. And if we take no action, then you’d have over 90% of Americans see a tax increase,’ Scalise warned.

Bloomberg News was first to report House Republicans’ 40% tax hike proposal.

When reached for comment, the White House pointed Fox News Digital to comments by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt earlier on Tuesday when she said Trump had not made up his mind on another proposal to raise the corporate tax rate.

‘I’ve seen this idea proposed. I’ve heard this idea discussed. But I don’t believe the president has made a determination on whether he supports it or not,’ Leavitt said.

Fox News Digital also reached out to Johnson’s office for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS