Author

admin

Browsing

BOULDER, Colorado – It was the worst practice since Deion Sanders arrived at Colorado.

So much for the crisp, up-tempo “Speed Day” that Coach Prime planned for Tuesday’s session, the next-to-last practice before spring football drills conclude on Saturday with the annual black-and-gold scrimmage. The effort, focus and attention to detail left something to be desired.

Hey, don’t take it from me.

“How can you not go all-out for three reps?” Sanders grumbled during a post-practice interview with USA TODAY Sports. “That’s a problem.”

Sanders, heading into his third season at Colorado, is challenged to develop a new version of the Buffaloes without the presence of the two stars projected as high picks in the NFL draft next week – Heisman Trophy-winning two-way phenom Travis Hunter and his son, quarterback Shedeur Sanders – but with the same type of intense spotlight attached to the program.

We coming? Yeah, and Sanders, the Pro Football Hall of Famer making another mark in the coaching ranks, is staying, too, having recently signed a five-year, $54 million extension that makes him one of college football’s highest-paid coaches.

Asked about the significance of his new deal, Sanders put it in a larger context that involves resources for the once-sagging football program that he has revitalized.

“We had to make sure we have the foundation that we need to be successful in this turbulent time in college football,” he said. “Because if the same teams keep going to the playoffs every year, that tells you something about the collectives and the NILs. I don’t think it says too much about the programs and coaching – I mean, there are some great coaches, don’t get me wrong. There are. But if the same teams go every year and they’re spending the same amount of money, it’s hard to compete with an institution that’s spending $25 million on freshmen alone.

“But our kids come out here to play for me and this staff. They don’t come out here for a bag, because they understand the real finances are garnished in the NFL, not with the NIL.”

That said, Sanders maintains that even without Shedeur and Hunter, he expects to field a better team than the squad that went 9-4 last season and tied for first in the Big 12 because the unit will be deeper in the trenches.

Of course, much will hinge on the process of replacing his son at quarterback, with a competition featuring fifth-year transfer Kaidon Salter and prized freshman recruit Julian “JuJu” Lewis. Salter came from the portal after four years at Liberty. Lewis is a five-star recruit from Carrollton, Ga. who was the Georgia Gatorade Player of the Year.

“It’s going to be a good fight,” Sanders said. “Salter is good; he has the upper hand right now because he has the experience. Juju’s going to be a phenomenal quarterback.”

In any event, Tuesday’s practice was hardly an example of Coach Prime’s big-picture expectations, which include winning a postseason bowl game after last season ended with the thud of an Alamo Bowl loss to BYU. After declaring before practice that he merely wanted three full-speed reps from each player, he wound up cutting the session short because, well, he had seen enough. The whole practice lasted 68 minutes and was interrupted twice when he ordered wind sprints.

“If you’re not getting nothing out of ’em, we might as well condition,” he said.

At one point, an errant shotgun snap and slow reaction drew his ire. Watching from midfield in a hoodie, behind the defense, Sanders reacted by merely pointing to the sideline. The offensive unit took that cue to run a pair of sideline-to-sideline sprints.

“First of all, how do you get a bad snap in that situation?” Sanders reflected. “Secondly, why didn’t you go for the ball? So, there were like three parts to that.”

When it was over, after Sanders called a midfield huddle for a parting message on the indoor field, he took the team upstairs to the large meeting room.

“We watched the film, so they could see what we’re talking about,” Sanders said.

Jim Trotter advances the ball after settling racial discrimination lawsuit against the NFL

He said he also had several of his assistant coaches speak to amplify the theme.

“Sometimes, coaches are not honest,” Sanders said. “But we’ve got to stop this delusion. Some kids are delusional. I’m a truth-teller. So, we’ve got to put it in perspective. ‘This is where you are. This is where you think you are, but this is where you really are.’ The coaches had to recalibrate these men and let them know who they are and what they need to do to get to the next level.”

With another level to pursue on the college football landscape, Sanders knows that one sloppy practice wasn’t a make-or-break moment. But no, they can’t get used to that. It was hardly surprising to hear him talk about the greater purpose of establishing a standard.

“A lot of the things I’m doing, I’m laying a foundation,” he said. “Sometimes when I do things, it’s not about right then. It’s about something that’s going to transpire later. I’ve got to get my team ready to fight adversity and go hard at all times.”

In the meantime, as was the case when he arrived at Colorado from Jackson State, he urged the players who are not all-in to hit the transfer portal that opens this week. That, too, is one of the realities of college football.

“I know you always have three or four surprises, so I’m trying to flush ’em out,” he said.

Sure enough, within hours of that worst practice, Sanders said he thinks three of his players were set to enter the transfer portal.

And perhaps they’ll take the memory of a sluggish practice with them.

Follow Jarrett Bell on social media: @JarrettBell

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Dallas Mavericks general manager Nico Harrison and CEO Rick Welts spoke to select members of the media behind closed doors on Tuesday, just a day before the Mavericks’ Play-in Tournament game on the road against the Sacramento Kings.

