The 2025 NCAA volleyball tournament intensifies as the Final Four begins with two matches in at T-Mobile Center in Kansas City on Thursday and the national championship on Sunday.

All four No. 1 seeds (Kentucky, Pitt, Texas and Nebraska) swept their opponents in the Sweet 16. In the Elite Eight, it was a different story. Kentucky swept No. 3 Creighton, and Pitt topped No. 3 Purdue, earning a trip to its fifth consecutive Final Four. Texas A&M stunned undefeated Nebraska, and Wisconsin upset Texas to punch their tickets.

The best high-level volleyball of the year is days away. Here’s a preview of the Final Four, including matchups, lineups and X-factors to keep an eye on.

(Number before team name represents its tournament seed)

No. 1 Pitt vs. No. 3 Texas A&M

Thursday, Dec. 18: 6:30 p.m. ET (ESPN)

Pittsburgh Panthers starting lineup

Head coach: Dan Fisher

• 3 Emery Dupes | L/DS 5-6 – Redshirt Senior
• 5 Olivia Babcock | RS 6-4 – Junior
• 8 Blaire Bayless | OH 6-2 – Junior
• 10 Marina Pezelj | OH 6-1 – Freshman
• 13 Mallorie Meyer | L/DS 5-7 – Sophomore
• 17 Brook Mosher | S 6-0 – Redshirt Senior
• 20 Abbey Emch | MB 6-4 – Freshman
• 21 Bre Kelley | MB 6-4 – Redshirt Senior

X-factor: Brooke Mosher, setter

Mosher’s development throughout the season and into the NCAA tournament has been on full display. The Illinois transfer is an outstanding setter with a vicious serve that showed up when the Panthers needed it most. With a fifth consecutive trip to the Final Four on the line, Mosher rattled off back-to-back service aces against Purdue to send Pitt to Kansas City. She finished her superb Elite Eight match with four kills on .500 hitting, an incredible 47 assists, three service aces, seven digs and four blocks. Don’t sleep on Mosher.

Texas A&M Aggies starting lineup

Head coach: Jamie Morrison

• 37 Kyndal Stowers | OH 5-11 – Sophomore
• 1 Ifenna Cos-Okpalla | MB 6-2 – Senior
• 2 Addi Applegate | L/DS 5-5 – Freshman
• 9 Logan Lednicky | OPP 6-3 – Senior
• 12 Ava Underwood | L/DS 5-7 – Senior
• 16 Maddie Waak | S 5-10 – Senior

X-factor: Emily Hellmuth, outside hitter

Coming off the bench, outside hitter Emily Hellmuth helps the Aggies keep a balanced attack on offense, and when she gets going, she’s hard to stop. She’s third on the team in total kills and her powerful swing is her secret weapon. Hellmuth’s ability to shine in big moments is what has helped the Aggies make the Final Four. She was critical to the Aggies’ success against No. 1 Nebraska during the Elite Eight, providing 13 kills, two aces and four blocks. Her best tournament outing came against Campbell. She finished with 10 kills on 15 swings and a .667 hitting percentage.

No. 1 Kentucky vs. No. 3 Wisconsin

Thursday, Dec. 18: Time TBD (ESPN)

Kentucky Wildcats starting lineup

Head coach: Craig Skinner

• 6 Kassie O’Brien | S 6-1 – Freshman
• 7 Eva Hudson | OH 6-1 – Senior
• 10 Kennedy Washington | MB 6-0 – Sophomore
• 11 Molly Berezowitz | DS 5-5 – Junior
• 12 Molly Tuozzo | L 5-7 – Junior
• 15 Lizzie Carr | MB 6-6 – Redshirt Junior
• 17 Brooklyn DeLeye | OH 6-2 – Junior

X factor: Lizzie Carr, middle blocker

Outside hitter duo Brooklyn DeLeye and Eva Hudson rightfully garner a lot of attention. Still, for Kentucky to make a push for a national championship, one of the keys may be middle blocker Lizzie Carr. The redshirt junior is a glue player who quietly gets the job done. She’s had multiple efficient performances during the NCAA tournament. Her best day came during a magnificent outing against Cal Poly in the Sweet 16, where she finished with 11 kills on 15 swings (with a .667 hitting percentage) and six crucial blocks.

Wisconsin Badgers starting lineup

Head coach: Kelly Sheffield

• 1 Una Vajagic | OH 6-0 – Redshirt Sophomore
• 7 Kristen Simon | L 5-8 – Freshman
• 15 Mimi Colyer | OH 6-3 – Senior
• 17 Alicia Andrew | MB 6-3 – Redshirt Senior
• 24 Charlie Fuerbringer | S 5-11 – Sophomore
• 32 Grace Egan | RS 6-1 – Redshirt Sophomore
• 52 Carter Booth | MB 6-7 – Senior

X-factor: Una Vajagic, outside hitter

Mimi Colyer and Carter Booth garner a lot of attention, but it’s Una Vajagic who is the unsung hero for the Badgers. She quietly works in the background and has had double-digit kills in each of her last three NCAA tournament matches, including 13 kills on .444 hitting and 11 digs against Stanford. The Badgers’ outside hitter also helps the team’s passing game, which they’ll need in the Final Four.

• The Chiefs have an extensive list of offseason concerns after being eliminated from the playoff race.
• Reworking Patrick Mahomes’ contract and finding a suitable fill-in should be atop the priorities for Kansas City after the quarterback suffered a torn ACL.
• Kansas City also will be under pressure to find a successor to Travis Kelce and reconfigure an ineffective rushing attack.

“Ding Dong! The Witch Is Dead.”

It’s a jingle the fine people of Kansas (and Missouri) are quite familiar with. And maybe it’s a touch apropos now that a Kansas City Chiefs season has died short of the playoffs for the first time in 11 years, though that’s likely not exactly an unwelcome development for the legions of hardcore and casual NFL fans that have developed K.C. fatigue over the past decade.

But let’s be clear, there’s no body to bury here. Not yet.

These Chiefs remain a living, breathing dynasty, one that’s won three Lombardi Trophies and appeared in five Super Bowls since the start of the 2019 campaign. This postseason will mark the first since 2017’s that Kansas City is absent from the AFC championship game. An organization that has already shown the ability to reimagine itself on the fly can’t and shouldn’t be discounted simply based on one disappointing chapter.

“Every year is a journey. Success is rented every year. Every year you get to rent success, and sometimes it doesn’t go the way you plan for it to go,” All-Pro DT Chris Jones said after Sunday’s loss to the Los Angeles Chargers, the defeat that officially staked the Chiefs.

“I think we learned a lot this year and we understand the fact that in order to be successful, it’s an everyday thing. It’s not one week you put in and next week, no. It’s a consistent thing and we have a lot of guys coming back and they know that it’s rented every year. Just because last year’s team made the Super Bowl, that doesn’t guarantee success.

“(W)e’re going to keep on going. Something to build off of and looking forward to next year.”

Right on.

That being said, as they would after any season – but especially so while being armed with unfamiliar (and welcome, in its own way) extra time in the coming months – the Kansas City brain trust of head coach Andy Reid, GM Brett Veach and even owner Clark Hunt will have to take a close look at the overarching operation as they assess their next moves going into 2026.

Here are seven steps the Chiefs should take if they want to restore themselves to championship relevance a year from now:

1. Address Patrick Mahomes’ contract

The three-time Super Bowl MVP’s pact – the famous 10-year, $450 million extension he signed in 2020 – runs through the 2031 season. But he’s due for an adjustment. Mahomes doesn’t make a stink about his paychecks but it is notable that his average annual salary ($45 million) is now tied for 14th (with Kirk Cousins) among NFL quarterbacks.

Moving forward, a restructure is needed not only to compensate Mahomes fairly but because his deal is about to affect the team’s ability to maneuver at large. His base salary balloons to more than $45 million in both 2026 and 2027 – it was $1.3 million in 2025 – and his salary cap hit will exceed $74 million in each of the next two years. In a word: untenable. That’s especially true given the team is overspent by nearly $44 million next year, per Over The Cap.

History suggests the parties will find a happy medium that rewards Mahomes but also allows Veach and Reid to maintain the competitive roster he demands.

2. Find the right backup quarterback

It probably wouldn’t shock anyone if Mahomes is behind center on opening day of the 2026 season. But in case you missed it, he did suffer a torn ACL at the end of Sunday’s loss to the Bolts and consequently – once surgery is performed – Mahomes is going to be rehabbing the joint pretty much right up to Week 1 next year, if not beyond. And the Chiefs need to operate as if he won’t be ready, to say nothing of the fact that they need someone trustworthy to take the bulk of the first-string snaps in the offseason.

The next three weeks should be a nice sample size to see if current QB2 Gardner Minshew II, something of a diet Mahomes (very low-calorie) given his ability to capture a locker room and sling it on the field, is the right fit. Barring that, Carson Wentz, who backed up Mahomes in 2024, could be an option. Blaine Gabbert, who held the job in 2023, hasn’t played since. Other potential fill-in alternatives scheduled to be on the free agent market include Teddy Bridgewater, Joe Flacco, Jimmy Garoppolo, Marcus Mariota, Kenny Pickett, Tyrod Taylor and Russell Wilson.