The Mavericks did release a transcript of the conversation later and provided in full by various outlets, including WFAA.com.

It was just the second time Harrison spoke on the record with the media since the Mavericks acquired Anthony Davis in a trade that sent Luka Dončić to the Los Angeles Lakers in a package deal on Feb. 2. 

Dončić was in his seventh season with the Mavericks and had just led Dallas to the NBA Finals in 2024.

Nico Harrison’s latest comments on Luka Doncic trade

“There’s no regrets on the trade,” Harrison said. “Part of my job is to do the best thing for the Mavericks, not only today, but also in the future. And some of the decisions I’m going to make are going to be unpopular, and that’s my job, and I have to stand by it.”

The decision to move on from Dončić led to a vocal group of the Dallas fan base showing up outside of the arena to express their displeasure. In the following weeks, fans are still heard chanting “Fire Nico” throughout the arena during home games at the American Airlines Center.

ESPN reporter Tim MacMahon asked Harrison about the GM’s ‘three to four-year time frame’ where he believes the team is ready to contend for a championship.

“I keep saying the same thing, but defense wins championships,” Harrison said. “I believe that we have a championship caliber team, not only for now, but also for the future.”

MacMahon also questioned the decision behind trading the Mavericks’ first-round draft picks from 2027 through 2030 and Dončić.

“Obviously, the future will hold if I’m right or wrong, and ultimately, we’re going to be held to the standard of wins and losses, and every executive in every field is going to be held to that same standard.”

Dončić is known for his offensive ability, but the trade for Davis is expected to help bolster the Mavericks’ defense.

Davis has never won defensive player of the year, but has been held in high regard as one of the better defensive players in the league and has been named to an All-Defensive Team five times during the first 12 years of his career.

The early results of the trade didn’t look pleasing for the Mavericks, who lost several players to injury, including Davis, who was injured during his first game as a Maverick before returning for the last few games of the regular season schedule. The team had also lost star point guard Kyrie Irving for the season shortly after.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Pat Shurmur spent the last two seasons at Colorado helping to coach star quarterback Shedeur Sanders. The 60-year-old coach sees similarities between Sanders and Daniel Jones, who he coached during the 2019 season with the New York Giants.

‘I think they’re very similar prospects, from a player and a person,’ Shurmur told The New York Post of Sanders and Jones. ‘I think they’re both wonderful human beings, they’re both highly accomplished, talented college players that have a chance to make an impact in the NFL, so there’s a lot of similarities between Daniel Jones and Shedeur Sanders.’

The Giants selected Jones No. 6 overall in the 2019 NFL draft, ahead of Shurmur’s second and final season with the Giants. The Duke product looked great in his first career start against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers but was largely uneven during his five-plus seasons with the Giants.

Jones had a record of 24-44-1 and posted a passer rating of 84.3 before being released midway through the 2024 season. He was less than two years into a four-year, $160 million contract when the Giants parted with him.

Shurmur lamented he didn’t get a chance to work with Jones for a second season after the quarterback posted a career-best 24 touchdowns during his rookie season. He also made it clear that his comparison of Sanders to Jones was meant as a compliment, despite the latter’s struggles during his NFL career to date.

‘I just think he’s got a very bright future in the NFL,’ Shurmur said of Sanders, via The Post. ‘No. 1, he’s very accurate. He’s got a very heroic personality, a very heroic nature, which allows him to execute at the end of the game when it’s very important. He’s an outstanding teammate and I think he’s a wonderful human being.’

That’s why Shurmur is confident the team that selects Sanders will be pleased with their investment.

‘I can’t believe there’s a better quarterback around this year than him,’ Shurmur said. ‘Whatever team chooses to pick him, and I can’t make those decisions for anybody, I think they’re going to be very, very happy that they do.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Trump administration has asked the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to revoke Harvard University’s tax-exempt status, sources within the Department of Justice (DOJ) confirmed to Fox News.

The Ivy League school’s failure to address antisemitism on campus is grounds for losing their 501(c)(3) status, Fox News’ sources said.

The IRS is expected to make a final decision soon on Harvard’s tax exemption, according to CNN, which was first to report the story. 

 In a recent social media post, President Donald Trump claimed that Harvard had ‘lost its way’ and didn’t deserve federal funding.

‘Harvard has been hiring almost all woke, Radical Left, idiots and ‘birdbrains’ who are only capable of teaching FAILURE to students and so-called ‘future leaders,” Trump wrote. ‘Look just to the recent past at their plagiarizing President, who so greatly embarrassed Harvard before the United States Congress.’

‘Many others, like these Leftist dopes, are teaching at Harvard, and because of that, Harvard can no longer be considered even a decent place of learning, and should not be considered on any list of the World’s Great Universities or Colleges,’ he continued. 

‘Harvard is a JOKE, teaches Hate and Stupidity, and should no longer receive Federal Funds.’