3. Target a replacement for Travis Kelce

This doesn’t necessarily mean a divorce from Kelce, who’s generally been more consistent and productive than he was in 2024 – and he was a Pro Bowler then despite his statistical dip. But these are the facts: He’d be 37 next season, his contract is about to expire, he’s set to marry pop superstar Taylor Swift and enter into a new phase of life, and it’s not clear whether or not he’s ready to retire anyway – though he did reference playing next year during the Chiefs’ spring workouts.

Regardless, it’s time to lay the groundwork for a successor − particularly considering how reliant Mahomes has historically been on his tight end. Backup Noah Gray, 26, has made an impact in previous seasons but has been used sparingly in the pass game this year. Ohio State’s Max Klare or Oregon’s Kenyon Sadiq could be compelling options at draft time, but neither would come cheaply. There will likely also be free agents worthy of close consideration – Kyle Pitts, David Njoku, Cade Otton and Isaiah Likely among them – and none might cost the $17.1 million Kelce has averaged on his current deal … though gifted Pitts’ market could potentially take off after the performance he just put on display.

Kelce is close with Mahomes, and his teammates have long raved about his work ethic and personality. But even if Kelce and the team decide they want to make one more Lombardi run together in 2026, the returns from a fading star had already begun diminishing.

4. Upgrade at running back

The Chiefs have generally been middling at best on the ground during their dynastic era, and that tends to track with Reid’s historic approach to running the ball. They currently rank 20th in the league with 113.9 rushing yards per game – yet Mahomes’ career-high 422 in 2025 is a significant component. Unideal.

It might have been an overdue move anyway, but given Mahomes will be coming back from the knee injury, this seems like the right time to invest more in the backfield. That doesn’t mean Reid has to use a first-round pick on the next Jamaal Charles. Yet his best backs with the Philadelphia Eagles, Brian Westbrook and LeSean McCoy, didn’t require a Round 1 expenditure – but certainly proved worthy of the third- and second-rounders spent on them, respectively. Barring that, it could make sense to target a multi-purpose back like Breece Hall or Travis Etienne in free agency as either could not only reduce the load on Mahomes in the short term but could elevate this offense as a whole over a longer period. But biding time with the likes of Isiah Pacheco and Kareem Hunt, who are unsigned beyond this season anyway, doesn’t seem viable.

5. Tweak the offensive line

Mahomes has been sacked 70 times over the past two seasons – not including a career-high six in Kansas City’s Super Bowl 59 loss to Philadelphia – and would likely have set a new career high for a season in 2025 if he was available for the final three weeks. And, to be sure, his propensity to extend plays contributes on that front.

Injuries have plagued Kansas City’s front five this year and, by extension, Mahomes and the offense at large. C Creed Humphrey and Gs Trey Smith and Kingsley Suamataia are probably the league’s premier interior trio when they’re all on the field together … but they haven’t been in recent weeks due to Smith’s bum ankle. Rookie LT Josh Simmons got rave reviews this year, but a wrist injury plus a family matter disrupted his season. The first-rounder should be fine moving forward.

But it’s time to move on from RT Jawaan Taylor. He’s too inconsistent, incurs too many penalties and isn’t worth another $19.5 million next season, when he won’t have any guarantees on the final year of his contract. Better to turn that job over to Jaylon Moore and find better overall depth on the market and in the draft.

6. Reassess the defense

Coordinator Steve Spagnuolo’s crew remains a top-10 unit and has allowed the fifth-fewest points (19.1) per game this season. But it might be time to re-examine things for the greater good. The Chiefs can’t realistically replicate their 2022 trade of WR Tyreek Hill, a maneuver that reshaped the organization and widened the championship window given the draft assets he returned from the Miami Dolphins. But it could be time to consider offloading players like Jones and/or Trent McDuffie in a renewed bid at maintaining this organization at or near the top of the league’s food chain.

Jones, 31, didn’t play well early on this season but has reclaimed his Pro Bowl form lately. Elite interior disruptors are hard to come by, and he might be the missing piece for a team like the Detroit Lions or New England Patriots, for example. And this might be the point to offer him a fresh start with a strong squad while divesting the final three seasons of his five-year, $159 million deal.

McDuffie, 25, is set to earn $13.6 million in 2026, the final season on the rookie deal of a player drafted in the aftermath of Hill’s departure. There’s certainly a solid case to keep one of the league’s best and most versatile defensive backs. But given his age, ability and contractual control (at present), McDuffie is the kind of chip that could elicit a valuable return – likely more than what Jones would fetch.