This is a breaking story. Check back with us for updates.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A third high-level Pentagon staffer has been placed on administrative leave in two days as part of a probe into media leaks.

Colin Carroll, chief of staff to Deputy Secretary Stephen Feinberg, was escorted out of the building on Wednesday, following Dan Caldwell, senior advisor to Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Darin Selnick, deputy chief of staff to Hegseth. 

‘We can confirm that Mr. Carroll has been placed on administrative leave pending investigation. We have nothing additional to provide at this time,’ a defense official told Fox News Digital. 

Carroll did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

Last month Defense Department (DOD) announced it would launch a probe into ‘recent unauthorized disclosures of national security information’ and might employ the use of polygraphs to determine the source of the leaks. 

‘The use of polygraphs in the execution of this investigation will be in accordance with applicable law and policy,’ DOD Chief of Staff Joe Kasper wrote in a memo. ‘This investigation will commence immediately and culminate in a report to the Secretary of Defense.’

He wrote that ‘information identifying a party responsible for an unauthorized disclosure’ would be referred for criminal prosecution. 

Caroll, a Marine Corps reservist, most recently worked at defense contractor Anduril, which develops autonomous weapons systems. Both Selnick and Caldwell worked at Concerned Veterans for America, an advocacy group once led by Hegseth. 

The Pentagon has not provided specifics about what the three officials are accused of leaking. An official told Politico that the leak concerned Panama Canal plans and Elon Musk’s visit to the Pentagon and a second aircraft carrier being deployed to the Red Sea. 

The DOD followed the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice in announcing it would use polygraphs to root out alleged leakers. But the DOD memo came after President Donald Trump pushed back on a New York Times report that Department of Government Efficiency leader Elon Musk would be briefed on ‘war plans’ with China during a visit to the Pentagon. Trump said he would not show such plans ‘to anybody.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

In each of the past two NBA playoffs, at least two lower seeds have won a first-round series, including four in 2023.

With depth and parity creeping into the NBA competitive paradigm, is the league in store for more unpredictability?

The Golden State Warriors are an atypical No. 7 seed, and the Minnesota Timberwolves are a No. 6 seed who made the Western Conference finals last season. The Milwaukee Bucks are the five seed but still have championship components, and the sixth-seeded Detroit Pistons beat the Knicks three times this season, including twice at Madison Square Garden.

Here are first-round NBA playoff predictions from USA TODAY Sports NBA staff writers and editors:

NBA first-round playoff predictions

Eastern Conference

No. 1 Cleveland vs. No. 8 Atlanta or Miami or Chicago

Noteworthy: The Cavaliers posted the NBA’s top offensive rating, scoring 121.0 points per 100 possessions en route to winning 64 games, most since the 2008-09 season, when they won 66.

Cavaliers-No. 8 predictions

  • Lorenzo Reyes: Cavaliers
  • Heather Tucker: Cavaliers
  • Jeff Zillgitt: Cavaliers

No. 2 Boston Celtics vs. No. 7 Orlando Magic

Noteworthy: The Magic actually won the season series, 2-1, though All-Star forward Jayson Tatum missed both Boston losses. One of those defeats came in the antepenultimate game of the regular season, when the Celtics sat Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Derrick White, Jrue Holiday and Kristaps Porziņģis — their entire starting unit.

Celtics-Magic predictions

  • Lorenzo Reyes: Celtics in five
  • Heather Tucker: Celtics in four
  • Jeff Zillgitt: Celtics in six

No. 3 New York Knicks vs. No. 6 Detroit Pistons

Noteworthy: No lineup played more minutes (940) than New York’s starting five of Karl-Anthony Towns, OG Anunoby, Josh Hart, Mikal Bridges and Jalen Brunson. The Pistons saw a 30-win improvement from last season, the sixth-best turnaround in NBA history.

Knicks-Pistons predictions

  • Lorenzo Reyes: Knicks in five
  • Heather Tucker: Knicks in six
  • Jeff Zillgitt: Knicks in six

No. 4 Indiana Pacers vs. No. 5 Milwaukee Bucks

Noteworthy: Bucks guard Damian Lillard’s availability (deep vein thrombosis) is up in the air, and he’ll be essential to Milwaukee’s chances: no duo in the NBA scored more points than Lillard and Giannis Antetokounmpo, who combined for 55.3 points per game. The Pacers won 50 games for the first time since 2013-14 and went 34-14 (.708) since Jan. 1.

Pacers-Bucks predictions

  • Lorenzo Reyes: Bucks in seven
  • Heather Tucker: Bucks in six
  • Jeff Zillgitt: Pacers in seven

Western Conference

No. 1 Oklahoma City Thunder vs. No 8 Memphis or Sacramento or Dallas

Noteworthy: The Thunder were the only team to finish in the top three in offensive (third) and defensive rating (first) and had the league’s best net rating at plus-12.7 points per 100 possessions – the second-best net rating in NBA history.