Spagnuolo’s D already faces key offseason decisions. But every good team has to make choices, and − given his tactical abilities − it seems to make more sense to make concessions here given what the offense is facing.

7. Take a cultural checkup

This isn’t to suggest that the Chiefs are going off the rails or have suddenly become complacent. Tom Brady tore his ACL in the 2008 opener – against Kansas City ironically – in the first game after the Patriots’ 16-0 regular season in 2007. He returned the next year, but the team also transformed around him and didn’t win another Super Bowl until the end of the 2014 season – ending a 10-year Lombardi drought while also sparking the second half of the two-decade Patriot reign.

Next season would be Reid’s 14th in Kansas City, matching the number of years he coached in Philadelphia. Ten years often marks the expiration date for many coaches and their messages. But Reid, 67, is beloved by his players, loves a challenge and has shown no signs of wanting to wind his career down. And Mahomes is the rare luxury who’s a coaching extension on the field, a fierce competitor who pulls his teammates up to his level, and an unselfish player committed to literally sharing the wealth in order to have a topflight roster around him.

“(Y)ou’ve got to stay ahead of the game as a coach. And that’s every offseason. That’s the challenge,’ Reid said Monday.

There will be turnover in Kansas City. Players like WR Hollywood Brown, S Bryan Cook, CB Jaylen Watson and maybe even Kelce – all of them pending free agents – could exit. OC Matt Nagy might get a second shot as a head coach. Change is a constant in the NFL.

But this franchise has been run as well as any in league history. Maybe the Chiefs can’t simply click their ruby and gold slippers and return to the Super Bowl. But the guys behind the curtain − and in front of it − shouldn’t suddenly require a sweeping overhaul to make this team great and powerful once again.

While at least 55% of youth ages 6-17 appear to be playing sports, a potential threat to the rising rate hovers over it, according to the Aspen Institute’s national State of Play 2025 report.

The percentage, according to the latest available data, pushes youth sports participation toward the 63% target set through the Healthy People 2030 program administered by the government and championed by Aspen’s Project Play.

However, as Aspen writes in its 2025 report of trends across the landscape, government raids of parks where immigrant children play, as well as other developments, have created an environment that suggests a reshaping of youth sports. Perhaps it even threatens the target goal of 63%.

“People will have different views about immigration and enforcement actions – and that’s understandable,” Oregon Youth Soccer Association executive director Simon Date wrote to parents this fall. “But wherever you stand on the politics, we stand unapologetically with kids not being scared to be at our events. Every child deserves to play soccer without fear, and that will always be our north star.”

The OYSA had announced that as many as 16 teams withdrew from competition in Portland after people reported Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity in community parks.

Overall, the Aspen Institute concludes, through assessment of government and industry data and its national sports parent survey, American youth sports has effectively recovered from the COVID 19 pandemic, with participation rates continuing to rebound.

But the cost of youth sports has risen 46% since 2019, and significant access gaps remain among youth from upper- and lower-income households.

Youth Sports Business Report predicts that by 2030 only two distinct tiers of sports offerings will be available for families as the growing influence of private equity continues to affect sports families.

Here are highlights of the Aspen report, which was provided to USA TODAY Sports before its release this week, and what youth and adolescent athletes and their parents can learn from it.

Latino youth sports participation is up, with a caveat

Sixty-five percent of Latino youth ages 6-17 tried sports at least one day in 2024 over the previous 12 months – a higher rate than Black and white youth, according to data from the Sports & Fitness Industry Association (SFIA).

Participation among Latina girls rose from 39.5% in 2019 to 48.4% in 2024, according to “Unlocking the growing power of Latino fans,” research published by the McKinsey Institute for Economic Mobility. The report attributes this rise to organizations such as ELLA Sports Foundation, Girls on the Run, Sports 4 Life and the Women’s Sports Foundation that have launched programs targeting underrepresented groups. 

Latino youth still regularly play sports at lower rates than white youth based on SFIA’s core participation statistic. Research by McKinsey and the U.S. Soccer Federation also found that Latino and Black children are three times more likely than white children to stop playing soccer because they feel unwelcome.

Aspen raises the issue of whether current immigration raids will have an adverse effect on Latino sports participation rates that appear in future analysis.

“It’s affecting our community-based (sports) programs and parks programs. It’s not a surprise,” said Renata Simril, president & CEO of LA84 Foundation, which ensures children have access to sports.

The State of Play report also cites 2025 media accounts in New York, California and Oregon that document fears due to immigration raids. According to a story posted at Today.com in July, Youman Wilder, the founder of Harlem Baseball Hitting Academy, said a group of ICE agents approached members of his team while they were practicing in a park.