Thunder-No. 8 seed predictions

  • Lorenzo Reyes: Thunder
  • Heather Tucker: Thunder
  • Jeff Zillgitt: Thunder

No. 2 Houston Rockets vs. No. 7 Golden State Warriors

Noteworthy: Golden State won the seasons series 3-2, outscoring Houston 517-509, and the Rockets held the Warriors to less than 100 points in three of the five games.

Rockets-Warriors predictions

  • Lorenzo Reyes: Rockets in five
  • Heather Tucker: Rockets in six
  • Jeff Zillgitt: Warriors in seven

No. 3 Los Angeles Lakers vs. No. 6 Minnesota Timberwolves

Noteworthy: The teams split the four-game seasons series – each winning twice at home. However, Luka Doncic was with the Lakers for only the final game, a 111-102 Lakers win on Feb. 27, with LeBron James and Doncic combining for 54 points, 20 rebounds and 11 assists.

Lakers-Timberwolves predictions

  • Lorenzo Reyes: Lakers in seven
  • Heather Tucker: Lakers in five
  • Jeff Zillgitt: Lakers in seven

No. 4 Denver Nuggets vs. No. 5 Los Angeles Clippers

Noteworthy: The Nuggets and the Clippers each won two games in the season series, but they haven’t played since Jan. 8. Norman Powell torched the Nuggets, averaging 27.8 points in four games on 48.7% shooting on 3-pointers.

Nuggets-Clippers predictions

  • Lorenzo Reyes: Clippers in five
  • Heather Tucker: Nuggets in six
  • Jeff Zillgitt: Clippers in six
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

We’re down to nearly one week until the 2025 NFL draft begins April 24 from Green Bay, Wisconsin. That Thursday night will begin three days of madness as 32 NFL teams make 257 total picks to shape the next crop of professional talent.

The first few picks of Round 1 have become clear over the last few months of the NFL draft process. Miami quarterback Cam Ward, Colorado wide receiver/cornerback Travis Hunter and Penn State edge rusher Abdul Carter are expected to go in the first three selections in some order.

After that, things can be pretty wide open and fans of all 32 teams are meticulously combing through the latest mock drafts to get some clues as to what their favorite franchise will do in Round 1 and beyond.

On April 16, one of the most respected evaluators in NFL draft coverage, The Athletic’s Dane Brugler, released a seven-round mock draft of all 257 picks. It’s a lot to get through so here are some takeaways from his latest predictions:

Takeaways from Dane Brugler’s seven-round mock draft

Click here to read Brugler’s full 257-pick mock draft.

A run on quarterbacks in Round 2 after Shedeur Sanders falls

Brugler tabbed the Pittsburgh Steelers as the home for the former Colorado quarterback at No. 21 overall. That’s become a popular choice as the farthest he falls in Round 1 if the New Orleans Saints pass on him at No. 9. Sanders at No. 21 breaks the drought from No. 1 overall (Ward to the Titans).

He’s the last first-round quarterback but precedes a run on passers in Round 2. Ole Miss’ Jaxson Dart (No. 33 overall to the Cleveland Browns), Alabama’s Jalen Milroe (No. 34 overall to the New York Giants) and Louisville’s (No. 40 overall to the Saints) all go in quick succession to start Round 2. Three quarterback-needy teams get a signal caller without having to use up too much draft capital.

Chicago goes offense early, defense late

The Bears are one of the more intriguing teams in the draft with a young quarterback, talented skill position players, a revamped offensive line and a new, exciting playcaller in head coach Ben Johnson.

Brugler sees another step forward for the Bears’ offense in the team’s first three picks: Penn State tight end Tyler Warren at No. 10 overall, Ohio State running back TreVeyon Henderson at No. 39 overall and Minnesota offensive tackle Aireontae Ersery at No. 41 overall.

Warren’s a dynamic threat as a tight end and Henderson’s long speed can somewhat mirror Sam LaPorta and Jahmyr Gibbs, two talents who made Johnson’s offenses effective in Detroit. Ersery offers a potential succession plan at tackle in 2026 and beyond.

The Bears also go all-Big Ten with their seven picks in Brugler’s mock with players from Ohio State, Minnesota, Penn State and Rutgers.

A new future in Cleveland

Brugler’s prediction of Dart to Cleveland potentially solves the quarterback position. That pick comes after taking arguably the best player in the draft in Hunter at No. 2 overall.

From there, the Browns bring in talent at key positions on offense. Boston College offensive tackle Ozzy Trapilo at No. 67 overall, Oregon running back Jordan James at No. 104, Alabama tight end CJ Dippre at No. 179 and Auburn wide receiver KeAndre Lambert-Smith at No. 192 offer a huge influx in talent to the Browns. On defense, they bring in reinforcements at every level led by LSU edge Sai’vion Jones at No. 94.