‘I heard them saying, ‘Where are you from? Where are your parents from?” Wilder told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace. ‘And I just stepped in and said this is very inappropriate to ask these kids anything … I’m just going to have them implement their Fifth Amendment right, and not say anything to you.’ ”

The Aspen Institute’s Project Play has developed a Children’s Bill of Rights in Sports with a working group of human rights and sports policy experts. It offers eight rights recognizing that all youth should have the opportunity to develop as people in safe and healthy environment through sports.

The first right: “To play sports. Organizations should make every effort to accommodate children’s interests to participate, and to help them play with peers from diverse backgrounds.”

Municipalities in Tacoma, Washington; Akron, Ohio; Alexandria, Virginia; Perris, California; and Chapel Hill, North Carolina endorsed the Bill of Rights in 2025.

Casual organized sports play is a hot trend

About 55.4% of youth ages 6-17 were playing sports as of 2023, according to the federal government. Seventeen states and the District of Columbia were within a percentage point of or greater than the 63% mark.

Also, 6% more children ages 6-17 played a team sport at least once in 2024 compared to 2023, according to SFIA data.

“The rebound in participation since the pandemic is a credit to all who have innovated to improve access to quality sport programs,” said Tom Farrey, executive director of Aspen’s Sports & Society Program. “But we’re going to need leadership to ensure that as more money flows into the space, the needs of children – all children – are prioritized in the development of policies, practices and partnerships shaping what is still a disjointed landscape.”

Teenagers ages 13-17 continued to regularly play sports at lower rates, with their participation dropping by 3% in 2024.

Girls and boys play rises; non-traditional sports are thriving

Boys 6-17 regularly played sports in 2024, marking a 2% increase over one year, but boys participation has resided at 42% or lower for nine straight years. Girls participation, while still trailing boys, increased for the third straight year (to 37%).

Coach Steve: Why are boys’ sports on the decline? A former NBA star looks at solutions

From 2019 to 2024, according to the State of Play report, flag football was the only team sport tracked by SFIA that experienced growth in regular participation among kids ages 6-17. However, Tennis and golf increased as individual sports through separate data shared with Aspen.

Flag football was up 14% while baseball was down 19%, tackle football down 7%, soccer down 3% and basketball was down 2%.

Among youth ages 13-17, tackle (6.4% participation) is still much more popular than flag (2.8%).

Flag’s growth, according to Aspen, is largely attributed to the NFL, which has invested more in the sport as some parents delayed or walked away from tackle due to the risk of brain injuries and shifting U.S. demographics.

The NFL has also campaigned to bring flag football to high schools for girls, and 28 states either sanction girls’ high school flag or are in stages of pilot programs.

“There are so many young boys and young girls, you look at them the first time that they go out there to a practice, and then by the end of the season, it’s almost like they’re a totally different little kid,” former Notre Dame and NFL cornerback Bobby Taylor, an important figure in developing programs for the sport, told USA TODAY Sports in 2024. “You see that progression.’

Volleyball participation is growing faster than any other high school boys sport (a 13% increase in 2024-25, according to National Federation and State High School Associations.) Volleyball is nearing the top 10 of the most-played boys high school sports, while over the past six years, nine states have added varsity boys volleyball: Oregon, Kentucky, Indiana, Utah, Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, South Carolina and Missouri.

Meanwhile, the number of children ages 6-12 who played another wildly popular sport – pickleball – at least once in the past year doubled over a two-year period, getting to 2.2 million in 2024.

Teenagers 13-17 increased their pickleball participation by 157% over two years.

More Coach Steve: Why pickleball is the perfect sport for everyone

Youth sports still cost too much, and it’s cutting families out of the picture

The average U.S. sports family spent $1,016 on their child’s primary sport in 2024, a 46% increase since 2019, according to Aspen’s parent survey in partnership with Utah State University and Louisiana Tech University.

According to Aspen, that’s twice the rate of price inflation in the U.S. economy during the same period. Baseball ($1,113) was the most expensive of the three most popular sports, costing more on average than soccer ($910) and basketball ($876).

The Aspen parent study came before President Trump’s tariffs and the federal government shutdown, and the organization says both could impact the economy and how families view their child’s sports costs. According to ESPN, $6.27 billion worth of sporting goods imported into the U.S. came from China, accounting for 61% of these imports.

Sports & Fitness Industry Association CEO Todd Smith told ESPN that tariffs may slow sports participation and physical activity for households earning less than $25,000 a year.

Thirteen years ago, 35.5% of kids ages 6-17 in homes with incomes under $25,000 regularly played sports vs. 49.1% who played from homes earning $100,000 or more. In 2024, the gap was 20.2 percentage points, according to SFIA data.