Super Bowl champion Eagles reload with great value

The Philadelphia Eagles crushed the Kansas City Chiefs in Super Bowl 59 and address their few needs well in this mock draft. Boston Colelge edge rusher Donovan Ezeiruaku is one of the most pro-ready players in the class; he somehow falls to the Eagles at No. 32 overall as a plug-and-play starting option in place of the departed Josh Sweat.

Brugler keeps the Georgia Bulldogs-Philadelphia Eagles connection going with guard Tate Ratledge at No. 64, helping in case the team doesn’t have the right replacement for Mekhi Becton in-house already. Philadelphia grabs another small-school standout in Bowling Green tight end Harold Fannin Jr. at No. 96, who is a versatile and productive player.

Safety is one of the few question marks on the roster and Brugler tabs Ohio State’s Lathan Ransom at No. 134 to Philadelphia. Hard to find flaws with this group.

CeeDee Lamb gets a new running mate in Dallas

The Cowboys’ offense struggled in 2024 before quarterback Dak Prescott’s season-ending injury. Lamb shouldered a heavy load in the passing game but Brugler thinks Dallas could find help early on.

In Round 1, Brugler has the Cowboys taking Texas wide receiver Matthew Golden. The local prospect was one of the fastest players at the NFL combine and offers alignment versatility and verticality to take some of the pressure off Lamb in the slot.

In Round 2, Dallas gets a new running back in Ohio State’s Quinshon Judkins. Ashton Jeanty was off the board long before Dallas was on the clock in Round 1 and Judkins is hardly a poor consolation prize. The former Buckeye is a powerful, aggressive runner with proven receiving abilities to help a team that scored just six rushing touchdowns in 2024.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Josh Heupel said no one is bigger than Tennessee’s program as he said farewell to quarterback Nico Iamaleava. His next move? Hunt for a transfer QB.
  • Coaches bemoan lack of roster control, but their demand for transfers contributes to transfer supply.
  • Tennessee sued the NCAA, spurring a settlement that further empowered athletes. Beware of the monsters you help create.

The irony hung thick in the air, like the springtime pollen in East Tennessee.

Tennessee coach Josh Heupel said “no one is bigger than the” program, explaining why the Vols were moving on from money-hungry starting quarterback Nico Iamaleava. In the next breath, Heupel explained that the Vols would pursue a transfer quarterback to fill the void created by Iamaleava’s departure.

Tennessee would benefit from another starting quarterback leaving his team after spring practice, entering the transfer portal and pursuing greener pastures.

In other words, Tennessee seeks a Nico to replace Nico.

“Going to have to find another (quarterback),’ Heupel said after Tennessee’s spring game.

Here comes another round of the transfer sweepstakes, as coaches line up to make an acquisition they hope will help their roster.

The transfer portal opened Wednesday, igniting college football’s second free-agency period in a span of four months. Coaches find the lack of roster control that accompanies multiple transfer windows to be a maddening situation, but their actions contribute to this situation.

It’s simple supply and demand. If coaches showed no demand for transfers in this April free-agency period, the supply would dry up.

Iamaleava isn’t the only player leaving a team in a lurch this spring. To wit, California’s All-America running back Jaydn Ott hit the portal, and Oklahoma quickly poached him.

Iamaleava stood to make more than $2 million this season from Tennessee’s NIL collective, but he sought to sweeten his deal. He reportedly wanted $4 million. Tennessee wouldn’t cave to that figure, and Iamaleava skipped practice Friday, skipped Tennessee’s spring game and entered the transfer portal.

How to curtail these types of situations in the future?

Well, what if no coach offers Iamaleava a lifeline and he withers in the portal? This would signal that coaches refuse to play the game of starting quarterbacks leaving their teams after spring practice. And what if Heupel had announced Saturday that Jake Merklinger, Iamaleava’s trusty backup, would be Tennessee’s starter, instead of announcing that he’s going transfer shopping?

If those actions happened, it might make the next quarterback think twice before pulling this maneuver.

But that’s not going to happen, is it?

Iamaleava’s too talented to go without a home, although I’m skeptical he’ll secure a $4 million offer. The market doesn’t seem particularly hot for him, but I can’t imagine he won’t generate interest if he lowers his price. He’s the top-rated transfer in the 247Sports rankings. If Iamaleava finds a destination and displaces the starter at his new program, that quarterback could then enter the portal.

Demand for transfers spurs more supply.

Tennessee won’t rush to anoint Merklinger, a loyal backup who signed as a four-star recruit. He’s one of two scholarship quarterbacks left on Tennessee’s roster. The Vols made the College Football Playoff with Iamaleava starting last season. They retained playoff potential in 2025 if Iamaleava had not transferred. With Merklinger starting, that playoff potential goes poof. So Heupel will try to seize a transfer quarterback who improves Tennessee’s outlook.

Round and round we go.