Mega-facilities (and mega-bucks) are becoming a permanent fixture

Aspen’s sports parent survey found that children from homes earning $100,000 or more are two times more likely to play travel sports than those in homes making under $50,000.

Project Play’s youth surveys in communities across the country show more children saying that what they dislike most about sports is that it’s too expensive, while, perhaps increasingly, they are feeling they can’t let down their parents.

“When kids or adults get emotional talking about their sports career almost always has something to do with their parents,” Linda Martindale, a boys high school basketball and mental fitness coach in the Boston area who also hosts the GameChangers podcast, recently told USA TODAY Sports. “It’s amazing how kids say, ‘I feel bad when I didn’t get to play or I didn’t perform, I feel bad for my parents.’ It’s like, ‘Wait, what?’ And a lot of times they say, ‘Well, my parents put so much into my playing career.’ ”

Commercial real estate and local economic development officials continue to capitalize on youth sports. This year, Ocoee, Florida approved development of a 159-acre youth sports and hotel complex (called The Dynasty project) valued at up to $1 billion.

While Project Play pushes for 63% participation by 2030, Youth Sports Business Report predicts that by that year, only two tiers of sports offerings will be available for families – premium destination experiences like Dynasty and community-based recreational programs.

More coaches are getting trained

A cohort of partners, including Little League International, the Positive Coaching Alliance, the U.S. Soccer Foundation and many others, has trained 1 million youth coaches in evidence-based youth development practices. The milestone was reached in 2025.

The Million Coaches Challenge also offers coaching strategies and a vision for making youth-centered coaching the standard nationwide.

Aspen created a 63X30 roundtable of 20 organizations that trained more than 263,000 coaches and administrators in 2025.

However, according to Aspen, coaches who were trained at least once in the previous 12 months dropped over a five-year period. For instance, in 2024, 26% of coaches had recent training in general safety and injury prevention, down from 34% in 2019.

The U.S. Tennis Association, Aspen says, has taken an unprecedented step for a National Governing Body (NGB) of sport, with USTA Coaching. It provides anyone who delivers tennis (parents, volunteers, high school coaches, staff pros, directors of tennis and certified professionals) access to resources and benefits such as liability insurance, telehealth, equipment discounts, coaching tools and a peer community.

Parents are much more about playing time than winning

According to Aspen’s parent survey, the most important coaching philosophy to parents (out of a choice of 10) was “supporting athletes in being healthy and fit.” “Winning games or competitions” was No. 8, but “distributing playing time in a fair manner” was No. 2.

Among parents with kids ages 6-10, only 23% say equal playing time is the right policy for their child’s age and competitive level. That’s nearly the same rate as parents of children ages 11-14 (19%) and 15-18 (17%).

About half of all surveyed sports parents believe every child on a team should receive some playing time.

NIL and AI are influencing the youth sports landscape

Forty-four states and Washington, D.C., allow name, image and likeness (NIL) agreements for high school students. There are even signs that NIL, in some cases, is changing the non-scholastic sports experience for middle schoolers (and younge)r.

The New York Times, for example, profiled an eighth-grade football player in Washington D.C. who signed sponsorship deals with a local fashion brand and hired an agent for future deals. “The goal is for him to reach a million dollars his freshman year of high school,” his mom said.

Elliot Hopkins, director of student services for the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS), told USA TODAY Sports in May he doesn’t see the system as sustainable. Hopkins played on the defensive line at Wake Forest from 1975 to 1979.

‘You just can’t keep doing this long term, because what happens is you and I are teammates and you get a bigger deal than I am, but I’m blocking for you,’ he says. ‘I’m like, ‘What the heck? You wouldn’t be getting any money if I didn’t block for you. I need more money so you can do your job,’ and the whole locker room becomes frazzled, and then no one trusts each other, no one wants to work for each other. They’re out for themselves.’

Meanwhile, artificial intelligence-powered video analysis, wearable sensors and analytics platforms potentially offer youth sports families a more personalized and engaging experience.

According to the State of Play Report, AI-powered platforms can analyze individual player performance and biometric data to create customized training programs and provide coaches with statistics to evaluate players that were previously unavailable. The advanced training, safety and administrative tools could help injury prevention.

But, according to Aspen, AI also carries concerns about costs, data privacy, balancing technology with personal coaching, and time commitment for younger children.

One New York soccer club offers parents the option of paying $300 annually for their child’s analytics.

“Reluctantly, the ecosystem has forced us to start younger and younger to stay in the game,” FC Westchester President George Gjokaj told NBC News.  “I’d prefer to let them just have fun and support them without taking it too seriously at that young an age.”

Want to hit a slam dunk with your holiday presents this year? Look no further than our gift guide for women sports lovers and fans of women’s sports.

Whether you’re shopping for a fashionable fan that turns any stadium into a runway or a homebody that loves to show their support from the comfy confines of their house, USA TODAY Sports has carefully-curated a list of gifts that feature something for everyone. We even included ideas for Caitlin Clark and Taylor Swift superfans.

You won’t drop the ball with our gift guide as your playbook. Here’s a wide-range of presents that any sports fan would love to unwrap for the upcoming holidays with links and prices included:

For the fashionista

Elevated game day apparel

The legendary Deion Sanders once said, ‘If you look good, you feel good. If you feel good, you play good. If you play good, they pay good.’ While sports fans won’t be stepping on the field or court, the motto still applies to spectators cheering on their favorites from the stands. Jerseys are great, but here are some other options:

Nike by TOGETHXR’s ‘Everyone Watches Women’s Sports’ Tee is a classic staple. If you want to switch it up, check out the WNBPA’s ‘Pay Us What You Owe Us’ shirts Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese and other players wore during the 2025 WNBA All-Star Game in Indianapolis or stand out in Playa Society’s bold looks. For everyday clothes you can wear outside of game day, check out Abercrombie or Lululemon’s NFL collections. Offseason by Kristin Juszczyk also offers upcycled women’s merch apparel that’s not boring.

Stylish clear stadium bag

Nothing beats seeing your favorite team in person, but stadium bag guidelines can seriously cramp your style if you aren’t prepared. Most stadiums require clear bags no larger than 12 ‘x 6′ x 12’. Avoid taking an extra trip to the car with a stylish stadium bag. Coach and Stoney Clover have effortlessly chic options that come with a much-needed cross body strap, while Beis and Target offer cheaper alternatives that are equally nice.

• Coach’s Stadium Swinger Bag: $150
• Stoney Clover’s Clear Curved Crossbody Bag: $78
• Beis The Stadium Crossbody in Black: $58
• Target’s Game Day Clear Crossbody Bag: $15

*Pro tip: Attach a cute bag charm (like this one from Amazon) or a lipgloss keychain.

Taylor-swift inspired jewelry

Taylor Swift sent social media buzzing after she donned a Kansas City Chiefs necklace from Baublebar in honor of her now-fiancé Travis Kelce. For fans (or Swifties) looking for a more subtle sign of support, try Baublebar’s NFL Bracelet Set ($52) that can seamlessly merges with everyday jewelry. The Varsity Number Custom Bracelet would be perfect for a mom to showcase their child’s jersey number. Baublebar’s NFL Beaded Phone Charm ($48) is also the perfect accessory you didn’t know you need.

For the homebody

For the fan that likes to support their team from the couch look for every day luxury items that people typically hesitate to buy for themselves, but would elevate their everyday routine. FOCO’s slipper collections can keep you warm on game day (in addition to robes and pajamas). MLB Sundae Slugger Ceramic Ice Cream Bowl Set or a playful mug from Uncommon Goods elevates any snack or beverage. Or pull on the heartstrings by framing a favorite game day memory. (Bonus points if you add the ticket stub to the frame).

For the Caitlin Clark fanatic

The WNBA is currently in the offseason, but fans can still get their dose of all things Caitlin Clark this holiday season with these finds. Clark’s signature shoe and signature collection won’t drop until next year, but fans can still get their hands on her logo collection, which includes T-shirts, hoodies, shorts and pants for all ages. A Caitlin Clark Funko Pop ($14.99) can jazz up any office or desk, while Clark trading cards are more popular than ever and a Clark basketball never goes out of style.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

Rookie Cooper Flagg scored a career-high 42 points, but it wasn’t enough to help the Dallas Mavericks avoid a 140-133 overtime defeat against the Utah Jazz on Monday, Dec. 15. The performance set a new single-game scoring standard for NBA players under the age of 19.

Flagg, the No. 1 overall pick in the 2025 NBA Draft, was the game’s leading scorer, shooting 13 of 27 from the field and making 15 of 20 free-throw attempts. Keyonte George (37 points) and Lauri Markkanen (33) helped the Jazz pull out the victory.

Flagg is the first 18-year-old player in NBA history with a 40-point game. On Nov. 29, Flagg joined LeBron James as the only 18-year-olds in NBA history to post 30-plus point totals. Against the Jazz, Flagg surpassed the 37 points an 18-year-old James scored for the Cleveland Cavaliers in a game on Dec. 13, 2003 against the Boston Celtics.