Nico Iamaleava overplayed hand at Tennessee

To be clear, Iamaleava misplayed this situation. He would have generated more demand and done less reputational damage if he had transferred in December, after Tennessee’s first-round playoff loss. He also would have given himself more time to learn the offense and assimilate with the roster at his destination school. Schools that otherwise might have been interested in Iamaleava already identified their starters by the time he decided to transfer. Also, an SEC rule requires players who transfer within the conference in the spring window to sit out a season before playing. That further hamstrings Iamaleava.

Tennessee, too, would have been better off knowing in December it would play this season without him.

This presents as a lose-lose situation, and still, Iamaleava’s decisions and Tennessee’s response feed kindling to the fires of the spring portal.

Tennessee sued NCAA, empowered athletes like Nico Iamaleava

Coaches and administrators have called upon the high heavens for “guardrails” to allow schools more roster control. One possible solution would include a collective bargaining agreement with athletes that allows schools more roster control, but the NCAA has steadfastly declined to pursue this avenue. Coaches and administrators repeatedly and unsuccessfully call on Congress for help.

Meanwhile, the NCAA keeps losing legal battles.

In a karmic twist, Tennessee’s attorney general sued the NCAA after the association tried to investigate the Vols for possible violations of NIL rules during their recruitment of Iamaleava. Tennessee’s administration stood behind its program and Iamaleava and publicly scolded the NCAA.

In a win for athletes’ money-making prospects, Tennessee’s federal lawsuit resulted in a settlement that further kneecapped the NCAA’s ability to regulate NIL dealmaking and smashed whatever flimsy NCAA guardrails existed surrounding NIL.

Beware of the monsters you help create.

Schools claim to want guardrails, right up to the point where those guardrails affect their ability to win and assemble the best roster.

Coaches bemoan their lack of roster control, while marching toward the transfer shopping market.

Supply, meet demand.

Demand, meet supply, while coaches call out for someone to save them from themselves.

Blake Toppmeyer is a columnist for the USA TODAY Network. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer. Subscribe to read all of his columns.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Cam Ward, the frontrunner to be the No. 1 pick by the Tennessee Titans in the 2025 NFL draft on April 24, attended three schools over the course of his five-year college career. In another era – one without college athletes maintaining the ability to earn money based on their name, image and likeness and the transfer portal – the quarterback’s journey from Incarnate Word to Washington State and, ultimately, Miami (Fla.) would have been highly unlikely, if not impossible. 

Instead, the new rules are the biggest driver of why Ward will likely hear his name called first by NFL commissioner Roger Goodell next week. For executives, coaches and scouts throughout the league, it’s a new reality. One that’s constantly changing and evolving – the Nico Iamaleava saga at Tennessee serving as the latest example of the uncharted territory college football and its participants find themselves occupying. And there are pros and cons to it all.

“The system is failing them in that regard but at the end of the day the coaches that get these players…these guys are a lot more NFL-ready,” Todd McShay, NFL draft analyst at The Ringer and Spotify who hosts ‘The McShay Show,’ told USA TODAY Sports. 

Compared to decades prior and broadly speaking, rookies now enter the league more experienced. Transferring and earning money matures them.

“When you get to the NFL, and it’s much more likely that you’ve played more ball, played a higher level of ball…you’re more of a veteran football player who had to deal with the journey and moving so when you get to the league it’s not quite as much of a culture shock in terms of the talent level and the experience and even just the day-to-day life stuff,” McShay said. “For a lot of these guys with the NIL, it can be a positive thing of learning how to manage money and handle fame and fortune.” 

McShay thought back to the advice former NFL coach Marty Schottenheimer imparted upon him during the year they spent as teammates at ESPN. 

“The hardest part of evaluating is trying to predict what a human being will do with more money, fame and free time than he’s ever had before,” Schottenheimer told McShay. 

‘Too many hands in the pocket’

Schottenheimer’s words still resonate in the league now.

McShay said he had pages of reports from talking to general managers and scouts about players with “too many hands in the pocket” and other external factors that come with money. Maturity concerns are easier to spot, if the proper research is done, once money is involved. It’s up to each pro organization to contextualize each transfer. 

“It’s not going anywhere and it’s absolutely something that we have to be aware of when it comes to, ‘How do we onboard our players?’” Jacksonville Jaguars first-year head coach Liam Coen, who was an offensive coordinator at the University of Kentucky two years ago, said regarding NIL and the transfer portal at the 2025 scouting combine in Indianapolis. 

“I think that’s changed a lot …. It’s hard to judge guys for jumping into the transfer portal,” Atlanta Falcons head coach Raheem Morris said. 

Since 2021, players could both make money on their own name, image and likeness deals and  also switch schools penalty-free. Transferring became en vogue. The total number of players among FBS scholarship transfers rose from 1,946 in 2021-22 to 2,303 in 2022-23, and then up to 2,707 in 2023-24, per NBC Sports. Nineteen of the 37 players drafted in the seventh round in 2024, for example, played for multiple schools, according to research from The Athletic. In 2019, one player fell into that category. 

Figuring out the path has fallen onto the Falcons’ scouting department, Morris said.  