Cooper Flagg stats vs. Jazz

• Points: 42
• FG: 13-for-27 (1-for-4 from 3-point line)
• Free Throws: 15-for-20
• Rebounds: 7
• Assists: 6
• Steals: 1
• Blocks: 2
• Turnovers: 4
• Fouls: 3
• Minutes: 42

Mavericks vs. Jazz highlights

The biggest stories, every morning. Stay up-to-date on all the key sports developments by subscribing to USA TODAY Sports’ newsletter.

• Michigan inched few more steps toward panic mode after Kalen DeBoer swats away Wolverines, but it’s not dire yet.
• Not a shock that a coach wouldn’t want to leave Alabama for Michigan.
• Sherrone Moore’s messy exit not the red flag about Michigan.

Imagine Michigan’s coaching search as that game off the “Price is Right,” where the contestant must stop the hiker’s climb up the mountain before he topples over the cliff.

Michigan inched a few more steps up the slope and toward the cliff with Kalen DeBoer saying no thanks to the Wolverines.

“I haven’t talked with anyone, no plans of talking with anyone,” DeBoer told reporters, before adding, unequivocally, he’ll be Alabama’s coach next season.

Ann Arbor is but a lovely place, and Michigan is but a fine program, but it really should come as no shock a coach didn’t want to leave Alabama for Michigan.

Alabama is college football’s mecca. Coaches who win big there ascend to single-name status.

Several years ago, a reporter asked Nick Saban whether he’d consider running for public office. He shot down the idea with a single word: No.

Saban just as easily could have said, “Why would I consider a demotion?”

Governor or senator would have been a step down from the demigod stature he attained as Alabama’s coach.

Sure, the pressures of the job can chew up a coach, but if DeBoer feared a challenge, he never would have left Washington and signed on to replace the irreplaceable.

I could argue DeBoer would have been smart to free himself from Saban’s shadow and opt instead for cleaning up Michigan’s mess. DeBoer cannot possibly hurdle the bar Saban set, and only a national championship will placate Alabama fans. Then, they’ll want another.

By comparison, clearing Sherrone Moore’s bar would only require avoiding national shame and staying out of jail.

But, if DeBoer had left Alabama for Michigan, he would’ve been branded a coward who ran. Who would welcome that narrative? And, if the price of failing to meet Alabama’s standards becomes a $50 million buyout check, well, would that be so bad?

Anyway, DeBoer announced he’s “fully committed” to Alabama and not interested in job hopping.

Where does that leave Michigan? That mountaineer keeps yodeling up the mountainside. It’s not panic mode — yet.

Kalen DeBoer says no to Michigan, other candidates stay quiet

DeBoer’s intentions provide clarity. If he’d wanted out of Tuscaloosa, then this coaching search would’ve been straightforward. You ask him whether he desires a seven- or eight-year contract at Michigan, what make and model of courtesy vehicle he wants to drive, and that’s that.

DeBoer doesn’t want out of Alabama, and so now Michigan can move on.

Lest you think Michigan teeters on the brink of the abyss, I’d point out DeBoer’s public rebuff of Michigan did not ignite a trend. So far, I hear only hear crickets from the likes of Louisville’s Jeff Brohm, Missouri’s Eli Drinkwitz or Washington’s Jedd Fisch.

Missouri is not college football’s mecca. Just saying.

Here’s the red flag with Michigan (Hint: It’s not Sherrone Moore)

Moore’s rap sheet is a black eye for Michigan, but it’s not a red flag for this job.

More likely to give job candidates pause is the university’s unstable alignment.

Michigan treks up the mountainside with an interim president, and athletic director Warde Manuel gives off the whiff of a lame duck, or at least a wounded duck, while his athletic department undergoes investigation for this latest scandal to occur under his watch.

In other words, the coach Michigan hires must accept the realities of shifting university alignment and the possibility of getting a new boss in the new year.

And, still, I cannot deny this would be a tempting level-up opportunity for someone like Drinkwitz or even Arizona State’s Kenny Dillingham or Vanderbilt’s Clark Lea, a coach who’s punching above his program’s weight class and might sense it’s time to springboard off that success, rather than risk staying in place too long and missing his window, akin to Mark Stoops at Kentucky.

Coaching searches rarely function as a neat line from starting point to dream candidate. Penn State stumbled around for nearly two months before backdooring its way to a solid hire of Iowa State’s Matt Campbell.

Michigan lacks the luxury of time. While DeBoer prepares for the College Football Playoff, and the transfer portal opens in just more than two weeks. That’s the cliff.

Has Michigan reached the point where it’s ready to humbly ask Drinkwitz or Fisch if he can put a stop to that yodeling mountaineer?

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s senior national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.