“You (transferred) back in the day, it was because of some over-the-top reason,” he said. “Now it’s a little bit more normal.” 

A player can make more on a one-year NIL deal than a late-round pick or undrafted free agent. That’s led to an increase in the number of players available to be drafted who are 22 to 25-years-old, Green Bay Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst said at the combine. 

“I think a lot of that has to do with guys that wouldn’t come out in the last couple drafts and having the opportunity to go back and make money and stay in,” Gutekunst said. “We’re seeing the effects of it, but it’s a moving target right now with the landscape of college football. I give our staff a lot of credit for really thinking outside the box of how we attack. It’s an immense challenge.”

Carolina Panthers head coach Dave Canales opted to not refer to the shifting dynamics as “a challenge,” rather an opportunity to find information from multiple sources. 

“Do their stories corroborate or was he one guy here and then somebody different?” Canales said. “I think you have more eyes on these players, which does help us evaluate the character and kind of go into those things. I understand players that have opportunities, financially, to go from one school to the next, that makes sense. They don’t know how long their careers are, so all these things kind of help us to be able to evaluate them.” 

One hurdle is evaluating a player as he transitions from one scheme to another over the course of a calendar year. But that’s just another data point.

“It’s the onboarding process that we have to be really detailed about and make sure that we’re vetting the right players, right? Why did they move? Why were they going from place to place?” Coen said. “A lot of guys are just trying to climb and go get better for themselves.” 

Area scouts vital in NIL, transfer portal era

The job has changed the most for area scouts, the members of the scouting department who oversee a particular area of the country. 

“I would say for the area scouts it’s probably the hardest,” Titans head coach Brian Callahan said. “In years past, before all these guys transferred, you’d have two, three, four years of information-gathering on a player if you’re an area scout. Let’s say you’re the Southwest area scout and you’re building four years’ worth of a profile on a player. Well, now these guys transfer – usually at least once; sometimes twice – and now there (are) gaps in the information.”

College programs are establishing their own versions of front offices and doing the first line of evaluating as players move up from lesser conferences or even Division II and Division III. A player such as NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year Jared Verse, who ended his career at Florida State, doesn’t stay at Albany for his entire college career anymore. 

On the flipside, not as many underclassmen enter the draft now. What incentive would a mid-round quarterback have to try his hand in the NFL when he could play at a more visible school and make more money if he hasn’t yet exhausted his eligibility? McShay estimates that the number of underclassmen taken in this draft will range from 55-65 rather than the usual 90-110.

McShay has friends who have been area scouts for nearly two decades. At a given Power Four school – South Carolina, for example – there would typically be 12-14 players to write reports about. Some were underclassmen. A few probably weren’t going to pan out, but it was important to start the research early. Now that number is closer to 30. 

“The volume at these schools is wild,” McShay said. “Now, for those (scouts), they don’t get paid enough compared to what everybody else is getting paid. It’s just unbelievable, the amount of detail, work and background checks and stuff.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

An NFL draft class isn’t quite the same as a high school or college graduating class, but that doesn’t mean it can’t have some of the same traditions.

With the 2025 NFL Draft just over one week away, USA TODAY Sports created a list of superlatives ahead of draft night. Which players are most likely to rise or fall? Which teams are most likely to trade up or down? Who’s the best prospect on offense? On defense?

All of these questions (and more) get answers in the 2025 NFL draft superlatives. Here’s how they shake out:

2025 NFL draft superlatives

Best overall prospect: Travis Hunter, CB/WR, Colorado

There was no question about this one. The Heisman Trophy winner has the ability to be an immediate starter – and a quality starter – at either (or both) of his positions. Some teams have viewed Hunter as a bigger contributor on offense, while others have said they view him primarily as a defender. The fact that such a debate can even exist means there’s no debate about which player is the top overall prospect.

Best quarterback prospect: Cam Ward, Miami (FL)

Ward has been the consensus top quarterback prospect since the end of the 2024 college season. His excellent year included a 67.2% completion rate (12th in FBS), 4,313 passing yards (second) and 39 passing touchdowns (first).

In addition to his statistical output, Ward showed off his strong ability to read defenses, anticipate throwing windows, improvise and scramble. The Miami Hurricanes quarterback has some dual-threat potential as well, rushing 60 times for 204 yards and four touchdowns last year.

Best offensive prospect: Ashton Jeanty, RB, Boise State

As great as Hunter is as a two-way player, and despite all of the excitement a quarterback prospect like Ward brings, no player was a more pure difference-maker on offense in 2024 than Ashton Jeanty.

The Boise State product rushed more than 370 times last year and still managed to average nearly seven yards per carry. That was thanks to his FBS-leading 2,601 rushing yards, a mark that was just 27 yards short of breaking Barry Sanders’ record for most rushing yards in a single season.

That’s all without mentioning Jeanty’s 29 rushing touchdowns in 14 games, which also led all FBS running backs. Of the top 40 players in the NCAA’s ranking of ‘points responsible for,’ 39 of them are quarterbacks. Jeanty was the lone exception, and he was tied with Penn State quarterback Drew Allar for 27th on the list with 180.

Best defensive prospect: Abdul Carter, Edge, Penn State

Carter is the best prospect in the 2025 draft class not named Hunter, despite some of the injury concerns that have popped up during the pre-draft process. His pass-rush tape includes wins using a plethora of methods: speed, hand fighting, spin moves, dips and more.

Once he’s past opposing tackles, the players still in the backfield – quarterbacks or running backs – are in trouble. He’ll hit a second gear, catch up and finish the tackle for a loss.

Carter finished the 2024 season as the FBS leader in tackles for loss with 23.5 of them, according to the NCAA. His 12.0 sacks ranked seventh in FBS, as well.

Player most likely to be a bust: Travis Hunter, CB/WR, Colorado

Wait, what? Hunter led this list as the best overall prospect, how could he also be the most likely to be a bust?

Well, with the high expectations Hunter enters this year’s draft with, there’s also plenty of opportunity for a letdown. The threshold for being a bust is lower with the inherent expectations and potential a two-way player comes with. If Hunter fails to live up to his projections as a starter on either side of the ball, or even remains limited to one position, there are those out there who will label him a ‘bust.’

Team most likely to trade back: Minnesota Vikings

The Vikings have the fewest picks in the 2025 NFL Draft, with four of them. That means they’re a prime candidate to trade back in the first round to get some additional draft picks in later rounds.

Minnesota is also in a good position with the No. 24 overall pick, since there are still eight other playoff teams picking behind it, several of which could be looking to jump up a few picks. It also means the Vikings aren’t so far back that a trade down would necessarily hamper them from taking one of the top players on their draft board.

Team most likely to trade up: Houston Texans

Since he took over as the Texans’ general manager in 2021, Nick Caserio has not shied away from trading up for the players he believes will improve the roster.

In his first year in charge, Caserio traded three future selections to Carolina to acquire an additional third-round pick, which he used to select wide receiver Nico Collins. Two years later, Caserio traded four picks to Arizona to move up to the No. 3 overall pick – in a draft in which the Texans already had the No. 2 pick. He used the second pick on quarterback C.J. Stroud and the third pick on edge rusher Will Anderson Jr. The two went on to sweep the NFL’s Offensive and Defensive Rookie of the Year awards for 2023.

If Caserio and the Texans are in a position to move up to ‘get their guy,’ the general manager won’t be afraid to pull the trigger.

Player most likely to rise above expected draft position: Jaxson Dart, QB, Mississippi

Dart has been one of the biggest pre-draft risers in this year’s class. From his time at the Senior Bowl to his performance at the NFL Scouting Combine, the Mississippi gunslinger has put in the work to push himself into Round 1 consideration.

Some analysts have predicted that Dart may be the second quarterback off the board – behind Ward and ahead of Colorado’s Shedeur Sanders. That would doubtless qualify him for this superlative, but even if he just hears his name called at all on the first night of the draft, Dart would have risen above previous expectations.

Player most likely to fall: Shedeur Sanders, QB, Colorado

Sanders could be drafted as early as the No. 2 pick – by a quarterback-needy team like the Cleveland Browns – or the No. 3 pick – by the quarterback-needy Giants. But he could also fall much further down the board.

The Saints – who hold the No. 9 overall pick – are currently the betting favorite to draft Sanders after news broke that veteran Derek Carr is dealing with a shoulder injury. But if they like another quarterback prospect more – perhaps the aforementioned Dart – Sanders could slide much further down the board.

Team most likely to trade back into first round: New York Giants

The biggest benefit a team gets by trading back up into the first round is the fifth-year team option exclusive to first-round picks. As a team without a franchise quarterback, New York could benefit from that extra year of flexibility, especially if it selected a younger quarterback in need of more development – a likely scenario given which prospects would be available late in the first round.

That would allow the Giants to sit their rookie quarterback behind their two veterans before he takes over as a starter in Year 2. One could envision a situation similar to the one the Ravens found themselves in, in 2018, when they traded back into Round 1 and took Lamar Jackson.

Player most likely to be traded during the draft: Kirk Cousins, QB, Atlanta Falcons

Just one year into his four-year, $180 million contract with the Falcons, Cousins appears to be the odd man out in Atlanta. Rookie Michael Penix Jr. took over the starting job late in 2024 as the veteran struggled, and Penix played well enough to hold onto that job in his second season.

Cousins isn’t likely to permit a trade before the draft given how he was blindsided by the Penix pick last year, but he may be willing to waive his no-trade clause if he joins a team that’s already picked a non-quarterback. The Cleveland Browns, who hold the No. 2 overall pick, could be a nice fit in that scenario, even after signing veteran Joe Flacco.

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter. Check out the latest edition: Mock draft shakeup after Saints QB Derek Carr news.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY